Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Full company profile

uuid0006h1h

Namestring
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Legal namestring
National Academy of Sciences
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1863
Descriptiontext

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) is a private, nonprofit institution established by an Act of Congress signed by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 to provide independent, evidence-based advice to the U.S. federal government on science, engineering, and medicine. It operates as a federation of three separately chartered academies—the National Academy of Sciences (1863), the National Academy of Engineering (1964), and the National Academy of Medicine (1970)—with the National Research Council functioning as its operating arm. Its core "products" are consensus study reports (over 200 published annually), peer-reviewed through an independent Office of Peer Review, alongside the PNAS scientific journal, the Transportation Research Board's research and convening activities, and an extensive portfolio of fellowship programs (including the new Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship, Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships, and NRC Research Associateships). The organization also operates program centers such as the Gulf Research Program, the Center for Advancing Science and Technology, and the Center for Health, People, and Places.

NASEM's go-to-market is overwhelmingly direct-to-government: it responds to congressional mandates, federal agency sponsorships (FAA, NIH, DOE, NSF, CDC, EPA, NOAA, DoD), and state/local government requests, coordinated through the Office of Congressional and Government Affairs. Funding comes from a mix of government appropriations, congressionally mandated study sponsorships, foundation grants (e.g., Schmidt Sciences), settlement funds (e.g., Deepwater Horizon criminal settlement funding the Gulf Research Program), publication revenue from PNAS and National Academies Press, and program fees for administered fellowships. Consensus study reports are distributed free to the public, while paid products include books and journal subscriptions.

The organization fulfills its mission through over 20,000 volunteers, Academy members, and staff annually, with approximately 6,000 top experts volunteering on projects each year. Its competitive advantage rests on its congressionally chartered status, 160+ years of brand authority, rigorous committee balance and conflict-of-interest policies, and an unmatched pipeline of elected Academy members. Recent strategic activity includes new fellowship and awards programs, philanthropic partnerships, and a notable leadership transition with Tsu-Jae King Liu becoming President of the National Academy of Engineering in July 2025.

Short descriptiontext

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private, congressionally chartered nonprofit that provides independent, evidence-based scientific and policy advice to the U.S. federal government, state and local governments, and the public through consensus study reports, peer-reviewed journals, fellowship programs, and convening activities.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
1,001–5,000
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices4 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
science policy advisory, consensus study reports, research fellowships, peer-reviewed publications, transportation research board
Industry3 codes
1Research & Science Grantmaking Foundations
CodeBPAGAKAIPrimaryYes
2Science, Technology & Innovation Administration (National R&D Policy)
CodeBPAIAAAKPrimaryNo
3Scientific & Laboratory Reference (Chemistry, Biology, Physics; Methods & Protocols)
CodeEDAGAGAGPrimaryNo
NAICS code3 codes
  • Scientific Research and Development Services5417
  • Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services54169
  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences54171
SIC code2 codes
  • Services-Engineering Services8711
  • Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research8731
Product category
Science Policy Advisory Services
Social media profiles2 records
GTM motion2 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model4 records
1Government Funding and Sponsorships
TypeProfessional Services
Description

Primary funding comes from government sponsors including Congress, federal agencies (such as the FAA, NIH, DOE, NSF), and state/local governments. Many studies are congressionally mandated, providing a steady stream of advisory work.

nationalacademies.org
2Foundation and Philanthropic Support
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Private foundations provide funding for specific research initiatives and programs, such as the Schmidt Sciences partnership for science communications awards.

nationalacademies.org
3Publications Revenue
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Revenue from scientific journals including PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), PNAS Nexus, and book sales through National Academies Press.

nationalacademies.org
4Fellowship and Program Fees
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Administer fellowship programs on behalf of government agencies, private foundations, and sponsoring organizations, with program fees supporting operations.

nationalacademies.org
Marketing channels8 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure
Pricing details3 tiers
1Free consensus reports and publications
ModelFreemiumBilling cadenceAnnual
Notes

All consensus study reports are available online for free. The organization states reports are 'frequently accompanied by summary materials, infographics, or interactive overviews' at no cost.

