Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Public Library of Science

Full company profile

uuid00074ty

Namestring
Public Library of Science
Legal namestring
Public Library of Science
Websiteurl
plos.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2003
Descriptiontext

Public Library of Science (PLOS) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation founded in 2003 and headquartered in San Francisco, California, with subsidiary offices in Germany and Singapore and an additional office in the United Kingdom. The organization operates a portfolio of 16 peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals spanning life sciences (PLOS Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Pathogens, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS ONE, PLOS Ecosystems), health research (PLOS Medicine, PLOS Global Public Health, PLOS Mental Health, PLOS Digital Health, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, PLOS Aging and Health), sustainability (PLOS Climate, PLOS Water, PLOS Sustainability and Transformation), and cross-disciplinary work (PLOS Complex Systems). All content is published immediately under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, making it freely accessible to anyone with internet access at no charge to readers.

The core technology stack consists of journal websites hosted at journals.plos.org, the public PLOS API for programmatic content access (provided without warranty and subject to modification), and the third-party Editorial Manager system for manuscript submission and peer-review processing. PLOS supplements the journals with the PLOS Blogs network for science communication, curated PLOS Collections, and the Open Science Indicators Dashboard for metrics. AI-enabled tools are deployed in supporting roles for manuscript screening, peer-review support, editorial workflows, research integrity checks, and customer support; the organization explicitly states these tools augment rather than replace human editorial judgment.

PLOS's revenue model is centered on Article Processing Charges (APCs) paid by authors at the point of publication, with fees quoted in USD through Editorial Manager and processed via third-party payment agents. Institutional subscriptions and negotiated agreements with libraries, consortia, and funders — including the Gates Foundation — cover APCs on behalf of affiliated authors in a recurring subscription-style structure. The customer base is structurally diversified across hundreds of thousands of corresponding authors globally, supplemented by institutional agreements with academic libraries and research organizations. Distribution is direct via journal websites, syndicated to third-party platforms, and programmatically accessible via the PLOS API.

Short descriptiontext

PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) open-access publisher operating 16 peer-reviewed scientific journals under CC BY licensing. It serves academic researchers, libraries, and funders worldwide, monetizing through Article Processing Charges and institutional agreements.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
51–100
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United States
HQ citystring
San Francisco
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices5 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
open access publishing, scientific journals, peer-reviewed research, scholarly communication, academic publishing
Industry2 codes
1Academic & Scholarly Journals Publishing (Peer-Reviewed)
CodeMPAJABACPrimaryYes
2Open Access Scholarly Journals & Monographs
CodeEDAGAFAJPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Periodical Publishers513120
  • Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishers5131
SIC code1 code
  • Periodicals: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing2721
Product category
Open-Access Academic Publishing
Social media profiles3 records
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model3 records
1Article Publishing Fees (APCs)
TypeOne Time License
Description

Authors pay publication fees to publish their research in PLOS open-access journals. Fees are denominated in U.S. currency and quoted through Editorial Manager. Institutions, funders, and consortia may pay on behalf of authors.

plos.org
2Institutional Subscriptions and Agreements
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

PLOS offers institutional sales and agreements with libraries, consortia, and funders. These negotiated agreements govern publication fees for affiliated authors and provide access to PLOS services.

plos.org
3Nonprofit Mission-Driven Revenue
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

As a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, PLOS operates with a mission-driven approach prioritizing research enterprise needs over shareholder returns. Revenue supports open science publishing operations.

plos.org
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure
Pricing details1 tier
1Standard Article Publishing Fee
ModelTransaction based/ take rateBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Authors pay applicable publication fees listed on PLOS fees page. Institutions and consortia pay based on negotiated agreements. No specific price points are publicly disclosed on source pages.

plos.org
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeDigital Commerce or Conte…
Digital Commerce or Content
Core offering1 text field

