Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Federal Maritime Commission

Full company profile

uuid000adbc

Namestring
Federal Maritime Commission
Legal namestring
Federal Maritime Commission
Websiteurl
fmc.gov
Company typeenum
Public
Founded yearint
1961
Descriptiontext

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is the independent U.S. federal agency, established in 1961, responsible for regulating the U.S. international ocean transportation system under the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. It enforces competition and disclosure rules across vessel-operating common carriers (VOCCs), ocean transportation intermediaries (NVOCCs and ocean freight forwarders), marine terminal operators, and passenger vessel operators, and it adjudicates cruise passenger and shipper complaints. The agency does not sell commercial products or services; its outputs are regulatory. Stakeholders interact with the FMC through statutory filings, licensing, complaints, and rulemaking proceedings.

The agency's technology footprint is composed of government-operated digital platforms: the SERVCON portal for ocean service contract filings, the public Agreement Library database of VOCC and MTO agreements, the OTI Registry of licensed intermediaries, the Electronic Reading Room for agency decisions and orders, ACE data sharing with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and internal FOIA and OSRA implementation tracking systems. Section 508 accessibility compliance is maintained across these systems. Public communications are digital-first via fmc.gov, press releases, commissioner engagement events, and fact-finding investigations (e.g., Fact Findings 28 on demurrage and detention, 29 on port congestion, 30 on the cruise industry's COVID-19 impact).

The FMC is funded through congressional appropriations rather than revenue from regulated parties. The House reauthorized the agency through 2029 in December 2025 with an annual budget increased from $49.2 million to $57 million, although FY2027 budget discussions cite a flat $40 million level. Minor ancillary receipts come from filing fees and collected civil penalties, including a $1.9 million penalty from a shipping line in May 2026. Governance rests with a five-member Commission appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate; Chairman Laura DiBella and most recent commissioner Robert J. Harvey (sworn in June 1, 2026) lead the current panel.

Short descriptiontext

The Federal Maritime Commission is the independent U.S. federal agency that regulates the international ocean transportation system, enforcing the Shipping Act and Ocean Shipping Reform Act across ocean carriers, intermediaries, terminal operators, and cruise lines serving U.S. exporters, importers, and passengers.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
101–250
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
ocean transportation regulation, maritime regulatory oversight, shipping act enforcement, ocean carrier licensing, maritime trade compliance
Industry1 code
1Transportation Regulators (Aviation, Maritime, Rail, Road)
CodeBPAIAOALPrimaryYes
NAICS code1 code
  • Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors92615
Product category
Maritime Regulatory Services
Marketing channels5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is the independent U.S. federal agency responsible for regulating the U.S. international ocean transportation system. It enforces the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, licenses Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (OTIs), reviews service contracts and tariffs, monitors carrier practices (including demurrage and detention charges), conducts fact-finding investigations, and resolves disputes involving ocean carriers, marine terminal operators, and shippers.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 2 values shown
  • U.S.-China port fee dispute cost to container shipping industry: $3.2 billion
+1 more record
Product overview1 text field

The Federal Maritime Commission is an independent U.S. federal agency that regulates the international ocean transportation system. Rather than offering commercial products, the agency provides regulatory databases and filing systems including the Agreement Library (public database of shipping agreements between carriers and terminal operators), SERVCON (electronic service contract filing system), the OTI Registry (licensed ocean transportation intermediaries), and Fact Finding Investigation processes for industry oversight. The agency enforces the Shipping Act of 1984 and Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, monitors carrier rates and practices, and handles complaints related to demurrage, detention, and other shipping charges.

Product and service4 records
1Agreement Library
2SERVCON (Service Contract System)
CategoryRegulatory Filing System
Description

Electronic filing and management system for ocean service contracts between vessel-operating common carriers and shippers, used for regulatory compliance under the Shipping Act.

3Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) Registry
CategoryLicensing Database
Description

Public registry listing all licensed ocean freight forwarders and non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVOCCs) authorized to operate in U.S. trade, including non-compliant NVOCC and controlled carrier lists.

