Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Full company profile

uuid000662a

Namestring
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Legal namestring
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Websiteurl
fdd.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2001
Descriptiontext

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute founded in 2001, shortly after the September 11 attacks, focused on U.S. national security and foreign policy. Its core product is open-source policy research and analysis on threats from Iran, China, Russia, terrorism, cyber adversaries, and Turkey, delivered as op-eds, policy briefs, memos, monographs, and legislative testimonies, plus three podcasts (The Iran Breakdown, Foreign Podicy, Generation Jihad) and two daily email publications (Morning Brief, Overnight Brief). The institute is organized into three American Power centers — Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation (CCTI), Center on Economic and Financial Power (CEFP), and Center on Military and Political Power (CMPP) — alongside regional/thematic programs covering Iran, China, Russia, Israel, Turkey, and nonproliferation. The Long War Journal is a marquee publication explicitly described as the best source of public information on terrorism. There is no technology product, API, SDK, or software offering; the underlying 'platform' is human-expert research, a 700+ practitioner National Security Network, and editorial assets.

Its business model is nonprofit fundraising: FDD solicits private donations through an 'Invest' mechanism and explicitly does not accept donations from any foreign governments. Research is distributed freely to policymakers, media, and the public rather than sold commercially. The principal customer segments are U.S. government policymakers (executive branch and Congressional offices across both parties), media/journalists seeking expert commentary, mid-career national security practitioners participating in the National Security Fellows Program and related programming, and democratic foreign allies (e.g., Taiwan, Israel) who benefit from thematic research support. The leadership team includes CEO Mark Dubowitz, Executive Director Jonathan Schanzer, Founder & President Clifford D. May, COO Bill McCarthy, and senior advisors including LTG (Ret.) H.R. McMaster, Juan C. Zarate, Jim Langevin, and RADM (Ret.) Mark Montgomery.

Short descriptiontext

Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute, founded in 2001, that produces open-source policy analysis, daily briefings, podcasts, and monographs on national security threats (Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey) for U.S. policymakers, media, and a 700-practitioner network.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
national security research, foreign policy analysis, defense policy briefs, geopolitical research, counterterrorism analysis
Industry1 code
1Security Sector Reform (SSR) & Defense Institution Building
CodeBPADAFAEPrimaryYes
NAICS code2 codes
  • National Security928110
  • International Affairs928120
SIC code1 code
  • International Affairs9721
Product category
Policy Research and National Security Analysis
Marketing channels9 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute that conducts policy research and analysis on national security threats, including Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey, and counterterrorism. FDD produces policy briefs, op-eds, monographs, legislative testimonies, daily email briefings, podcasts, and fellowship programs, and distributes these to U.S. policymakers, media, allied governments, and the public.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 2 values shown
  • FDD expertise shared with Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden administrations and Congressional offices on a bipartisan basis
+1 more record
Product overview1 text field

FDD is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute specializing in national security and foreign policy analysis, organized around three Centers on American Power (CCTI, CEFP, CMPP) and multiple regional/thematic programs (Iran, China, Israel, Russia, Turkey, Nonproliferation). The organization produces publications (policy briefs, op-eds, monographs, memos), daily briefings (Morning Brief, Overnight Brief), podcasts (The Iran Breakdown, Foreign Podicy, Generation Jihad), and manages educational programs including the National Security Fellows Program and Media Fellows Program. FDD's Long War Journal tracks global terrorism. The organization does not offer technology products, APIs, or software services.

Product and service8 records
1FDD Morning Brief
CategoryPublication/Newsletter
Description

Daily morning email newsletter providing analysis on national security issues, distributed to policymakers, media, and the public.

2Overnight Brief
CategoryPublication/Newsletter
Description

Daily overnight email briefing summarizing overnight developments across multiple global security and foreign policy issues.

3FDD Long War Journal
CategoryPublication/Sub-brand
Description

Publication providing expert reporting on global terrorism and the jihadi movement, widely cited as a leading source of public information on terrorism.

