Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Institute For Justice

Full company profile

uuid0007dvo

Namestring
Institute For Justice
Legal namestring
Institute for Justice
Websiteurl
ij.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1991
Descriptiontext

The Institute for Justice (IJ) is a 501(c)(3) national public interest law firm founded in 1991 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. It litigates constitutional cases in state and federal courts on behalf of individuals and small businesses whose rights have been infringed by government action, organized around four pillars: private property, First Amendment, educational choice, and economic liberty. IJ has argued 13 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court since 2002, winning 11, and reports a nearly 70% success rate across litigation and legislation. Its docket spans 103 active cases in 37 states plus Washington, D.C., and over 400 lifetime cases on behalf of more than 1,300 clients.

IJ does not develop proprietary technology; its core "products" are legal services, original research (e.g., 50-state Policing for Profit and License to Work studies), legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism. These are delivered through direct in-house representation by staff attorneys and supported by issue-specific sub-brands such as the Project on Immunity and Accountability, the Zoning Justice Project, the Food Freedom Initiative, the End Forfeiture Initiative, the IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship, and the Center for Judicial Engagement. Educational channels include four podcasts (Short Circuit, Bound By Oath, Beyond the Brief, Unpublished Opinions), a biweekly Liberty & Law magazine, and active presence on Facebook, X, YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok.

IJ's business model is donor-funded philanthropy, not fee-for-service. It receives no government funding and no payment from clients; 85% of its budget comes from more than 16,000 individual supporters nationwide. Donations are accepted as one-time gifts, monthly recurring, stock, IRA, or planned gifts. The organization has held Charity Navigator's four-star rating continuously since 2002, with recognized transparency and accountability standing. IJ is governed by an independent board and operates without subsidiaries, parent entities, or equity holders.

Short descriptiontext

The Institute for Justice is a 501(c)(3) national public interest law firm, founded in 1991 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, that litigates constitutional cases at no cost on behalf of individuals and small businesses across four pillars: private property, First Amendment, educational choice, and economic liberty, funded almost entirely by private donations.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
101–250
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersArlington, United States
HQ citystring
Arlington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
public interest law firm, constitutional litigation services, civil rights legal advocacy, nonprofit legal representation, individual rights defense
Industry3 codes
1Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAAPrimaryYes
2Rule of Law & Justice Sector Reform
CodeBPADAGABPrimaryNo
3Public Defense & Legal Aid Services
CodeBPAIAFACPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers54111
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Public Interest Legal Services
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Individual Donations
TypeGrants Donations
Description

IJ receives 85% of its funding from individual donors. The organization is powered by more than 16,000 supporters across the country who believe in the Constitution and the ideals it enshrines. Donors can give one-time, monthly, or through various planned giving mechanisms.

ij.org
Marketing channels11 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 of 9 records shown
1Project on Immunity and Accountability
Description

A project dedicated to eliminating qualified immunity and other legal barriers that prevent individuals from holding government officials accountable for constitutional violations.

ij.org
+8 more records
Core offering1 text field

The Institute for Justice is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public interest law firm that provides free legal representation to individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated by government. It litigates cutting-edge cases in state and federal courts across four pillars — economic liberty, private property, First Amendment, and educational choice — and pairs litigation with research, legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism to set precedent.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 6 values shown
  • Nearly 70% success rate through litigation and legislation
+5 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Institute for Justice is a nonprofit, public interest law firm offering legal representation, research, legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism services. Rather than a commercial product company, IJ provides litigation services for constitutional rights cases, publishes research reports and policy studies, advocates for legislative reforms, and produces educational publications including Liberty & Law magazine and multiple podcasts (Short Circuit, Beyond the Brief, Bound By Oath, Unpublished Opinions). IJ also operates supporting programs including the IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship and Center for Judicial Engagement. The organization focuses on four core pillars: Economic Liberty, Private Property, First Amendment, and Educational Choice.