nationalacademies.org
2Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceAnnual
Notes

Award amounts range from $20,000 to $40,000 per recipient, with 24 awards totaling $640,000 presented to science communicators.

nationalacademies.org
3National Academies Press publications
ModelOne time/ perpetual licenseBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Physical and digital publications available for purchase through National Academies Press, with members receiving 10% discount.

nationalacademies.org
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 of 4 records shown
1National Research Council (NRC)
Description

The operating arm of the National Academies that carries out studies, workshops, and advisory activities.

nationalacademies.org
+3 more records
Core offering1 text field

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provides independent, evidence-based advice to the U.S. government and the public on complex issues in science, engineering, and medicine. Core offerings include peer-reviewed consensus study reports, scientific journals (notably PNAS), the Transportation Research Board's research and convening activities, administered fellowship programs, public engagement resources, and books and reports published through the National Academies Press.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • Over 200 publications and products published annually
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private, nonprofit organization established by an Act of Congress in 1863 that provides independent, objective advice to advance science, engineering, and medicine. The organization operates as a platform of interconnected programs rather than a single unified product. Its core offerings include: (1) Consensus Study Reports — peer-reviewed expert reports on scientific and policy topics; (2) PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) — a premier scientific journal; (3) Transportation Research Board (TRB) — transportation research and convening activities; (4) Fellowship Programs administered through the Office of Fellowships, including the Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships, NRC Research Associateship Programs, and the new Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship Program; (5) Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications; (6) Convening Activities including forums, roundtables, workshops, and conferences; and (7) the Based on Science public information resource. The organization also operates specialized centers including the Center for Advancing Science and Technology, Center for Health, People, and Places, and the Gulf Research Program. Together, these products and programs support the organization's mission to provide evidence-based guidance to policymakers and the public.

Product and service11 records
1Consensus Study Reports
CategoryAdvisory Reports
2Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
CategoryScientific Journal
3Transportation Research Board (TRB)
CategoryResearch Program
4Office of Fellowships Programs
CategoryFellowship Program
5Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships
CategoryFellowship Program
6Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications
CategoryAward Program
7National Academies Press (NAP)
CategoryPublishing
8Gulf Research Program
CategoryResearch Program
9Center for Advancing Science and Technology
CategoryProgram Center
10Center for Health, People, and Places
CategoryProgram Center
11Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship Program
CategoryFellowship Program
Scale indicator8 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership6 partners
Strategic tierFlagshipTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-06-25
Description

Co-hosting 'Revolutions in Science: Discovery, Imagination, and the Future' symposium to explore ideas, technologies, and people that have shaped the American scientific enterprise during the U.S. 250th anniversary celebration.

Strategic tierMajorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-04-23
Description

Gulf Futures Challenge winner awarded $20 million to transform eight Gulf Coast Community Health Centers into energy-independent Learning Resilience Hubs, expandable to 135 centers.

Strategic tierMajorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-04-23
Description

Gulf Futures Challenge winner awarded $20 million to repurpose aging offshore oil and gas platforms into multi-use hubs for habitat conservation, aquaculture, ocean monitoring, renewable energy, and critical mineral research.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-01-01
Description

Partnership with Schmidt Sciences to present the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications, awarding $640,000 across 24 recipients in 2026.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-01-01
Description

Public-private partnership network of 17 advanced manufacturing institutes. The National Academies study and provide recommendations on strengthening this network as part of industrial strategy reports.

6National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO)
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-01-01
Description

Federal coordination office for nanotechnology R&D. National Academies conduct quadrennial reviews of the National Nanotechnology Initiative as mandated by Congress.

nationalacademies.org
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The U.S. federal agency that funds non-medical basic research and serves as a key partner/sponsor for NASEM studies. Comparable as a major actor in U.S. science policy, though NSF is a government funder rather than an independent advisory body.

TypeDirect peer
Description

A pan-European network that provides independent science policy advice to EU institutions, drawing on national academies across Europe. Comparable in function as a science advisory body serving government policymakers.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The UK national scientific academy, founded in 1660, serves as the British government's independent advisor on science. Directly comparable to NASEM in mission, prestige, and consensus-based advisory function, though smaller in scale.