PLOS operates a portfolio of 16 peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals across life sciences, health, sustainability, and technology disciplines. Authors pay article processing charges (APCs) to publish under CC BY license, with institutional agreements enabling libraries, consortia, and funders to cover publication fees for affiliated researchers. All content is freely accessible worldwide through journal websites, third-party syndication, and a public PLOS API.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 2 values shown
  • Anyone with internet access can find, read, mine, cite and share OA articles at no cost to them
+1 more record
Product overview1 text field

Public Library of Science (PLOS) is a non-profit open science publisher operating a portfolio of peer-reviewed open access journals across scientific disciplines. The portfolio includes 16 journals covering life sciences (PLOS Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Pathogens, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS ONE, PLOS Ecosystems, PLOS Aging and Health), health research (PLOS Medicine, PLOS Global Public Health, PLOS Mental Health, PLOS Digital Health), sustainability (PLOS Climate, PLOS Water, PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases), and cross-disciplinary work (PLOS Complex Systems). PLOS also operates supporting platforms including PLOS Blogs for science communication, PLOS Collections for curated article bundles, the Open Science Indicators Dashboard for metrics, and provides access via a public PLOS API. All PLOS content is published under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license for open access.

Product and service16 records
1PLOS Biology
CategoryLife Sciences Journal
Description

A peer-reviewed open-access journal dedicated to all aspects of biology, from molecular to ecosystem scale.

2PLOS Medicine
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

A leading medical journal publishing human health research of the highest standards.

3PLOS Computational Biology
CategoryLife Sciences Journal
Description

An open-access journal featuring research in computational biology and bioinformatics.

4PLOS Genetics
CategoryLife Sciences Journal
Description

An open-access journal publishing research in genetics and genomics.

5PLOS Pathogens
CategoryLife Sciences Journal
Description

A journal dedicated to pathogens, host biology, and immunity research.

6PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

The leading open-access journal focused on neglected tropical diseases.

7PLOS ONE
CategoryMultidisciplinary Journal
Description

A broad-scope, rigorous peer-reviewed open-access journal covering all aspects of science and technology.

8PLOS Global Public Health
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

An open-access journal addressing global public health challenges and inequities.

9PLOS Climate
CategorySustainability Journal
Description

A multidisciplinary open-access journal dedicated to climate change research.

10PLOS Digital Health
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

An open-access journal dedicated to digital health research spanning health informatics, wearable devices, and health data science.

11PLOS Complex Systems
CategoryMultidisciplinary Journal
Description

An open-access journal focusing on complex systems research across scientific disciplines.

12PLOS Mental Health
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

An open-access journal dedicated to mental health research across all disciplines.

13PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
CategorySustainability Journal
Description

An open-access journal addressing global challenges of transitioning to a resource-efficient, food-secure, sustainable future.

14PLOS Water
CategorySustainability Journal
Description

An open-access journal bringing together research on water as a vital resource for societies worldwide.

15PLOS Aging and Health
CategoryHealth Sciences Journal
Description

A journal focusing on research addressing human aging and health across the lifespan.

16PLOS Ecosystems
CategorySustainability Journal
Description

An open-access journal publishing research on ecosystems and ecological systems.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership5 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Gates Foundation partnership mentioned in announcements section of PLOS website. The foundation has been a significant funder and partner in advancing open science and global health research publishing. PLOS engages with major funders on policy and publication initiatives.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

World Vision partnered with Emory University to conduct research on women's water collection burden and economic empowerment. World Vision developed the Strong Women Strong World: Beyond Access (SWSW) program, and partnered with Emory to lead research testing hypotheses about women's water access and economic engagement.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Emory University led mixed-methods research design and implementation in partnership with World Vision across Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya, and Zimbabwe. Research focused on women's water collection burden and economic engagement, resulting in publications in PLOS Global Public Health and PLOS Water.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

PLOS partnership with UNC Water Institute for the UNC Water and Health Conference Collection. Partnership spans PLOS Water and PLOS Sustainability and Transformation journals to publish critical research in the WASH sector (water, hygiene, and sanitation).

