Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen

Full company profile

uuid000opyo

Namestring
Tin Fulton Walker & Owen
Legal namestring
Tin Fulton Walker & Owen, PLLC
Websiteurl
tinfulton.com
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2002
Descriptiontext

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina-based litigation boutique founded in 2002, organized as a professional limited liability company (PLLC) and headquartered in Charlotte with additional offices in Raleigh and Durham. The firm fields 17 attorneys across approximately 15 practice areas, with concentrations in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, family law, and appellate litigation, and offers specialized offerings in medical malpractice, white collar defense, business litigation, wrongful death, nursing home abuse, eminent domain, professional discipline, mediation/arbitration, and education law.

The firm's core technology is limited to standard legal practice management and case management systems; there is no proprietary technology, AI/ML capability, or platform architecture disclosed. Service delivery is conducted through in-person consultations at the three North Carolina offices, supplemented by phone and online intake. Marketing channels include a content-marketing website with attorney profiles, noteworthy case studies, blog content on family law topics, and earned media coverage of high-profile matters.

Revenue is generated through professional services fees billed on hourly, contingency, or flat-fee structures depending on practice area and engagement type. The firm's go-to-market is sales-led, relying on professional reputation, referrals, direct outreach, and digital presence to attract individual clients, business entities, and government employees. Notable case outcomes include the successful constitutional challenge to North Carolina's Amendment One same-sex marriage ban, multiple wrongful conviction exonerations, a $10 million jury verdict in D.D. v. Novant Health, and a $1.1 million-plus verdict in Leardini v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. The firm is owned by its attorney members under a standard partnership model with no institutional investment or parent company identified.

Short descriptiontext

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina litigation boutique founded in 2002 with 17 attorneys across offices in Charlotte, Raleigh, and Durham, serving individual, business, and government clients in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment, and family law matters.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersCharlotte, United States
HQ citystring
Charlotte
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices3 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
personal injury law, criminal defense services, civil rights litigation, employment law representation, family law practice
Industry3 codes
1Litigation & Dispute Resolution
CodeBPAHAAABPrimaryYes
2Personal Injury & Insurance Defense
CodeBPAHAAAMPrimaryNo
3Employment & Labor Law
CodeBPAHAAADPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers54111
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Legal Services
Social media profiles1 record
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Legal Services Fees
TypeProfessional Services
Description

Professional legal services billed on an hourly rate, contingency, or flat fee basis depending on practice area and client engagement type. Services include litigation, consultation, and representation in civil, criminal, and family law matters.

tinfulton.com
Marketing channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
Pricing details1 tier
1Quote-based legal services with variable fee structures
ModelOtherBilling cadenceMulti-year contract
Notes

Fees are determined based on practice area, case complexity, attorney time, and engagement type (hourly, contingency, or flat fee). No public pricing available.

tinfulton.com
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina law firm providing specialized legal representation across 15+ practice areas, with a focus on personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, and family law matters. Services are delivered through attorney consultations and courtroom representation in both state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Engagement pricing varies by practice area and case complexity, billed hourly, on contingency, or at a flat fee.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 4 values shown
  • Landmark civil rights ruling striking down Amendment One (same-sex marriage ban) in North Carolina
+3 more records
Product overview1 text field

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina law firm offering comprehensive legal services across multiple practice areas. The firm provides specialized legal representation in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, family law, medical malpractice, white collar defense, business litigation, appellate law, mediation/arbitration, eminent domain, professional discipline, nursing home abuse, wrongful death, and education law. The firm is headquartered in Charlotte with additional offices in Raleigh and Durham.

Product and service15 records
1Personal Injury Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Legal representation for individuals seriously injured due to the negligent or reckless acts of others, pursuing compensation for all damages. Targeted at personal injury plaintiffs in North Carolina.

2Criminal Defense
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Defense representation for individuals facing criminal charges in state or federal court, from investigation through trial and appeals. Targeted at criminal defendants.

3Civil Rights Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Protection of individuals whose rights have been violated by government or private actors, including discrimination, police misconduct, wrongful conviction, false arrest, and voting rights cases. Targeted at civil rights claimants.

4Employment Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Representation in workplace discrimination, wrongful termination, contract violations, and other employment-related matters under federal and state laws. Targeted at employees and employers.

5Family Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Legal services including separation, divorce, child custody, child support, equitable distribution, alimony, and domestic violence matters. Targeted at individuals and families in North Carolina.

6Medical Malpractice
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Representation for victims of medical negligence and malpractice by healthcare providers. Targeted at injured patients and families.

7White Collar Defense
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Defense of individuals and businesses in non-violent financial crimes including securities fraud, tax evasion, RICO cases, and regulatory matters. Targeted at individuals and businesses under investigation or charged with financial crimes.

