Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Susman Godfrey

Full company profile

uuid0005vee

Namestring
Susman Godfrey
Legal namestring
Susman Godfrey L.L.P.
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2011
Descriptiontext

Susman Godfrey L.L.P. is a US-based litigation boutique law firm headquartered in Houston, Texas, with additional offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Founded in 1980 and organized as an all-equity limited liability partnership, the firm specializes in bet-the-company commercial litigation, class actions, antitrust disputes, intellectual property and technology matters, defamation, securities litigation, bankruptcy, arbitration, and appellate work. It has been ranked Vault's #1 litigation boutique in the nation for 16 consecutive years and placed at #41 in Vault's Law 100 in a recent ranking cycle. The firm employs 251–500 people and has grown to more than 100 all-equity partners across its four US offices.

The firm is known for handling some of the highest-profile commercial disputes in the US legal market, with a recent track record that includes the $1.5 billion Anthropic AI copyright settlement, a $787.5 million defamation settlement for Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, a $1.6 billion judgment for BML Properties in the Baha Mar fraud case, a $425 million jury verdict against Google in privacy litigation, a $341 million verdict for KPN against Samsung, a $600 million Flint Water Crisis settlement, and a multi-billion dollar arbitration win for Flutter Entertainment against Fox Corporation. Notable clients include Anthropic, Dominion Voting Systems, Google, Uber, KPN, Flutter Entertainment, and BML Properties, with the firm also serving as co-lead counsel alongside firms such as Lieff Cabraser, Boies Schiller, and Morgan & Morgan on major matters.

Susman Godfrey generates revenue through professional services fees, primarily hourly billing and contingency fee arrangements on high-stakes commercial disputes. As a private partnership, it does not publicly disclose revenue, headcount, or pricing details. The firm acquires clients through reputation, referrals, and high-profile case wins rather than traditional marketing; its go-to-market is enterprise-focused, targeting large corporations, financial institutions, and government entities that need elite trial counsel for complex, high-value disputes. Co-managing partners Kalpana Srinivasan and Vineet Bhatia, along with managing partner Neal S. Manne, lead the firm alongside a deep bench of equity partners.

Short descriptiontext

Susman Godfrey is a US litigation boutique law firm with 100+ all-equity partners across offices in Houston, New York, Los Angeles, and Seattle, serving large corporations, financial institutions, and government entities in bet-the-company commercial disputes, class actions, and antitrust and intellectual property litigation.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
251–500
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersHouston, United States
HQ citystring
Houston
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices4 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
commercial litigation services, antitrust litigation, class action lawsuits, intellectual property litigation, appellate litigation
Industry1 code
1Litigation Support & Expert Witness Services
CodeBPAHALAGPrimaryYes
NAICS code1 code
  • Offices of Lawyers541110
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Commercial Litigation Legal Services
Social media profiles2 records
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Commercial Litigation Services
TypeProfessional Services
Description

Hourly billing and contingency fee arrangements for high-stakes commercial litigation, class actions, antitrust disputes, intellectual property cases, and regulatory matters

susmangodfrey.com
Marketing channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Susman Godfrey is a U.S. litigation boutique law firm that provides high-stakes commercial litigation services, including antitrust, intellectual property and patent, class action, defamation, securities, environmental, insurance, bankruptcy, arbitration, and appellate representation. The firm operates through more than 100 all-equity partners across four U.S. offices (Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle) and is consistently ranked Vault's #1 Litigation Boutique in the Nation, representing large corporations, institutions, and plaintiff classes in bet-the-company disputes.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 5 values shown
  • $1.5 billion settlement in Anthropic AI copyright case - largest ever in US copyright litigation
+4 more records
Product overview1 text field

Susman Godfrey is a litigation law firm offering high-stakes commercial litigation, antitrust, intellectual property, and trial services. The firm operates across four offices (Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle) and specializes in complex business disputes, class actions, and bet-the-company litigation. The firm provides legal services across multiple practice areas including Antitrust, Appellate, Arbitration, Bankruptcy, Class Actions, Defamation, Environmental, Insurance, Intellectual Property & Technology, Patent Litigation, Product Liability, Shareholder & Securities, and Labor & Employment. The firm is recognized as Vault's #1 litigation boutique in America for 16 consecutive years.

