Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

R Street Institute

Full company profile

uuid0009uu1

Namestring
R Street Institute
Legal namestring
R Street Institute
Websiteurl
rstreet.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2012
Descriptiontext

The R Street Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization founded in 2012 and headquartered in Washington, D.C. It produces policy research, analysis, and recommendations across a broad portfolio of issue areas including technology and AI, cybersecurity, energy and environment, insurance, criminal justice, federal and state governance, finance and trade, and political violence. Its primary audience consists of federal and state policymakers, legislators, regulatory agency staff, journalists, fellow think tanks, and the broader policy community, with all publications made freely available.

R Street's research output is organized into formal Policy Studies, concise R Sheets, educational Explainers, congressional and state testimony, regulatory comments, coalition letters, op-eds, the Real Solutions Blog, and the Red Tape Podcast. Its product portfolio is content-driven rather than technology-driven; there is no proprietary software, API, or commercial platform product. Notable research products include the annual 50-state Insurance Regulation Report Card, a comparative benchmarking tool that evaluates state insurance regulatory environments across seven categories, and a Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration policy paper addressing critical infrastructure cyber readiness, developed through a multi-stakeholder PQC Policy Working Group.

The organization operates as a 501(c)(3) funded primarily by charitable contributions and grants, with a Director of Development (Ginny Mansour) overseeing fundraising. It maintains a headquarters at 1411 K Street N.W., Suite 900 in Washington, D.C. plus offices in California, Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Virginia, with staff distributed globally. Distribution is exclusively free and digital, with a content-led GTM focused on earned media (op-eds in Politico, The Hill, the Orange County Register, The American Spectator, and Dark Reading), congressional and state legislative testimony, regulatory comments, and coalition letters, reaching its audience through organic influence rather than commercial sales channels.

Short descriptiontext

R Street Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization that produces research, commentary, and policy recommendations on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, and criminal justice for federal and state policymakers.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
public policy research, nonprofit think tank, regulatory policy analysis, cybersecurity policy research, legislative testimony services
Industry1 code
1Think Tanks, Policy Research & Public Policy Institutes
CodeBPAGAFAOPrimaryYes
NAICS code3 codes
  • Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities541720
  • Political Organizations813940
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
Product category
Public Policy Research
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Grant and Donation Funding
TypeAffiliate Referral
Description

As a nonprofit public policy research organization, R Street Institute is funded through grants and charitable donations. The organization has a Director of Development (Ginny Mansour) and accepts support to fund its research operations. Revenue is not derived from product sales or commercial services.

rstreet.org
Marketing channels7 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

R Street Institute is a nonprofit public policy research organization that produces and freely disseminates nonpartisan policy research, analysis, and commentary on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, criminal justice, and regulatory reform. Its deliverables include Policy Studies, R Sheets, Explainers, expert congressional and state legislative testimony, regulatory comments, coalition letters, op-eds, and signature products such as the annual Insurance Regulation Report Card, distributed at no cost to policymakers, journalists, and the public.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • R Street's Insurance Regulation Report Card evaluates all 50 U.S. states across seven categories, providing comparative benchmarking used by policymakers.
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

R Street Institute is a nonprofit public policy research organization offering a portfolio of research publications and outreach services focused on technology policy, cybersecurity, AI regulation, and regulatory reform. The organization does not offer commercial technology products; instead, it provides policy research services including Policy Studies, R Sheets, and Explainers as core research products, complemented by Testimony, Regulatory Comments, and Letters as outreach services to policymakers. The portfolio also includes Commentary publications through Op-Eds and the Real Solutions Blog, along with Podcasts. Key research products include insurance regulation evaluation tools like the annual Insurance Regulation Report Card and specialized policy papers on emerging technology topics such as post-quantum cryptography migration.

Product and service10 records
1Policy Studies
CategoryResearch Publication
Description

In-depth policy research publications examining technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, criminal justice, and regulatory issues with policy recommendations, produced for federal and state policymakers, media, and the public.

2R Sheets
CategoryResearch Publication
Description

Concise policy briefs providing targeted analysis on specific regulatory or technology policy topics for policymakers and stakeholders.

3Explainers
CategoryResearch Publication
Description

Educational publications breaking down complex technology and policy topics for stakeholders, legislators, and the general public.

4Congressional and State Legislative Testimony
CategoryOutreach Service
Description

Expert written and oral testimony submitted to U.S. congressional committees and state legislatures on technology, AI, cybersecurity, autonomous vehicles, telecommunications, and regulatory policy matters.