Scale indicator9 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership1 partner
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2023-11-01
Description

IJ has joined with EdChoice—the foundation established by Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and his wife, Rose—to create the Partnership for Educational Choice. After a multi-year transition period within this partnership, EdChoice will take over as the main defender of traditional educational choice programs, while IJ will turn attention to the regulatory barriers that stand in the way of education providers—especially those developing new and innovative models.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeEmerging player
Description

Cato is a libertarian think tank that conducts policy research and occasionally litigates or files amicus briefs. While not a direct litigation peer, it shares IJ's ideological base, donor pool, and influence on constitutional and economic liberty debates.

TypeEmerging player
Description

AFP Foundation is a liberty-oriented advocacy and education organization that engages in litigation support and public policy work. It overlaps with IJ's donor base and shares overlapping themes on economic liberty and limited government.

3Landmark Legal Foundation
TypeDirect peer
Description

Landmark is a conservative public interest law firm litigating constitutional and accountability cases against government overreach. Its mission and donor-funded model are directly comparable to IJ.

TypeRegional player
Description

TPPF is a state-focused think tank and litigation source with a heavy Texas emphasis, engaging in constitutional litigation and policy advocacy on liberty issues. It parallels IJ's economic liberty and property rights work but at a state-focused level.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The ACLU is the largest U.S. public interest law organization, litigating constitutional cases in federal and state courts on First Amendment, due process, and equal protection grounds. It is the closest direct comparable to IJ in terms of mission, federal court practice, and donor-funded model, though ACLU's ideological orientation differs.

TypeDirect peer
Description

PLF is a national public interest law firm focused on property rights, economic liberty, and limited government, directly overlapping IJ's four pillars. Both organizations litigate precedent-setting constitutional cases and accept clients at no cost, funded by private donors.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Goldwater is a liberty-focused public interest law and policy organization litigating in state and federal courts on economic liberty, school choice, and constitutional reform. Its litigation arm parallels IJ's state-court strategy and donor-funded model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The Rutherford Institute is a nonprofit public interest law organization providing free legal representation in First Amendment, religious liberty, and parental rights cases. It directly competes for donor dollars and cases involving government overreach, similar to IJ.

TypeDirect peer
Description

CIR is a public interest law firm that litigates high-impact constitutional and civil rights cases, including First Amendment and equal protection matters. Its federal-court, precedent-driven strategy closely mirrors IJ's approach.

TypeDirect peer
Description

SLF is a national public interest law firm litigating cases involving constitutional rights, limited government, and free enterprise. It competes with IJ for donor support and case selection in overlapping doctrinal areas.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers7 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles16 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Institute For Justice

Public Interest Legal Servicesij.org

The Institute for Justice is a 501(c)(3) national public interest law firm, founded in 1991 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, that litigates constitutional cases at no cost on behalf of individuals and small businesses across four pillars: private property, First Amendment, educational choice, and economic liberty, funded almost entirely by private donations.

What Institute For Justice does

The Institute for Justice (IJ) is a 501(c)(3) national public interest law firm founded in 1991 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. It litigates constitutional cases in state and federal courts on behalf of individuals and small businesses whose rights have been infringed by government action, organized around four pillars: private property, First Amendment, educational choice, and economic liberty. IJ has argued 13 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court since 2002, winning 11, and reports a nearly 70% success rate across litigation and legislation. Its docket spans 103 active cases in 37 states plus Washington, D.C., and over 400 lifetime cases on behalf of more than 1,300 clients.

IJ does not develop proprietary technology; its core "products" are legal services, original research (e.g., 50-state Policing for Profit and License to Work studies), legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism. These are delivered through direct in-house representation by staff attorneys and supported by issue-specific sub-brands such as the Project on Immunity and Accountability, the Zoning Justice Project, the Food Freedom Initiative, the End Forfeiture Initiative, the IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship, and the Center for Judicial Engagement. Educational channels include four podcasts (Short Circuit, Bound By Oath, Beyond the Brief, Unpublished Opinions), a biweekly Liberty & Law magazine, and active presence on Facebook, X, YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok.

