Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Full company profile

uuid0007jug

Namestring
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Legal namestring
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Websiteurl
priv.gc.ca
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1983
Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
251–500
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersQuebec, Canada
HQ citystring
Quebec
HQ countrystring
Canada
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
privacy regulation, data protection oversight, privacy compliance enforcement, privacy complaint investigation, federal privacy guidance
Industry2 codes
1Data Protection, Privacy & Cybersecurity Regulators
CodeBPAIAOAHPrimaryYes
2Executive Office / Cabinet Secretariat
CodeBPAIAAAAPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors92615
  • Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities922
Product category
Privacy Regulation
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Others
GTM typeB2B and B2C
B2B and B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a federal Agent of Parliament that protects and promotes privacy rights in Canada by enforcing the Privacy Act (federal institutions) and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA, private sector). It accepts and investigates privacy complaints from individuals, processes breach reports from organizations, issues guidance and policy on emerging privacy topics, and represents Canada in international data protection forums.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 2 values shown
  • 2024-2025: 1,942 Privacy Act complaints accepted; 446 PIPEDA complaints accepted
+1 more record
Product overview1 text field

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a regulatory body (Agent of Parliament) rather than a commercial product company. Its core offering consists of the priv.gc.ca website and associated digital services including online complaint forms, secure breach reporting tools, and information request forms. The OPC also publishes guidance documents on privacy topics including age assurance, biometrics, and deceptive design patterns. The organization provides multiple RSS feeds for subscription-based updates and publishes the OPC Strategic Plan 2024-2027. These services collectively support the OPC's mission to protect and promote privacy rights under the Privacy Act and PIPEDA.

Product and service4 records
1Online Complaint Form
CategoryPrivacy complaint service
2Secure Breach Reporting Tool
CategoryBreach reporting service
3Online Information Request Form
CategoryInformation request service
4RRDPG Tool (Real Risk of Significant Harm)
CategoryPrivacy risk assessment tool
Scale indicator4 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight4 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The US federal consumer protection and antitrust agency with privacy enforcement as part of its broader remit (Section 5, FTC Act). Functions as an indirect peer: comparable enforcement activity against large technology companies, but operating as a much larger generalist regulator.

TypeDirect peer
Description

France's national data protection authority, with strong fining powers under GDPR. Directly comparable to OPC in remit (national data protection supervision) and in operating as an independent administrative authority.

TypeDirect peer
Description

New Zealand's independent privacy regulator, with a near-identical mandate structure (oversight of public and private-sector compliance) and a shared cross-Pacific regulatory community with OPC.

4Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
TypeDirect peer
Description

The UK's independent data protection and information rights regulator, with direct fining powers under the UK GDPR and DPA 2018. Most direct functional analogue to OPC: comparable mandate, national scope, and authority over both public and private sectors.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Australia's national privacy and information-rights regulator, covering private-sector compliance (Privacy Act 1988) and federal agency obligations. Most direct common-law peer to OPC in mandate design.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Italy's independent data protection authority, established as an independent administrative body supervising GDPR/private-sector compliance and public-sector data processing. Comparable in governance form (independent quasi-judicial regulator) and substantive mandate.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The Netherlands' national data protection authority, operating with independent regulatory powers under the GDPR/UAVG. Functions as a near-equivalent peer regulator for a similarly-sized economy to Canada.

8BfDI (Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Germany's federal data protection authority, supervising both public-sector and private-sector compliance with the GDPR/BDSG. A federal-state parallel to OPC's federal-level oversight of public institutions plus private-sector activity.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Spain's national data protection authority, notable for active enforcement against large technology platforms. Shares the OPC's role of investigating private-sector data practices under a national statutory framework.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Hong Kong's independent statutory privacy regulator overseeing the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. Comparable in governance form (independent statutory office), though operating under a common-jurisdiction rather than bilingual-federal regime.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat3 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature1 record

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles5 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
Compliance4 records

Each record includes

Name, Class, Description

Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Privacy Regulationpriv.gc.ca

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Legal name
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Website
https://priv.gc.ca
Company type
Private
Founded year
1983
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
251–500 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada industry classification

Industry
Product category
Privacy Regulation
NAICS
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors (92615), Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities (922)
akta.pro primary industry
Data Protection, Privacy & Cybersecurity Regulators (BPAIAOAH)
akta.pro secondary industry
Executive Office / Cabinet Secretariat (BPAIAAAA)