5Regulatory Comments
CategoryOutreach Service
Description

Formal comments submitted to federal and state regulatory agencies responding to proposed rules and policy frameworks across technology, energy, insurance, and other sectors.

6Coalition and Policy Letters
CategoryOutreach Service
Description

Coalition letters and individual policy letters signed by R Street scholars on technology, regulatory, and governance issues, often in coordination with like-minded partner organizations.

7Commentary (Op-Eds and Real Solutions Blog)
CategoryCommentary Publication
Description

Opinion pieces and blog posts analyzing current technology, AI regulation, energy, criminal justice, and cybersecurity policy developments for policymakers, media, and the public.

8Podcasts (Red Tape Podcast)
CategoryCommentary Publication
Description

Audio content including the Red Tape Podcast, which covers regulatory reform, technology policy topics, and interviews with policy experts.

9Insurance Regulation Report Card
CategoryResearch Product
Description

Annual evaluation of all 50 U.S. states across seven insurance regulatory categories including solvency regulation, underwriting freedom, residual markets, fiscal efficiency, politicization, and competitiveness, providing comparative benchmarking for state policymakers and industry.

10Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration Policy Study
CategoryResearch Product
Description

Policy study on managing post-quantum cryptography migration risks in U.S. critical infrastructure, with four policy recommendations for federal action, produced for cybersecurity policymakers and infrastructure stakeholders.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership5 partners
1Green Scissors Coalition
Strategic tierMinorTypeOthersAnnounced on2026-05-12
Description

R Street Institute participates in the Green Scissors Coalition, which brings together free-market and conservative organizations to advocate for eliminating wasteful government spending on harmful energy subsidies, including year-round E15 ethanol policies.

rstreet.org
Strategic tierMinorTypeOthersAnnounced on2026-05-01
Description

R Street joined a coalition led by Americans for Prosperity calling for permanent repeal of the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 50104), which requires U.S.-flagged vessels to carry cargo between American ports.

Strategic tierMinorTypeOthersAnnounced on2026-05-01
Description

R Street joined a coalition led by Competitive Enterprise Institute supporting preemption of the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, which would harm payment card networks and consumers.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-13
Description

ALEC published a State AI Policy Toolkit featuring four model pieces of state legislation designed as innovation-friendly alternatives to more restrictive AI regulations. The toolkit was highlighted in a joint report by the American Consumer Institute and the R Street Institute as examples of sound AI governance that states can adopt.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-13
Description

The American Consumer Institute and R Street Institute jointly released a report highlighting ALEC's State AI Policy Toolkit as examples of sound state AI governance that balances consumer protection with innovation. The four model policies include the Model State Artificial Intelligence Act, the Technology-Neutral Anti-Discrimination Clarification Act, the AI Tax Non-Discrimination Act, and the Right to Compute Act.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Market position
Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles9 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

R Street Institute

Public Policy Researchrstreet.org

R Street Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization that produces research, commentary, and policy recommendations on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, and criminal justice for federal and state policymakers.

What R Street Institute does

The R Street Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization founded in 2012 and headquartered in Washington, D.C. It produces policy research, analysis, and recommendations across a broad portfolio of issue areas including technology and AI, cybersecurity, energy and environment, insurance, criminal justice, federal and state governance, finance and trade, and political violence. Its primary audience consists of federal and state policymakers, legislators, regulatory agency staff, journalists, fellow think tanks, and the broader policy community, with all publications made freely available.

R Street's research output is organized into formal Policy Studies, concise R Sheets, educational Explainers, congressional and state testimony, regulatory comments, coalition letters, op-eds, the Real Solutions Blog, and the Red Tape Podcast. Its product portfolio is content-driven rather than technology-driven; there is no proprietary software, API, or commercial platform product. Notable research products include the annual 50-state Insurance Regulation Report Card, a comparative benchmarking tool that evaluates state insurance regulatory environments across seven categories, and a Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration policy paper addressing critical infrastructure cyber readiness, developed through a multi-stakeholder PQC Policy Working Group.

The organization operates as a 501(c)(3) funded primarily by charitable contributions and grants, with a Director of Development (Ginny Mansour) overseeing fundraising. It maintains a headquarters at 1411 K Street N.W., Suite 900 in Washington, D.C. plus offices in California, Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Virginia, with staff distributed globally. Distribution is exclusively free and digital, with a content-led GTM focused on earned media (op-eds in Politico, The Hill, the Orange County Register, The American Spectator, and Dark Reading), congressional and state legislative testimony, regulatory comments, and coalition letters, reaching its audience through organic influence rather than commercial sales channels.