IJ's business model is donor-funded philanthropy, not fee-for-service. It receives no government funding and no payment from clients; 85% of its budget comes from more than 16,000 individual supporters nationwide. Donations are accepted as one-time gifts, monthly recurring, stock, IRA, or planned gifts. The organization has held Charity Navigator's four-star rating continuously since 2002, with recognized transparency and accountability standing. IJ is governed by an independent board and operates without subsidiaries, parent entities, or equity holders.

Institute For Justice firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Institute For Justice
Legal name
Institute for Justice
Website
https://ij.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
1991
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
101–250 employees
Short description
The Institute for Justice is a 501(c)(3) national public interest law firm, founded in 1991 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, that litigates constitutional cases at no cost on behalf of individuals and small businesses across four pillars: private property, First Amendment, educational choice, and economic liberty, funded almost entirely by private donations.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Institute For Justice industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Interest Legal Services
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers (54111), Legal Services (5411)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy (BPAGAFAA)
akta.pro secondary industries
Rule of Law & Justice Sector Reform (BPADAGAB), Public Defense & Legal Aid Services (BPAIAFAC)

Keywords

  • Public interest law firm
  • Constitutional litigation services
  • Civil rights legal advocacy
  • Nonprofit legal representation
  • Individual rights defense

Where Institute For Justice is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Arlington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Institute For Justice business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Individual Donations: IJ receives 85% of its funding from individual donors. The organization is powered by more than 16,000 supporters across the country who believe in the Constitution and the ideals it enshrines. Donors can give one-time, monthly, or through various planned giving mechanisms.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels11 records

Institute For Justice product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Institute for Justice is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public interest law firm that provides free legal representation to individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated by government. It litigates cutting-edge cases in state and federal courts across four pillars — economic liberty, private property, First Amendment, and educational choice — and pairs litigation with research, legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism to set precedent.

Product overview

The Institute for Justice is a nonprofit, public interest law firm offering legal representation, research, legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism services. Rather than a commercial product company, IJ provides litigation services for constitutional rights cases, publishes research reports and policy studies, advocates for legislative reforms, and produces educational publications including Liberty & Law magazine and multiple podcasts (Short Circuit, Beyond the Brief, Bound By Oath, Unpublished Opinions). IJ also operates supporting programs including the IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship and Center for Judicial Engagement. The organization focuses on four core pillars: Economic Liberty, Private Property, First Amendment, and Educational Choice.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • Project on Immunity and Accountability: A project dedicated to eliminating qualified immunity and other legal barriers that prevent individuals from holding government officials accountable for constitutional violations.
  • Project on the Fourth Amendment
  • End Forfeiture Initiative
  • Food Freedom Initiative
  • Zoning Justice Project
  • IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship
  • Center for Judicial Engagement
  • Short Circuit
  • Americans Against Qualified Immunity

Quantifiable outcome

  • Nearly 70% success rate through litigation and legislation
  • +5 more outcomes

Companies that use Institute For Justice

Customer profile

Named customers7 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles2 records

Institute For Justice technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Institute For Justice partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

One partnership is on record.

  • EdChoicecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 November 2023IJ has joined with EdChoice—the foundation established by Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and his wife, Rose—to create the Partnership for Educational Choice. After a multi-year transition period within this partnership, EdChoice will take over as the main defender of traditional educational choice programs, while IJ will turn attention to the regulatory barriers that stand in the way of education providers—especially those developing new and innovative models.

Scale indicators9 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Institute For Justice competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Emerging players

  • Cato Institute: Cato is a libertarian think tank that conducts policy research and occasionally litigates or files amicus briefs. While not a direct litigation peer, it shares IJ's ideological base, donor pool, and influence on constitutional and economic liberty debates.
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation: AFP Foundation is a liberty-oriented advocacy and education organization that engages in litigation support and public policy work. It overlaps with IJ's donor base and shares overlapping themes on economic liberty and limited government.