TypeDirect peer
Description

A Canadian nonprofit that produces independent expert assessments on science, technology, and policy topics for the Canadian government. Operates with a nearly identical consensus-study model and federal advisory mandate as NASEM.

TypeRegional player
Description

Germany's largest nonprofit scientific research organization, operating 86+ Max Planck Institutes conducting basic research. Comparable in scale and prestige as a non-governmental research institution, but primarily a research performer rather than a consensus advisor.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The largest general scientific society in the world, publisher of Science magazine and a broader advocacy organization. Comparable to NASEM in publishing scientific content and engaging policymakers, but with a much wider membership-based mandate rather than consensus-study focus.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Canada's primary federal research and advisory organization, operating under a similar mandate to provide science and technology advice to the Canadian government. Comparable in scale, structure, and federal advisory role.

TypeRegional player
Description

China's premier national scientific institution, conducting large-scale research and advising the Chinese government on science policy. Comparable in scale and national advisory role, but state-operated rather than independently chartered.

TypeRegional player
Description

India's national scientific academy, established in 1935, representing Indian scientists and advising the government on science policy. Comparable as a national honorific academy with an advisory mandate.

TypeRegional player
Description

Germany's largest scientific research organization, operating 18 research centers across energy, health, and earth systems. Comparable in scale and breadth but primarily a research performer with a different governance model.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers11 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature3 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles24 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment1 record

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Science Policy Advisory Servicesnationalacademies.org

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private, congressionally chartered nonprofit that provides independent, evidence-based scientific and policy advice to the U.S. federal government, state and local governments, and the public through consensus study reports, peer-reviewed journals, fellowship programs, and convening activities.

What National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine does

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) is a private, nonprofit institution established by an Act of Congress signed by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 to provide independent, evidence-based advice to the U.S. federal government on science, engineering, and medicine. It operates as a federation of three separately chartered academies—the National Academy of Sciences (1863), the National Academy of Engineering (1964), and the National Academy of Medicine (1970)—with the National Research Council functioning as its operating arm. Its core "products" are consensus study reports (over 200 published annually), peer-reviewed through an independent Office of Peer Review, alongside the PNAS scientific journal, the Transportation Research Board's research and convening activities, and an extensive portfolio of fellowship programs (including the new Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship, Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships, and NRC Research Associateships). The organization also operates program centers such as the Gulf Research Program, the Center for Advancing Science and Technology, and the Center for Health, People, and Places.

NASEM's go-to-market is overwhelmingly direct-to-government: it responds to congressional mandates, federal agency sponsorships (FAA, NIH, DOE, NSF, CDC, EPA, NOAA, DoD), and state/local government requests, coordinated through the Office of Congressional and Government Affairs. Funding comes from a mix of government appropriations, congressionally mandated study sponsorships, foundation grants (e.g., Schmidt Sciences), settlement funds (e.g., Deepwater Horizon criminal settlement funding the Gulf Research Program), publication revenue from PNAS and National Academies Press, and program fees for administered fellowships. Consensus study reports are distributed free to the public, while paid products include books and journal subscriptions.

The organization fulfills its mission through over 20,000 volunteers, Academy members, and staff annually, with approximately 6,000 top experts volunteering on projects each year. Its competitive advantage rests on its congressionally chartered status, 160+ years of brand authority, rigorous committee balance and conflict-of-interest policies, and an unmatched pipeline of elected Academy members. Recent strategic activity includes new fellowship and awards programs, philanthropic partnerships, and a notable leadership transition with Tsu-Jae King Liu becoming President of the National Academy of Engineering in July 2025.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine firmographics

Firmographics
Name
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Legal name
National Academy of Sciences
Website
https://nationalacademies.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
1863
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
1,001–5,000 employees
Short description
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private, congressionally chartered nonprofit that provides independent, evidence-based scientific and policy advice to the U.S. federal government, state and local governments, and the public through consensus study reports, peer-reviewed journals, fellowship programs, and convening activities.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine industry classification