4National Security Fellows Program
CategoryProgram/Educational
Description

A 12-month fellowship program for mid-career national security professionals combining networking, skill-building, and expert roundtable discussions.

5Media Fellows Program
CategoryProgram/Educational
Description

Professional development program for media professionals covering the intersection of media, strategic communications, public diplomacy, and national security.

6The Iran Breakdown Podcast
CategoryPodcast
Description

Podcast providing recurring analysis of Iran-related national security developments.

7Foreign Podicy Podcast
CategoryPodcast
Description

Podcast featuring discussions on foreign policy and national security topics with FDD experts.

8Generation Jihad Podcast
CategoryPodcast
Description

Podcast focused on understanding and countering jihadist ideology and terrorism.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership5 partners
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-19
Description

Microsoft partnered with FDD's Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation (CCTI) and the Cyber Readiness Institute on a 2023-2025 cybersecurity assistance pilot program for water utilities. The program found that while 90% of participating utilities reported better cybersecurity understanding, hands-on assistance proved more effective than free training alone.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-19
Description

The Cyber Readiness Institute partnered with Microsoft and FDD's Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation on a 2023-2025 cybersecurity assistance pilot program for water utilities that compared hands-on coaching versus self-paced training approaches.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-11-19
Description

FDD conducted a tabletop exercise with Taiwan's National Chengchi University for a report titled 'Power Under Pressure' that recommended improvements to Taiwan's energy resilience to deter China's gray zone tactics targeting fuel supplies.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-08-04
Description

CSIS and FDD partnered to launch the Commission on Cyber Force Generation on August 4, 2025, co-chaired by former House Armed Services Committee staff member Josh Stiefel and retired Lieutenant General Ed Cardon. The commission aims to develop implementation recommendations for a potential dedicated U.S. military Cyber Force, addressing organizational structure, core functions, and necessary authorities. They also co-published a report proposing a model for an independent U.S. Cyber Force with approximately $11 billion in reallocated funds and 30,000 personnel.

5Cyber Solarium Commission 2.0 (CSC 2.0)
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-08-04
Description

The Cyber Solarium Commission 2.0 is housed at FDD and partnered with CSIS to launch the Commission on Cyber Force Generation. The initiative aims to accelerate execution and reduce transition risk by focusing on implementation planning ahead of any decision to create a Cyber Force.

csis.org
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit research institution providing in-depth analysis on national security, defense, and international affairs. Comparable in producing rigorous research for policymakers, though with a more analytical/methodological approach than FDD's advocacy-oriented research.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based think tank focused on international affairs with programs on national security, economics, and regional studies. Comparable in producing policy briefs, hosting events, and engaging directly with executive branch officials.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Largest conservative-leaning Washington, DC think tank with significant foreign policy and defense programs. Comparable in policy influence and government access, though with a broader domestic policy portfolio than FDD.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Stanford-based public policy research center with major programs on national security, foreign policy, and economic policy. Comparable in research depth, distinguished fellows, and government connections across multiple administrations.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based think tank conducting policy research in economics, foreign policy, and national security. Comparable in mission and Washington policy engagement, with similar reach into both Republican and Democratic administrations.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based think tank focused on national security, foreign policy, and economics. Comparable to FDD in size, hawkish foreign policy orientation, and Washington-based policy engagement with government officials.

TypeDirect peer
Description

One of the largest Washington, DC-based policy research organizations with substantial foreign policy and national security programs. Comparable in research-driven policy influence, but with a broader policy mandate and significantly larger budget than FDD.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based bipartisan think tank focused on national security and foreign policy. Directly comparable to FDD as both specialize in defense and international affairs, share a bipartisan approach, and recently co-led the Cyber Force Generation Commission.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based think tank focused on U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly Israel. Comparable to FDD's regional expertise on Israel and Iran, with a similarly hawkish orientation toward Iran policy.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based think tank with global programs on international peace, security, and economics. Comparable in producing expert foreign policy analysis, though with a more centrist orientation and broader geographic focus than FDD.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature5 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles23 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Policy Research and National Security Analysisfdd.org

Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute, founded in 2001, that produces open-source policy analysis, daily briefings, podcasts, and monographs on national security threats (Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey) for U.S. policymakers, media, and a 700-practitioner network.