4Fact Finding Investigations
CategoryRegulatory Investigation Process
Description

Formal Commission investigations into industry issues and emerging trends, with public participation, including Fact Finding 28 on demurrage and detention charges, Fact Finding 29 on port congestion, and Fact Finding 30 on COVID-19 cruise impact.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership1 partner
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2024-03-19
Description

FMC and U.S. Customs and Border Protection share ACE (Automated Commercial Environment) data to improve trade enforcement and regulatory oversight. This interagency collaboration enhances the agencies' ability to monitor cargo flows and enforce trade regulations.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

DOT agency regulating commercial motor vehicles, motor carriers, and drivers. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with analogous licensing, compliance monitoring, and enforcement responsibilities.

TypeOthers
Description

U.S. independent federal agency investigating transportation accidents across all modes. Peer in the independent federal transportation agency model, sharing governance structure and Congressional accountability.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

UN specialized agency for maritime safety, security, and environmental performance. Global maritime regulator with broader international standard-setting role; the FMC operates within IMO frameworks and represents the U.S. in this ecosystem.

TypeDirect peer
Description

DOT agency regulating civil aviation safety, air traffic control, and airline economic activities. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with broader regulatory scope and substantially larger resources.

TypeDirect peer
Description

DOT agency regulating U.S. rail safety and economic competition. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with comparable rulemaking, oversight, and investigation functions.

TypeRegional player
Description

EU agency providing technical and scientific assistance to the European Commission on maritime safety, security, and pollution prevention. Peer maritime regulator operating in a different geographic jurisdiction with comparable monitoring and advisory functions.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Independent U.S. federal economic regulator of U.S. rail and pipeline transportation. Structurally and functionally analogous to the FMC as another independent federal transportation regulator, with similar commissioner-based governance and statutory authority over carrier agreements and rates.

TypeRegional player
Description

Australian federal agency responsible for maritime safety, navigation, and environmental protection. Peer maritime regulator in a different geography with comparable vessel registration, oversight, and enforcement functions.

TypeOthers
Description

DHS agency responsible for maritime safety, security, and environmental stewardship, including vessel inspection and port facility security. Adjacent federal agency with overlapping maritime jurisdiction and complementary enforcement authorities.

10U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD)
TypeDirect peer
Description

DOT agency dealing with U.S. maritime policy, ports, sealift readiness, and Jones Act enforcement. Closely aligned maritime federal entity with overlapping jurisdiction on shipping policy and U.S.-flag vessel matters.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat3 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature4 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles5 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
Compliance1 record

Each record includes

Name, Class, Description

Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Federal Maritime Commission

Maritime Regulatory Servicesfmc.gov

The Federal Maritime Commission is the independent U.S. federal agency that regulates the international ocean transportation system, enforcing the Shipping Act and Ocean Shipping Reform Act across ocean carriers, intermediaries, terminal operators, and cruise lines serving U.S. exporters, importers, and passengers.

What Federal Maritime Commission does

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is the independent U.S. federal agency, established in 1961, responsible for regulating the U.S. international ocean transportation system under the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. It enforces competition and disclosure rules across vessel-operating common carriers (VOCCs), ocean transportation intermediaries (NVOCCs and ocean freight forwarders), marine terminal operators, and passenger vessel operators, and it adjudicates cruise passenger and shipper complaints. The agency does not sell commercial products or services; its outputs are regulatory. Stakeholders interact with the FMC through statutory filings, licensing, complaints, and rulemaking proceedings.

The agency's technology footprint is composed of government-operated digital platforms: the SERVCON portal for ocean service contract filings, the public Agreement Library database of VOCC and MTO agreements, the OTI Registry of licensed intermediaries, the Electronic Reading Room for agency decisions and orders, ACE data sharing with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and internal FOIA and OSRA implementation tracking systems. Section 508 accessibility compliance is maintained across these systems. Public communications are digital-first via fmc.gov, press releases, commissioner engagement events, and fact-finding investigations (e.g., Fact Findings 28 on demurrage and detention, 29 on port congestion, 30 on the cruise industry's COVID-19 impact).

The FMC is funded through congressional appropriations rather than revenue from regulated parties. The House reauthorized the agency through 2029 in December 2025 with an annual budget increased from $49.2 million to $57 million, although FY2027 budget discussions cite a flat $40 million level. Minor ancillary receipts come from filing fees and collected civil penalties, including a $1.9 million penalty from a shipping line in May 2026. Governance rests with a five-member Commission appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate; Chairman Laura DiBella and most recent commissioner Robert J. Harvey (sworn in June 1, 2026) lead the current panel.