Keywords

  • Privacy regulation
  • Data protection oversight
  • Privacy compliance enforcement
  • Privacy complaint investigation
  • Federal privacy guidance

Where Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Quebec
HQ country
Canada
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B and B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Others

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a federal Agent of Parliament that protects and promotes privacy rights in Canada by enforcing the Privacy Act (federal institutions) and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA, private sector). It accepts and investigates privacy complaints from individuals, processes breach reports from organizations, issues guidance and policy on emerging privacy topics, and represents Canada in international data protection forums.

Product overview

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a regulatory body (Agent of Parliament) rather than a commercial product company. Its core offering consists of the priv.gc.ca website and associated digital services including online complaint forms, secure breach reporting tools, and information request forms. The OPC also publishes guidance documents on privacy topics including age assurance, biometrics, and deceptive design patterns. The organization provides multiple RSS feeds for subscription-based updates and publishes the OPC Strategic Plan 2024-2027. These services collectively support the OPC's mission to protect and promote privacy rights under the Privacy Act and PIPEDA.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Online Complaint Form
  • Secure Breach Reporting Tool
  • Online Information Request Form
  • RRDPG Tool (Real Risk of Significant Harm)

Quantifiable outcome

  • 2024-2025: 1,942 Privacy Act complaints accepted; 446 PIPEDA complaints accepted
  • +1 more outcomes

Companies that use Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature1 record

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Scale indicators4 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights4 records

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • Federal Trade Commission (FTC): The US federal consumer protection and antitrust agency with privacy enforcement as part of its broader remit (Section 5, FTC Act). Functions as an indirect peer: comparable enforcement activity against large technology companies, but operating as a much larger generalist regulator.

Direct peers

  • CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés): France's national data protection authority, with strong fining powers under GDPR. Directly comparable to OPC in remit (national data protection supervision) and in operating as an independent administrative authority.
  • Office of the Privacy Commissioner (New Zealand): New Zealand's independent privacy regulator, with a near-identical mandate structure (oversight of public and private-sector compliance) and a shared cross-Pacific regulatory community with OPC.
  • Information Commissioner's Office (ICO): The UK's independent data protection and information rights regulator, with direct fining powers under the UK GDPR and DPA 2018. Most direct functional analogue to OPC: comparable mandate, national scope, and authority over both public and private sectors.
  • Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC): Australia's national privacy and information-rights regulator, covering private-sector compliance (Privacy Act 1988) and federal agency obligations. Most direct common-law peer to OPC in mandate design.
  • Garante per la protezione dei dati personali: Italy's independent data protection authority, established as an independent administrative body supervising GDPR/private-sector compliance and public-sector data processing. Comparable in governance form (independent quasi-judicial regulator) and substantive mandate.
  • Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP): The Netherlands' national data protection authority, operating with independent regulatory powers under the GDPR/UAVG. Functions as a near-equivalent peer regulator for a similarly-sized economy to Canada.
  • BfDI (Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information): Germany's federal data protection authority, supervising both public-sector and private-sector compliance with the GDPR/BDSG. A federal-state parallel to OPC's federal-level oversight of public institutions plus private-sector activity.
  • Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD): Spain's national data protection authority, notable for active enforcement against large technology platforms. Shares the OPC's role of investigating private-sector data practices under a national statutory framework.
  • Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong (PCPD): Hong Kong's independent statutory privacy regulator overseeing the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. Comparable in governance form (independent statutory office), though operating under a common-jurisdiction rather than bilingual-federal regime.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat3 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada social profiles

Digital presence

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada compliance and trust

Trust signal

Compliance4 records

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

What does Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada do?

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a federal Agent of Parliament that protects and promotes privacy rights in Canada by enforcing the Privacy Act (federal institutions) and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA, private sector). It accepts and investigates privacy complaints from individuals, processes breach reports from organizations, issues guidance and policy on emerging privacy topics, and represents Canada in international data protection forums.

Is Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada a public or private company?

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada founded?

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada was founded in 1983. It employs 251 to 500 people.

Where is Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada based?

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is headquartered in Quebec, Canada, in the North America region.

Who are Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's main competitors?