What Foundation for Defense of Democracies does

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute founded in 2001, shortly after the September 11 attacks, focused on U.S. national security and foreign policy. Its core product is open-source policy research and analysis on threats from Iran, China, Russia, terrorism, cyber adversaries, and Turkey, delivered as op-eds, policy briefs, memos, monographs, and legislative testimonies, plus three podcasts (The Iran Breakdown, Foreign Podicy, Generation Jihad) and two daily email publications (Morning Brief, Overnight Brief). The institute is organized into three American Power centers — Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation (CCTI), Center on Economic and Financial Power (CEFP), and Center on Military and Political Power (CMPP) — alongside regional/thematic programs covering Iran, China, Russia, Israel, Turkey, and nonproliferation. The Long War Journal is a marquee publication explicitly described as the best source of public information on terrorism. There is no technology product, API, SDK, or software offering; the underlying 'platform' is human-expert research, a 700+ practitioner National Security Network, and editorial assets.

Its business model is nonprofit fundraising: FDD solicits private donations through an 'Invest' mechanism and explicitly does not accept donations from any foreign governments. Research is distributed freely to policymakers, media, and the public rather than sold commercially. The principal customer segments are U.S. government policymakers (executive branch and Congressional offices across both parties), media/journalists seeking expert commentary, mid-career national security practitioners participating in the National Security Fellows Program and related programming, and democratic foreign allies (e.g., Taiwan, Israel) who benefit from thematic research support. The leadership team includes CEO Mark Dubowitz, Executive Director Jonathan Schanzer, Founder & President Clifford D. May, COO Bill McCarthy, and senior advisors including LTG (Ret.) H.R. McMaster, Juan C. Zarate, Jim Langevin, and RADM (Ret.) Mark Montgomery.

Foundation for Defense of Democracies firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Legal name
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Website
https://fdd.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2001
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute, founded in 2001, that produces open-source policy analysis, daily briefings, podcasts, and monographs on national security threats (Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey) for U.S. policymakers, media, and a 700-practitioner network.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Foundation for Defense of Democracies industry classification

Industry
Product category
Policy Research and National Security Analysis
NAICS
National Security (928110), International Affairs (928120)
SIC
International Affairs (9721)
akta.pro primary industry
Security Sector Reform (SSR) & Defense Institution Building (BPADAFAE)

Keywords

  • National security research
  • Foreign policy analysis
  • Defense policy briefs
  • Geopolitical research
  • Counterterrorism analysis

Where Foundation for Defense of Democracies is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Foundation for Defense of Democracies business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels9 records

Foundation for Defense of Democracies product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute that conducts policy research and analysis on national security threats, including Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey, and counterterrorism. FDD produces policy briefs, op-eds, monographs, legislative testimonies, daily email briefings, podcasts, and fellowship programs, and distributes these to U.S. policymakers, media, allied governments, and the public.