Product and service13 records
1Antitrust Litigation
CategoryCommercial Litigation
Description

Plaintiff-side and defense antitrust representation in complex competition disputes for corporations and institutions.

2Appellate Litigation
Description

Appellate advocacy in federal and state appellate courts for clients in commercial, constitutional, and class action matters.

3International and Commercial Arbitration
Description

Representation in international and domestic commercial arbitration proceedings, including high-value disputes between corporations.

4Bankruptcy Litigation
Description

Litigation related to bankruptcy proceedings, including disputes involving creditors, debtors, and distressed entities.

5Class Action Litigation
Description

Plaintiff-side and defense class action representation, including consumer, securities, privacy, and intellectual property class actions.

6Defamation Litigation
Description

Representation of corporations and individuals in high-stakes defamation and First Amendment matters, including media and political disputes.

7Environmental Litigation
Description

Environmental and mass tort litigation, including public health and natural resource matters.

8Insurance Litigation
Description

Coverage and bad faith disputes on behalf of policyholders and insurers in complex insurance matters.

9Intellectual Property & Technology Litigation
Description

Intellectual property and technology litigation, including copyright, trademark, trade secrets, and technology-related disputes.

10Patent Litigation
Description

Patent infringement and validity litigation in federal courts for technology and life sciences companies.

11Product Liability Litigation
Description

Defense and plaintiff-side product liability representation for manufacturers and consumers in mass tort and individual cases.

12Shareholder & Securities Litigation
Description

Shareholder derivative suits, securities class actions, and securities fraud litigation on behalf of investors and corporations.

13Labor & Employment Litigation
Description

Complex employment litigation matters, including wage and hour class actions and high-stakes individual employment disputes.

Scale indicator5 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership1 partner
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-09-25
Description

Co-lead plaintiffs' counsel with Justin Nelson of Susman Godfrey and Rachel Geman of Lieff Cabraser in the $1.5 billion Anthropic copyright settlement. The firms collaborated as co-lead class counsel representing authors in this landmark AI copyright case.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Elite plaintiffs' litigation boutique with a strong class action and complex litigation practice. Comparable in plaintiff-side complex litigation positioning and bet-the-company case selection.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Elite litigation boutique known for bet-the-company and high-profile trial work, including serving as co-lead counsel alongside Susman Godfrey in the $425M Google privacy verdict. Closely comparable in business model, client type, and case profile.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Leading plaintiffs' litigation boutique that co-led the $1.5B Anthropic copyright settlement with Susman Godfrey. Comparable in plaintiff-side mega-litigation focus and elite complex-case reputation.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Premier New York-based law firm with the leading M&A and litigation practice, regularly engaged in bet-the-company disputes. Overlaps with Susman Godfrey in elite commercial litigation for major corporations, though operates as a full-service firm.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Premier Wall Street law firm with elite litigation capabilities serving major corporations in high-stakes disputes. Comparable in case quality and client prestige, though Cravath operates as a full-service firm with M&A and transactional depth.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The largest litigation-only global law firm, with a comparable bet-the-company, trial-focused business model and similar elite brand positioning in complex commercial disputes. Most direct competitor to Susman Godfrey in the 'litigation boutique' category, though at significantly larger scale.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Complex litigation boutique with strong plaintiff-side class action practice. Comparable in serving institutional plaintiffs and consumers in high-stakes commercial disputes.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Top-tier full-service law firm with an elite litigation department handling bet-the-company disputes. Competes for similar matters and clients but offers broader corporate, transactional, and restructuring capabilities.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Top-tier trial boutique focused on complex commercial litigation with a reputation for elite trial counsel. Direct peer with similar bet-the-company positioning, though typically more defense-oriented in case mix.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Major national law firm with a top-ranked litigation practice handling high-stakes commercial disputes across the country. Overlaps with Susman Godfrey on defense-side and plaintiff-side commercial matters.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers7 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles8 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Susman Godfrey