Federal Maritime Commission firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Federal Maritime Commission
Legal name
Federal Maritime Commission
Website
https://fmc.gov
Company type
Public
Founded year
1961
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
101–250 employees
Short description
The Federal Maritime Commission is the independent U.S. federal agency that regulates the international ocean transportation system, enforcing the Shipping Act and Ocean Shipping Reform Act across ocean carriers, intermediaries, terminal operators, and cruise lines serving U.S. exporters, importers, and passengers.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Federal Maritime Commission industry classification

Industry
Product category
Maritime Regulatory Services
NAICS
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors (92615)
akta.pro primary industry
Transportation Regulators (Aviation, Maritime, Rail, Road) (BPAIAOAL)

Keywords

  • Ocean transportation regulation
  • Maritime regulatory oversight
  • Shipping act enforcement
  • Ocean carrier licensing
  • Maritime trade compliance

Where Federal Maritime Commission is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Federal Maritime Commission business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Others

Marketing channels5 records

Federal Maritime Commission product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is the independent U.S. federal agency responsible for regulating the U.S. international ocean transportation system. It enforces the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, licenses Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (OTIs), reviews service contracts and tariffs, monitors carrier practices (including demurrage and detention charges), conducts fact-finding investigations, and resolves disputes involving ocean carriers, marine terminal operators, and shippers.

Product overview

The Federal Maritime Commission is an independent U.S. federal agency that regulates the international ocean transportation system. Rather than offering commercial products, the agency provides regulatory databases and filing systems including the Agreement Library (public database of shipping agreements between carriers and terminal operators), SERVCON (electronic service contract filing system), the OTI Registry (licensed ocean transportation intermediaries), and Fact Finding Investigation processes for industry oversight. The agency enforces the Shipping Act of 1984 and Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, monitors carrier rates and practices, and handles complaints related to demurrage, detention, and other shipping charges.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Agreement Library
  • SERVCON (Service Contract System) Electronic filing and management system for ocean service contracts between vessel-operating common carriers and shippers, used for regulatory compliance under the Shipping Act.
  • Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) Registry Public registry listing all licensed ocean freight forwarders and non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVOCCs) authorized to operate in U.S. trade, including non-compliant NVOCC and controlled carrier lists.
  • Fact Finding Investigations Formal Commission investigations into industry issues and emerging trends, with public participation, including Fact Finding 28 on demurrage and detention charges, Fact Finding 29 on port congestion, and Fact Finding 30 on COVID-19 cruise impact.

Quantifiable outcome

  • U.S.-China port fee dispute cost to container shipping industry: $3.2 billion
  • +1 more outcomes

Companies that use Federal Maritime Commission

Customer profile

Segments5 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Federal Maritime Commission technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature4 records

Federal Maritime Commission partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

One partnership is on record.

  • U.S. Customs and Border ProtectioncoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 19 March 2024FMC and U.S. Customs and Border Protection share ACE (Automated Commercial Environment) data to improve trade enforcement and regulatory oversight. This interagency collaboration enhances the agencies' ability to monitor cargo flows and enforce trade regulations.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Federal Maritime Commission competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA): DOT agency regulating commercial motor vehicles, motor carriers, and drivers. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with analogous licensing, compliance monitoring, and enforcement responsibilities.
  • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): DOT agency regulating civil aviation safety, air traffic control, and airline economic activities. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with broader regulatory scope and substantially larger resources.
  • Federal Railroad Administration (FRA): DOT agency regulating U.S. rail safety and economic competition. Peer mode-specific federal transportation regulator with comparable rulemaking, oversight, and investigation functions.
  • Surface Transportation Board: Independent U.S. federal economic regulator of U.S. rail and pipeline transportation. Structurally and functionally analogous to the FMC as another independent federal transportation regulator, with similar commissioner-based governance and statutory authority over carrier agreements and rates.
  • U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD): DOT agency dealing with U.S. maritime policy, ports, sealift readiness, and Jones Act enforcement. Closely aligned maritime federal entity with overlapping jurisdiction on shipping policy and U.S.-flag vessel matters.

