Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart

Full company profile

uuid000he7c

Namestring
Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart
Legal namestring
Lowey Dannenberg, P.C.
Websiteurl
lowey.com
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1967
Descriptiontext

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart, P.C. is a U.S. plaintiff-side complex litigation law firm founded in 1967 in White Plains, New York, with a second office in West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, and a headcount of 11–50 employees. The firm represents institutional and individual investors, public pension plans, third-party payors, and consumer classes across five practice areas: Data Privacy, Commodities/Whistleblower, Antitrust, Healthcare, and Securities. Counsel has served as court-appointed co-lead counsel in matters such as Shell Eggs Antitrust, Ramaco Resources securities class actions, and the Google Assistant privacy litigation, and has secured multiple eight- and nine-figure recoveries, including a $386.5 million bond market antitrust settlement, a $95 million Apple consumer privacy settlement, a $68 million Google privacy settlement, and a $63.2 million Amitiza end-payor generic-drug verdict.

The firm operates on a contingency fee model across securities, antitrust, consumer protection, data breach, and mass arbitration matters, recovering a percentage of client settlements or judgments. Case origination combines court-appointed co-lead counsel appointments, portfolio monitoring contracts with public pension plans, and press-release-driven outreach (GlobeNewsWire/FinancialContent) soliciting investor participation in active matters. The firm has also developed Claim Magic, an in-house consumer-facing case management portal where class members check eligibility, retain counsel, upload documents, track case status, and receive settlement payments.

Recent strategic activity includes the 2025 lateral hires of former U.S. Congressman Matthew A. Cartwright to lead the Healthcare Litigation Team and former Assistant Attorney General Joseph Nielsen to deepen the antitrust bench, alongside 2026 Chambers & Partners recognition in Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiff New York. Distribution is primarily direct client engagement (White Plains and West Conshohocken offices) supported by the firm's website, newsletter, and organic social presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. The firm is privately held as a New York professional corporation with no parent company or institutional investment structure.

Short descriptiontext

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a U.S. plaintiff-side complex litigation firm representing institutional investors, public pension plans, third-party payors, and consumer classes in securities, antitrust, healthcare, and data privacy matters on a contingency fee basis, supported by its in-house Claim Magic consumer portal.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWhite Plains, United States
HQ citystring
White Plains
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices2 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
securities class action litigation, antitrust litigation services, consumer data privacy litigation, healthcare litigation law, portfolio monitoring services
NAICS code1 code
  • Legal Services5411
Product category
Legal Services - Complex Litigation
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model4 records
1Legal Services - Securities Class Action Litigation
TypeProfessional Services
Description

The firm represents institutional and individual investors who suffered financial losses from corporate fraud and malfeasance in violation of federal securities laws. Revenue is generated through contingency fee arrangements typical in securities litigation, where the firm recovers a percentage of settlements or judgments on behalf of plaintiff clients.

lowey.com
2Legal Services - Antitrust Litigation
TypeProfessional Services
Description

The firm represents purchasers and other parties in antitrust class action cases, including direct purchaser plaintiffs and end-payor plaintiffs. Revenue generated through contingency fees from successful settlements or judgments.

lowey.com
3Legal Services - Consumer Protection and Data Privacy
TypeProfessional Services
Description

The firm handles data privacy, data breach, and consumer protection matters, including mass arbitration cases. Revenue generated through contingency fee arrangements.

lowey.com
4Portfolio Monitoring Services
TypeProfessional Services
Description

The firm provides portfolio monitoring services to pension plans and institutional investors, identifying securities litigation opportunities at no cost to the plans, with the firm assessing cases based on merits, likelihood of recovery, and alignment with client investment policies.

lowey.com
Marketing channels5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 record
1Claim Magic
Description

Centralized case management platform developed by Lowey Dannenberg attorneys to simplify and streamline the process of pursuing legal claims for consumers, including checking eligibility, retaining lawyers, uploading case information, and receiving updates and compensation.