Commercial Litigation Legal Servicessusmangodfrey.com

Susman Godfrey is a US litigation boutique law firm with 100+ all-equity partners across offices in Houston, New York, Los Angeles, and Seattle, serving large corporations, financial institutions, and government entities in bet-the-company commercial disputes, class actions, and antitrust and intellectual property litigation.

What Susman Godfrey does

Susman Godfrey L.L.P. is a US-based litigation boutique law firm headquartered in Houston, Texas, with additional offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Founded in 1980 and organized as an all-equity limited liability partnership, the firm specializes in bet-the-company commercial litigation, class actions, antitrust disputes, intellectual property and technology matters, defamation, securities litigation, bankruptcy, arbitration, and appellate work. It has been ranked Vault's #1 litigation boutique in the nation for 16 consecutive years and placed at #41 in Vault's Law 100 in a recent ranking cycle. The firm employs 251–500 people and has grown to more than 100 all-equity partners across its four US offices.

The firm is known for handling some of the highest-profile commercial disputes in the US legal market, with a recent track record that includes the $1.5 billion Anthropic AI copyright settlement, a $787.5 million defamation settlement for Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, a $1.6 billion judgment for BML Properties in the Baha Mar fraud case, a $425 million jury verdict against Google in privacy litigation, a $341 million verdict for KPN against Samsung, a $600 million Flint Water Crisis settlement, and a multi-billion dollar arbitration win for Flutter Entertainment against Fox Corporation. Notable clients include Anthropic, Dominion Voting Systems, Google, Uber, KPN, Flutter Entertainment, and BML Properties, with the firm also serving as co-lead counsel alongside firms such as Lieff Cabraser, Boies Schiller, and Morgan & Morgan on major matters.

Susman Godfrey generates revenue through professional services fees, primarily hourly billing and contingency fee arrangements on high-stakes commercial disputes. As a private partnership, it does not publicly disclose revenue, headcount, or pricing details. The firm acquires clients through reputation, referrals, and high-profile case wins rather than traditional marketing; its go-to-market is enterprise-focused, targeting large corporations, financial institutions, and government entities that need elite trial counsel for complex, high-value disputes. Co-managing partners Kalpana Srinivasan and Vineet Bhatia, along with managing partner Neal S. Manne, lead the firm alongside a deep bench of equity partners.

Susman Godfrey firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Susman Godfrey
Legal name
Susman Godfrey L.L.P.
Website
https://susmangodfrey.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
2011
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
251–500 employees
Short description
Susman Godfrey is a US litigation boutique law firm with 100+ all-equity partners across offices in Houston, New York, Los Angeles, and Seattle, serving large corporations, financial institutions, and government entities in bet-the-company commercial disputes, class actions, and antitrust and intellectual property litigation.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Susman Godfrey industry classification

Industry
Product category
Commercial Litigation Legal Services
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers (541110)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Litigation Support & Expert Witness Services (BPAHALAG)

Keywords

  • Commercial litigation services
  • Antitrust litigation
  • Class action lawsuits
  • Intellectual property litigation
  • Appellate litigation

Where Susman Godfrey is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Houston
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices4 records

Markets served

Susman Godfrey business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure, Others

Revenue model

  1. Commercial Litigation Services: Hourly billing and contingency fee arrangements for high-stakes commercial litigation, class actions, antitrust disputes, intellectual property cases, and regulatory matters

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels3 records

Susman Godfrey product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Susman Godfrey is a U.S. litigation boutique law firm that provides high-stakes commercial litigation services, including antitrust, intellectual property and patent, class action, defamation, securities, environmental, insurance, bankruptcy, arbitration, and appellate representation. The firm operates through more than 100 all-equity partners across four U.S. offices (Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle) and is consistently ranked Vault's #1 Litigation Boutique in the Nation, representing large corporations, institutions, and plaintiff classes in bet-the-company disputes.

