Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Center for Democracy and Technology

Full company profile

uuid00033uf

Namestring
Center for Democracy and Technology
Legal namestring
Center for Democracy and Technology
Websiteurl
cdt.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1994
Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices2 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
digital rights advocacy, technology policy research, AI governance policy, privacy policy advocacy, internet freedom advocacy
Industry6 codes
1Digital Rights, Privacy & Free Expression Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFALPrimaryYes
2Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAAPrimaryNo
3Media Freedom, Access to Information & Digital Rights
CodeBPADAGAEPrimaryNo
4Public Communications, Transparency & Open Government
CodeBPAIAAAHPrimaryNo
5Democratic Governance & Public Administration Reform
CodeBPADAGAJPrimaryNo
6Democracy, Voting Rights & Civic Participation Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAJPrimaryNo
NAICS code3 codes
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
  • Social Advocacy Organizations8133
  • Political Organizations813940
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Membership Organizations8600
Product category
Digital Rights Policy Advocacy
Social media profiles3 records
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model2 records
1Donations and Grants
TypeData Monetisation
Description

CDT operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization receiving support from philanthropic foundations, companies, individuals, and court settlements ('cy pres' awards). Financial supporters have no role in decision-making regarding policy or company oversight.

cdt.org
2Events and Programs
TypeProfessional Services
Description

CDT generates revenue through signature events including an annual Tech Prom benefit that raised over $1 million and Spring Fling gatherings.

cdt.org
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 of 3 records shown
1CDT AI Governance Lab
Description

Develops and promotes adoption of robust, technically-informed solutions for the effective regulation and governance of AI systems

cdt.org
+2 more records
Core offering1 text field

Center for Democracy and Technology is a nonprofit policy advocacy and research organization that works to advance civil rights and civil liberties in the digital age. It produces original research, convenes multistakeholder coalitions, and directly advocates before U.S. and European policymakers on issues including AI governance, privacy, encryption, free expression, government surveillance, and elections. Its deliverables include policy analysis, regulatory comments, amicus briefs, coalition letters, research reports, and public education content.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • 430+ organizations across 105 countries participate in CDT-coordinated Global Encryption Coalition
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

Center for Democracy and Technology is a nonprofit policy advocacy organization, not a commercial technology product company. CDT's offerings consist of research publications, policy analysis resources, advocacy initiatives, and collaborative working groups rather than a unified software product or platform. The organization operates through its CDT AI Governance Lab (which develops policy solutions for AI regulation), CDT Research (which produces original research on technology policy), and various coalitions and initiatives including the Global Encryption Coalition (430+ members across 105 countries) and the Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health Info (30+ members). CDT also produces content through its Tech Talks podcast (70,300+ lifetime plays) and maintains the CDT AI Policy Tracker, a searchable database of their AI-related policy positions. These offerings are informational and advocacy-focused rather than commercial software products, and there are no product integrations, APIs, or commercial product launches.

Product and service6 records
1CDT AI Policy Tracker
CategoryPolicy Database / Research Tool
Description

A searchable public database archiving CDT's AI-related policy positions, prior stances, and common thematic content to support AI governance researchers, policymakers, and the public.

2Tech Talks Podcast
CategoryPublication / Content Series
Description

A long-standing podcast discussing tech and Internet policy issues, available on major podcast platforms with 70,300+ lifetime plays; aimed at policymakers, journalists, and the informed public.

3CDT AI Governance Lab
CategoryPolicy Research Initiative
Description

A specialized policy unit developing and promoting technically-informed solutions for AI regulation and governance, providing public interest expertise in AI policy and technical conversations.

4CDT Research
CategoryResearch Division
Description

A research team producing original, peer-reviewed scholarship and policy briefs on technology policy, bridging academic research and policymaking.

5Global Encryption Coalition
CategoryCoalition / Multistakeholder Initiative
Description

A CDT-coordinated civil society coalition of 430+ member organizations across 105 countries focused on encryption policy and rapid response to encryption threats.

6Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health Info
CategoryCoalition / Multistakeholder Initiative
Description

A multistakeholder task force of 30+ experts from tech companies, academia, and civil rights organizations identifying ways to protect the privacy and access to information for people seeking reproductive health care.