lowey.com
Core offering1 text field

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a complex litigation law firm founded in 1967 that represents investors and corporations in securities class actions, antitrust litigation, consumer protection, data privacy, healthcare, and commodities matters, recovering billions of dollars through contingency fee arrangements. The firm also provides portfolio monitoring services to public pension plans and offers its proprietary Claim Magic platform to streamline consumer participation in legal claims.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 6 values shown
  • $95 million settlement against Apple for consumer privacy violations
+5 more records
Product overview1 text field

Lowey Dannenberg is a securities litigation law firm offering legal services across five practice areas: Data Privacy, Commodities, Antitrust, Health Care, and Securities. Their primary technology product is Claim Magic, a consumer-facing case management portal that enables individuals to check eligibility for ongoing litigation, retain counsel, upload documentation, track case status, and receive settlement payments. The firm does not offer a platform-plus-modules architecture; Claim Magic is a single unified consumer-facing platform supported by the firm's litigation services.

Product and service6 records
1Securities Class Action Litigation
CategorySecurities Litigation
2Antitrust Litigation Services
CategoryAntitrust Litigation
3Consumer Protection and Data Privacy Litigation
CategoryConsumer Protection Litigation
4Healthcare Litigation Services
CategoryHealthcare Litigation
5Portfolio Monitoring Services
CategorySecurities Monitoring Services
6Claim Magic Platform
CategoryConsumer Case Management Platform
Description

A centralized consumer-facing case management platform that simplifies and streamlines the process of pursuing legal claims. Users can check eligibility, retain a lawyer, upload case information, monitor case status, and receive payments through a single online portal. Developed by Lowey Dannenberg attorneys for consumer participation in legal proceedings.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Largest U.S. securities and shareholder rights litigation firm; co-lead counsel in many of the same institutional investor securities class actions that Lowey Dannenberg pursues. Directly comparable in practice areas, client base (pension funds and institutional investors), and court-appointed roles.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Premier securities fraud class action firm; frequently competes against Lowey Dannenberg for lead plaintiff appointments in high-profile securities matters. Most closely comparable in scale of recoveries and breadth of institutional client relationships.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Leading plaintiff securities and antitrust litigation firm; represents institutional investors with strong overlap in practice areas (securities class actions, antitrust, corporate governance) and client base.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Securities fraud class action and shareholder rights firm; operates in identical plaintiff-side litigation space with overlapping court-appointed counsel roles. Closely comparable on contingency fee model and institutional client servicing.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side antitrust, consumer protection, and securities litigation firm; co-counsel with Lowey Dannenberg on the $68M Google Assistant privacy settlement. Direct comparable on contingency model, case type, and court-appointed roles.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Securities litigation and investor rights firm; regular appointments as lead counsel in securities class actions directly competing with Lowey Dannenberg for case volume.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Antitrust and complex class action litigation firm with long tenure in plaintiff-side work; comparable in practice mix, contingency fee model, and class action orientation.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Consumer protection, securities, and antitrust class action firm; comparable in plaintiff-side class action work, especially in technology and consumer privacy where Lowey Dannenberg's Claim Magic intersects.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National plaintiff-side class action and mass tort firm with comparable practice scope across securities, antitrust, consumer protection, and employment. Directly comparable in case scale and contingency fee model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side antitrust, securities fraud, and consumer protection litigation firm with direct practice overlap (antitrust class actions, securities, consumer rights) and similar court-appointed role profile.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers5 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature1 record

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles14 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart

Legal Services - Complex Litigationlowey.com

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a U.S. plaintiff-side complex litigation firm representing institutional investors, public pension plans, third-party payors, and consumer classes in securities, antitrust, healthcare, and data privacy matters on a contingency fee basis, supported by its in-house Claim Magic consumer portal.

What Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart does

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart, P.C. is a U.S. plaintiff-side complex litigation law firm founded in 1967 in White Plains, New York, with a second office in West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, and a headcount of 11–50 employees. The firm represents institutional and individual investors, public pension plans, third-party payors, and consumer classes across five practice areas: Data Privacy, Commodities/Whistleblower, Antitrust, Healthcare, and Securities. Counsel has served as court-appointed co-lead counsel in matters such as Shell Eggs Antitrust, Ramaco Resources securities class actions, and the Google Assistant privacy litigation, and has secured multiple eight- and nine-figure recoveries, including a $386.5 million bond market antitrust settlement, a $95 million Apple consumer privacy settlement, a $68 million Google privacy settlement, and a $63.2 million Amitiza end-payor generic-drug verdict.

The firm operates on a contingency fee model across securities, antitrust, consumer protection, data breach, and mass arbitration matters, recovering a percentage of client settlements or judgments. Case origination combines court-appointed co-lead counsel appointments, portfolio monitoring contracts with public pension plans, and press-release-driven outreach (GlobeNewsWire/FinancialContent) soliciting investor participation in active matters. The firm has also developed Claim Magic, an in-house consumer-facing case management portal where class members check eligibility, retain counsel, upload documents, track case status, and receive settlement payments.

Recent strategic activity includes the 2025 lateral hires of former U.S. Congressman Matthew A. Cartwright to lead the Healthcare Litigation Team and former Assistant Attorney General Joseph Nielsen to deepen the antitrust bench, alongside 2026 Chambers & Partners recognition in Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiff New York. Distribution is primarily direct client engagement (White Plains and West Conshohocken offices) supported by the firm's website, newsletter, and organic social presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. The firm is privately held as a New York professional corporation with no parent company or institutional investment structure.

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart
Legal name
Lowey Dannenberg, P.C.
Website
https://lowey.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
1967
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a U.S. plaintiff-side complex litigation firm representing institutional investors, public pension plans, third-party payors, and consumer classes in securities, antitrust, healthcare, and data privacy matters on a contingency fee basis, supported by its in-house Claim Magic consumer portal.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
White Plains
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices2 records

Markets served

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Legal Services - Securities Class Action Litigation: The firm represents institutional and individual investors who suffered financial losses from corporate fraud and malfeasance in violation of federal securities laws. Revenue is generated through contingency fee arrangements typical in securities litigation, where the firm recovers a percentage of settlements or judgments on behalf of plaintiff clients.
  2. Legal Services - Antitrust Litigation: The firm represents purchasers and other parties in antitrust class action cases, including direct purchaser plaintiffs and end-payor plaintiffs. Revenue generated through contingency fees from successful settlements or judgments.
  3. Legal Services - Consumer Protection and Data Privacy: The firm handles data privacy, data breach, and consumer protection matters, including mass arbitration cases. Revenue generated through contingency fee arrangements.
  4. Portfolio Monitoring Services: The firm provides portfolio monitoring services to pension plans and institutional investors, identifying securities litigation opportunities at no cost to the plans, with the firm assessing cases based on merits, likelihood of recovery, and alignment with client investment policies.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels5 records

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a complex litigation law firm founded in 1967 that represents investors and corporations in securities class actions, antitrust litigation, consumer protection, data privacy, healthcare, and commodities matters, recovering billions of dollars through contingency fee arrangements. The firm also provides portfolio monitoring services to public pension plans and offers its proprietary Claim Magic platform to streamline consumer participation in legal claims.

Product overview

Lowey Dannenberg is a securities litigation law firm offering legal services across five practice areas: Data Privacy, Commodities, Antitrust, Health Care, and Securities. Their primary technology product is Claim Magic, a consumer-facing case management portal that enables individuals to check eligibility for ongoing litigation, retain counsel, upload documentation, track case status, and receive settlement payments. The firm does not offer a platform-plus-modules architecture; Claim Magic is a single unified consumer-facing platform supported by the firm's litigation services.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • Claim Magic: Centralized case management platform developed by Lowey Dannenberg attorneys to simplify and streamline the process of pursuing legal claims for consumers, including checking eligibility, retaining lawyers, uploading case information, and receiving updates and compensation.