Product overview

Susman Godfrey is a litigation law firm offering high-stakes commercial litigation, antitrust, intellectual property, and trial services. The firm operates across four offices (Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle) and specializes in complex business disputes, class actions, and bet-the-company litigation. The firm provides legal services across multiple practice areas including Antitrust, Appellate, Arbitration, Bankruptcy, Class Actions, Defamation, Environmental, Insurance, Intellectual Property & Technology, Patent Litigation, Product Liability, Shareholder & Securities, and Labor & Employment. The firm is recognized as Vault's #1 litigation boutique in America for 16 consecutive years.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Antitrust Litigation Plaintiff-side and defense antitrust representation in complex competition disputes for corporations and institutions.
  • Appellate Litigation Appellate advocacy in federal and state appellate courts for clients in commercial, constitutional, and class action matters.
  • International and Commercial Arbitration Representation in international and domestic commercial arbitration proceedings, including high-value disputes between corporations.
  • Bankruptcy Litigation Litigation related to bankruptcy proceedings, including disputes involving creditors, debtors, and distressed entities.
  • Class Action Litigation Plaintiff-side and defense class action representation, including consumer, securities, privacy, and intellectual property class actions.
  • Defamation Litigation Representation of corporations and individuals in high-stakes defamation and First Amendment matters, including media and political disputes.
  • Environmental Litigation Environmental and mass tort litigation, including public health and natural resource matters.
  • Insurance Litigation Coverage and bad faith disputes on behalf of policyholders and insurers in complex insurance matters.
  • Intellectual Property & Technology Litigation Intellectual property and technology litigation, including copyright, trademark, trade secrets, and technology-related disputes.
  • Patent Litigation Patent infringement and validity litigation in federal courts for technology and life sciences companies.
  • Product Liability Litigation Defense and plaintiff-side product liability representation for manufacturers and consumers in mass tort and individual cases.
  • Shareholder & Securities Litigation Shareholder derivative suits, securities class actions, and securities fraud litigation on behalf of investors and corporations.
  • Labor & Employment Litigation Complex employment litigation matters, including wage and hour class actions and high-stakes individual employment disputes.

Quantifiable outcome

  • $1.5 billion settlement in Anthropic AI copyright case - largest ever in US copyright litigation
  • +4 more outcomes

Companies that use Susman Godfrey

Customer profile

Named customers7 records

Segments2 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Susman Godfrey technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Susman Godfrey partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

One partnership is on record.

  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 25 September 2025Co-lead plaintiffs' counsel with Justin Nelson of Susman Godfrey and Rachel Geman of Lieff Cabraser in the $1.5 billion Anthropic copyright settlement. The firms collaborated as co-lead class counsel representing authors in this landmark AI copyright case.

Scale indicators5 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Susman Godfrey competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll: Elite plaintiffs' litigation boutique with a strong class action and complex litigation practice. Comparable in plaintiff-side complex litigation positioning and bet-the-company case selection.
  • Boies Schiller Flexner: Elite litigation boutique known for bet-the-company and high-profile trial work, including serving as co-lead counsel alongside Susman Godfrey in the $425M Google privacy verdict. Closely comparable in business model, client type, and case profile.
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: Leading plaintiffs' litigation boutique that co-led the $1.5B Anthropic copyright settlement with Susman Godfrey. Comparable in plaintiff-side mega-litigation focus and elite complex-case reputation.
  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan: The largest litigation-only global law firm, with a comparable bet-the-company, trial-focused business model and similar elite brand positioning in complex commercial disputes. Most direct competitor to Susman Godfrey in the 'litigation boutique' category, though at significantly larger scale.
  • Keller Rohrback: Complex litigation boutique with strong plaintiff-side class action practice. Comparable in serving institutional plaintiffs and consumers in high-stakes commercial disputes.
  • Bartlit Beck: Top-tier trial boutique focused on complex commercial litigation with a reputation for elite trial counsel. Direct peer with similar bet-the-company positioning, though typically more defense-oriented in case mix.