Industry
Product category
Science Policy Advisory Services
NAICS
Scientific Research and Development Services (5417), Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services (54169), Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (54171)
SIC
Services-Engineering Services (8711), Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research (8731)
akta.pro primary industry
Research & Science Grantmaking Foundations (BPAGAKAI)
akta.pro secondary industries
Science, Technology & Innovation Administration (National R&D Policy) (BPAIAAAK), Scientific & Laboratory Reference (Chemistry, Biology, Physics; Methods & Protocols) (EDAGAGAG)

Keywords

  • Science policy advisory
  • Consensus study reports
  • Research fellowships
  • Peer-reviewed publications
  • Transportation research board

Where National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices4 records

Markets served

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Government Funding and Sponsorships: Primary funding comes from government sponsors including Congress, federal agencies (such as the FAA, NIH, DOE, NSF), and state/local governments. Many studies are congressionally mandated, providing a steady stream of advisory work.
  2. Foundation and Philanthropic Support: Private foundations provide funding for specific research initiatives and programs, such as the Schmidt Sciences partnership for science communications awards.
  3. Publications Revenue: Revenue from scientific journals including PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), PNAS Nexus, and book sales through National Academies Press.
  4. Fellowship and Program Fees: Administer fellowship programs on behalf of government agencies, private foundations, and sponsoring organizations, with program fees supporting operations.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
FreemiumAnnualFree consensus reports and publications
SubscriptionAnnualEric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications
One time/ perpetual licensePay-as-you-goNational Academies Press publications

Go-to-market motion2 records

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels8 records

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provides independent, evidence-based advice to the U.S. government and the public on complex issues in science, engineering, and medicine. Core offerings include peer-reviewed consensus study reports, scientific journals (notably PNAS), the Transportation Research Board's research and convening activities, administered fellowship programs, public engagement resources, and books and reports published through the National Academies Press.

Product overview

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private, nonprofit organization established by an Act of Congress in 1863 that provides independent, objective advice to advance science, engineering, and medicine. The organization operates as a platform of interconnected programs rather than a single unified product. Its core offerings include: (1) Consensus Study Reports — peer-reviewed expert reports on scientific and policy topics; (2) PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) — a premier scientific journal; (3) Transportation Research Board (TRB) — transportation research and convening activities; (4) Fellowship Programs administered through the Office of Fellowships, including the Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships, NRC Research Associateship Programs, and the new Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship Program; (5) Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications; (6) Convening Activities including forums, roundtables, workshops, and conferences; and (7) the Based on Science public information resource. The organization also operates specialized centers including the Center for Advancing Science and Technology, Center for Health, People, and Places, and the Gulf Research Program. Together, these products and programs support the organization's mission to provide evidence-based guidance to policymakers and the public.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • National Research Council (NRC): The operating arm of the National Academies that carries out studies, workshops, and advisory activities.
  • Transportation Research Board (TRB)
  • National Academies Press (NAP)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)

Products and services

  • Consensus Study Reports
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
  • Transportation Research Board (TRB)
  • Office of Fellowships Programs
  • Gulf Research Program Science Policy Fellowships
  • Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications
  • National Academies Press (NAP)
  • Gulf Research Program
  • Center for Advancing Science and Technology
  • Center for Health, People, and Places
  • Biotechnology Regulatory Fellowship Program

Quantifiable outcome

  • Over 200 publications and products published annually
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Customer profile

Named customers11 records

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles2 records

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature3 records

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Six partnerships are on record, tiered flagship, major and core.