Scale indicator7 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership8 partners
1Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at Stanford
Strategic tierFlagshipTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-05-15
Description

Stanford's CDDRL has entered into a new partnership with the Journal of Democracy, under which CDDRL will support production of the Journal's quarterly print issues and expanding digital content. The partnership gives Stanford faculty formal roles in shaping the Journal's editorial direction and creates new editorial internships for students.

cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu
2Cornell Global AI Initiative
Strategic tierFlagshipTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-04-30
Description

CDT and Cornell Global AI Initiative submitted joint comments to the UN's first Global Dialogue on AI Governance calling for meaningful investment into linguistic diversity in AI systems. The partnership produces research and policy recommendations on multilingual AI governance.

cdt.org
3Global Encryption Coalition Members
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-04-29
Description

More than 20 civil society organizations including CDT and members of the Global Encryption Coalition are urging the Canadian government to withdraw Bill C-22, arguing encryption backdoors cannot be created without compromising privacy and security.

cdt.org
4Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-23
Description

CDT, as a member of the Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities, joined over 25 disability rights and justice organizations in signing letters to the U.S. House and Senate requesting funding for Assistive Technology (AT) Act Programs.

cdt.org
5Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA)
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-04
Description

CDT joined with SIIA and Americans for Prosperity in sending a separate letter to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce warning that proposed age verification methods create unprecedented privacy and constitutional risks.

biometricupdate.com
Strategic tierFlagshipTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-01-22
Description

Brookings Institution and CDT hosted a public discussion on global AI governance ahead of the India AI Impact Summit, presenting findings from a report assessing the Hiroshima AI Process (HAIP) Reporting Framework.

7Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health Info
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2022-07-19
Description

CDT-convened multistakeholder group of 30+ experts representing tech companies, academia, and civil rights and privacy organizations aimed at identifying ways to protect the privacy and access to information of people seeking reproductive health care. Includes representatives from major technology companies, ACLU, Brennan Center for Justice, EFF, and reproductive justice experts.

cdt.org
8Global Encryption Coalition
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

CDT coordinates the Global Encryption Coalition with 430+ member organizations across 105 countries helping to respond rapidly to emerging threats to encryption. CDT serves as the coordinating organization for this civil society coalition focused on encryption policy.

cdt.org
Recent move7 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Brookings is a major public policy think tank that conducts research on technology, AI governance, and democratic institutions. It has co-hosted events with CDT and produces overlapping scholarship on tech policy and AI.

TypeDirect peer
Description

ISOC is a global nonprofit advocating for an open, globally-connected, and secure internet. Its work on encryption, internet standards, and digital inclusion parallels CDT's Open Internet and encryption advocacy.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Mozilla Foundation advocates for a healthy internet through research, advocacy, and grants on issues like trustworthy AI, privacy, and platform regulation. Its focus on internet health and AI governance is highly comparable to CDT's AI Governance Lab and Open Internet work.

TypeDirect peer
Description

AI Now Institute is a research institute examining the social implications of artificial intelligence and producing policy research. Its focus on AI governance and accountability overlaps directly with CDT's AI Governance Lab.

TypeDirect peer
Description

EFF is a leading nonprofit defending civil liberties in the digital world, working on privacy, free expression, and encryption policy. Like CDT, it engages in litigation, policy advocacy, and coalition-building on digital rights issues, making it a direct peer in advocacy focus and target audience.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

ACLU is a broad-based civil liberties organization that litigates and advocates across digital rights, free speech, and privacy. It is a much larger incumbent overlapping significantly with CDT's mission and even co-participates in coalitions like the reproductive health task force.

TypeDirect peer
Description

FPF is a nonprofit focused on privacy and data protection policy, producing research and convening stakeholders. It overlaps with CDT's privacy and AI governance work and similarly engages with regulators and corporate policy teams.

TypeDirect peer
Description

OTI is a policy program that works on issues including net neutrality, encryption, and surveillance reform. As a digital rights think tank within a larger foundation, it is highly comparable in advocacy focus and policy output to CDT.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Access Now is an international digital rights organization that defends and extends the digital rights of users at risk. Its policy and advocacy work on encryption, AI governance, and platform regulation closely mirrors CDT's transatlantic agenda.