Broad incumbents

  • Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Premier New York-based law firm with the leading M&A and litigation practice, regularly engaged in bet-the-company disputes. Overlaps with Susman Godfrey in elite commercial litigation for major corporations, though operates as a full-service firm.
  • Cravath, Swaine & Moore: Premier Wall Street law firm with elite litigation capabilities serving major corporations in high-stakes disputes. Comparable in case quality and client prestige, though Cravath operates as a full-service firm with M&A and transactional depth.
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison: Top-tier full-service law firm with an elite litigation department handling bet-the-company disputes. Competes for similar matters and clients but offers broader corporate, transactional, and restructuring capabilities.
  • Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher: Major national law firm with a top-ranked litigation practice handling high-stakes commercial disputes across the country. Overlaps with Susman Godfrey on defense-side and plaintiff-side commercial matters.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Susman Godfrey social profiles

Digital presence

Susman Godfrey financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Susman Godfrey leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles8 records

Susman Godfrey funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Susman Godfrey M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Susman Godfrey

What does Susman Godfrey do?

Susman Godfrey is a U.S. litigation boutique law firm that provides high-stakes commercial litigation services, including antitrust, intellectual property and patent, class action, defamation, securities, environmental, insurance, bankruptcy, arbitration, and appellate representation. The firm operates through more than 100 all-equity partners across four U.S. offices (Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle) and is consistently ranked Vault's #1 Litigation Boutique in the Nation, representing large corporations, institutions, and plaintiff classes in bet-the-company disputes.

Is Susman Godfrey a public or private company?

Susman Godfrey is a private company. It is classified as management employee owned and is currently operating.

When was Susman Godfrey founded?

Susman Godfrey was founded in 2011. It employs 251 to 500 people.

Where is Susman Godfrey based?

Susman Godfrey is headquartered in Houston, United States, in the North America region.

How does Susman Godfrey make money?

One revenue line is on record: commercial Litigation Services.

Who are Susman Godfrey's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, Boies Schiller Flexner, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Keller Rohrback and Bartlit Beck. Broad incumbents are Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

Does Susman Godfrey have an API?

No public API is recorded for Susman Godfrey.

What industry is Susman Godfrey in?

Susman Godfrey's product category is Commercial Litigation Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAHALAG, Litigation Support & Expert Witness Services. Its NAICS code is 541110 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
PR NewswireLITFINCON Europe se déroule à Amsterdam les 7 et 8 octobre, avec la participation de Burford, Therium, WTW, CAC Specialty, Susman Godfrey et Ignite Specialty RiskLITFINCON Europe will be held in Amsterdam on October 7-8, 2026, at Rosewood Amsterdam, with participation from Burford, Therium, WTW, CAC Specialty, Susman Godfrey, and Ignite Specialty Risk. The event, organized by Siltstone Capital, is the first European edition of the global litigation funding conference series.Above the LawBiglaw Partner Dishes On Her Unique Path To PartnershipGloria Park, a partner at Susman Godfrey, discusses her journey to partnership in litigation, emphasizing her immigrant background and her belief in storytelling as a crucial aspect of law. She highlights the importance of detail-oriented litigation over theatrical courtroom arguments and shares insights on firm culture and personal balance. Park's experience epitomizes the challenges and triumphs faced by members of underrepresented backgrounds in Biglaw.Law360ABA Says Feds' Susman Godfrey DQ Bid Is More IntimidationThe American Bar Association urged a D.C. federal judge to reject the Trump administration's bid to disqualify Susman Godfrey LLP as plaintiffs' counsel in its lawsuit challenging 2025 executive orders. The ABA called the move the latest effort to intimidate the legal profession.Above the LawDOJ Wants Susman Godfrey Kicked Off The ABA’s Case Because DOJ Subpoenaed Susman GodfreyThe Justice Department filed a motion to disqualify the law firm Susman Godfrey from representing the American Bar Association in its lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's executive orders targeting law firms, arguing that Susman Godfrey cannot serve as both advocate and fact witness under D.C. professional conduct rules. The article notes the apparent contradiction that the DOJ itself subpoenaed Susman Godfrey on July 2, demanding the firm's communications with Boris Epshteyn and noticing a partner for deposition, before filing the disqualification motion two weeks later. The ABA is required to respond by July 27, and Susman Godfrey has previously successfully defeated the administration in court when an earlier executive order targeting the firm was struck down as a "shocking abuse of power."ThehillFederal appeals court probes Trump’s targeting of law firmsA federal appeals court panel on Thursday scrutinized President Trump’s executive orders targeting major law firms Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, and Susman Godfrey, which claim the orders were unlawful retaliation for representing his political adversaries. The three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned both the law firms and the Justice Department on presidential authority, security clearance powers, and whether the directives unconstitutionally punished protected speech. The judges probed the legal boundaries of executive power while the DOJ argued that commercial associations with firms are not constitutionally protected conduct.The Daily RecordUS appeals court questions Trump’s push to punish major law firmsA federal appeals court panel heard arguments on Trump's executive orders targeting four major law firms, with the Justice Department arguing the firms' associations are not protected by the First Amendment. The orders, which barred lawyers from federal buildings and stripped security clearances, were previously rejected by lower courts. The panel's rulings can be appealed to the Supreme Court.Bloomberg Law NewsLaw Firms Can Use Conduct Rule to Push Back on Trump SanctionsThe article argues that law firms can use Model Rule 8.4(e) to resist Trump's executive orders, citing Paul Weiss's $40 million pro bono settlement as a violation. It notes the DC Circuit will address the appeals and that the rule's enforcement could protect firms from future sanctions.Bloomberg Law NewsEx-EEOC Officials Back Law Firms in Trump Executive Order AppealA group of former Equal Employment Opportunity Commission officials filed an amicus brief supporting four law firms—Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, and Susman Godfrey—in their appeal against Trump administration executive orders directing the EEOC to investigate big law firms for race-based programs. The former officials, largely Democrats, argue the executive orders violate the commission's established procedures and are backing the law firms' efforts to uphold lower court rulings that struck down the White House directives. The brief criticizes the current EEOC enforcement stance under Republican Chair Andrea Lucas.Bloomberg Law NewsTrump-Targeted Law Firms Fight DOJ Bid to Revive Orders (2)Four major law firms—WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, Susman Godfrey, and Perkins Coie—urged the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to uphold rulings striking down President Trump's executive orders that targeted them over their lawyers' ties to investigations against him. The DOJ initially said it would drop its appeal of the lower court decisions blocking the orders but reversed course less than 24 hours later, with oral arguments scheduled for May 14. The firms argued the orders pose a severe threat to the legal profession and rule of law, contrasting their legal challenge with Paul Weiss's $940 million settlement with the White House.Bloomberg Law NewsTrump Dropping Law Firm Case ‘Inadvertent,’ Official Says (1)The Justice Department accidentally filed to dismiss its appeal of court rulings striking down President Trump's executive orders targeting four prominent law firms, then withdrew the motion within 24 hours before filing a brief on March 6 defending the orders. The administration changed course after Trump expressed anger at department leadership for backing down, according to reports. The four firms—Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, and Susman Godfrey—had won injunctions from separate judges who ruled the orders unconstitutional, and are scheduled to file briefs by March 27.