Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Oppenheim + Zebrak

Full company profile

uuid000mz2m

Namestring
Oppenheim + Zebrak
Legal namestring
Oppenheim + Zebrak
Websiteurl
oandzlaw.com
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2011
Descriptiontext

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm founded in 2011, operating in the for-profit private sector with a headcount range of 11-50 employees. The firm concentrates its practice in four specialized areas: litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes. These niches — particularly royalty disputes and theft protection — suggest a client base with intellectual property, entertainment, licensing, or commercial-contracts exposure, where contested royalty calculations and alleged misappropriation of confidential information or trade secrets create recurring demand for specialized counsel. Public leadership references identify Scott Zebrak as a co-founding partner, with the firm operating under the legal name Oppenheim + Zebrak and a web presence at oandzlaw.com.

The firm's business model is the standard professional-services model for a US boutique law firm: fee-for-service legal representation billed to clients under engagement agreements, with revenue tied to billable hours, retainer structures, and case-level scope. Operating geographies and segment mix are not specified in available sources, though the firm's Washington, DC base suggests exposure to federal-court matters, regulatory adjacency, and a client base concentrated in or served by the mid-Atlantic region. Channels are traditional legal-sector channels: counsel referrals, professional networks, and direct client engagement rather than digital or productized distribution.

Public data on the firm is thin. The firm's own website currently displays only a verification/waiting page rather than substantive content, and disclosed third-party sources provide no product catalog, technology stack detail, pricing, partnerships, awards, headcount trend, or revenue figure. As a result, the assessment below depends heavily on the operating sector's typical benchmarks, and confidence is correspondingly reduced in any quantitative area where direct disclosure is missing.

Short descriptiontext

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm founded in 2011 that specializes in litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes, serving clients with legal needs in these niche practice areas.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Keyword5 values
litigation services, contract law, intellectual property law, royalty disputes, theft protection
NAICS code2 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers54111
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Legal Services
Social media profiles1 record
Cost components2 values
Personnel, Operations
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, D.C.-based law firm founded in 2011 that provides legal services focused on litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes. The firm represents clients in commercial disputes and intellectual property-related matters, including contract enforcement and recovery of stolen assets or royalties.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Product overview1 text field

No product information available. The source website (oandzlaw.com) displayed only a verification/waiting page, which did not contain any product, service, or company overview content.

Product and service4 records
1Litigation Services
2Contract Law
3Theft Protection
4Royalty Disputes
Recent move1 record

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
TypeDirect peer
Description

The world's largest litigation-only law firm with deep experience in commercial and IP/royalty disputes. Comparable as a specialist dispute-resolution firm serving sophisticated corporate clients.

2Williams & Connolly
TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington, DC-based litigation boutique widely regarded for high-stakes commercial litigation. Closely comparable in geography, boutique scale, and litigation focus to Oppenheim + Zebrak.

3Boies Schiller Flexner
TypeDirect peer
Description

Prominent litigation boutique with significant commercial and IP-related dispute practice. Comparable as a partner-driven firm focused on contentious matters for sophisticated clients.

4Susman Godfrey
TypeDirect peer
Description

Elite litigation boutique with a strong record in commercial and IP disputes including royalty-related matters. Comparable in boutique model and complex litigation orientation.

5Fish & Richardson
TypeDirect peer
Description

Leading IP-focused law firm handling patent, copyright, and royalty disputes. Comparable in royalty and IP dispute work, though larger and more IP-dedicated than Oppenheim + Zebrak.

6Covington & Burling
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Major DC-based full-service firm with strong litigation, IP, and regulatory practices. Comparable as a DC-headquartered legal services competitor but materially larger and broader in scope.

7Arnold & Porter
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large DC-headquartered law firm with significant commercial litigation and IP dispute capabilities. Comparable in geography and litigation practice but operating at a much larger scale.

8WilmerHale
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

DC-based full-service firm with nationally recognized litigation and IP practices. Comparable as a sophisticated DC legal services competitor with overlapping practice areas.

9King & Spalding
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large international law firm with a strong litigation practice and growing IP/royalty dispute work. Comparable in commercial litigation but operating across many practice areas.

10Latham & Watkins
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Global full-service law firm with leading commercial litigation and IP licensing/royalty practices. Comparable in handling complex disputes but operating at far greater scale and breadth.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat2 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Ideal customer profile1 record

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Oppenheim + Zebrak

Legal Servicesoandzlaw.com

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm founded in 2011 that specializes in litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes, serving clients with legal needs in these niche practice areas.

What Oppenheim + Zebrak does

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm founded in 2011, operating in the for-profit private sector with a headcount range of 11-50 employees. The firm concentrates its practice in four specialized areas: litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes. These niches — particularly royalty disputes and theft protection — suggest a client base with intellectual property, entertainment, licensing, or commercial-contracts exposure, where contested royalty calculations and alleged misappropriation of confidential information or trade secrets create recurring demand for specialized counsel. Public leadership references identify Scott Zebrak as a co-founding partner, with the firm operating under the legal name Oppenheim + Zebrak and a web presence at oandzlaw.com.

The firm's business model is the standard professional-services model for a US boutique law firm: fee-for-service legal representation billed to clients under engagement agreements, with revenue tied to billable hours, retainer structures, and case-level scope. Operating geographies and segment mix are not specified in available sources, though the firm's Washington, DC base suggests exposure to federal-court matters, regulatory adjacency, and a client base concentrated in or served by the mid-Atlantic region. Channels are traditional legal-sector channels: counsel referrals, professional networks, and direct client engagement rather than digital or productized distribution.