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Professor Sera Young from Northwestern University serves as co-Editor-in-Chief of PLOS Water journal, providing editorial leadership and academic oversight for the journal.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeOthers
Description

Open-access preprint repository in physics, mathematics, computer science, and quantitative biology. arXiv is an adjacent, ecosystem-level participant in open scholarly communication that influences author submission behavior toward or away from traditional OA journals like PLOS.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Largest STM publisher with an extensive open-access journal portfolio (including BMC, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports) plus hybrid and subscription journals converting to OA. A broad incumbent that competes with PLOS across the full open-access spectrum and is the primary counterparty in many institutional transformative agreements.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open-access publisher of peer-reviewed journals in the biological and medical sciences. PeerJ uses an APC-based model similar to PLOS, targets academic researchers and institutions, and is often compared with PLOS ONE on broad-scope life-sciences publishing.

4Open Library of Humanities
TypeEmerging player
Description

Nonprofit, library-funded open-access publisher in the humanities. It is a like-for-like nonprofit OA publisher peer that shares PLOS's mission-driven model, though it operates in HSS journals rather than STM, making it an emerging peer in open science publishing broadly.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Swiss-based open-access publisher with a large portfolio of peer-reviewed journals across science, health, and sustainability. Frontiers competes head-to-head with PLOS for the same APC-funded author base and has overlapping journal scopes in life sciences, climate, and health.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit open-access publisher of peer-reviewed research in life and medical sciences. eLife is a direct peer to PLOS in mission, nonprofit governance, and OA publishing model, and is often cited alongside PLOS Biology and PLOS Medicine as a destination for high-profile biomedical research.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Springer Nature's open-access journal portfolio covering STM disciplines. BMC is a direct peer to PLOS: both publish large portfolios of peer-reviewed OA journals funded primarily through APCs and serve the same academic author and institutional customer base.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Open-research publishing platform using post-publication peer review and APCs. F1000 is an emerging peer whose open, transparent peer-review model overlaps with PLOS's open-science mission and competes for researchers seeking novel review workflows.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory preprint servers for biology and clinical sciences. They are not traditional journals but are emerging players in scholarly communication that compete with PLOS journals for author attention, early research dissemination, and version-of-record decisions.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open-access publisher with a very large APC-funded journal portfolio spanning the sciences. MDPI is a direct peer in business model and target market, often competing with PLOS on turnaround time, scope breadth, and APC pricing.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers5 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
Yes
API detail
Has APIbool
Yes

Docs URL, Description

AI capability2 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature3 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles4 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
Compliance1 record

Each record includes

Name, Class, Description

Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Public Library of Science

Open-Access Academic Publishingplos.org

PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) open-access publisher operating 16 peer-reviewed scientific journals under CC BY licensing. It serves academic researchers, libraries, and funders worldwide, monetizing through Article Processing Charges and institutional agreements.

What Public Library of Science does

Public Library of Science (PLOS) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation founded in 2003 and headquartered in San Francisco, California, with subsidiary offices in Germany and Singapore and an additional office in the United Kingdom. The organization operates a portfolio of 16 peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals spanning life sciences (PLOS Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Pathogens, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS ONE, PLOS Ecosystems), health research (PLOS Medicine, PLOS Global Public Health, PLOS Mental Health, PLOS Digital Health, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, PLOS Aging and Health), sustainability (PLOS Climate, PLOS Water, PLOS Sustainability and Transformation), and cross-disciplinary work (PLOS Complex Systems). All content is published immediately under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, making it freely accessible to anyone with internet access at no charge to readers.

The core technology stack consists of journal websites hosted at journals.plos.org, the public PLOS API for programmatic content access (provided without warranty and subject to modification), and the third-party Editorial Manager system for manuscript submission and peer-review processing. PLOS supplements the journals with the PLOS Blogs network for science communication, curated PLOS Collections, and the Open Science Indicators Dashboard for metrics. AI-enabled tools are deployed in supporting roles for manuscript screening, peer-review support, editorial workflows, research integrity checks, and customer support; the organization explicitly states these tools augment rather than replace human editorial judgment.

