Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

International Center for Law and Economics

Full company profile

uuid000hr2q

Namestring
International Center for Law and Economics
Legal namestring
International Center for Law & Economics
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2009
Descriptiontext

The International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center founded in 2009 and headquartered in Portland, Oregon. The organization produces law & economics scholarship to inform public policy debates, operating across six research programs: Antitrust & Consumer Protection, Data Security & Privacy, Financial Regulation & Corporate Governance, Innovation & the New Economy, Intellectual Property & Licensing, and Telecommunications & Regulated Utilities. Its primary audiences are policymakers and regulatory agencies (including the FCC, DOJ, FTC, U.S. Congress, and the European Commission), the academic and research community, and industry stakeholders affected by regulation.

ICLE's core methodology applies an error-cost analytical framework — grounded in decision theory and empirical evidence — to evaluate the social costs and benefits of proposed regulatory interventions, with particular attention to how institutions shape the appropriateness and effectiveness of enforcement. Outputs include white papers, regulatory comments, congressional testimony, academic publications, and topical spotlights. The organization draws on a network of over 185 Global Academic Affiliates and runs the Next Generation Scholars Program to cultivate emerging talent. Research is distributed freely through the ICLE website, two newsletters (Competition and Innovation), co-publishing on the Truth on the Market blog, and earned media in trade publications.

As a 501(c)-style nonprofit with 11-50 employees, ICLE is funded through donations (visible PayPal donation link) and grants rather than commercial revenue. It has no conventional product, pricing model, or paying customers; its 'distribution' is its influence on regulatory and judicial proceedings. The organization maintains a global research footprint spanning the United States, Europe, Asia, and the United Kingdom, and has recently deepened engagement in satellite spectrum policy, AI regulation, and international competition law.

Short descriptiontext

The International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center founded in 2009 that produces law & economics scholarship — including regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and white papers — to inform public policy debates for policymakers, regulatory agencies, academics, and industry stakeholders.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersPortland, United States
HQ citystring
Portland
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Keyword5 values
policy research, law and economics, antitrust analysis, regulatory analysis, public policy research
NAICS code1 code
  • Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities541720
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Educational Services8200
Product category
Policy Research and Think Tank Services
Social media profiles2 records
Marketing channels5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

ICLE is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that produces and disseminates law-and-economics scholarship to inform public policy debates. It operates six research programs covering antitrust, data security and privacy, financial regulation, innovation policy, intellectual property, and telecommunications, delivering outputs such as white papers, regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and academic publications. It also runs the Next Generation Scholars Program to develop emerging law-and-economics scholars.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • State laws requiring automakers to sell through franchised dealerships add between $3,934 and $4,992 to new car transaction prices based on $50,000 average prices
+2 more records
Product and service7 records
1Antitrust & Consumer Protection Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on antitrust and consumer protection policy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

2Data Security & Privacy Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on data security and privacy regulation for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

3Financial Regulation & Corporate Governance Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on financial regulation and corporate governance for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

4Innovation & the New Economy Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on innovation policy and the new economy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

5Intellectual Property & Licensing Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on intellectual property and licensing policy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

6Telecommunications & Regulated Utilities Research Program
CategoryPolicy Research
Description

A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on telecommunications and regulated utilities for policymakers, regulators, and academics.

7Next Generation Scholars Program
CategoryAcademic Program
Description

An ICLE program that supports and fosters the development of new law-and-economics scholars by identifying and promoting promising young scholars and helping them engage with the larger intellectual tradition and community of law-and-economics scholarship.

Partnership2 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-01-01
Description

Jointly convened LEO Policy Working Group, culminating in collaborative report on U.S. priorities for the 2027 World Radiocommunication Conference. Both organizations contribute expertise on satellite spectrum policy and international regulatory frameworks.

2Truth on the Market
Strategic tierCoreTypeGTM or Marketing Partner
Description

Co-publishing platform for ICLE analysis and scholarship. ICLE scholars publish articles and commentary through the Truth on the Market blog, extending reach to policy and academic audiences.

laweconcenter.org
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

ICLE's actual partner on the LEO satellite policy working group. Comparable as a policy research organization, though broader and more centrist, and overlapping on telecom and technology regulation topics.

TypeDirect peer
Description

One of the largest U.S. think tanks producing rigorous policy research across economics, law, and regulation. Directly comparable to ICLE in mission (evidence-based policy analysis) though much larger in scale and broader in scope.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Centrist think tank covering technology, financial regulation, and telecom with rigorous research output. Comparable in size and mission, and overlaps with ICLE on insurance, IP, and digital policy issues.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Free-market advocacy organization focused heavily on technology regulation, antitrust, and telecom policy — directly overlapping ICLE's research programs on net neutrality, digital competition, and consumer protection.