8Business Litigation
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Civil court representation in disputes arising from business relationships including breach of contract, fraud, and non-compete issues. Targeted at companies and business owners.

9Appellate Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Appeals representation in state and federal appellate courts including the U.S. Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Targeted at clients seeking appellate review.

10Mediation and Arbitration
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Alternative dispute resolution services providing faster, more affordable, and confidential resolution of legal disputes. Targeted at parties seeking ADR.

11Eminent Domain
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Representation for property owners facing government acquisition of privately owned land for public use. Targeted at property owners in eminent domain proceedings.

12Professional Discipline and Licensing
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Defense of professionals facing disciplinary claims before licensing boards including the North Carolina State Bar, Medical Board, and other licensing authorities. Targeted at licensed professionals.

13Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Legal representation for victims of abuse and neglect in nursing homes and long-term care facilities. Targeted at residents and families of long-term care patients.

14Wrongful Death
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Pursuit of compensation for families who have lost loved ones due to negligence or wrongful acts. Targeted at surviving family members.

15Education Law
CategoryLegal Practice Area
Description

Legal matters related to education including representation of school employees, students in Title IX proceedings, and families in discipline, special education, and residency disputes. Targeted at school employees, students, and education-sector families.

Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership3 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2014-10-10
Description

Co-counsel partnership in the landmark civil rights case General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Reisinger, which successfully challenged North Carolina's Amendment One ban on same-sex marriage. Judge Max G. Cogburn ruled in favor of the joint legal team.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel partnership in the historic Charlotte school desegregation case originally known as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, later as Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Luke Largess represented the class of black families.

3Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel partnership in the Kenneth Kagonyera innocence case. Chris Fialko represented co-defendant Robert Wilcoxson while Noell Tin represented Kagonyera before the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission.

tinfulton.com
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

National Am Law 50 firm with a premier civil rights litigation practice. Broad incumbent: partnered with Tin Fulton Walker & Owen as co-counsel in the landmark Amendment One case; competes for the same high-profile civil rights and appellate work but at vastly greater scale.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Largest law firm headquartered in North Carolina (Raleigh) with full-service corporate, litigation, and regulatory practices. Direct comparable: competes for complex litigation, employment, and government-facing matters in NC; subject firm has a regional edge in plaintiff-side work while Smith Anderson dominates defendant-side.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Charlotte-based plaintiff-side personal injury and wrongful death firm. Direct comparable: competes directly for personal injury, wrongful death, and medical malpractice cases in the Charlotte and broader NC market.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Charlotte-based law firm with a strong business litigation, employment, and appellate practice. Direct comparable: same Charlotte market, overlapping litigation and employment practices, and appellate experience in NC and federal courts.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Mid-size Charlotte law firm with practices spanning business litigation, family law, employment, and personal injury. Direct comparable: similar size and Charlotte-based, with overlapping practice areas in employment, family law, and commercial litigation.

6Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko
TypeDirect peer
Description

Charlotte-based criminal defense and plaintiff-side firm known for innocence and post-conviction work. Direct comparable: co-counseled with subject firm on the Kenneth Kagonyera exoneration and competes in the same criminal defense and civil rights plaintiff space in NC.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Large Charlotte-headquartered full-service law firm with offices across the Carolinas. Direct comparable: shares Charlotte HQ and competes for employment, litigation, and business clients in the same NC market, though with significantly larger headcount.

TypeRegional player
Description

Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regional law firm with offices in North and South Carolina. Regional player: comparable size and Carolinas footprint, with overlapping business litigation, employment, and government-facing practices.

9Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresham & Sumter
TypeDirect peer
Description

Charlotte-based law firm focused on civil rights, education law, and plaintiff-side litigation. Direct comparable: both firms share a co-counsel relationship in the Belk/Swann school desegregation matter and compete for the same plaintiff-side civil rights and education work in North Carolina.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

National Am Law firm with deep Carolina roots (Charlotte, Raleigh, and other Southeast offices). Broad incumbent: overlaps with the subject firm in employment, business litigation, and appellate work, but operates at significantly greater scale across many more practice areas.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat3 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles17 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen

Legal Servicestinfulton.com

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina litigation boutique founded in 2002 with 17 attorneys across offices in Charlotte, Raleigh, and Durham, serving individual, business, and government clients in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment, and family law matters.

What Tin Fulton Walker & Owen does

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina-based litigation boutique founded in 2002, organized as a professional limited liability company (PLLC) and headquartered in Charlotte with additional offices in Raleigh and Durham. The firm fields 17 attorneys across approximately 15 practice areas, with concentrations in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, family law, and appellate litigation, and offers specialized offerings in medical malpractice, white collar defense, business litigation, wrongful death, nursing home abuse, eminent domain, professional discipline, mediation/arbitration, and education law.