PLOS's revenue model is centered on Article Processing Charges (APCs) paid by authors at the point of publication, with fees quoted in USD through Editorial Manager and processed via third-party payment agents. Institutional subscriptions and negotiated agreements with libraries, consortia, and funders — including the Gates Foundation — cover APCs on behalf of affiliated authors in a recurring subscription-style structure. The customer base is structurally diversified across hundreds of thousands of corresponding authors globally, supplemented by institutional agreements with academic libraries and research organizations. Distribution is direct via journal websites, syndicated to third-party platforms, and programmatically accessible via the PLOS API.

Public Library of Science firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Public Library of Science
Legal name
Public Library of Science
Website
https://plos.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2003
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
51–100 employees
Short description
PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) open-access publisher operating 16 peer-reviewed scientific journals under CC BY licensing. It serves academic researchers, libraries, and funders worldwide, monetizing through Article Processing Charges and institutional agreements.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Public Library of Science industry classification

Industry
Product category
Open-Access Academic Publishing
NAICS
Periodical Publishers (513120), Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishers (5131)
SIC
Periodicals: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing (2721)
akta.pro primary industry
Academic & Scholarly Journals Publishing (Peer-Reviewed) (MPAJABAC)
akta.pro secondary industry
Open Access Scholarly Journals & Monographs (EDAGAFAJ)

Keywords

  • Open access publishing
  • Scientific journals
  • Peer-reviewed research
  • Scholarly communication
  • Academic publishing

Where Public Library of Science is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
San Francisco
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices5 records

Markets served

Public Library of Science business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Digital Commerce or Content
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Article Publishing Fees (APCs): Authors pay publication fees to publish their research in PLOS open-access journals. Fees are denominated in U.S. currency and quoted through Editorial Manager. Institutions, funders, and consortia may pay on behalf of authors.
  2. Institutional Subscriptions and Agreements: PLOS offers institutional sales and agreements with libraries, consortia, and funders. These negotiated agreements govern publication fees for affiliated authors and provide access to PLOS services.
  3. Nonprofit Mission-Driven Revenue: As a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, PLOS operates with a mission-driven approach prioritizing research enterprise needs over shareholder returns. Revenue supports open science publishing operations.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
Transaction based/ take ratePay-as-you-goStandard Article Publishing Fee

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels6 records

Public Library of Science product offering

Product offering

Core offering

PLOS operates a portfolio of 16 peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals across life sciences, health, sustainability, and technology disciplines. Authors pay article processing charges (APCs) to publish under CC BY license, with institutional agreements enabling libraries, consortia, and funders to cover publication fees for affiliated researchers. All content is freely accessible worldwide through journal websites, third-party syndication, and a public PLOS API.

Product overview

Public Library of Science (PLOS) is a non-profit open science publisher operating a portfolio of peer-reviewed open access journals across scientific disciplines. The portfolio includes 16 journals covering life sciences (PLOS Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Pathogens, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS ONE, PLOS Ecosystems, PLOS Aging and Health), health research (PLOS Medicine, PLOS Global Public Health, PLOS Mental Health, PLOS Digital Health), sustainability (PLOS Climate, PLOS Water, PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases), and cross-disciplinary work (PLOS Complex Systems). PLOS also operates supporting platforms including PLOS Blogs for science communication, PLOS Collections for curated article bundles, the Open Science Indicators Dashboard for metrics, and provides access via a public PLOS API. All PLOS content is published under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license for open access.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • PLOS Biology A peer-reviewed open-access journal dedicated to all aspects of biology, from molecular to ecosystem scale.
  • PLOS Medicine A leading medical journal publishing human health research of the highest standards.
  • PLOS Computational Biology An open-access journal featuring research in computational biology and bioinformatics.
  • PLOS Genetics An open-access journal publishing research in genetics and genomics.
  • PLOS Pathogens A journal dedicated to pathogens, host biology, and immunity research.
  • PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases The leading open-access journal focused on neglected tropical diseases.
  • PLOS ONE A broad-scope, rigorous peer-reviewed open-access journal covering all aspects of science and technology.
  • PLOS Global Public Health An open-access journal addressing global public health challenges and inequities.
  • PLOS Climate A multidisciplinary open-access journal dedicated to climate change research.
  • PLOS Digital Health An open-access journal dedicated to digital health research spanning health informatics, wearable devices, and health data science.
  • PLOS Complex Systems An open-access journal focusing on complex systems research across scientific disciplines.
  • PLOS Mental Health An open-access journal dedicated to mental health research across all disciplines.
  • PLOS Sustainability and Transformation An open-access journal addressing global challenges of transitioning to a resource-efficient, food-secure, sustainable future.
  • PLOS Water An open-access journal bringing together research on water as a vital resource for societies worldwide.
  • PLOS Aging and Health A journal focusing on research addressing human aging and health across the lifespan.
  • PLOS Ecosystems An open-access journal publishing research on ecosystems and ecological systems.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Anyone with internet access can find, read, mine, cite and share OA articles at no cost to them
  • +1 more outcomes