TypeDirect peer
Description

George Mason University-affiliated market-oriented research center focusing on regulatory policy and economic analysis. Shares ICLE's academic-affiliate network structure and produces overlapping work on financial regulation and telecom.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Centrist-to-conservative think tank producing economic and legal policy research with strong regulatory focus. Shares ICLE's pro-market orientation and academic affiliate model, and competes for similar policymaker attention on antitrust and telecom issues.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large, well-funded conservative think tank covering a wide range of policy areas including regulation, antitrust, and telecom. Less specialized than ICLE in law & economics methodology but competes for similar policymaker influence.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Academic center at GMU producing law & economics scholarship with a strong judicial-education focus. Shares ICLE's methodological orientation and overlaps on antitrust, IP, and regulatory analysis.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Libertarian think tank publishing policy research on regulation, antitrust, and technology. Closely aligned with ICLE's free-market analytical framework and produces overlapping commentary on net neutrality and digital competition.

TypeDirect peer
Description

D.C.-based think tank focused specifically on technology and innovation policy. Direct overlap with ICLE's Innovation & the New Economy and Telecommunications research programs, and comparable scale and methodology.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles9 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

International Center for Law and Economics

Policy Research and Think Tank Serviceslaweconcenter.org

The International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center founded in 2009 that produces law & economics scholarship — including regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and white papers — to inform public policy debates for policymakers, regulatory agencies, academics, and industry stakeholders.

What International Center for Law and Economics does

The International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center founded in 2009 and headquartered in Portland, Oregon. The organization produces law & economics scholarship to inform public policy debates, operating across six research programs: Antitrust & Consumer Protection, Data Security & Privacy, Financial Regulation & Corporate Governance, Innovation & the New Economy, Intellectual Property & Licensing, and Telecommunications & Regulated Utilities. Its primary audiences are policymakers and regulatory agencies (including the FCC, DOJ, FTC, U.S. Congress, and the European Commission), the academic and research community, and industry stakeholders affected by regulation.

ICLE's core methodology applies an error-cost analytical framework — grounded in decision theory and empirical evidence — to evaluate the social costs and benefits of proposed regulatory interventions, with particular attention to how institutions shape the appropriateness and effectiveness of enforcement. Outputs include white papers, regulatory comments, congressional testimony, academic publications, and topical spotlights. The organization draws on a network of over 185 Global Academic Affiliates and runs the Next Generation Scholars Program to cultivate emerging talent. Research is distributed freely through the ICLE website, two newsletters (Competition and Innovation), co-publishing on the Truth on the Market blog, and earned media in trade publications.

As a 501(c)-style nonprofit with 11-50 employees, ICLE is funded through donations (visible PayPal donation link) and grants rather than commercial revenue. It has no conventional product, pricing model, or paying customers; its 'distribution' is its influence on regulatory and judicial proceedings. The organization maintains a global research footprint spanning the United States, Europe, Asia, and the United Kingdom, and has recently deepened engagement in satellite spectrum policy, AI regulation, and international competition law.

International Center for Law and Economics firmographics

Firmographics
Name
International Center for Law and Economics
Legal name
International Center for Law & Economics
Website
https://laweconcenter.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2009
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
The International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center founded in 2009 that produces law & economics scholarship — including regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and white papers — to inform public policy debates for policymakers, regulatory agencies, academics, and industry stakeholders.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where International Center for Law and Economics is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Portland
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Markets served

International Center for Law and Economics business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels5 records

International Center for Law and Economics product offering

Product offering

Core offering

ICLE is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that produces and disseminates law-and-economics scholarship to inform public policy debates. It operates six research programs covering antitrust, data security and privacy, financial regulation, innovation policy, intellectual property, and telecommunications, delivering outputs such as white papers, regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and academic publications. It also runs the Next Generation Scholars Program to develop emerging law-and-economics scholars.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Antitrust & Consumer Protection Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on antitrust and consumer protection policy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Data Security & Privacy Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on data security and privacy regulation for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Financial Regulation & Corporate Governance Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on financial regulation and corporate governance for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Innovation & the New Economy Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on innovation policy and the new economy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Intellectual Property & Licensing Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on intellectual property and licensing policy for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Telecommunications & Regulated Utilities Research Program A standing research program at ICLE producing white papers, regulatory comments, and analysis on telecommunications and regulated utilities for policymakers, regulators, and academics.
  • Next Generation Scholars Program An ICLE program that supports and fosters the development of new law-and-economics scholars by identifying and promoting promising young scholars and helping them engage with the larger intellectual tradition and community of law-and-economics scholarship.