Others

  • National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB): U.S. independent federal agency investigating transportation accidents across all modes. Peer in the independent federal transportation agency model, sharing governance structure and Congressional accountability.
  • U.S. Coast Guard (USCG): DHS agency responsible for maritime safety, security, and environmental stewardship, including vessel inspection and port facility security. Adjacent federal agency with overlapping maritime jurisdiction and complementary enforcement authorities.

Broad incumbents

  • International Maritime Organization (IMO): UN specialized agency for maritime safety, security, and environmental performance. Global maritime regulator with broader international standard-setting role; the FMC operates within IMO frameworks and represents the U.S. in this ecosystem.

Regional players

  • European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA): EU agency providing technical and scientific assistance to the European Commission on maritime safety, security, and pollution prevention. Peer maritime regulator operating in a different geographic jurisdiction with comparable monitoring and advisory functions.
  • Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA): Australian federal agency responsible for maritime safety, navigation, and environmental protection. Peer maritime regulator in a different geography with comparable vessel registration, oversight, and enforcement functions.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat3 records

Key risks7 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Federal Maritime Commission social profiles

Digital presence

Federal Maritime Commission compliance and trust

Trust signal

Compliance1 record

Federal Maritime Commission financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Federal Maritime Commission leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Federal Maritime Commission funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Federal Maritime Commission M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Federal Maritime Commission

What does Federal Maritime Commission do?

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is the independent U.S. federal agency responsible for regulating the U.S. international ocean transportation system. It enforces the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, licenses Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (OTIs), reviews service contracts and tariffs, monitors carrier practices (including demurrage and detention charges), conducts fact-finding investigations, and resolves disputes involving ocean carriers, marine terminal operators, and shippers.

Is Federal Maritime Commission a public or private company?

Federal Maritime Commission is a public company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Federal Maritime Commission founded?

Federal Maritime Commission was founded in 1961. It employs 101 to 250 people.

Where is Federal Maritime Commission based?

Federal Maritime Commission is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Federal Maritime Commission's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Surface Transportation Board and U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD). Others are National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). International Maritime Organization (IMO) is listed as a broad incumbent. Regional players are European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) and Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA).

Does Federal Maritime Commission have an API?

No public API is recorded for Federal Maritime Commission.

What industry is Federal Maritime Commission in?