Direct peers

  • Landmark Legal Foundation: Landmark is a conservative public interest law firm litigating constitutional and accountability cases against government overreach. Its mission and donor-funded model are directly comparable to IJ.
  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): The ACLU is the largest U.S. public interest law organization, litigating constitutional cases in federal and state courts on First Amendment, due process, and equal protection grounds. It is the closest direct comparable to IJ in terms of mission, federal court practice, and donor-funded model, though ACLU's ideological orientation differs.
  • Pacific Legal Foundation: PLF is a national public interest law firm focused on property rights, economic liberty, and limited government, directly overlapping IJ's four pillars. Both organizations litigate precedent-setting constitutional cases and accept clients at no cost, funded by private donors.
  • Goldwater Institute: Goldwater is a liberty-focused public interest law and policy organization litigating in state and federal courts on economic liberty, school choice, and constitutional reform. Its litigation arm parallels IJ's state-court strategy and donor-funded model.
  • Rutherford Institute: The Rutherford Institute is a nonprofit public interest law organization providing free legal representation in First Amendment, religious liberty, and parental rights cases. It directly competes for donor dollars and cases involving government overreach, similar to IJ.
  • Center for Individual Rights: CIR is a public interest law firm that litigates high-impact constitutional and civil rights cases, including First Amendment and equal protection matters. Its federal-court, precedent-driven strategy closely mirrors IJ's approach.
  • Southeastern Legal Foundation: SLF is a national public interest law firm litigating cases involving constitutional rights, limited government, and free enterprise. It competes with IJ for donor support and case selection in overlapping doctrinal areas.

Regional players

  • Texas Public Policy Foundation: TPPF is a state-focused think tank and litigation source with a heavy Texas emphasis, engaging in constitutional litigation and policy advocacy on liberty issues. It parallels IJ's economic liberty and property rights work but at a state-focused level.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks4 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Institute For Justice social profiles

Digital presence

Institute For Justice financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Institute For Justice leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles16 records

Institute For Justice funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Institute For Justice M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Institute For Justice

What does Institute For Justice do?

The Institute for Justice is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public interest law firm that provides free legal representation to individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated by government. It litigates cutting-edge cases in state and federal courts across four pillars — economic liberty, private property, First Amendment, and educational choice — and pairs litigation with research, legislative advocacy, and grassroots activism to set precedent.

Is Institute For Justice a public or private company?

Institute For Justice is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Institute For Justice founded?

Institute For Justice was founded in 1991. It employs 101 to 250 people.

Where is Institute For Justice based?

Institute For Justice is headquartered in Arlington, United States, in the North America region.

How does Institute For Justice make money?

One revenue line is on record: individual Donations.

Who are Institute For Justice's main competitors?

Emerging players on record are Cato Institute and Americans for Prosperity Foundation. Direct peers are Landmark Legal Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Pacific Legal Foundation, Goldwater Institute, Rutherford Institute, Center for Individual Rights and Southeastern Legal Foundation. Texas Public Policy Foundation is listed as a regional player.

Does Institute For Justice have an API?

No public API is recorded for Institute For Justice.

What industry is Institute For Justice in?