Products and services

  • Securities Class Action Litigation
  • Antitrust Litigation Services
  • Consumer Protection and Data Privacy Litigation
  • Healthcare Litigation Services
  • Portfolio Monitoring Services
  • Claim Magic Platform A centralized consumer-facing case management platform that simplifies and streamlines the process of pursuing legal claims. Users can check eligibility, retain a lawyer, upload case information, monitor case status, and receive payments through a single online portal. Developed by Lowey Dannenberg attorneys for consumer participation in legal proceedings.

Quantifiable outcome

  • $95 million settlement against Apple for consumer privacy violations
  • +5 more outcomes

Companies that use Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart

Customer profile

Named customers5 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature1 record

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann: Largest U.S. securities and shareholder rights litigation firm; co-lead counsel in many of the same institutional investor securities class actions that Lowey Dannenberg pursues. Directly comparable in practice areas, client base (pension funds and institutional investors), and court-appointed roles.
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd: Premier securities fraud class action firm; frequently competes against Lowey Dannenberg for lead plaintiff appointments in high-profile securities matters. Most closely comparable in scale of recoveries and breadth of institutional client relationships.
  • Labaton Sucharow: Leading plaintiff securities and antitrust litigation firm; represents institutional investors with strong overlap in practice areas (securities class actions, antitrust, corporate governance) and client base.
  • Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check: Securities fraud class action and shareholder rights firm; operates in identical plaintiff-side litigation space with overlapping court-appointed counsel roles. Closely comparable on contingency fee model and institutional client servicing.
  • Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law: Plaintiff-side antitrust, consumer protection, and securities litigation firm; co-counsel with Lowey Dannenberg on the $68M Google Assistant privacy settlement. Direct comparable on contingency model, case type, and court-appointed roles.
  • Glancy Prongay & Murray: Securities litigation and investor rights firm; regular appointments as lead counsel in securities class actions directly competing with Lowey Dannenberg for case volume.
  • Pomerantz LLP: Antitrust and complex class action litigation firm with long tenure in plaintiff-side work; comparable in practice mix, contingency fee model, and class action orientation.
  • Hagens Berman: Consumer protection, securities, and antitrust class action firm; comparable in plaintiff-side class action work, especially in technology and consumer privacy where Lowey Dannenberg's Claim Magic intersects.
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: National plaintiff-side class action and mass tort firm with comparable practice scope across securities, antitrust, consumer protection, and employment. Directly comparable in case scale and contingency fee model.
  • Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll: Plaintiff-side antitrust, securities fraud, and consumer protection litigation firm with direct practice overlap (antitrust class actions, securities, consumer rights) and similar court-appointed role profile.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart social profiles

Digital presence

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles14 records

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart

What does Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart do?

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a complex litigation law firm founded in 1967 that represents investors and corporations in securities class actions, antitrust litigation, consumer protection, data privacy, healthcare, and commodities matters, recovering billions of dollars through contingency fee arrangements. The firm also provides portfolio monitoring services to public pension plans and offers its proprietary Claim Magic platform to streamline consumer participation in legal claims.

Is Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart a public or private company?

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is a private company. It is classified as management employee owned and is currently operating.

When was Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart founded?

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart was founded in 1967. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart based?

Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart is headquartered in White Plains, United States, in the North America region.

How does Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart make money?

Four revenue lines are on record. Legal Services - Securities Class Action Litigation is the primary driver. The others are legal Services - Antitrust Litigation, legal Services - Consumer Protection and Data Privacy and portfolio Monitoring Services.

Who are Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, Labaton Sucharow, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law, Glancy Prongay & Murray, Pomerantz LLP, Hagens Berman, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.

Does Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart have an API?