  • Smithsonian InstitutionflagshipStrategic or Co-development Partner · 25 June 2026Co-hosting 'Revolutions in Science: Discovery, Imagination, and the Future' symposium to explore ideas, technologies, and people that have shaped the American scientific enterprise during the U.S. 250th anniversary celebration.
  • Louisiana Public Health InstitutemajorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 23 April 2026Gulf Futures Challenge winner awarded $20 million to transform eight Gulf Coast Community Health Centers into energy-independent Learning Resilience Hubs, expandable to 135 centers.
  • Gulf Offshore Research InstitutemajorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 23 April 2026Gulf Futures Challenge winner awarded $20 million to repurpose aging offshore oil and gas platforms into multi-use hubs for habitat conservation, aquaculture, ocean monitoring, renewable energy, and critical mineral research.
  • Schmidt SciencescoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2026Partnership with Schmidt Sciences to present the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications, awarding $640,000 across 24 recipients in 2026.
  • Manufacturing USA NetworkcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2026Public-private partnership network of 17 advanced manufacturing institutes. The National Academies study and provide recommendations on strengthening this network as part of industrial strategy reports.
  • National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2025Federal coordination office for nanotechnology R&D. National Academies conduct quadrennial reviews of the National Nanotechnology Initiative as mandated by Congress.

Scale indicators8 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • National Science Foundation (NSF): The U.S. federal agency that funds non-medical basic research and serves as a key partner/sponsor for NASEM studies. Comparable as a major actor in U.S. science policy, though NSF is a government funder rather than an independent advisory body.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS): The largest general scientific society in the world, publisher of Science magazine and a broader advocacy organization. Comparable to NASEM in publishing scientific content and engaging policymakers, but with a much wider membership-based mandate rather than consensus-study focus.

Direct peers

  • European Academies' Science Advisory Council: A pan-European network that provides independent science policy advice to EU institutions, drawing on national academies across Europe. Comparable in function as a science advisory body serving government policymakers.
  • Royal Society: The UK national scientific academy, founded in 1660, serves as the British government's independent advisor on science. Directly comparable to NASEM in mission, prestige, and consensus-based advisory function, though smaller in scale.
  • Council of Canadian Academies: A Canadian nonprofit that produces independent expert assessments on science, technology, and policy topics for the Canadian government. Operates with a nearly identical consensus-study model and federal advisory mandate as NASEM.
  • National Research Council of Canada: Canada's primary federal research and advisory organization, operating under a similar mandate to provide science and technology advice to the Canadian government. Comparable in scale, structure, and federal advisory role.

Regional players

  • Max Planck Society: Germany's largest nonprofit scientific research organization, operating 86+ Max Planck Institutes conducting basic research. Comparable in scale and prestige as a non-governmental research institution, but primarily a research performer rather than a consensus advisor.
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences: China's premier national scientific institution, conducting large-scale research and advising the Chinese government on science policy. Comparable in scale and national advisory role, but state-operated rather than independently chartered.
  • Indian National Science Academy: India's national scientific academy, established in 1935, representing Indian scientists and advising the government on science policy. Comparable as a national honorific academy with an advisory mandate.
  • Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres: Germany's largest scientific research organization, operating 18 research centers across energy, health, and earth systems. Comparable in scale and breadth but primarily a research performer with a different governance model.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine social profiles

Digital presence

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles24 records

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments1 record

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

What does National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine do?

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provides independent, evidence-based advice to the U.S. government and the public on complex issues in science, engineering, and medicine. Core offerings include peer-reviewed consensus study reports, scientific journals (notably PNAS), the Transportation Research Board's research and convening activities, administered fellowship programs, public engagement resources, and books and reports published through the National Academies Press.

Is National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine a public or private company?

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine founded?

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine was founded in 1863. It employs 1,001 to 5,000 people.

Where is National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine based?

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

How does National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine make money?

Four revenue lines are on record. Government Funding and Sponsorships are the primary driver. The others are foundation and Philanthropic Support, publications Revenue and fellowship and Program Fees.

Who are National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are National Science Foundation (NSF) and American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Direct peers are European Academies' Science Advisory Council, Royal Society, Council of Canadian Academies and National Research Council of Canada. Regional players are Max Planck Society, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Indian National Science Academy and Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres.

Does National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have an API?

No public API is recorded for National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

What industry is National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in?