Companies that use Public Library of Science

Customer profile

Named customers5 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Public Library of Science technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed Yes

API detail

Has API
Yes
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

AI capability2 records

Feature3 records

Public Library of Science partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Five partnerships are on record, tiered core.

  • Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerGates Foundation partnership mentioned in announcements section of PLOS website. The foundation has been a significant funder and partner in advancing open science and global health research publishing. PLOS engages with major funders on policy and publication initiatives.
  • World VisioncoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerWorld Vision partnered with Emory University to conduct research on women's water collection burden and economic empowerment. World Vision developed the Strong Women Strong World: Beyond Access (SWSW) program, and partnered with Emory to lead research testing hypotheses about women's water access and economic engagement.
  • Emory University Rollins School of Public HealthcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerEmory University led mixed-methods research design and implementation in partnership with World Vision across Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya, and Zimbabwe. Research focused on women's water collection burden and economic engagement, resulting in publications in PLOS Global Public Health and PLOS Water.
  • UNC Water InstitutecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPLOS partnership with UNC Water Institute for the UNC Water and Health Conference Collection. Partnership spans PLOS Water and PLOS Sustainability and Transformation journals to publish critical research in the WASH sector (water, hygiene, and sanitation).
  • Northwestern UniversitycoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerProfessor Sera Young from Northwestern University serves as co-Editor-in-Chief of PLOS Water journal, providing editorial leadership and academic oversight for the journal.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Public Library of Science competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Others

  • arXiv: Open-access preprint repository in physics, mathematics, computer science, and quantitative biology. arXiv is an adjacent, ecosystem-level participant in open scholarly communication that influences author submission behavior toward or away from traditional OA journals like PLOS.

Broad incumbents

  • Springer Nature (Open Access portfolio): Largest STM publisher with an extensive open-access journal portfolio (including BMC, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports) plus hybrid and subscription journals converting to OA. A broad incumbent that competes with PLOS across the full open-access spectrum and is the primary counterparty in many institutional transformative agreements.

Direct peers

  • PeerJ: Open-access publisher of peer-reviewed journals in the biological and medical sciences. PeerJ uses an APC-based model similar to PLOS, targets academic researchers and institutions, and is often compared with PLOS ONE on broad-scope life-sciences publishing.
  • Frontiers: Swiss-based open-access publisher with a large portfolio of peer-reviewed journals across science, health, and sustainability. Frontiers competes head-to-head with PLOS for the same APC-funded author base and has overlapping journal scopes in life sciences, climate, and health.
  • eLife: Nonprofit open-access publisher of peer-reviewed research in life and medical sciences. eLife is a direct peer to PLOS in mission, nonprofit governance, and OA publishing model, and is often cited alongside PLOS Biology and PLOS Medicine as a destination for high-profile biomedical research.
  • BioMed Central (BMC): Springer Nature's open-access journal portfolio covering STM disciplines. BMC is a direct peer to PLOS: both publish large portfolios of peer-reviewed OA journals funded primarily through APCs and serve the same academic author and institutional customer base.
  • MDPI: Open-access publisher with a very large APC-funded journal portfolio spanning the sciences. MDPI is a direct peer in business model and target market, often competing with PLOS on turnaround time, scope breadth, and APC pricing.