R Street Institute firmographics

Firmographics
Name
R Street Institute
Legal name
R Street Institute
Website
https://rstreet.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2012
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
R Street Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization that produces research, commentary, and policy recommendations on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, and criminal justice for federal and state policymakers.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

R Street Institute industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Policy Research
NAICS
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities (541720), Political Organizations (813940), Human Rights Organizations (813311)
akta.pro primary industry
Think Tanks, Policy Research & Public Policy Institutes (BPAGAFAO)

Keywords

  • Public policy research
  • Nonprofit think tank
  • Regulatory policy analysis
  • Cybersecurity policy research
  • Legislative testimony services

Where R Street Institute is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

R Street Institute business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Grant and Donation Funding: As a nonprofit public policy research organization, R Street Institute is funded through grants and charitable donations. The organization has a Director of Development (Ginny Mansour) and accepts support to fund its research operations. Revenue is not derived from product sales or commercial services.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels7 records

R Street Institute product offering

Product offering

Core offering

R Street Institute is a nonprofit public policy research organization that produces and freely disseminates nonpartisan policy research, analysis, and commentary on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, criminal justice, and regulatory reform. Its deliverables include Policy Studies, R Sheets, Explainers, expert congressional and state legislative testimony, regulatory comments, coalition letters, op-eds, and signature products such as the annual Insurance Regulation Report Card, distributed at no cost to policymakers, journalists, and the public.

Product overview

R Street Institute is a nonprofit public policy research organization offering a portfolio of research publications and outreach services focused on technology policy, cybersecurity, AI regulation, and regulatory reform. The organization does not offer commercial technology products; instead, it provides policy research services including Policy Studies, R Sheets, and Explainers as core research products, complemented by Testimony, Regulatory Comments, and Letters as outreach services to policymakers. The portfolio also includes Commentary publications through Op-Eds and the Real Solutions Blog, along with Podcasts. Key research products include insurance regulation evaluation tools like the annual Insurance Regulation Report Card and specialized policy papers on emerging technology topics such as post-quantum cryptography migration.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Policy Studies In-depth policy research publications examining technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, criminal justice, and regulatory issues with policy recommendations, produced for federal and state policymakers, media, and the public.
  • R Sheets Concise policy briefs providing targeted analysis on specific regulatory or technology policy topics for policymakers and stakeholders.
  • Explainers Educational publications breaking down complex technology and policy topics for stakeholders, legislators, and the general public.
  • Congressional and State Legislative Testimony Expert written and oral testimony submitted to U.S. congressional committees and state legislatures on technology, AI, cybersecurity, autonomous vehicles, telecommunications, and regulatory policy matters.
  • Regulatory Comments Formal comments submitted to federal and state regulatory agencies responding to proposed rules and policy frameworks across technology, energy, insurance, and other sectors.
  • Coalition and Policy Letters Coalition letters and individual policy letters signed by R Street scholars on technology, regulatory, and governance issues, often in coordination with like-minded partner organizations.
  • Commentary (Op-Eds and Real Solutions Blog) Opinion pieces and blog posts analyzing current technology, AI regulation, energy, criminal justice, and cybersecurity policy developments for policymakers, media, and the public.
  • Podcasts (Red Tape Podcast) Audio content including the Red Tape Podcast, which covers regulatory reform, technology policy topics, and interviews with policy experts.
  • Insurance Regulation Report Card Annual evaluation of all 50 U.S. states across seven insurance regulatory categories including solvency regulation, underwriting freedom, residual markets, fiscal efficiency, politicization, and competitiveness, providing comparative benchmarking for state policymakers and industry.
  • Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration Policy Study Policy study on managing post-quantum cryptography migration risks in U.S. critical infrastructure, with four policy recommendations for federal action, produced for cybersecurity policymakers and infrastructure stakeholders.

Quantifiable outcome

  • R Street's Insurance Regulation Report Card evaluates all 50 U.S. states across seven categories, providing comparative benchmarking used by policymakers.
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use R Street Institute

Customer profile

Segments2 records

Ideal customer profiles2 records

R Street Institute technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

R Street Institute partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Five partnerships are on record, tiered minor and core.