TypeOthers
Description

Stanford CDDRL partners with the Journal of Democracy on democratic governance research. It is adjacent rather than directly competitive, but shares thematic overlap with CDT's elections and democracy work through institutional partnership.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat6 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles18 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

Subsidiaries1 record

Each record includes

Name, Acquired on, Relationship type, Type, Business focus

No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds2 records

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors2 records

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Democracy and Technology

Digital Rights Policy Advocacycdt.org

Center for Democracy and Technology firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Center for Democracy and Technology
Legal name
Center for Democracy and Technology
Website
https://cdt.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
1994
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Center for Democracy and Technology industry classification

Industry
Product category
Digital Rights Policy Advocacy
NAICS
Human Rights Organizations (813311), Social Advocacy Organizations (8133), Political Organizations (813940)
SIC
Services-Membership Organizations (8600)
akta.pro primary industry
Digital Rights, Privacy & Free Expression Advocacy (BPAGAFAL)
akta.pro secondary industries
Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy (BPAGAFAA), Media Freedom, Access to Information & Digital Rights (BPADAGAE), Public Communications, Transparency & Open Government (BPAIAAAH), Democratic Governance & Public Administration Reform (BPADAGAJ), Democracy, Voting Rights & Civic Participation Advocacy (BPAGAFAJ)

Keywords

  • Digital rights advocacy
  • Technology policy research
  • AI governance policy
  • Privacy policy advocacy
  • Internet freedom advocacy

Where Center for Democracy and Technology is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices2 records

Markets served

Center for Democracy and Technology business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others

Revenue model

  1. Donations and Grants: CDT operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization receiving support from philanthropic foundations, companies, individuals, and court settlements ('cy pres' awards). Financial supporters have no role in decision-making regarding policy or company oversight.
  2. Events and Programs: CDT generates revenue through signature events including an annual Tech Prom benefit that raised over $1 million and Spring Fling gatherings.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Center for Democracy and Technology product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Center for Democracy and Technology is a nonprofit policy advocacy and research organization that works to advance civil rights and civil liberties in the digital age. It produces original research, convenes multistakeholder coalitions, and directly advocates before U.S. and European policymakers on issues including AI governance, privacy, encryption, free expression, government surveillance, and elections. Its deliverables include policy analysis, regulatory comments, amicus briefs, coalition letters, research reports, and public education content.

Product overview

Center for Democracy and Technology is a nonprofit policy advocacy organization, not a commercial technology product company. CDT's offerings consist of research publications, policy analysis resources, advocacy initiatives, and collaborative working groups rather than a unified software product or platform. The organization operates through its CDT AI Governance Lab (which develops policy solutions for AI regulation), CDT Research (which produces original research on technology policy), and various coalitions and initiatives including the Global Encryption Coalition (430+ members across 105 countries) and the Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health Info (30+ members). CDT also produces content through its Tech Talks podcast (70,300+ lifetime plays) and maintains the CDT AI Policy Tracker, a searchable database of their AI-related policy positions. These offerings are informational and advocacy-focused rather than commercial software products, and there are no product integrations, APIs, or commercial product launches.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • CDT AI Governance Lab: Develops and promotes adoption of robust, technically-informed solutions for the effective regulation and governance of AI systems
  • CDT Research
  • CDT Europe

Products and services

  • CDT AI Policy Tracker A searchable public database archiving CDT's AI-related policy positions, prior stances, and common thematic content to support AI governance researchers, policymakers, and the public.
  • Tech Talks Podcast A long-standing podcast discussing tech and Internet policy issues, available on major podcast platforms with 70,300+ lifetime plays; aimed at policymakers, journalists, and the informed public.
  • CDT AI Governance Lab A specialized policy unit developing and promoting technically-informed solutions for AI regulation and governance, providing public interest expertise in AI policy and technical conversations.
  • CDT Research A research team producing original, peer-reviewed scholarship and policy briefs on technology policy, bridging academic research and policymaking.
  • Global Encryption Coalition A CDT-coordinated civil society coalition of 430+ member organizations across 105 countries focused on encryption policy and rapid response to encryption threats.
  • Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health Info A multistakeholder task force of 30+ experts from tech companies, academia, and civil rights organizations identifying ways to protect the privacy and access to information for people seeking reproductive health care.