The firm's core technology is limited to standard legal practice management and case management systems; there is no proprietary technology, AI/ML capability, or platform architecture disclosed. Service delivery is conducted through in-person consultations at the three North Carolina offices, supplemented by phone and online intake. Marketing channels include a content-marketing website with attorney profiles, noteworthy case studies, blog content on family law topics, and earned media coverage of high-profile matters.

Revenue is generated through professional services fees billed on hourly, contingency, or flat-fee structures depending on practice area and engagement type. The firm's go-to-market is sales-led, relying on professional reputation, referrals, direct outreach, and digital presence to attract individual clients, business entities, and government employees. Notable case outcomes include the successful constitutional challenge to North Carolina's Amendment One same-sex marriage ban, multiple wrongful conviction exonerations, a $10 million jury verdict in D.D. v. Novant Health, and a $1.1 million-plus verdict in Leardini v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. The firm is owned by its attorney members under a standard partnership model with no institutional investment or parent company identified.

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Tin Fulton Walker & Owen
Legal name
Tin Fulton Walker & Owen, PLLC
Website
https://tinfulton.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
2002
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina litigation boutique founded in 2002 with 17 attorneys across offices in Charlotte, Raleigh, and Durham, serving individual, business, and government clients in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment, and family law matters.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen industry classification

Industry
Product category
Legal Services
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers (54111), Legal Services (5411)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Litigation & Dispute Resolution (BPAHAAAB)
akta.pro secondary industries
Personal Injury & Insurance Defense (BPAHAAAM), Employment & Labor Law (BPAHAAAD)

Keywords

  • Personal injury law
  • Criminal defense services
  • Civil rights litigation
  • Employment law representation
  • Family law practice

Where Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Charlotte
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices3 records

Markets served

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Legal Services Fees: Professional legal services billed on an hourly rate, contingency, or flat fee basis depending on practice area and client engagement type. Services include litigation, consultation, and representation in civil, criminal, and family law matters.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherMulti-year contractQuote-based legal services with variable fee structures

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels2 records

Marketing channels3 records

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina law firm providing specialized legal representation across 15+ practice areas, with a focus on personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, and family law matters. Services are delivered through attorney consultations and courtroom representation in both state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Engagement pricing varies by practice area and case complexity, billed hourly, on contingency, or at a flat fee.

Product overview

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina law firm offering comprehensive legal services across multiple practice areas. The firm provides specialized legal representation in personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, family law, medical malpractice, white collar defense, business litigation, appellate law, mediation/arbitration, eminent domain, professional discipline, nursing home abuse, wrongful death, and education law. The firm is headquartered in Charlotte with additional offices in Raleigh and Durham.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Personal Injury Law Legal representation for individuals seriously injured due to the negligent or reckless acts of others, pursuing compensation for all damages. Targeted at personal injury plaintiffs in North Carolina.
  • Criminal Defense Defense representation for individuals facing criminal charges in state or federal court, from investigation through trial and appeals. Targeted at criminal defendants.
  • Civil Rights Law Protection of individuals whose rights have been violated by government or private actors, including discrimination, police misconduct, wrongful conviction, false arrest, and voting rights cases. Targeted at civil rights claimants.
  • Employment Law Representation in workplace discrimination, wrongful termination, contract violations, and other employment-related matters under federal and state laws. Targeted at employees and employers.
  • Family Law Legal services including separation, divorce, child custody, child support, equitable distribution, alimony, and domestic violence matters. Targeted at individuals and families in North Carolina.
  • Medical Malpractice Representation for victims of medical negligence and malpractice by healthcare providers. Targeted at injured patients and families.
  • White Collar Defense Defense of individuals and businesses in non-violent financial crimes including securities fraud, tax evasion, RICO cases, and regulatory matters. Targeted at individuals and businesses under investigation or charged with financial crimes.
  • Business Litigation Civil court representation in disputes arising from business relationships including breach of contract, fraud, and non-compete issues. Targeted at companies and business owners.
  • Appellate Law Appeals representation in state and federal appellate courts including the U.S. Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Targeted at clients seeking appellate review.
  • Mediation and Arbitration Alternative dispute resolution services providing faster, more affordable, and confidential resolution of legal disputes. Targeted at parties seeking ADR.
  • Eminent Domain Representation for property owners facing government acquisition of privately owned land for public use. Targeted at property owners in eminent domain proceedings.
  • Professional Discipline and Licensing Defense of professionals facing disciplinary claims before licensing boards including the North Carolina State Bar, Medical Board, and other licensing authorities. Targeted at licensed professionals.
  • Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect Legal representation for victims of abuse and neglect in nursing homes and long-term care facilities. Targeted at residents and families of long-term care patients.
  • Wrongful Death Pursuit of compensation for families who have lost loved ones due to negligence or wrongful acts. Targeted at surviving family members.
  • Education Law Legal matters related to education including representation of school employees, students in Title IX proceedings, and families in discipline, special education, and residency disputes. Targeted at school employees, students, and education-sector families.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Landmark civil rights ruling striking down Amendment One (same-sex marriage ban) in North Carolina
  • +3 more outcomes