Emerging players

  • Open Library of Humanities: Nonprofit, library-funded open-access publisher in the humanities. It is a like-for-like nonprofit OA publisher peer that shares PLOS's mission-driven model, though it operates in HSS journals rather than STM, making it an emerging peer in open science publishing broadly.
  • F1000 (F1000Research): Open-research publishing platform using post-publication peer review and APCs. F1000 is an emerging peer whose open, transparent peer-review model overlaps with PLOS's open-science mission and competes for researchers seeking novel review workflows.
  • bioRxiv and medRxiv: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory preprint servers for biology and clinical sciences. They are not traditional journals but are emerging players in scholarly communication that compete with PLOS journals for author attention, early research dissemination, and version-of-record decisions.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Public Library of Science social profiles

Digital presence

Public Library of Science compliance and trust

Trust signal

Compliance1 record

Public Library of Science financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Public Library of Science leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles4 records

Public Library of Science funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Public Library of Science M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Public Library of Science

What does Public Library of Science do?

PLOS operates a portfolio of 16 peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals across life sciences, health, sustainability, and technology disciplines. Authors pay article processing charges (APCs) to publish under CC BY license, with institutional agreements enabling libraries, consortia, and funders to cover publication fees for affiliated researchers. All content is freely accessible worldwide through journal websites, third-party syndication, and a public PLOS API.

Is Public Library of Science a public or private company?

Public Library of Science is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Public Library of Science founded?

Public Library of Science was founded in 2003. It employs 51 to 100 people.

Where is Public Library of Science based?

Public Library of Science is headquartered in San Francisco, United States, in the North America region.

How does Public Library of Science make money?

Three revenue lines are on record. Article Publishing Fees (APCs) is the primary driver. The others are institutional Subscriptions and Agreements and nonprofit Mission-Driven Revenue.

Who are Public Library of Science's main competitors?

arXiv is listed as an others. Springer Nature (Open Access portfolio) is listed as a broad incumbent. Direct peers are PeerJ, Frontiers, eLife, BioMed Central (BMC) and MDPI. Emerging players are Open Library of Humanities, F1000 (F1000Research) and bioRxiv and medRxiv.

Does Public Library of Science have an API?

Yes. PLOS makes certain application programming interfaces available through the PLOS Sites. The PLOS API is provided "as is," without support or warranties of any kind, and PLOS does not guarantee that it will always be available. PLOS may modify or discontinue the PLOS API at any time, temporarily or permanently, with or without notice. Developer documentation is at api.plos.org/api-display-policy.

What industry is Public Library of Science in?