Quantifiable outcome

  • 430+ organizations across 105 countries participate in CDT-coordinated Global Encryption Coalition
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use Center for Democracy and Technology

Customer profile

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Center for Democracy and Technology technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Center for Democracy and Technology partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Eight partnerships are on record, tiered flagship, core and minor.

  • Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at StanfordflagshipStrategic or Co-development Partner · 15 May 2026Stanford's CDDRL has entered into a new partnership with the Journal of Democracy, under which CDDRL will support production of the Journal's quarterly print issues and expanding digital content. The partnership gives Stanford faculty formal roles in shaping the Journal's editorial direction and creates new editorial internships for students.
  • Cornell Global AI InitiativeflagshipStrategic or Co-development Partner · 30 April 2026CDT and Cornell Global AI Initiative submitted joint comments to the UN's first Global Dialogue on AI Governance calling for meaningful investment into linguistic diversity in AI systems. The partnership produces research and policy recommendations on multilingual AI governance.
  • Global Encryption Coalition MemberscoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 29 April 2026More than 20 civil society organizations including CDT and members of the Global Encryption Coalition are urging the Canadian government to withdraw Bill C-22, arguing encryption backdoors cannot be created without compromising privacy and security.
  • Consortium for Constituents with DisabilitiesminorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 23 March 2026CDT, as a member of the Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities, joined over 25 disability rights and justice organizations in signing letters to the U.S. House and Senate requesting funding for Assistive Technology (AT) Act Programs.
  • Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA)minorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 4 March 2026CDT joined with SIIA and Americans for Prosperity in sending a separate letter to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce warning that proposed age verification methods create unprecedented privacy and constitutional risks.
  • Brookings InstitutionflagshipStrategic or Co-development Partner · 22 January 2026Brookings Institution and CDT hosted a public discussion on global AI governance ahead of the India AI Impact Summit, presenting findings from a report assessing the Hiroshima AI Process (HAIP) Reporting Framework.
  • Task Force on Protecting Reproductive Health InfocoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 19 July 2022CDT-convened multistakeholder group of 30+ experts representing tech companies, academia, and civil rights and privacy organizations aimed at identifying ways to protect the privacy and access to information of people seeking reproductive health care. Includes representatives from major technology companies, ACLU, Brennan Center for Justice, EFF, and reproductive justice experts.
  • Global Encryption CoalitioncoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCDT coordinates the Global Encryption Coalition with 430+ member organizations across 105 countries helping to respond rapidly to emerging threats to encryption. CDT serves as the coordinating organization for this civil society coalition focused on encryption policy.

Scale indicators7 records

Recent moves7 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Center for Democracy and Technology competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • Brookings Institution: Brookings is a major public policy think tank that conducts research on technology, AI governance, and democratic institutions. It has co-hosted events with CDT and produces overlapping scholarship on tech policy and AI.
  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): ACLU is a broad-based civil liberties organization that litigates and advocates across digital rights, free speech, and privacy. It is a much larger incumbent overlapping significantly with CDT's mission and even co-participates in coalitions like the reproductive health task force.

Direct peers

  • Internet Society (ISOC): ISOC is a global nonprofit advocating for an open, globally-connected, and secure internet. Its work on encryption, internet standards, and digital inclusion parallels CDT's Open Internet and encryption advocacy.
  • Mozilla Foundation: Mozilla Foundation advocates for a healthy internet through research, advocacy, and grants on issues like trustworthy AI, privacy, and platform regulation. Its focus on internet health and AI governance is highly comparable to CDT's AI Governance Lab and Open Internet work.
  • AI Now Institute: AI Now Institute is a research institute examining the social implications of artificial intelligence and producing policy research. Its focus on AI governance and accountability overlaps directly with CDT's AI Governance Lab.
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): EFF is a leading nonprofit defending civil liberties in the digital world, working on privacy, free expression, and encryption policy. Like CDT, it engages in litigation, policy advocacy, and coalition-building on digital rights issues, making it a direct peer in advocacy focus and target audience.
  • Future of Privacy Forum (FPF): FPF is a nonprofit focused on privacy and data protection policy, producing research and convening stakeholders. It overlaps with CDT's privacy and AI governance work and similarly engages with regulators and corporate policy teams.
  • New America’s Open Technology Institute (OTI): OTI is a policy program that works on issues including net neutrality, encryption, and surveillance reform. As a digital rights think tank within a larger foundation, it is highly comparable in advocacy focus and policy output to CDT.
  • Access Now: Access Now is an international digital rights organization that defends and extends the digital rights of users at risk. Its policy and advocacy work on encryption, AI governance, and platform regulation closely mirrors CDT's transatlantic agenda.