Quantifiable outcome

  • State laws requiring automakers to sell through franchised dealerships add between $3,934 and $4,992 to new car transaction prices based on $50,000 average prices
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use International Center for Law and Economics

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

International Center for Law and Economics technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

International Center for Law and Economics partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Two partnerships are on record, tiered core.

  • New America FoundationcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2025Jointly convened LEO Policy Working Group, culminating in collaborative report on U.S. priorities for the 2027 World Radiocommunication Conference. Both organizations contribute expertise on satellite spectrum policy and international regulatory frameworks.
  • Truth on the MarketcoreGTM or Marketing PartnerCo-publishing platform for ICLE analysis and scholarship. ICLE scholars publish articles and commentary through the Truth on the Market blog, extending reach to policy and academic audiences.

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

International Center for Law and Economics competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • New America Foundation: ICLE's actual partner on the LEO satellite policy working group. Comparable as a policy research organization, though broader and more centrist, and overlapping on telecom and technology regulation topics.
  • Brookings Institution: One of the largest U.S. think tanks producing rigorous policy research across economics, law, and regulation. Directly comparable to ICLE in mission (evidence-based policy analysis) though much larger in scale and broader in scope.
  • R Street Institute: Centrist think tank covering technology, financial regulation, and telecom with rigorous research output. Comparable in size and mission, and overlaps with ICLE on insurance, IP, and digital policy issues.
  • Competitive Enterprise Institute: Free-market advocacy organization focused heavily on technology regulation, antitrust, and telecom policy — directly overlapping ICLE's research programs on net neutrality, digital competition, and consumer protection.
  • Mercatus Center: George Mason University-affiliated market-oriented research center focusing on regulatory policy and economic analysis. Shares ICLE's academic-affiliate network structure and produces overlapping work on financial regulation and telecom.
  • American Enterprise Institute: Centrist-to-conservative think tank producing economic and legal policy research with strong regulatory focus. Shares ICLE's pro-market orientation and academic affiliate model, and competes for similar policymaker attention on antitrust and telecom issues.
  • George Mason University Law & Economics Center: Academic center at GMU producing law & economics scholarship with a strong judicial-education focus. Shares ICLE's methodological orientation and overlaps on antitrust, IP, and regulatory analysis.
  • Cato Institute: Libertarian think tank publishing policy research on regulation, antitrust, and technology. Closely aligned with ICLE's free-market analytical framework and produces overlapping commentary on net neutrality and digital competition.
  • Information Technology and Innovation Foundation: D.C.-based think tank focused specifically on technology and innovation policy. Direct overlap with ICLE's Innovation & the New Economy and Telecommunications research programs, and comparable scale and methodology.

Broad incumbents

  • Heritage Foundation: Large, well-funded conservative think tank covering a wide range of policy areas including regulation, antitrust, and telecom. Less specialized than ICLE in law & economics methodology but competes for similar policymaker influence.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

International Center for Law and Economics social profiles

Digital presence

International Center for Law and Economics financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

International Center for Law and Economics leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles9 records

International Center for Law and Economics funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

International Center for Law and Economics M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about International Center for Law and Economics

What does International Center for Law and Economics do?

ICLE is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that produces and disseminates law-and-economics scholarship to inform public policy debates. It operates six research programs covering antitrust, data security and privacy, financial regulation, innovation policy, intellectual property, and telecommunications, delivering outputs such as white papers, regulatory comments, congressional testimony, and academic publications. It also runs the Next Generation Scholars Program to develop emerging law-and-economics scholars.

Is International Center for Law and Economics a public or private company?

International Center for Law and Economics is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was International Center for Law and Economics founded?

International Center for Law and Economics was founded in 2009. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is International Center for Law and Economics based?

International Center for Law and Economics is headquartered in Portland, United States, in the North America region.

Who are International Center for Law and Economics's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are New America Foundation, Brookings Institution, R Street Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Mercatus Center, American Enterprise Institute, George Mason University Law & Economics Center, Cato Institute and Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Heritage Foundation is listed as a broad incumbent.

Does International Center for Law and Economics have an API?