Product overview

FDD is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute specializing in national security and foreign policy analysis, organized around three Centers on American Power (CCTI, CEFP, CMPP) and multiple regional/thematic programs (Iran, China, Israel, Russia, Turkey, Nonproliferation). The organization produces publications (policy briefs, op-eds, monographs, memos), daily briefings (Morning Brief, Overnight Brief), podcasts (The Iran Breakdown, Foreign Podicy, Generation Jihad), and manages educational programs including the National Security Fellows Program and Media Fellows Program. FDD's Long War Journal tracks global terrorism. The organization does not offer technology products, APIs, or software services.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • FDD Morning Brief Daily morning email newsletter providing analysis on national security issues, distributed to policymakers, media, and the public.
  • Overnight Brief Daily overnight email briefing summarizing overnight developments across multiple global security and foreign policy issues.
  • FDD Long War Journal Publication providing expert reporting on global terrorism and the jihadi movement, widely cited as a leading source of public information on terrorism.
  • National Security Fellows Program A 12-month fellowship program for mid-career national security professionals combining networking, skill-building, and expert roundtable discussions.
  • Media Fellows Program Professional development program for media professionals covering the intersection of media, strategic communications, public diplomacy, and national security.
  • The Iran Breakdown Podcast Podcast providing recurring analysis of Iran-related national security developments.
  • Foreign Podicy Podcast Podcast featuring discussions on foreign policy and national security topics with FDD experts.
  • Generation Jihad Podcast Podcast focused on understanding and countering jihadist ideology and terrorism.

Quantifiable outcome

  • FDD expertise shared with Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden administrations and Congressional offices on a bipartisan basis
  • +1 more outcomes

Companies that use Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Customer profile

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Foundation for Defense of Democracies technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature5 records

Foundation for Defense of Democracies partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Five partnerships are on record, tiered minor and core.

  • MicrosoftminorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 19 March 2026Microsoft partnered with FDD's Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation (CCTI) and the Cyber Readiness Institute on a 2023-2025 cybersecurity assistance pilot program for water utilities. The program found that while 90% of participating utilities reported better cybersecurity understanding, hands-on assistance proved more effective than free training alone.
  • Cyber Readiness InstituteminorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 19 March 2026The Cyber Readiness Institute partnered with Microsoft and FDD's Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation on a 2023-2025 cybersecurity assistance pilot program for water utilities that compared hands-on coaching versus self-paced training approaches.
  • National Chengchi University (Taiwan)minorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 19 November 2025FDD conducted a tabletop exercise with Taiwan's National Chengchi University for a report titled 'Power Under Pressure' that recommended improvements to Taiwan's energy resilience to deter China's gray zone tactics targeting fuel supplies.
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 4 August 2025CSIS and FDD partnered to launch the Commission on Cyber Force Generation on August 4, 2025, co-chaired by former House Armed Services Committee staff member Josh Stiefel and retired Lieutenant General Ed Cardon. The commission aims to develop implementation recommendations for a potential dedicated U.S. military Cyber Force, addressing organizational structure, core functions, and necessary authorities. They also co-published a report proposing a model for an independent U.S. Cyber Force with approximately $11 billion in reallocated funds and 30,000 personnel.
  • Cyber Solarium Commission 2.0 (CSC 2.0)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 4 August 2025The Cyber Solarium Commission 2.0 is housed at FDD and partnered with CSIS to launch the Commission on Cyber Force Generation. The initiative aims to accelerate execution and reduce transition risk by focusing on implementation planning ahead of any decision to create a Cyber Force.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Foundation for Defense of Democracies competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • RAND Corporation: Nonprofit research institution providing in-depth analysis on national security, defense, and international affairs. Comparable in producing rigorous research for policymakers, though with a more analytical/methodological approach than FDD's advocacy-oriented research.
  • Atlantic Council: Washington, DC-based think tank focused on international affairs with programs on national security, economics, and regional studies. Comparable in producing policy briefs, hosting events, and engaging directly with executive branch officials.
  • Heritage Foundation: Largest conservative-leaning Washington, DC think tank with significant foreign policy and defense programs. Comparable in policy influence and government access, though with a broader domestic policy portfolio than FDD.
  • Hoover Institution: Stanford-based public policy research center with major programs on national security, foreign policy, and economic policy. Comparable in research depth, distinguished fellows, and government connections across multiple administrations.
  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI): Washington, DC-based think tank conducting policy research in economics, foreign policy, and national security. Comparable in mission and Washington policy engagement, with similar reach into both Republican and Democratic administrations.
  • Hudson Institute: Washington, DC-based think tank focused on national security, foreign policy, and economics. Comparable to FDD in size, hawkish foreign policy orientation, and Washington-based policy engagement with government officials.
  • Brookings Institution: One of the largest Washington, DC-based policy research organizations with substantial foreign policy and national security programs. Comparable in research-driven policy influence, but with a broader policy mandate and significantly larger budget than FDD.
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS): Washington, DC-based bipartisan think tank focused on national security and foreign policy. Directly comparable to FDD as both specialize in defense and international affairs, share a bipartisan approach, and recently co-led the Cyber Force Generation Commission.
  • Washington Institute for Near East Policy: Washington, DC-based think tank focused on U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly Israel. Comparable to FDD's regional expertise on Israel and Iran, with a similarly hawkish orientation toward Iran policy.
  • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Washington, DC-based think tank with global programs on international peace, security, and economics. Comparable in producing expert foreign policy analysis, though with a more centrist orientation and broader geographic focus than FDD.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Foundation for Defense of Democracies social profiles

Digital presence

Foundation for Defense of Democracies financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Foundation for Defense of Democracies leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles23 records

Foundation for Defense of Democracies funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Foundation for Defense of Democracies M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Foundation for Defense of Democracies

What does Foundation for Defense of Democracies do?

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) is a Washington, DC-based nonpartisan 501(c)(3) research institute that conducts policy research and analysis on national security threats, including Iran, China, Russia, cyber, Turkey, and counterterrorism. FDD produces policy briefs, op-eds, monographs, legislative testimonies, daily email briefings, podcasts, and fellowship programs, and distributes these to U.S. policymakers, media, allied governments, and the public.

Is Foundation for Defense of Democracies a public or private company?

Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Foundation for Defense of Democracies founded?

Foundation for Defense of Democracies was founded in 2001. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Foundation for Defense of Democracies based?

Foundation for Defense of Democracies is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Foundation for Defense of Democracies's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are RAND Corporation, Atlantic Council, Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution, American Enterprise Institute (AEI), Hudson Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Does Foundation for Defense of Democracies have an API?

No public API is recorded for Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

What industry is Foundation for Defense of Democracies in?

Foundation for Defense of Democracies's product category is Policy Research and National Security Analysis. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPADAFAE, Security Sector Reform (SSR) & Defense Institution Building. Its NAICS code is 928110 and its SIC code is 9721.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Crypto BriefingIran to boost crypto use for oil sales amid US sanctions crackdownIran is expected to increase use of cryptocurrencies and dollar-backed stablecoins to sell sanctioned oil and buy dual-use goods, per an analyst from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. The U.S. is intensifying sanctions enforcement, including a $61 million stablecoin forfeiture case. Market pricing shows low odds of WTI reaching $150-$130 but 74% odds of hitting $85.YouTube‘Highly likely’ US will have to give up its ‘greatest leverage’ to secure Hormuz openingBenham Taleblu, Senior Director of the FDD Iran Program, stated that a deal to secure the opening of the Strait of Hormuz is possible but would likely require the United States to relinquish significant leverage, such as maintaining a blockade. The analysis suggests that diplomatic negotiations regarding this strategic waterway involve substantial concessions from US policy positions.IndustrialcyberFDD backs zero-knowledge proofs to boost critical infrastructure cyber reporting without exposing sensitive informationResearchers from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) proposed the use of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to improve cybersecurity reporting for critical infrastructure in the U.S. without revealing sensitive operational data, demonstrated through a pilot in the energy sector. The pilot modeled vulnerabilities across three companies, illustrating how ZKPs can facilitate sector-wide vulnerability assessments without data disclosure. The analysis argues that this approach could enable government and industry to better address systemic cyber risks.New York PostThe time for talk is over — Trump needs to get tough with IranAn opinion piece argues that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding is failing after Iranian forces attacked three commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting the US to strike nearly 100 military targets in response, with President Trump dismissing negotiations as a "waste of time." The author, Mark Dubowitz of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, advocates for reimposing maximum pressure through crushing sanctions, a naval blockade on Iranian ports, and direct support to the Iranian people to permanently dismantle the regime's nuclear program and end state sponsorship of terrorism.IranintlPolicy