Others

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses6 records

Competitive moat6 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Center for Democracy and Technology social profiles

Digital presence

Center for Democracy and Technology financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Center for Democracy and Technology leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles18 records

Center for Democracy and Technology subsidiaries and ownership

Company hierarchy

Subsidiaries1 record

Center for Democracy and Technology funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds2 records

Investors2 records

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Democracy and Technology M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Center for Democracy and Technology

What does Center for Democracy and Technology do?

Center for Democracy and Technology is a nonprofit policy advocacy and research organization that works to advance civil rights and civil liberties in the digital age. It produces original research, convenes multistakeholder coalitions, and directly advocates before U.S. and European policymakers on issues including AI governance, privacy, encryption, free expression, government surveillance, and elections. Its deliverables include policy analysis, regulatory comments, amicus briefs, coalition letters, research reports, and public education content.

Is Center for Democracy and Technology a public or private company?

Center for Democracy and Technology is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Center for Democracy and Technology founded?

Center for Democracy and Technology was founded in 1994. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Center for Democracy and Technology based?

Center for Democracy and Technology is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

How does Center for Democracy and Technology make money?

Two revenue lines are on record. Donations and Grants are the primary driver. The others are events and Programs.

Who are Center for Democracy and Technology's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are Brookings Institution and American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Direct peers are Internet Society (ISOC), Mozilla Foundation, AI Now Institute, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Future of Privacy Forum (FPF), New America’s Open Technology Institute (OTI) and Access Now. National Association of Broadcasters / Stanford CDDRL (Journal of Democracy partner) is listed as an others.

Does Center for Democracy and Technology have an API?

No public API is recorded for Center for Democracy and Technology.

What industry is Center for Democracy and Technology in?