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is listed as a broad incumbent. Direct peers are CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés), Office of the Privacy Commissioner (New Zealand), Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP), BfDI (Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information), Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong (PCPD).

Does Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada have an API?

No public API is recorded for Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.

What industry is Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada in?

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's product category is Privacy Regulation. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIAOAH, Data Protection, Privacy & Cybersecurity Regulators, with a secondary code of BPAIAAAA, Executive Office / Cabinet Secretariat. Its NAICS code is 92615.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
CBCWoman flagged by ID scanner as nationwide 'public safety concern' after incident in Winnipeg bar | CBC NewsA Montreal lawyer was denied entry to a Calgary venue due to a flag placed on her ID by a Winnipeg bar using the Patronscan system, which labeled her a 'public safety concern' after an incident in a washroom. The incident has sparked criticism from privacy experts regarding the transparency and adequacy of consent notices for data sharing across the network. The Winnipeg bar later admitted the flag was an administrative error and removed it, while the individual prepares to file a complaint with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.MichaelgeistCanada’s Digital Super-Regulator: Bill C-36 Pushes Out the Privacy Commissioner and Hands Private Sector Privacy to an Overloaded CommissionThe Canadian government tabled Bill C-36, which transfers private sector privacy enforcement from the independent Privacy Commissioner to the newly empowered Digital Safety and Data Protection Commission. This legislative change consolidates oversight of personal data handling with the regulation of online harms and content moderation under a single, Cabinet-appointed body. The move has been criticized for reducing institutional independence and potentially jeopardizing Canada's international standing in data protection standards.International Association of Privacy ProfessionalsNotes from the IAPP Canada: Regulators sharpen focus on children's privacyThe Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has released guidance on age assurance technologies designed to help organizations verify users' ages while preserving privacy. This guidance supports the implementation of Bill S-209, federal legislation that would impose fines of up to CAD 250,000 (or CAD 500,000 for subsequent offenses) on organizations that make internet explicit material available to minors and create a legal defense for organizations implementing prescribed age-verification or age-estimation methods. The bill has completed Senate readings and received its first reading in the House of Commons on April 30.ForbesCanada’s New Biometric Rules Raise The Bar For EmployersCanada's Office of the Privacy Commissioner finalized guidance for private-sector biometric processing under PIPEDA, setting strict rules on consent, purpose, and data retention. Employers must obtain express consent, limit data collection, and destroy biometric information when no longer needed. The guidance also requires testing for accuracy and bias, with implications for other provinces and U.S. employers.PrivOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s 2025-26 Departmental PlanThe Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada released its 2025-26 Departmental Plan emphasizing the importance of modernizing Canada's privacy laws and protecting data privacy rights. The plan highlights ongoing investigations into privacy breaches, efforts to improve compliance and awareness, and international collaboration on data protection issues.PrivThe SIM card swap scam: What it is and what you can do to minimize riskThe Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada published an advisory explaining how SIM card swap scams operate, where fraudsters deceive carriers to redirect victims' phone numbers for account takeover. The article outlines methods used by scammers to gather personal data and advises consumers to implement security controls like PINs or port locks with their service providers.PrivA full year of mandatory data breach reporting: What we’ve learned and what businesses need to knowThe Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada reports a six-fold increase in mandatory data breach notifications under PIPEDA since November 1st, totaling 680 incidents affecting over 28 million Canadians. Unauthorized access remains the primary cause of breaches, with social engineering and employee errors identified as key contributing factors. The OPC has initiated record reviews to assess organizational compliance with new mandatory reporting and retention requirements.PrivChallenges and opportunities for privacy protectionThe Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's Research Group published a January 2014 report examining the privacy implications of wearable computing, including body-worn cameras, fitness trackers, smart glasses and augmented reality devices. It finds that ubiquitous sensors amplify tracking and profiling risks, complicate consent and purpose limitation, and accelerate "context collapse," while also identifying design opportunities for user control.GlobeNewswireCLC Sends Strongly-Worded Letter to PM on Bill C-377CLC president sent a strongly-worded letter to the Prime Minister opposing Bill C-377, which would force unions to publicly disclose detailed financial information. The bill, passed by the House of Commons, would require annual filings on spending, including payments to private contractors, and is opposed by the Canadian Bar Association and the Privacy Commissioner.