brief urges removal, not dilution, of Iran uranium stockpileThe Foundation for Defense of Democracies issued a policy brief warning that diluting Iran's enriched uranium stockpile would be reversible and preserve breakout capability. It recommends immediate destruction or export to an IAEA fuel bank for controlled storage.AirandspaceforcesA Cyber Force With No Enlisted? Not So Fast, Some Experts SayA commission led by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies has released a report recommending a new U.S. Cyber Force military service with no enlisted personnel, relying instead on commissioned and warrant officers to attract cyber talent with officer-level pay. The Senate Armed Services Committee recently voted 14-13 against a separate Cyber Force proposal under the Department of the Army for the 2027 defense policy bill, though proponents expect to continue pushing the initiative. The proposal has sparked debate among military experts, with some arguing that enlisted cyber personnel already perform critical work and that the military mission itself outweighs financial incentives as a recruiting draw.FocustaiwanTaiwan needs layered defenses against China's 'robot wolves': ExpertCraig Singleton, senior director of the China Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), has advised Taiwan to develop layered defenses against China's emerging "robot wolf" four-legged ground robotic systems that have appeared in People's Liberation Army training footage. Singleton states these systems could allow China to deploy machines rather than soldiers during the opening stages of an invasion, helping preserve manpower, and recommends multiple affordable defensive layers including rapid detection of unmanned ground systems, electronic warfare capabilities, signal jamming, and urban counter-robot training. Taiwan's National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology recently unveiled three prototypes of robotic dogs for military use as part of efforts to counter the threat.DefensescoopA Cyber Force without enlisted? New report poses model for standalone military cyber organizationA joint commission from the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies published a report proposing a model for an independent U.S. Cyber Force that would cost approximately $11 billion through reallocated funds, employ around 30,000 uniformed and civilian personnel, and reach initial operating capacity within 18 months. The proposed force would be staffed exclusively by commissioned officers, warrant officers, civilians, and contractors — excluding enlisted service members — citing compensation disparities, lengthy training pipelines, and the need for technical career tracks. Former military cyber officials have pushed back on the proposal, arguing that enlisted personnel provide critical operational value, administrative functions, and a unique culture that an officer-only force would lose.IndustrialcyberWeak authentication, exposed ICS environments heighten concerns over Iranian cyber intrusions into US critical infrastructureIranian-aligned cyber actors are increasingly targeting weakly secured U.S. critical infrastructure, exploiting gaps in basic cyber hygiene and exposed industrial control systems, according to a policy analysis by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). The report highlights that attackers accessed OT infrastructure including gas station tank gauge systems exposed online with default or no passwords, manipulating display data without altering actual fuel levels. The FDD warns that these intrusions reflect a sustained campaign against energy, water, and essential services sectors, with U.S. agencies repeatedly flagging Iran-linked efforts to exploit internet-facing programmable logic controllers and supervisory control systems.Fox NewsInside China’s AI ‘wolf pack’ drones built with Taiwan conflict in mindChina is developing AI-enabled robotic "wolf packs" with quadruped robots designed for reconnaissance, supply, and combat support operations, according to a Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) report analyzing Beijing's military modernization. The PLA is reportedly moving beyond demonstrations toward integrating networked expendable machines into coordinated battlefield units, particularly for a potential Taiwan invasion scenario where unmanned systems could absorb initial losses and sustain offensive momentum while reducing personnel risks. The report warns that China's ability to leverage its commercial technology sector could give it production scaling advantages over U.S. competitors.