  • Green Scissors CoalitionminorOthers · 12 May 2026R Street Institute participates in the Green Scissors Coalition, which brings together free-market and conservative organizations to advocate for eliminating wasteful government spending on harmful energy subsidies, including year-round E15 ethanol policies.
  • Americans for ProsperityminorOthers · 1 May 2026R Street joined a coalition led by Americans for Prosperity calling for permanent repeal of the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 50104), which requires U.S.-flagged vessels to carry cargo between American ports.
  • Competitive Enterprise InstituteminorOthers · 1 May 2026R Street joined a coalition led by Competitive Enterprise Institute supporting preemption of the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, which would harm payment card networks and consumers.
  • American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 13 March 2026ALEC published a State AI Policy Toolkit featuring four model pieces of state legislation designed as innovation-friendly alternatives to more restrictive AI regulations. The toolkit was highlighted in a joint report by the American Consumer Institute and the R Street Institute as examples of sound AI governance that states can adopt.
  • American Consumer InstitutecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 13 March 2026The American Consumer Institute and R Street Institute jointly released a report highlighting ALEC's State AI Policy Toolkit as examples of sound state AI governance that balances consumer protection with innovation. The four model policies include the Model State Artificial Intelligence Act, the Technology-Neutral Anti-Discrimination Clarification Act, the AI Tax Non-Discrimination Act, and the Right to Compute Act.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

R Street Institute competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Market position

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

R Street Institute social profiles

Digital presence

R Street Institute financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

R Street Institute leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles9 records

R Street Institute funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

R Street Institute M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about R Street Institute

What does R Street Institute do?

R Street Institute is a nonprofit public policy research organization that produces and freely disseminates nonpartisan policy research, analysis, and commentary on technology, cybersecurity, AI, energy, insurance, criminal justice, and regulatory reform. Its deliverables include Policy Studies, R Sheets, Explainers, expert congressional and state legislative testimony, regulatory comments, coalition letters, op-eds, and signature products such as the annual Insurance Regulation Report Card, distributed at no cost to policymakers, journalists, and the public.

Is R Street Institute a public or private company?

R Street Institute is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was R Street Institute founded?

R Street Institute was founded in 2012. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is R Street Institute based?

R Street Institute is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

How does R Street Institute make money?

One revenue line is on record: grant and Donation Funding.

Does R Street Institute have an API?

No public API is recorded for R Street Institute.

What industry is R Street Institute in?