No public API is recorded for International Center for Law and Economics.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
EIN PresswireSDOs, Experts Agree: Pro Codes Act Must Be StoppedLeaders from ASME, AWS, SAE, and other standards organizations testified against the Pro Codes Act, warning it would undermine safety standards. They argue the bill conditions copyright on free public access, threatening the revenue model that funds expert-driven standards. The organizations urge Congress to reject the legislation.YahooStudy Quantifies How Much the Dealership Model Costs Customers—And It Ain’t PrettyA study by the nonprofit International Center for Law & Economics found that state laws requiring automakers to sell cars through franchised dealerships add between $3,934 and $4,992 to new car transaction prices, based on average prices of $50,000. The study attributes these costs to inventory carrying costs, floorplan interest rates of 6% to 9%, inventory movement expenses, and facility/staff overhead. The findings build on prior research by Goldman Sachs and the U.S. Justice Department, with companies like Tesla and Volkswagen Group's Scout brand actively challenging these franchise laws through direct-sales models.LaweconcenterPaying to Stand Still: Legacy Copper Mandates in a Fiber WorldA policy brief from the International Center for Law & Economics argues that federal and state regulations requiring telecommunications carriers to maintain aging copper networks are economically unjustified, as consumer migration to mobile, VoIP, and fiber has reduced copper subscribers by 81% since 2014. AT&T spends roughly $6 billion annually (about 5% of revenue) maintaining copper infrastructure serving only about 12.5 million remaining subscribers, while Verizon's migration of 4.5 million circuits to fiber produced approximately $180 million in annual operating savings. The paper urges the FCC to use its Section 10 forbearance authority to streamline copper retirement rules, enabling carriers to redirect billions in annual maintenance spending toward next-generation fiber deployment.LaweconcenterThe Future of Competition in LEO-Satellite ServicesThe International Center for Law & Economics and New America’s Wireless Future Project published a report urging regulators to prevent market distortions in the low-earth-orbit satellite sector. The authors recommend streamlining licensing, expanding spectrum access, and mitigating entry barriers to ensure fair competition against state-supported foreign operators. The report emphasizes that competition should shift from price-based metrics to quality-based outcomes as the industry matures.LaweconcenterICLE Comments to OSTP on AI Regulatory ReformThe International Center for Law & Economics submitted comments to the Office of Science and Technology Policy advocating for regulatory forbearance and modernization to support artificial intelligence development in the United States. The report identifies structural mismatches in federal regulations from agencies like the FAA, FDA, and NHTSA, which rely on human-centric assumptions incompatible with autonomous AI systems. It further recommends targeted congressional preemption of conflicting state laws to prevent a fragmented compliance landscape that imposes significant economic burdens on businesses.LaweconcenterA Framework for Understanding and Evaluating AI Commercialization StrategiesThe International Center for Law & Economics and the University of Michigan-Flint published an issue brief analyzing diverse commercialization strategies for artificial intelligence, including proprietary private, open-source private, hybrid, and public models. The report argues that no single approach is universally superior and that optimal strategies depend on specific market contexts, balancing innovation incentives with regulatory considerations. It highlights examples such as Meta's Llama 3 and Stability AI's Stable Diffusion to illustrate the trade-offs between closed and open ecosystems.LaweconcenterThe Governance of Digital Public Infrastructure: Case StudiesThe International Center for Law & Economics published a white paper analyzing the governance models of digital public infrastructure (DPI), specifically comparing digital identity systems like India's Aadhaar and Estonia's e-ID against real-time payment systems such as Brazil's Pix and India's UPI. The study evaluates private, government-owned, and hybrid operational structures to determine how ownership and regulation impact security, innovation, and financial inclusion. It concludes that while government involvement can be constructive, it risks crowding out private sector competition and suggests governments should focus on enabling frameworks rather than direct operation.LaweconcenterICLE Comments Re: Modernizing Spectrum Sharing for Satellite BroadbandThe International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) submitted comments to the Federal Communications Commission urging a modernization of spectrum-sharing rules for satellite broadband systems. ICLE argues that current Equivalent Power-Flux Density (EPFD) limits, established in the late 1990s, are technologically outdated and impose significant economic costs by restricting Non-Geostationary Orbit (NGSO) operators like Amazon and SpaceX. The submission advocates for regulatory reforms to enhance spectrum efficiency and foster competition in the satellite broadband market.LaweconcenterLabor Monopsony and Antitrust Enforcement: A Cautionary TaleA white paper by the International Center for Law & Economics argues that applying antitrust laws to address labor monopsony is premature due to unsettled economic evidence and legal complexities. The authors critique recent regulatory actions, including the FTC's noncompete ban and the Kroger/Albertsons merger challenge, as lacking sufficient empirical foundation. They urge caution and further interdisciplinary research before radically expanding labor-antitrust enforcement.LaweconcenterSerial Acquisitions and Roll-Up StrategiesThe International Center for Law & Economics published an analysis arguing against imposing stricter antitrust regulations on serial acquisitions and roll-up strategies. The authors contend that there is insufficient evidence to suggest these below-threshold mergers systematically harm consumer welfare or competition. They warn that heightened scrutiny would impose disproportionate administrative costs and risk chilling legitimate business growth and innovation.