Federal Maritime Commission's product category is Maritime Regulatory Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIAOAL, Transportation Regulators (Aviation, Maritime, Rail, Road). Its NAICS code is 92615.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
EconomyNextSri Lanka seeks US maritime cooperation, invites FMC chair to visit ColomboSri Lanka’s high-level delegation visited the US to discuss maritime cooperation, supply chain management, and modernization efforts, including a meeting with US Federal Maritime Commission Chair Laura DiBella. The visit aimed to strengthen trade ties and study digital logistics tools at the Port of Baltimore. Additionally, Sri Lanka is considering modernizing its tax treaty framework to align with international standards amid recent amendments by India, and recent trade and financial developments reflect ongoing efforts to improve trade relations and economic stability.PorttechnologyFMC wins detention fee case against EvergreenThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a Federal Maritime Commission ruling that Evergreen Shipping Agency charged unreasonable detention fees to a trucker during a port closure. The court affirmed that the fees violated the Shipping Act's requirement for just and reasonable practices because they failed to promote freight fluidity given the circumstances. This decision reinforces the FMC's authority to regulate ocean carrier fees based on their effectiveness in incentivizing efficient equipment flow.The LoadstarAs rates rally, the FMC enforcement offensive hits critical mass...The Federal Maritime Commission has levied over $68 million in combined awards against ocean carriers MSC, OOCL, and Maersk within a six-month period, marking a significant escalation in detention and demurrage enforcement. An Evergreen court win has reinforced the FMC's enforcement authority, raising questions about whether OOCL's pending constitutional challenge can halt the regulatory momentum.Journal of CommerceUS shipper group seeks to change notification rules for ocean freight tariffsThe Agriculture Transportation Coalition (AgTC) is urging the US Federal Maritime Commission to issue new rulemaking or have Congress amend the US Shipping Act to require ocean carriers to directly notify customers of new rates and surcharges instead of only publishing changes in tariffs. Ocean carriers are currently required to provide only 30-day notice through tariff publications, which AgTC says fails to adequately inform shippers of rate increases and unforeseen costs. The push for regulatory change stems from complaints that agricultural exporters face difficulties due to inadequate carrier notification practices.IndexBoxJones Act Waiver and FY2027 Maritime Budget Under Congressional ScrutinyA congressional hearing on Wednesday saw lawmakers question the U.S. Maritime Administration and Federal Maritime Commission about their FY2027 budget requests, with the primary focus on a White House Jones Act waiver described as the longest and broadest in recent history. Maritime Administrator Stephen Carmel stated his office was not consulted about the waiver decision, which was issued by the Department of War and Homeland Security without prior notice. MARAD's budget request includes funding to double the Tanker Security Program to 20 vessels, $550 million for USMMA infrastructure, but cuts assistance to state maritime academies by $50 million, contingent on a new Maritime Security Trust Fund being enacted.Legis1Maritime Budget Hearing Exposes Efficiency Contradictions | Legis1The House Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation held a hearing where the Maritime Administration and Federal Maritime Commission testified on FY2027 budget proposals amid conflicting federal policy signals. MARAD is seeking $250 million for a large shipyard program while the Department of Government Efficiency simultaneously targets its Beaumont, Texas office for closure, and the FMC faces flat $40 million funding despite overseeing a U.S.-China port fee dispute that has cost the container shipping industry an estimated $3.2 billion. The hearing highlighted fundamental contradictions in federal maritime policy as lawmakers question how agencies can execute expanded missions with shrinking administrative capacity.GcaptainMaritime Action Plan Takes Center Stage as Congress Reviews MARAD, FMC BudgetsThe House Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee reviewed fiscal year 2027 budget requests from the Maritime Administration and Federal Maritime Commission, with MARAD seeking $2.6 billion to support the Trump administration's Maritime Action Plan aimed at rebuilding the U.S. maritime industrial base. MARAD Administrator Stephen Carmel warned of declining cargo volumes and weak cargo preference enforcement threatening the viability of the Maritime Security Program, while FMC Chairman Laura DiBella requested $40 million and highlighted enforcement actions including a $22.67 million penalty against Mediterranean Shipping Company for deceptive billing practices. The hearing underscored growing bipartisan consensus around maritime policy as a national security and economic security priority.PorttechnologyMaersk to pay $1.9 million FMC civil penaltyThe Federal Maritime Commission has recovered $1.9 million in civil penalties from Maersk A/S under a compromise agreement related to alleged violations of the Shipping Act. The allegations concerned Maersk assessing detention charges against third parties under service contracts and tariffs without those parties consenting to be bound by those terms. Maersk has agreed to end the practice, amend its US tariff rules, and issue refunds and waivers to affected third parties, though it did not admit to violating the Shipping Act.GcaptainA New Front in Shipping’s Climate Battle: The Federal Maritime CommissionThe Federal Maritime Commission made an unprecedented move by having Chairman Laura DiBella attend the IMO's MEPC 84 session in London to oppose the proposed Net-Zero Framework, breaking with the traditional approach where the U.S. Coast Guard and State Department handled such climate negotiations. The agency invoked its "unfavorable conditions" authority under 46 U.S.C. §§ 42101–42109, signaling potential enforcement actions including fines and port access restrictions against foreign-flag vessels for international environmental regulations. This represents a notable policy shift that could significantly impact carriers operating in U.S. trade and shippers facing potential cost increases, marking the FMC's entry into climate policy enforcement.The Times of IndiaThe stunning way China is using America's own playbook to hit the US where it hurts most, and Washington has no idea how to respond - The Economic TimesChina detained 91 Panama-flagged vessels at Chinese ports in March 2026, representing roughly 74% of all ship detentions in the Asia-Pacific region that month, according to the US Federal Maritime Commission. The action follows Panama's Supreme Court annulment of CK Hutchison Holdings' concession to operate the Balboa and Cristobal terminals flanking the canal, after which Maersk APM Terminals and MSC's Terminal Investment Limited were appointed as interim operators. CK Hutchison is pursuing over $2 billion in international arbitration, while COSCO suspended operations at Balboa, and the US together with six Latin American nations issued a joint statement condemning China's actions as targeted economic pressure.