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's product category is Science Policy Advisory Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAKAI, Research & Science Grantmaking Foundations, with a secondary code of BPAIAAAK, Science, Technology & Innovation Administration (National R&D Policy). Its NAICS code is 5417 and its SIC code is 8711.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Federal News NetworkA dispute involving the National Academies continues to test the suspension and debarment systemThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine faces a debarment review after the president directed debarring officials to consider ending its federal funding. The dispute highlights how presidential pressure can complicate the suspension and debarment system, which normally relies on agency-led, ground-up reviews. The case will be watched for official action on SAM.gov and congressional involvement.NPRWhy medical diagnosis error is a crisis : Short Wave : NPRNearly every person will experience at least one diagnostic error in their lifetime, according to a 2015 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The episode features a physician affected by the crisis and New York Times editor and author of The Elusive Body.The Daily CallerIt’s Time For Accountability At The National Academies Of ScienceThe National Academies of Science withdrew a controversial climate science chapter from its judicial reference manual following pressure from state attorneys general, Congress, and the Trump administration due to identified conflicts of interest. The organization also published an attribution report that continued to involve Michael Burger, an attorney representing plaintiffs in climate lawsuits against energy companies. Congressional committees have launched investigations into the National Academies' adherence to conflict-of-interest policies.PhysicsWhite House calls for science funding shake-up, US caps length of student visas, and moreThe Department of Homeland Security finalized new immigration rules ending the 'duration of status' for international students, capping F and J visa stays at four years and shortening post-graduation grace periods. Simultaneously, the White House Office of Science and Technology released a report calling for a fundamental redesign of federal science funding to prioritize individual researchers over elite institutions, while President Trump proposed suspending federal funding for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.Le Monde.frL’administration Trump annule un rapport de référence sur l’Arctique, une nouvelle atteinte à la science du climat aux Etats-UnisThe White House confirmed that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will not publish the 2026 reference report on the state of the Arctic, marking a cessation of the annual publication since 2006. This decision follows a broader pattern of the Trump administration rolling back climate science initiatives, including the removal of a climate chapter from a judicial reference work by the National Academies of Sciences. Scientists have expressed strong disappointment, viewing the move as an attempt to suppress critical data on global warming.NationalacademiesOpportunities for Strengthening and Updating Crisis Standards of Care: A Rapid Expert Consultation - Public BriefingThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are conducting a rapid expert consultation to examine gaps in crisis standards of care (CSC) frameworks and identify opportunities to strengthen them. The consultation draws on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergencies, addressing emerging challenges and evolving threat scenarios. It will inform near-term decision-making but will not produce formal findings or policy advice.The Seattle TimesTop science body deletes climate chapter from judges’ manualThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine removed a climate science chapter from a judges’ reference manual after criticism from Republican officials, including President Donald Trump, who accused the organization of climate fraud. The chapter was the first on climate science in the manual and was taken down while an independent review of its development process is underway. The controversy involves allegations of partisanship and concerns about the accuracy of climate science information used in legal contexts.UmtMontana Climate Scientist Co-Authors Report on Drought in a Changing ClimateDr. Zachary Hoylman, an assistant state climatologist at the Montana Climate Office, co-authored a report for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine on evolving drought assessment methods in the United States. The committee recommended new approaches to account for climate-driven drying, distinguishing it from temporary drought conditions to better support operational monitoring and community planning. This work aims to provide farmers, water managers, and communities with improved risk information as hydroclimatic conditions change.NationalacademiesNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicineThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine engage with various stakeholders to provide evidence-based advice on scientific and health-related issues. They facilitate discussions among experts and policymakers on challenges like artificial intelligence in cancer care and transportation systems. Their efforts aim to improve public understanding and advance the U.S. economy through innovation and technical workforce development.Marijuana MomentFAA Considers New Marijuana Standards For Pilots And Air Traffic Controllers Under Trump’s Rescheduling MoveThe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is partnering with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to develop new marijuana-related standards for pilots and air traffic controllers in response to the Trump administration's rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III. The FAA is funding four meetings over 12 months with over $200,000 to address the "operational risk" and policy misalignment created by the dual-status regulatory environment, including determining when individuals are fit for duty after cannabis use. The agency aims to implement new cannabis policies within 12-18 months while existing DOT drug testing requirements remain unchanged.