Public Library of Science's product category is Open-Access Academic Publishing. Its primary akta.pro industry code is MPAJABAC, Academic & Scholarly Journals Publishing (Peer-Reviewed), with a secondary code of EDAGAFAJ, Open Access Scholarly Journals & Monographs. Its NAICS code is 513120 and its SIC code is 2721.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Mirage NewsLow-Income Seniors Face Steeper Physical DeclineA study published in PLOS Medicine reveals that low-income seniors in England and Canada experience steeper declines in physical function compared to their wealthier peers, with inequalities being more pronounced in England. The research, analyzing over 31,000 participants, found that the poorest 60-year-olds in England had the walking speed of a wealthy 75-year-old, highlighting significant socioeconomic disparities in aging. Researchers attribute these differences to structural factors rather than just healthcare access or lifestyle, calling for targeted policies to reduce wealth-based health gaps.IolScrolling endlessly to unwind could make you feel worseA study published in PLOS One indicates that problematic internet usage creates a vicious cycle where individuals use online platforms to relieve stress but ultimately experience increased anxiety and lower moods. Researchers from the University of Duisburg-Essen found that while short-term relief may occur, exposure to stressful content and social comparison leads to negative long-term psychological effects.YahooThis simple bodyweight exercise reveals whether your balance is above average for your ageThe article provides instructions for a single-leg stork pose balance test, offering age-specific time benchmarks to help individuals assess their stability and mobility. It cites research from the Mayo Clinic and PLOS ONE indicating that one-legged balance is a significant predictor of healthy aging and mortality risk. The piece also references CDC statistics on falls among older adults to highlight the practical importance of maintaining balance.Nature‘A waste of time for all of us’: caught in the crossfire of the peer-review warsResearchers Maria Ángeles Oviedo-García and Dorothy Bishop have documented 'review mills' — networks of academics who duplicate peer review reports and request citations to their own or collaborators' work — a phenomenon that has grown due to publish-or-perish pressure and AI tools. In one case, biophysical chemist Michael Börsch discovered his paper published in MDPI's International Journal of Molecular Sciences had been flagged with a warning notice after one reviewer was found to have submitted duplicated reviews containing coercive citation requests. Publishers including MDPI, Springer Nature, Elsevier, and PLoS ONE are grappling with how to detect and prevent review-mill activity, which threatens academic integrity and unfairly stigmatizes innocent authors whose papers are implicated.Science NewsA new monkey species has been found deep in Congo’s forestsResearchers discovered a new monkey species, Colobus congoensis, in the dense forests of the Democratic Republic of Congo, confirming its distinct lineage through genetic evidence showing it diverged from the closely related Colobus satanas at least 4 million years ago. The discovery, based on a 2008 photograph and field observations from 2018 to 2022, was published in PLOS ONE on July 15. The new species may already be at risk due to hunting and its limited habitat range of approximately 1,700 square kilometers.HistoryEarly Humans May Have Used Fire 1.8 Million Years Ago, Nearly Doubling the Age of the Oldest Known Evidence for the FeatResearchers published findings in PLOS One suggesting that Homo erectus used fire in Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa, approximately 1.8 million years ago, nearly doubling the previous oldest evidence of such behavior. The conclusion is based on a new luminescence analysis technique applied to burned rodent bones found deep within the cave alongside stone tools. While the study authors argue this indicates active fire maintenance by early humans, some external experts remain skeptical regarding the interpretation of the evidence.EurekAlert!Simulations predict how astronaut team dynamics could impact future Moon base operationsResearchers from George Mason University developed a virtual model to simulate astronaut team dynamics for future Moon base operations, with findings published in PLOS One. The simulations indicate that increasing crew size improves skill advancement and personality compatibility, while longer missions without replacements increase psychological stress and reduce performance. These insights aim to aid NASA's Artemis program planning by optimizing mission success factors beyond engineering systems.EurekAlert!Trafficked pangolin DNA reveals hotspots of illegal wildlife tradeA study published in PLOS Biology details a gene-capture method that successfully traces illegal pangolin trafficking routes and hotspots using degraded DNA samples. The research identified key collection areas in southwest Cameroon, Myanmar, and various African localities, while mapping trade flows across China and Indonesia. These findings aim to support intelligence-driven conservation efforts by revealing the interconnectedness of domestic and international wildlife markets.Chemical & Engineering NewsHow bathwater forensics can provide DNA dataResearch led by Mitsuyo Machida at Tokyo Women’s Medical University demonstrates that short tandem repeat profiling of bathwater can effectively recover DNA profiles from individuals immersed for more than one minute. The study, published in PLOS One, validated this method using both volunteer experiments and samples from real forensic cases, finding sufficient DNA in bathtubs to generate complete or partial genetic fingerprints. These findings suggest bathwater analysis could serve as a supplementary tool to identify persons present at crime scenes.The ScientistOver 90 Percent of Scientists Admit to Questionable Research BehaviorsA survey of over 1,500 researchers at Portuguese universities revealed that 91 percent admitted to engaging in at least one questionable research practice (QRP). The study, published in PLoS One by Marta Entradas and colleagues, indicates widespread ethical grey-area behaviors such as improper authorship attribution and post-hoc hypothesis development. These findings suggest a significant threat to scientific integrity driven by factors like publication pressure and institutional culture.