Scott+Scott
- Company typePrivate
- Founded1975
- HeadquartersColchester, United Kingdom
- Headcount101–250
- GTM typeB2B
- OfferingServices
Scott+Scott firmographics
Firmographics- Name
- Scott+Scott
- Legal name
- Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP
- Website
- https://scott-scott.com
- Company type
- Private
- Founded year
- 1975
- Operating status
- Operating
- Headcount range
- 101–250 employees
- Ownership category
- akta.pro rank
Scott+Scott industry classification
Industry- Product category
- Complex Litigation Legal Services
- NAICS
- Legal Services (5411)
- SIC
- Services-Legal Services (8111)
- akta.pro primary industry
- Litigation Support & Expert Witness (Valuation-Related) (BPAHANAG)
Keywords
Where Scott+Scott is headquartered
LocationHeadquarters
- HQ city
- Colchester
- HQ country
- United Kingdom
- HQ region
- Europe
Offices8 records
Markets served
Scott+Scott business model
Business model- GTM type
- B2B
- Offering type
- Services
- Cost components
- Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure
Revenue model
- Legal Services - Securities Litigation: Scott+Scott generates revenue through legal representation in securities class actions, shareholder derivative litigation, and corporate governance matters. The firm serves as lead counsel and recovers damages on behalf of institutional and individual clients.
- Legal Services - Antitrust Litigation: Revenue generated from antitrust and competition litigation including price-fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation cases worldwide, recovering billions for clients in financial, foreign exchange, logistics, agricultural, and consumer goods markets.
- Legal Services - Consumer Litigation: Revenue from consumer protection class actions including data breach litigation, healthcare and pharmaceutical cases, and consumer fraud matters resulting in settlements for class members.
Pricing tiers
| Model | Billing | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Pay-as-you-go | Free portfolio monitoring for institutional investors |
Go-to-market motion2 records
Distribution channels3 records
Marketing channels5 records
Scott+Scott product offering
Product offeringCore offering
Scott+Scott is an international law firm that investigates and prosecutes complex litigation matters, including securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, antitrust/competition cases (price-fixing, cartels, bid rigging), and consumer protection class actions (data breaches, product liability). The firm represents institutional investors, public pension funds, shareholders, and consumer classes to recover damages and operates a proprietary PT+ portfolio monitoring service that screens securities holdings for fraud and corporate mismanagement impacts.
Product overview
Scott+Scott is a law firm specializing in complex litigation and does not operate a traditional product/platform architecture. The firm's primary service offerings are legal services in antitrust and competition, securities litigation, consumer litigation, and corporate governance. The firm does offer proprietary technology-enabled services including PT+ (Portfolio Tracking + Loss Recovery System), a securities monitoring platform for institutional investors, and Monjur Pilot, an AI-powered contract management assistant for MSPs developed by its subsidiary Monjur.
Differentiator
Problem solved
Functional benefit
Products and services
- Antitrust + Competition Litigation Representation of business and institutional clients in antitrust and competition matters including price-fixing, bid rigging, market allocation, and cartel cases across global jurisdictions, recovering billions for clients harmed by anticompetitive conduct.
- Securities Litigation Lead counsel representation in securities class actions, shareholder derivative litigation, and corporate governance matters, recovering damages for institutional and individual clients harmed by securities fraud, breach of fiduciary duties, and corporate mismanagement.
- Consumer Litigation Representation of consumer classes in data breach, privacy, healthcare, pharmaceutical, and consumer fraud class actions, securing settlements for class members harmed by corporate malfeasance.
- Corporate Governance + Shareholder Rights Legal services addressing shareholder rights, corporate governance reforms, and derivative actions aimed at holding corporations accountable for misconduct and fiduciary breaches.
- PT+ Portfolio Tracking + Loss Recovery System Proprietary monitoring system that automatically tracks every securities transaction in client portfolios, creates triggers when fund assets are potentially impacted by fraud or corporate mismanagement, and supports identification of litigation opportunities with associated ROI modeling.
- Monjur Pilot AI-powered contract management assistant offered by Scott+Scott's subsidiary Monjur, using RAG architecture and proprietary confidence scoring to help MSPs answer contract questions, redline issues, and manage negotiations while addressing AI hallucination concerns.
Quantifiable outcome
- $2.3 billion recovered in Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation - #1 largest antitrust recovery in past decade
- +4 more outcomes
Companies that use Scott+Scott
Customer profileNamed customers5 records
Segments4 records
Ideal customer profiles3 records
Scott+Scott technology and API
TechnologyTechnology focussed No
API detail
- Has API
- No
- API docs
- API detail
Core technology
AI maturity
App detail
Feature1 record
Scott+Scott partnerships and signals
Strategic signalPartnerships
Ten partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.
- Lowey Dannenberg, P.C.coreScott+Scott and Lowey Dannenberg co-announced a $68 million class action settlement with Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, resolving claims about Google Assistant's recording of user communications.
- Dilworth Paxson LLPminorScott+Scott and Dilworth Paxson filed a securities class action lawsuit against Wildermuth Fund, alleging violations of federal securities laws during November 2020 to June 2023 period.
- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLPminorHagens Berman and Scott+Scott co-announced a class action for Vaxart shareholders regarding securities law violations between June 25 and July 24, 2020.
- Mark McLaren Class RepresentativecoreMark McLaren serves as class representative in UK Car Carrier Cartel litigation handled by Scott+Scott UK, achieving £92.75 million total settlement - first UK collective settlement pathfinder case.