Institute For Justice's product category is Public Interest Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAA, Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy, with a secondary code of BPADAGAB, Rule of Law & Justice Sector Reform. Its NAICS code is 54111 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
nwitimes.comExclusive: Hybrid schools open new legal front for choiceA Pennsylvania hybrid school, Roots Learning Academy, was inspected and told it must become a certified childcare program to continue operating. The Institute for Justice is representing the school, arguing it is not childcare but a homeschooling co-op. The firm is launching a new Education Entrepreneurship Project to address regulatory obstacles for microschools.The Times of IndiaIn 2003, Lakewood homeowners defeated a city plan to use eminent domain to clear their neighborhood for private retail developmentIn 2003, Lakewood voters rejected a city plan to use eminent domain for private retail development by 39 votes. The city later repealed the blight designation, and the Institute for Justice documented a national pattern of such condemnations.Common DreamsNew Database Documents Over 100 Cases of Cops Abusing Flock Surveillance CamerasThe Institute for Justice launched a database documenting over 100 cases of alleged misconduct by law enforcement officers using Flock Safety's automated license plate reader network. This report has intensified a nationwide backlash against the technology, resulting in the termination of 82 contracts across 28 states as communities express concerns over privacy violations and mass surveillance.Reason.comGeorgia Has Arrested At Least 20 Officials for Misusing the Flock Surveillance DatabaseGeorgia has arrested at least 20 officials for misusing Flock Safety's automatic license plate reader surveillance system, including an investigator who allegedly accessed the database over 60 times in three weeks and a deputy who misused data related to a personal relationship. Flock Safety, the largest ALPR provider in the US with over 120,000 cameras, has introduced auditing tools to detect misuse, but privacy experts and an Institute for Justice attorney argue that widespread warrantless searches of license plate data lack meaningful oversight and represent a systemic threat to Americans' Fourth Amendment rights. A lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice found that San Jose's 474 Flock cameras were searched nearly 2.5 million times in six months with almost no oversight.AgwebGovernment Surveillance Power Rebuked as Landowners Win Massive Property Rights BattleThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 7-0 that the Pennsylvania Game Commission cannot enter private land without probable cause, striking down the application of the Open Fields doctrine to private property. The case was brought by two hunting clubs, Pitch Pine and Punxsutawney, represented by the Institute for Justice, after decades of warrantless entries by game wardens onto club grounds. The ruling could influence ongoing Open Fields litigation in Alabama, Louisiana, and Virginia, and legal experts suggest it builds toward a potential future challenge of the federal Open Fields doctrine at the U.S. Supreme Court.nj6-pack of beer center of latest Supreme Court caseThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Kenneth Jouppi, an Alaska bush pilot in his 80s, who has fought for over a decade to prevent the state of Alaska from seizing his $95,000 Cessna airplane after a passenger he transported was found with a six-pack of beer heading to the dry community of Beaver, Alaska. Jouppi argues the forfeiture violates the Eighth Amendment's "Excessive Fines Clause," and the Institute for Justice is representing him in making this constitutional challenge. Arguments are expected in the fall, with the case potentially setting precedent for how governments can use forfeiture laws.IjVictory! Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Against Warrantless Searches of PropertyThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state agents must obtain a warrant before conducting searches on private land, overturning the previous 'open fields' doctrine interpretation. This decision represents a major victory for the Punxsutawney and Pitch Pine hunting clubs, who were represented by the Institute for Justice in challenging the Pennsylvania Game Commission's routine warrantless intrusions. The ruling establishes that the Pennsylvania Constitution provides greater privacy protections than the U.S. Fourth Amendment for lands where owners have taken steps to exclude intruders.AL.com6-pack of beer center of latest Supreme Court caseThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Kenneth Jouppi, an 80-year-old Alaska bush pilot who has spent over a decade fighting to prevent the state from seizing his $95,000 Cessna airplane after he transported a passenger carrying a six-pack of beer to a dry community. Jouppi argues that the forfeiture violates the Eighth Amendment's "Excessive Fines Clause," with his legal team at the Institute for Justice arguing it represents government overreach. Oral arguments are expected in the fall.TimesNowWho Is Ken Jouppi? Alaska Pilot Fighting Plane Confiscation Before Supreme Court Over a Six-Pack of BeerThe US Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Ken Jouppi, an Alaska pilot challenging the state's civil forfeiture of his $95,000 aircraft after he transported a six-pack of beer to a "dry" village in 2012. The case raises a constitutional question about whether confiscating an aircraft valued at roughly $95,000 for transporting about nine gallons of alcohol violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on excessive fines. Jouppi, now in his 80s, has been fighting the forfeiture for over a decade with representation from the Institute for Justice, arguing the seizure is disproportionate and unconstitutional.FortuneA pilot must defend his plane's seizure before SCOTUS after a passenger brought beer onboardThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal by Alaska bush pilot Kenneth Jouppi, who is fighting to prevent the seizure of his $95,000 plane after a passenger brought a six-pack of beer on a flight to a dry village in 2012. Jouppi, who was convicted of a misdemeanor for transporting alcohol into a dry community, argues that forfeiting his 1969 Cessna would violate the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause. Arguments are expected in the fall, with Jouppi's attorneys at the Institute for Justice framing the case as a self-evident candidate for review given the disproportionality of seizing an airplane over a six-pack.