No public API is recorded for Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
The future of tradingLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating Astrana Health, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTH) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is investigating Astrana Health, Inc. for potential federal securities law violations, citing a Glass House Research report on aggressive acquisitions and a $545 million related-party loan. The stock fell 9.02% to $34.30 on September 17, 2026, after the report was published.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg P.C., Court-Appointed Co-Lead Counsel, Is Prosecuting Securities Class Action Against Ramaco Resources Inc. (NASDAQ: METC)Lowey Dannenberg P.C. is prosecuting a securities class action against Ramaco Resources over its Brook Mine project in Wyoming, which the company touted as a source of rare earth elements. The case covers investors who purchased Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025 and October 23, 2025, and the firm is seeking investors from the August 7, 2025 secondary offering.PR NewswireLowey Dannenberg, P.C. Announce a Settlement for Those Who Have Transacted in Mexican Government Bonds between January 1, 2006 through April 19, 2017A proposed class action settlement of $86.4 million was reached with six Mexican banks over alleged price-fixing of Mexican government bonds from 2006 to 2017. The settlement fund will be divided among class members who file claims, with a fairness hearing set for December 3, 2026.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLowey Dannenberg P.C. is investigating Cardinal Infrastructure Group for potential federal securities law violations. The company's Q2 2026 adjusted EPS fell 51% to $0.26, missing estimates, and its stock dropped 36% to $38.27. The investigation concerns whether the company disclosed cost pressures and operational risks at the time of its June 2026 secondary offering.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating EquipmentShare.com Inc. (NASDAQ: EQPT) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLowey Dannenberg P.C. is investigating EquipmentShare.com Inc. for potential federal securities law violations. The firm cites a June 2026 Umibōzu report alleging undisclosed related-party transactions netted at least $77 million, and EquipmentShare's stock fell to $19.69 after the IPO.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLaw firm Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. announced on August 27, 2026 that it is investigating Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNL) for possible federal securities law violations. The investigation centers on whether the company and its executives concealed cost pressures and operational risks at the time of its June 24, 2026 secondary offering, which raised over $318 million. Cardinal's second-quarter results missed estimates, with adjusted EBITDA margin falling to 12.4% and full-year guidance cut to 16%-18%.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating Innventure, Inc. (NASDAQ: INV) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLaw firm Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. announced on August 27, 2026 that it is investigating Innventure, Inc. (NASDAQ: INV) for potential violations of federal securities laws, questioning whether the company and its executives disclosed accurate and complete information. The investigation follows Innventure's August 13, 2026 disclosure of second-quarter revenue of about $953,000 and a $0.32 per share loss, plus suspended guidance for its Accelsius subsidiary.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALHC) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLaw firm Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. announced on August 26, 2026 that it is investigating Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALHC) for potential federal securities law violations. The investigation follows a whistleblower lawsuit filed July 8, 2026, by a former chief transformation officer alleging $8–10 million in operating expenses were misclassified as capital expenditures, inflating adjusted EBITDA. Alignment's stock fell $4.02, or 16.7%, to $20.03.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. is Investigating The Ensign Group (NASDAQ: ENSG) for Potential Violations of the Federal Securities LawsLaw firm Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. announced on August 26, 2026 that it is investigating The Ensign Group (NASDAQ: ENSG) for potential violations of federal securities laws, including whether executives provided investors with accurate and complete information. The investigation follows Hunterbrook's June 8 report alleging quality-measure gaming and falsified care-quality data, and Muddy Waters' June 11 report alleging Medicare and Medicaid fraud.FinancialContent Business PageLowey Dannenberg, P.C. Reminds Investors of the October 5, 2026 Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Smartsheet Inc. (NASDAQ: SMAR) Class Action LawsuitLowey Dannenberg, P.C. notified investors that a class action, Galveston Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Smartsheet Inc., is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging Smartsheet concealed a $56.50 per share offer from Blackstone and Vista Equity Partners while repurchasing stock. The complaint cites an average Class Period price of $46.45. Lead plaintiff motions are due October 5, 2026.