- Jeremy NewmancoreFormer Competition and Markets Authority panel member Jeremy Newman leads £1.5 billion class action against Rightmove as class representative, with support from Scott+Scott.
- Stichting Take Back Your PrivacycoreScott+Scott represents Take Back Your Privacy Foundation in Dutch collective action against TikTok under WAMCA, and in separate action against Tinder/Match Group for data privacy violations.
- Stichting MIFC (MIFC Foundation)minorScott+Scott Amsterdam filed collective action on behalf of MIFC Foundation against Visa and Mastercard for excessive interchange fees in the Netherlands.
- Stichting Consumenten Competition Claims Foundation (CCC)minorScott+Scott represents Dutch foundation CCC in collective action against six major energy suppliers on behalf of Dutch consumers with variable energy contracts.
- Robins KaplancoreScott+Scott and Robins Kaplan co-reached agreement in principle with Greystar in rental pricing case, marking settlement simultaneously with U.S. Department of Justice.
- HausfeldcoreScott+Scott and Hausfeld co-reached agreement in principle with Greystar in rental pricing case for multifamily rental pricing litigation.
Scale indicators7 records
Recent moves8 records
Expansion highlights5 records
Scott+Scott competitors and assessment
Company assessmentDirect peers
- Labaton Sucharow: NYC-based leading securities class action firm with a proprietary portfolio monitoring service (Securities Watch) targeting institutional investors. Direct competitor to Scott+Scott's PT+ offering and routinely competes for the same lead-plaintiff mandates.
- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check: Philadelphia-based plaintiff firm specializing in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative litigation, frequently representing public pension funds as lead plaintiff. Overlapping client base and case selection with Scott+Scott.
- Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann: Largest US securities class action plaintiff firm and frequent co-lead counsel with Scott+Scott on institutional investor-led securities cases. Operates a similar portfolio monitoring program for pension funds and competes directly for lead-plaintiff appointments.
- Hausfeld: Global antitrust and competition plaintiff firm with US, UK and European offices; directly comparable practice mix and an explicit co-counsel partner with Scott+Scott in the Greystar rental pricing case. Competes for cartel and antitrust class action mandates in same jurisdictions.
- Robins Kaplan: Major US plaintiff firm with deep antitrust class action practice and similar track record of billion-dollar recoveries. Co-counsel partner with Scott+Scott on Greystar matter and directly competes for institutional plaintiff mandates.
- Pomerantz LLP: Long-established plaintiff securities class action firm with comparable size and dedicated institutional investor practice. Direct competitor for lead-plaintiff appointments in major securities class actions.
- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro: Plaintiff securities and consumer class action firm; current co-counsel partner with Scott+Scott on the Vaxart securities matter. Overlapping institutional client base and direct competitor for securities fraud cases.
- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd: Premier US securities class action and shareholder litigation firm with comparable scale (hundreds of attorneys) and similar recovery track record. Both firms routinely serve as co-lead counsel and compete for institutional lead-plaintiff mandates.
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: National plaintiff firm with strong securities and consumer class action practices, overlapping client base of public pension funds. Comparable mid-size scale and similar case-to-settlement ratio positioning.
- Lowey Dannenberg: New York-based plaintiff firm specializing in antitrust, securities, and consumer class actions; co-counsel partner with Scott+Scott on the $68M Google Assistant data privacy settlement. Similar practice focus and comparable scale.
Market position
Strengths5 records
Weaknesses5 records
Competitive moat4 records
Key risks5 records
Key highlights7 records
Customer concentration
Scott+Scott social profiles
Digital presenceScott+Scott financial estimates
Financial estimateRevenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Scott+Scott leadership team
Management profileNumber of profiles
Profiles12 records
Scott+Scott subsidiaries and ownership
Company hierarchySubsidiaries2 records
Scott+Scott funding detail
Funding detailFunding overview
Funding rounds
Investors
Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Scott+Scott M&A and investment
M&A and investmentM&A
Investments
M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Frequently asked questions about Scott+Scott
What does Scott+Scott do?
Scott+Scott is an international law firm that investigates and prosecutes complex litigation matters, including securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, antitrust/competition cases (price-fixing, cartels, bid rigging), and consumer protection class actions (data breaches, product liability). The firm represents institutional investors, public pension funds, shareholders, and consumer classes to recover damages and operates a proprietary PT+ portfolio monitoring service that screens securities holdings for fraud and corporate mismanagement impacts.
Is Scott+Scott a public or private company?
Scott+Scott is a private company. It is classified as family owned and is currently operating.
When was Scott+Scott founded?
Scott+Scott was founded in 1975. It employs 101 to 250 people.
Where is Scott+Scott based?
Scott+Scott is headquartered in Colchester, United Kingdom, in the Europe region.
How does Scott+Scott make money?
Three revenue lines are on record. Legal Services - Securities Litigation is the primary driver. The others are legal Services - Antitrust Litigation and legal Services - Consumer Litigation.
Who are Scott+Scott's main competitors?
Direct peers on record are Labaton Sucharow, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, Hausfeld, Robins Kaplan, Pomerantz LLP, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Lowey Dannenberg.
Does Scott+Scott have an API?
No public API is recorded for Scott+Scott.
What industry is Scott+Scott in?
Scott+Scott's product category is Complex Litigation Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAHANAG, Litigation Support & Expert Witness (Valuation-Related). Its NAICS code is 5411 and its SIC code is 8111.