Center for Democracy and Technology's product category is Digital Rights Policy Advocacy. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAL, Digital Rights, Privacy & Free Expression Advocacy, with a secondary code of BPAGAFAA, Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy. Its NAICS code is 813311 and its SIC code is 8600.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Nextgov/FCWTrump redoubles pro-AI stance amid calls to slow developmentPresident Trump pushed back against calls to slow AI development, saying the U.S. has proper safety infrastructure and that only a strong president is needed. He cited Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's warnings, but defended the U.S. lead over China. Trump plans to welcome China's Xi Jinping to the White House on Sept. 24.Tech TimesEFF, CDT, and State AGs Warn FTC AI Policy Exposes Safety Tuning to Federal LiabilityA coalition of civil liberties organizations including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy and Technology, Public Knowledge, and Fight for the Future, along with attorneys general from California, Colorado, and approximately 20 additional states, filed formal comments on August 3, 2026, urging the FTC to withdraw its proposed AI accuracy policy that would expose standard safety engineering practices to federal consumer-deception liability under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The CDT's comments identified a foundational technical problem with the FTC's central premise: no neutral baseline exists in AI systems because every choice developers make during training shapes outputs, meaning the policy's compliance framework is based on a technically false premise. If finalized, the policy would create legal uncertainty that forces AI developers to choose between exposure to state anti-discrimination liability for discriminatory outputs or federal liability for undisclosed safety tuning, while signaling enforcement priorities without carrying the force of a formal rule.StateScoopState, local governments can do more to safeguard LGBTQ+ data under TrumpThree advocacy organizations—the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Movement Advancement Project, and Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy—published a report urging U.S. state and local governments to expand and safeguard collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data amid concerns that federal agencies under the Trump administration could access, share, or repurpose this information for discriminatory purposes. The report highlights that only 11 states and the District of Columbia currently require SOGI data collection, leaving a fragmented landscape of protections, and proposes measures including responsible data governance policies, clear access and retention rules, and privacy safeguards. New York City is cited as an example of successful implementation, having passed a 2023 law requiring state agencies to collect SOGI data alongside race and ethnicity data.Android AuthorityBuying a burner phone in the US could soon become much harderThe FCC has proposed new rules requiring wireless carriers to collect personal information—including government-issued ID numbers, physical addresses, and alternate contact numbers—before activating or renewing phone service. The proposal, aimed at combating scams and robocalls, would make anonymous 'burner phones' significantly harder to obtain, a change the agency compares to identity verification practices used in banking. Privacy advocacy groups including the ACLU, EFF, and Center for Democracy & Technology have criticized the measure, arguing it would disproportionately harm whistleblowers, domestic violence survivors, and journalists while doing little to stop scammers who can obtain fake credentials.404 MediaNew Study Reveals the Manipulative ‘Dark Patterns’ of AI ChatbotsResearchers at the Center for Democracy & Technology published a study identifying 37 dark patterns in AI chatbots including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Replika, and Character.AI that manipulate users through psychological tactics such as data extraction, anthropomorphizing, and emotional attachment strategies. The study found these deceptive design choices exploit human psychology to undermine user autonomy and can lead to serious consequences including mental health crises, such as when Replika users experienced crises after the company changed its bots in 2023. The researchers are calling on chatbot companies to implement design changes including reversible choices, easier data deletion, and removal of emotionally manipulative language.Center for Democracy and TechnologyCanadians Value Encryption and Reject Key Surveillance Powers in Bill C-22CDT (Center for Democracy & Technology) commissioned Public First, a UK-based polling firm, to survey Canadian public opinion on encryption and government surveillance in relation to Bill C-22, which would expand government surveillance powers. The polling results show that the majority of Canadians oppose or want meaningful constraints on the surveillance powers proposed in the bill, with overwhelming majorities concerned about risks to free speech, privacy, and believing there are better ways to tackle serious crimes than accessing encrypted messages.Center for Democracy and TechnologyCanadian Government Proposes Legislation To Enable Encryption BackdoorsThe Canadian government has introduced Bill C-22, the "Act respecting lawful access," which would require companies to build technical capabilities facilitating law enforcement access to encrypted communications. More than 20 civil society organizations, including the Center for Democracy and Technology and members of the Global Encryption Coalition, are urging the government to withdraw the legislation, arguing that encryption backdoors cannot be created without compromising the privacy and security of law-abiding citizens. The organizations warn that advances in AI have accelerated the timeline for exploiting such vulnerabilities from months to hours, making mandated backdoors particularly dangerous, and cite the UK example where similar legislation prompted Apple to withdraw its encrypted cloud service.PCMagThe One Thing Americans Can Agree On: The Feds Collect Too Much Personal DataA survey released Tuesday by the Center for Democracy & Technology found that 74% of Americans across political party lines are at least somewhat concerned about government collection and storage of their personal data, with 39% being very concerned. The survey showed bipartisan agreement on these concerns, with 77% of Democrats, 75% of Republicans, and 69% of independents expressing at least some concern. The article notes that Congress has failed to pass comprehensive federal privacy legislation, with any meaningful change unlikely before 2027.Center for Democracy and TechnologyCDT Joins Disability Rights and Justice Allies in Requesting Funding for the Assistive Technology ActCenter for Democracy & Technology (CDT), as a member of the Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities, joined over 25 disability rights and justice organizations in signing two letters to the U.S. House and Senate requesting funding for Assistive Technology (AT) Act Programs. The funding would support programs that provide assistive technologies, devices, and services to people with disabilities and address the consistently increased demand for these services.Biometric UpdateAVPA, academics, advocacy groups trade letters over age assurance techNearly 400 scientists and academics signed an open letter arguing that mandatory age assurance technologies for internet access do more harm than good, citing privacy risks and unknown efficacy. The Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) responded with counterarguments, and a coalition including the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Software & Information Industry Association, and Americans for Prosperity sent a separate letter to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce warning that proposed age verification methods create unprecedented privacy and constitutional risks. AVPA contends that modern age assurance systems are designed to verify age without disclosing identity, and that critics rely on outdated assumptions about centralized, identity-heavy implementations.