Public data on the firm is thin. The firm's own website currently displays only a verification/waiting page rather than substantive content, and disclosed third-party sources provide no product catalog, technology stack detail, pricing, partnerships, awards, headcount trend, or revenue figure. As a result, the assessment below depends heavily on the operating sector's typical benchmarks, and confidence is correspondingly reduced in any quantitative area where direct disclosure is missing.

Oppenheim + Zebrak firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Oppenheim + Zebrak
Legal name
Oppenheim + Zebrak
Website
https://oandzlaw.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
2011
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, DC-based boutique law firm founded in 2011 that specializes in litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes, serving clients with legal needs in these niche practice areas.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where Oppenheim + Zebrak is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Markets served

Oppenheim + Zebrak business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations

Oppenheim + Zebrak product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, D.C.-based law firm founded in 2011 that provides legal services focused on litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes. The firm represents clients in commercial disputes and intellectual property-related matters, including contract enforcement and recovery of stolen assets or royalties.

Product overview

No product information available. The source website (oandzlaw.com) displayed only a verification/waiting page, which did not contain any product, service, or company overview content.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Litigation Services
  • Contract Law
  • Theft Protection
  • Royalty Disputes

Companies that use Oppenheim + Zebrak

Customer profile

Ideal customer profiles1 record

Oppenheim + Zebrak technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Oppenheim + Zebrak partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Recent moves1 record

Expansion highlights1 record

Oppenheim + Zebrak competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan: The world's largest litigation-only law firm with deep experience in commercial and IP/royalty disputes. Comparable as a specialist dispute-resolution firm serving sophisticated corporate clients.
  • Williams & Connolly: Washington, DC-based litigation boutique widely regarded for high-stakes commercial litigation. Closely comparable in geography, boutique scale, and litigation focus to Oppenheim + Zebrak.
  • Boies Schiller Flexner: Prominent litigation boutique with significant commercial and IP-related dispute practice. Comparable as a partner-driven firm focused on contentious matters for sophisticated clients.
  • Susman Godfrey: Elite litigation boutique with a strong record in commercial and IP disputes including royalty-related matters. Comparable in boutique model and complex litigation orientation.
  • Fish & Richardson: Leading IP-focused law firm handling patent, copyright, and royalty disputes. Comparable in royalty and IP dispute work, though larger and more IP-dedicated than Oppenheim + Zebrak.

Broad incumbents

  • Covington & Burling: Major DC-based full-service firm with strong litigation, IP, and regulatory practices. Comparable as a DC-headquartered legal services competitor but materially larger and broader in scope.
  • Arnold & Porter: Large DC-headquartered law firm with significant commercial litigation and IP dispute capabilities. Comparable in geography and litigation practice but operating at a much larger scale.
  • WilmerHale: DC-based full-service firm with nationally recognized litigation and IP practices. Comparable as a sophisticated DC legal services competitor with overlapping practice areas.
  • King & Spalding: Large international law firm with a strong litigation practice and growing IP/royalty dispute work. Comparable in commercial litigation but operating across many practice areas.
  • Latham & Watkins: Global full-service law firm with leading commercial litigation and IP licensing/royalty practices. Comparable in handling complex disputes but operating at far greater scale and breadth.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat2 records

Key risks4 records

Key highlights4 records

Customer concentration

Oppenheim + Zebrak social profiles

Digital presence

Oppenheim + Zebrak financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Oppenheim + Zebrak leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Oppenheim + Zebrak funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Oppenheim + Zebrak M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Oppenheim + Zebrak

What does Oppenheim + Zebrak do?

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a Washington, D.C.-based law firm founded in 2011 that provides legal services focused on litigation, contract law, theft protection, and royalty disputes. The firm represents clients in commercial disputes and intellectual property-related matters, including contract enforcement and recovery of stolen assets or royalties.

Is Oppenheim + Zebrak a public or private company?

Oppenheim + Zebrak is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.

When was Oppenheim + Zebrak founded?

Oppenheim + Zebrak was founded in 2011. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Oppenheim + Zebrak based?

Oppenheim + Zebrak is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Oppenheim + Zebrak's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Williams & Connolly, Boies Schiller Flexner, Susman Godfrey and Fish & Richardson. Broad incumbents are Covington & Burling, Arnold & Porter, WilmerHale, King & Spalding and Latham & Watkins.

Does Oppenheim + Zebrak have an API?

No public API is recorded for Oppenheim + Zebrak.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Bloomberg Law NewsFees Ask in Anthropic AI-Copyright Settlement Draws Judge’s IreFederal Judge William Alsup criticized attorneys' fee requests in a $1.5 billion class-action settlement between authors and AI developer Anthropic PBC, opposing $75 million sought by three additional law firms—Edelson PC, Oppenheim & Zebrak, and Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP—saying their involvement was "never blessed" and ordering all firms to disclose any fee-sharing arrangements with class members. The judge, who is retiring, filed the memorandum to set the record straight for his successor, expressing concern that such arrangements could give certain publishers preferential recovery at the expense of other class members.Bloomberg Law NewsAnthropic Slams Add-On Firms’ Bid for $75 Million of IP Deal (1)Anthropic PBC urged a federal judge to deny $75 million in attorneys' fees sought by three law firms—Edelson PC, Oppenheim + Zebrak, and Cowan DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP—from its $1.5 billion copyright class action settlement with authors over AI training using pirated books. Anthropic argued there is "scant justification" for the fees, claiming the firms entered the case only after settlement mediation had been scheduled and failed to explain how their work was non-duplicative. The add-on firms collectively seek 15 to 95 times the fees they claim to have incurred, while class counsel Susman Godfrey and Lieff Cabraser are seeking approximately $300 million in total fees from the settlement.