R Street Institute's product category is Public Policy Research. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAO, Think Tanks, Policy Research & Public Policy Institutes. Its NAICS code is 541720.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Third NewsGrid Acceleration Coalition Urges Action on Transmission Rules to Enhance Economic GrowthThe Grid Acceleration Coalition has submitted comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission urging revision of federal solicitation requirements for transmission infrastructure, arguing that current processes in MISO and SPP are causing 16 to 20 months of delays in selecting developers. The coalition, whose spokesperson is from ITC Holdings Corp., contends that directly assigned projects outperform competitively solicited ones in speed, and criticized the R Street Institute's opposing analysis as relying on narrow data samples. Rising electricity demand from AI and data centers has intensified the urgency for grid capacity improvements, with the coalition warning that continued constraints in the solicitation process cost crucial time for building transmission capacity.RstreetPost-Quantum Cryptography Migration in the United States: Managing Risk and Advancing Cyber Readiness in Critical InfrastructureThe R Street Institute's PQC Policy Working Group released a policy paper urging organizations to treat post-quantum cryptography migration as a present-day risk-management imperative rather than a distant future milestone, citing recent advances in quantum computing that have compressed estimated Q-Day timelines from around 2035 to potentially as early as 2029. The paper examines challenges facing U.S. critical infrastructure—85% of which is privately owned—and offers four policy recommendations: aligning federal leadership with budgeting mechanisms, using targeted Requests for Information to identify implementation gaps, launching pilot programs in high-impact federal environments, and leveraging market signals from private-sector early movers like Microsoft to accelerate adoption.RstreetRight Diagnosis, Wrong Prescription: CRA’s Case for Utility-Owned GenerationCharles River Associates published a report commissioned by Exelon arguing that allowing rate-regulated utilities to build and own generation in the PJM region could save customers $9.6 billion to $20 billion by preventing capacity auction price caps and displacing older, less efficient power plants. The R Street Institute responded with a critique arguing the report conflates the value of additional generation capacity with who should own it, noting that Exelon could build competitive generation at shareholder risk but is instead seeking ratepayer-backed cost recovery. R Street contends this policy shift would transfer investment risk from utility shareholders to captive ratepayers and proposes targeted alternatives such as streamlining permitting and expanding demand response programs.RstreetR Street Testimony in support of MD HB 1295, authorizing autonomous vehicles in MarylandThe R Street Institute submitted testimony to the Maryland House Environment and Transportation Committee on March 5, 2026, expressing support for House Bill 1295, which would establish a comprehensive policy framework for the deployment of highly autonomous vehicles in Maryland. The testimony cites safety data from Swiss Re analysis of 25.3 million miles driven by autonomous vehicles, showing an 88 percent reduction in property damage claims and 92 percent reduction in bodily injury claims compared to human drivers. The institute argues the bill would enhance roadway safety, reduce congestion, lower fuel consumption by up to 42 percent, and drive private investment and job creation in Maryland.RstreetR Street Testimony in support of MD SB 909, authorizing autonomous vehicles in MarylandRobert Melvin, Northeast Region Director at the R Street Institute, submitted testimony on March 4, 2026, expressing support for Maryland Senate Bill 909, which would establish a comprehensive framework authorizing the deployment of highly autonomous vehicles in Maryland without a human driver. The testimony cites data from Swiss Re and Waymo indicating that autonomous vehicles show an 88 percent reduction in property damage claims and 92 percent reduction in bodily injury claims compared to human drivers, arguing AVs are approximately 10.4 times safer than conventional drivers. The R Street Institute is requesting a favorable report on the bill, citing benefits including improved roadway safety, reduced congestion, lower fuel consumption, and potential economic growth through private investment and job creation.RstreetR Street Testimony in Support of VA SB 670, authorizing autonomous vehicles in VirginiaRobert Melvin, Northeast Region Director for the R Street Institute, testified before the Virginia House Transportation Committee in support of Senate Bill 670, which would establish a regulatory framework for fully autonomous vehicles to operate commercially in Virginia. The bill authorizes AV deployment without human drivers, creates a new AV license through the Virginia DMV, and establishes safety, insurance, and geofencing requirements while preventing local bans. The testimony cited data showing Virginia traffic fatalities rose from 847 in 2020 to 918 in 2024, and referenced studies indicating autonomous vehicles demonstrate an 88 percent reduction in property damage claims and 92 percent reduction in bodily injury claims compared to human drivers.RstreetR Street Testimony in Opposition to VA HB 1124, autonomous vehicle human operator requirementThe R Street Institute, a nonprofit public-policy research organization, submitted testimony to the Virginia House Transportation Committee opposing House Bill 1124, which would require fully autonomous vehicles to have a human operator physically present at all times. The testimony argues this requirement would suppress the rollout of autonomous vehicle technology and undermine road safety improvements, citing data showing AVs generate 88% fewer liability claims and 62% fewer police-reported crashes than human-driven vehicles. The organization is urging Virginia legislators to reject the bill and instead adopt forward-looking policies to position the state as a leader in AV innovation.Rstreet“Initial Comments on the Interconnection of Large Loads to the Interstate Transmission System” Filed before the Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionThe R Street Institute submitted initial comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding the proposed Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) for load interconnections of 20 MW or more. They express concerns about the efficiency and appropriateness of the proposed ANOPR's jurisdictional expansion and recommend focusing on amendments to the existing interconnection processes for better regulation. R Street Institute argues that the current proposed ANOPR could create more problems than it solves for load customers trying to connect to the grid.Rstreet“Comment on DOE RFI on Accelerating Speed to Power” Outreach to the Department of EnergyThe U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is soliciting stakeholder input on expanding energy generation and transmission grid capacity to meet rising electric demand. The R Street Institute emphasizes the importance of supporting early-stage technologies, accelerating infrastructure projects, and reducing regulatory and policy barriers to improve grid reliability and affordability.RstreetR Street Institute Comments on the Iowa Utilities Commission’s “Order Opening Rulemaking Docket and Setting Technical Conference and Comment Deadline”The R Street Institute, a nonprofit public policy research organization, submitted comments to the Iowa Utilities Commission on November 10, 2025, in response to the Commission's proposed rulemaking to allow Aggregators of Retail Customers (ARCs) to participate in Iowa electricity markets. The organization supports the proposed rules permitting customers with demand greater than 100 kW to participate with ARCs but recommends stronger data access requirements, alignment with the Green Button Connect standard, and ARC registration requirements to ensure effective demand response participation.