Companies that use Tin Fulton Walker & Owen

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Three partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Arnold & PortercoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 10 October 2014Co-counsel partnership in the landmark civil rights case General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Reisinger, which successfully challenged North Carolina's Amendment One ban on same-sex marriage. Judge Max G. Cogburn ruled in favor of the joint legal team.
  • Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresham & SumtercoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel partnership in the historic Charlotte school desegregation case originally known as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, later as Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Luke Largess represented the class of black families.
  • Rudolf Widenhouse & FialkominorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel partnership in the Kenneth Kagonyera innocence case. Chris Fialko represented co-defendant Robert Wilcoxson while Noell Tin represented Kagonyera before the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • Arnold & Porter: National Am Law 50 firm with a premier civil rights litigation practice. Broad incumbent: partnered with Tin Fulton Walker & Owen as co-counsel in the landmark Amendment One case; competes for the same high-profile civil rights and appellate work but at vastly greater scale.
  • Womble Bond Dickinson: National Am Law firm with deep Carolina roots (Charlotte, Raleigh, and other Southeast offices). Broad incumbent: overlaps with the subject firm in employment, business litigation, and appellate work, but operates at significantly greater scale across many more practice areas.

Direct peers

  • Smith Anderson: Largest law firm headquartered in North Carolina (Raleigh) with full-service corporate, litigation, and regulatory practices. Direct comparable: competes for complex litigation, employment, and government-facing matters in NC; subject firm has a regional edge in plaintiff-side work while Smith Anderson dominates defendant-side.
  • Stewart Law Offices: Charlotte-based plaintiff-side personal injury and wrongful death firm. Direct comparable: competes directly for personal injury, wrongful death, and medical malpractice cases in the Charlotte and broader NC market.
  • Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson: Charlotte-based law firm with a strong business litigation, employment, and appellate practice. Direct comparable: same Charlotte market, overlapping litigation and employment practices, and appellate experience in NC and federal courts.
  • James, McElroy & Diehl: Mid-size Charlotte law firm with practices spanning business litigation, family law, employment, and personal injury. Direct comparable: similar size and Charlotte-based, with overlapping practice areas in employment, family law, and commercial litigation.
  • Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko: Charlotte-based criminal defense and plaintiff-side firm known for innocence and post-conviction work. Direct comparable: co-counseled with subject firm on the Kenneth Kagonyera exoneration and competes in the same criminal defense and civil rights plaintiff space in NC.
  • Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein: Large Charlotte-headquartered full-service law firm with offices across the Carolinas. Direct comparable: shares Charlotte HQ and competes for employment, litigation, and business clients in the same NC market, though with significantly larger headcount.
  • Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresham & Sumter: Charlotte-based law firm focused on civil rights, education law, and plaintiff-side litigation. Direct comparable: both firms share a co-counsel relationship in the Belk/Swann school desegregation matter and compete for the same plaintiff-side civil rights and education work in North Carolina.

Regional players

  • Nexsen Pruet: Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regional law firm with offices in North and South Carolina. Regional player: comparable size and Carolinas footprint, with overlapping business litigation, employment, and government-facing practices.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat3 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen social profiles

Digital presence

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles17 records

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Tin Fulton Walker & Owen

What does Tin Fulton Walker & Owen do?

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a North Carolina law firm providing specialized legal representation across 15+ practice areas, with a focus on personal injury, criminal defense, civil rights, employment law, and family law matters. Services are delivered through attorney consultations and courtroom representation in both state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Engagement pricing varies by practice area and case complexity, billed hourly, on contingency, or at a flat fee.

Is Tin Fulton Walker & Owen a public or private company?

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is a private company. It is classified as management employee owned and is currently operating.

When was Tin Fulton Walker & Owen founded?

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen was founded in 2002. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Tin Fulton Walker & Owen based?

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen is headquartered in Charlotte, United States, in the North America region.

How does Tin Fulton Walker & Owen make money?

One revenue line is on record: legal Services Fees.

Who are Tin Fulton Walker & Owen's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are Arnold & Porter and Womble Bond Dickinson. Direct peers are Smith Anderson, Stewart Law Offices, Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, James, McElroy & Diehl, Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein and Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresham & Sumter. Nexsen Pruet is listed as a regional player.

Does Tin Fulton Walker & Owen have an API?

No public API is recorded for Tin Fulton Walker & Owen.

What industry is Tin Fulton Walker & Owen in?

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen's product category is Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAHAAAB, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, with a secondary code of BPAHAAAM, Personal Injury & Insurance Defense. Its NAICS code is 54111 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales