Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Michigan Public Service Commission

Full company profile

uuid000kwpv

Namestring
Michigan Public Service Commission
Legal namestring
Michigan Public Service Commission
Websiteurl
michigan.gov
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1939
Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
101–250
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersLansing, United States
HQ citystring
Lansing
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Keyword5 values
utility regulation services, public utility oversight, telecommunications regulation, energy regulatory authority, public safety oversight
Industry3 codes
1State/Provincial Licensing, Permitting & Regulatory Administration (Cross-sector)
CodeBPAIABAOPrimaryYes
2Community Safety Administration (Fire/EMS, Emergency Management)
CodeBPAIACALPrimaryNo
3Health, Safety & Building Code Regulators (Inspections)
CodeBPAIAOAGPrimaryNo
NAICS code3 codes
  • Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities926130
  • Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities922
  • Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors92615
SIC code1 code
  • Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services4900
Product category
Utility Regulation
No data
Marketing channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components3 values
Personnel, Operations, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) serves as the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing electric, natural gas, steam, and telecommunications utilities operating within Michigan. It regulates rates, service quality, and safety standards for investor-owned utilities, and addresses wildfire risks through oversight of Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) policies that include advance notifications, real-time monitoring, and rapid restoration efforts.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 value
  • The Consumers Energy Public Safety Power Shutoff policy includes advance notifications, real-time monitoring, and rapid restoration efforts to protect communities and infrastructure from wildfire risks
Product and service1 record
1Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) Language Access Coordinator Services
CategoryRegulatory Service
Description

Language assistance services designated under the Meaningful Language Access to State Services Act, coordinated by Filonna Thomas ([email protected], 517-643-7981), provided to Michigan residents and communities interacting with the MPSC's regulatory oversight of electric, natural gas, steam, and telecommunications utilities.

Recent move3 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight2 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

California's state-level regulator of electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and water utilities. Directly comparable to MPSC in mandate, structure, and scope; CPUC also oversees extensive wildfire-mitigation and PSPS policy in a state with significant utility-related fire risk.

2New York State Department of Public Service (NYPSC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

New York's state utility regulatory agency, with rate-setting, safety, and reliability oversight over investor-owned electric, gas, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC, governing a comparable investor-owned utility sector.

3Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Texas state agency regulating electric and telecom utilities, with similar quasi-judicial rate-case and service-quality authority to MPSC, including growing responsibility for grid reliability and emergency response.

4Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Illinois's state regulatory body overseeing electric, natural gas, water, and telecom utilities. Comparable in role and authority to MPSC, with parallel responsibilities for rate-setting, safety, and service quality across investor-owned utilities.

5Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Florida's state utility regulator overseeing investor-owned electric, gas, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC with similar jurisdiction over rates, service quality, and safety; FPSC also addresses storm-related grid resilience analogous to MPSC's PSPS oversight.

6Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Pennsylvania's state regulator of electric, gas, water, wastewater, and telecommunications utilities. Comparable in mandate and investor-owned utility oversight structure to MPSC, with parallel quasi-judicial proceedings and rate-setting functions.

7Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Ohio's state agency regulating electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and transportation utilities. Comparable in scope to MPSC, overseeing similar rate-making, reliability, and safety enforcement duties for an investor-owned utility sector.

8Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy / DPU
TypeDirect peer
Description

Massachusetts's state Department of Public Utilities regulates electric, gas, water, and telecom utilities. Comparable to MPSC in regulatory mandate, with parallel responsibilities for investor-owned utility rates, service quality, and energy policy oversight.

9Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Indiana's state regulator of investor-owned electric, gas, steam, water, wastewater, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC in both scope and authority, including quasi-judicial rate-case and certificate-of-public-need functions.

10Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction over interstate electricity transmission, natural gas pipelines, and wholesale energy markets. Operates in the same regulatory space as MPSC but at the federal, interstate level — providing the higher-authority layer above state PUCs.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat2 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment2 records

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Michigan Public Service Commission

Utility Regulationmichigan.gov

Michigan Public Service Commission firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Michigan Public Service Commission
Legal name
Michigan Public Service Commission
Website
https://michigan.gov
Company type
Private
Founded year
1939
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
101–250 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Michigan Public Service Commission industry classification

Industry
Product category
Utility Regulation
NAICS
Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities (926130), Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities (922), Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors (92615)
SIC
Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services (4900)
akta.pro primary industry
State/Provincial Licensing, Permitting & Regulatory Administration (Cross-sector) (BPAIABAO)
akta.pro secondary industries
Community Safety Administration (Fire/EMS, Emergency Management) (BPAIACAL), Health, Safety & Building Code Regulators (Inspections) (BPAIAOAG)

Keywords

  • Utility regulation services
  • Public utility oversight
  • Telecommunications regulation
  • Energy regulatory authority
  • Public safety oversight

Where Michigan Public Service Commission is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Lansing
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Markets served

Michigan Public Service Commission business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Infrastructure

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels1 record

Michigan Public Service Commission product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) serves as the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing electric, natural gas, steam, and telecommunications utilities operating within Michigan. It regulates rates, service quality, and safety standards for investor-owned utilities, and addresses wildfire risks through oversight of Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) policies that include advance notifications, real-time monitoring, and rapid restoration efforts.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) Language Access Coordinator Services Language assistance services designated under the Meaningful Language Access to State Services Act, coordinated by Filonna Thomas ([email protected], 517-643-7981), provided to Michigan residents and communities interacting with the MPSC's regulatory oversight of electric, natural gas, steam, and telecommunications utilities.

Quantifiable outcome

  • The Consumers Energy Public Safety Power Shutoff policy includes advance notifications, real-time monitoring, and rapid restoration efforts to protect communities and infrastructure from wildfire risks

Companies that use Michigan Public Service Commission

Customer profile

Segments1 record

Ideal customer profiles2 records

Michigan Public Service Commission technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Michigan Public Service Commission partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Recent moves3 records

Expansion highlights2 records

Michigan Public Service Commission competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC): California's state-level regulator of electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and water utilities. Directly comparable to MPSC in mandate, structure, and scope; CPUC also oversees extensive wildfire-mitigation and PSPS policy in a state with significant utility-related fire risk.
  • New York State Department of Public Service (NYPSC): New York's state utility regulatory agency, with rate-setting, safety, and reliability oversight over investor-owned electric, gas, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC, governing a comparable investor-owned utility sector.
  • Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT): Texas state agency regulating electric and telecom utilities, with similar quasi-judicial rate-case and service-quality authority to MPSC, including growing responsibility for grid reliability and emergency response.
  • Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC): Illinois's state regulatory body overseeing electric, natural gas, water, and telecom utilities. Comparable in role and authority to MPSC, with parallel responsibilities for rate-setting, safety, and service quality across investor-owned utilities.
  • Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC): Florida's state utility regulator overseeing investor-owned electric, gas, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC with similar jurisdiction over rates, service quality, and safety; FPSC also addresses storm-related grid resilience analogous to MPSC's PSPS oversight.
  • Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC): Pennsylvania's state regulator of electric, gas, water, wastewater, and telecommunications utilities. Comparable in mandate and investor-owned utility oversight structure to MPSC, with parallel quasi-judicial proceedings and rate-setting functions.
  • Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO): Ohio's state agency regulating electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and transportation utilities. Comparable in scope to MPSC, overseeing similar rate-making, reliability, and safety enforcement duties for an investor-owned utility sector.
  • Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy / DPU: Massachusetts's state Department of Public Utilities regulates electric, gas, water, and telecom utilities. Comparable to MPSC in regulatory mandate, with parallel responsibilities for investor-owned utility rates, service quality, and energy policy oversight.
  • Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC): Indiana's state regulator of investor-owned electric, gas, steam, water, wastewater, and telecom utilities. Direct peer to MPSC in both scope and authority, including quasi-judicial rate-case and certificate-of-public-need functions.

Broad incumbents

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC): Federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction over interstate electricity transmission, natural gas pipelines, and wholesale energy markets. Operates in the same regulatory space as MPSC but at the federal, interstate level — providing the higher-authority layer above state PUCs.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat2 records

Key risks4 records

Key highlights5 records

Customer concentration

Michigan Public Service Commission financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Michigan Public Service Commission leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Michigan Public Service Commission funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Michigan Public Service Commission M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments2 records

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Michigan Public Service Commission

What does Michigan Public Service Commission do?

The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) serves as the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing electric, natural gas, steam, and telecommunications utilities operating within Michigan. It regulates rates, service quality, and safety standards for investor-owned utilities, and addresses wildfire risks through oversight of Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) policies that include advance notifications, real-time monitoring, and rapid restoration efforts.

Is Michigan Public Service Commission a public or private company?

Michigan Public Service Commission is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Michigan Public Service Commission founded?

Michigan Public Service Commission was founded in 1939. It employs 101 to 250 people.

Where is Michigan Public Service Commission based?

Michigan Public Service Commission is headquartered in Lansing, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Michigan Public Service Commission's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), New York State Department of Public Service (NYPSC), Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC), Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC), Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC), Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO), Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy / DPU and Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is listed as a broad incumbent.

Does Michigan Public Service Commission have an API?

No public API is recorded for Michigan Public Service Commission.

What industry is Michigan Public Service Commission in?

Michigan Public Service Commission's product category is Utility Regulation. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIABAO, State/Provincial Licensing, Permitting & Regulatory Administration (Cross-sector), with a secondary code of BPAIACAL, Community Safety Administration (Fire/EMS, Emergency Management). Its NAICS code is 926130 and its SIC code is 4900.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
YahooReport: Energy waste reduction efforts to save Michigan $1.4BMichigan's energy waste reduction programs saved customers over $1.4 billion in 2025, according to a Public Service Commission report. The programs cut 1.76 million megawatt-hours of electricity and 5.88 million cubic feet of natural gas, with utilities spending more than $595 million.Utility DiveAffordability concerns drive momentum for performance-based ratemakingMichigan's Public Service Commission, at Governor Whitmer's request, recommended multi-year rate plans with performance-based ratemaking to address energy affordability. The proposal would require changing state law, and Senate Bill 768, extending rate case intervals, remains in committee. Utilities have voiced concerns, and change may not happen this election year.Michigan PublicIngham County solar project gets greenlight, after trying to bypass local oppositionA 90-megawatt solar facility in southern Ingham County, Michigan, moved forward after its developer asked the Michigan Public Service Commission to review plans that faced local opposition. The project will span three townships, and Ingham County waived its right to intervene in exchange for a $180,000 payment split among the townships. The state law enabling this bypass is still being contested in court.The Cool DownMichigan utility regulator seeks to end annual rate cases as prices rank second in MidwestMichigan regulators are advocating for changes in how DTE Energy and Consumers Energy manage rate increases due to high electricity costs, with average residential rates reaching 22.01 cents per kilowatt-hour as of May 2026. The Michigan Public Service Commission seeks to transition from annual to multi-year rate cases to provide more predictable pricing and encourage efficiency in utility earnings. This proposal includes broader assistance for lower-income residents as well as requiring large data centers to cover the full costs of their demand on the electric system.Winnipeg Free PressMichigan regulators ask lawmakers to end annual rate hikes, change how DTE, Consumers make moneyMichigan’s Public Service Commission has urged state lawmakers to pass legislation ending annual utility rate hikes and restructuring how DTE Electric and Consumers Energy earn profits, aiming to lower household energy bills. The recommendations include implementing multiyear rate plans tied to performance metrics, requiring utilities to maximize existing infrastructure before building new ones, and closing loopholes that allow utilities to profit from closed power plants or exempt data centers from transmission costs.The Cool DownMichigan proposal favors home solar and batteries over more power lines and plantsMichigan regulators have opened a public comment period on a proposal to integrate distributed energy resources, such as rooftop solar and home batteries, into the state's power grid via virtual power plants. The Michigan Public Service Commission aims to use these resources to manage rising electricity demand from hyperscale data centers while avoiding costly traditional infrastructure expansions by utilities DTE Energy and Consumers Energy.Michigan AdvanceHow a Michigan Supreme Court decision on a Line 5 permit might ripple beyond the pipeline • Michigan AdvanceThe Michigan Supreme Court vacated a permit for Enbridge Energy’s Line 5 tunnel project, ruling that the Michigan Public Service Commission must consider public trust doctrine impacts in future reviews. This decision expands the scope of environmental harms agencies must evaluate under the Michigan Environmental Protection Act, potentially affecting various infrastructure projects across the state.YahooState regulators call for investigation of July Fourth power outagesMichigan's state utility regulator, the Public Service Commission, has opened an investigation into DTE Energy and Consumers Energy following widespread July Fourth weekend power outages affecting an estimated 750,000 customers across multiple counties. The utilities have been ordered to submit detailed reports by August 27 on their outage response, including crew deployment, damage assessment, and accuracy of restoration time estimates. Separately, the MPSC also approved new rules prohibiting utilities from voluntarily pausing service during extreme weather events, defined as temperatures below 20°F or above 90°F.AP NewsJudge: Michigan should reject Consumers’ ‘highly problematic’ dam saleA Michigan judge recommended rejecting Consumers Energy's plan to sell 13 dams to a private equity firm, calling it inconsistent with public interest. The deal would cost ratepayers $3.4 billion and include a $270 million profit for Consumers. The Public Service Commission is expected to decide by September.Detroit Free PressDetroit should speak to residents, not refer calls to AI | LettersThe article discusses concerns from residents about Detroit's adoption of an AI chatbot for answering district phone calls, highlighting issues related to data privacy, energy use, and the need for human interaction in municipal services. Critics argue that such technology lacks accountability and fails to address the real needs of the community. Additionally, there is criticism directed towards the Michigan Public Service Commission's approval of a massive new data center, emphasizing environmental and economic risks associated with its construction.