Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

Full company profile

uuid000px53

Namestring
The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Legal namestring
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1998
Descriptiontext

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) is a non-profit policy research and advocacy organization founded in 1998 and headquartered at 1615 H Street NW, Washington, DC, operating as an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Its functional role is to advance civil justice reform on behalf of the U.S. business community by conducting research, publishing policy analysis, and advocating before federal and state legislatures, regulators, courts, and international policymakers on issues including tort reform, third-party litigation funding (TPLF) transparency, class action and securities litigation, arbitration, asbestos litigation, and the use (and misuse) of public nuisance doctrine.

ILR's core outputs are research publications and advocacy content rather than technology products. These include the annual State Lawsuit Climate Survey (a ranking of states based on input from in-house counsel and senior litigators), the recurring 101 Ways to Improve State Legal Systems policy guide (currently in its eighth edition), the Tort Costs in America economic impact series (with state-specific briefs such as 'ILR Briefly'), targeted issue research (e.g., Waking the Litigation Monster on public nuisance), blog and video content, podcasts, and formal letters, comments, and petitions submitted to federal and state advisory committees. The organization distributes these materials through a multi-channel approach spanning its website, social media on X, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Facebook, email newsletters, press outreach, and direct engagement with policymakers.

ILR does not sell products or services and discloses no pricing. Its funding flows through U.S. Chamber of Commerce membership dues drawn from the broader business federation, with advocacy directed at reducing litigation costs, promoting tort reform, and increasing transparency in third-party litigation funding. It is led by President Stephen Waguespack and a senior leadership team that includes specialized VPs covering legal reform policy, legal reform initiatives, political affairs, policy and research, and international initiatives, reflecting a deliberate verticalization of its reform agenda across U.S. and international jurisdictions.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
civil justice reform, tort reform advocacy, legal reform research, lawsuit climate analysis, litigation funding transparency
NAICS code1 code
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Membership Organizations8600
Product category
Legal Reform Advocacy
Revenue model1 record
1U.S. Chamber of Commerce Membership Dues
TypeOthers
Description

ILR is part of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and likely funded through membership dues from the business community. The organization advocates for civil justice reform on behalf of the business community.

instituteforlegalreform.com
Marketing channels7 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

ILR is a policy research and advocacy organization that publishes research reports, state legal reform guides, and policy briefs on civil justice issues, while directly lobbying federal and state policymakers for tort reform, litigation funding transparency, and lawsuit abuse prevention. The organization operates as the legal reform affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and does not sell commercial products or services.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • Florida reforms resulted in approximately $1 billion in auto insurance rebates to 2.7 million policyholders
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) operates as the country's most influential and successful advocate for civil justice reform, functioning as a policy research and advocacy organization rather than a software product company. ILR's offerings consist of research publications, policy advocacy content, and educational resources. The core products include the annual State Lawsuit Climate Survey ranking, the 101 Ways guide to state legal reforms, state-specific liability environment reports (ILR Briefly series), blog content analyzing current legal reform developments, video content on topics like Third-Party Litigation Funding, official letters and comments submitted to policymakers, and events/podcasts featuring reform discussions. These publications and advocacy materials are distributed through the institute's website to advance pragmatic legal reform solutions with Congress, state legislatures, federal regulators, international policymakers, and courts.

Scale indicator8 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership3 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

ILR and Lawyers for Civil Justice submitted a joint filing on March 10 to the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee proposing amendments to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding. The organizations have collaborated on multiple TPLF disclosure proposals and advocacy efforts.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

APCIA expressed support for the proposed federal rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding, aligning with proposals advanced by ILR and LCJ. APCIA linked the issue to concerns about rising legal costs and insurance premiums.

3Texas Civil Justice League (TCJL)
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

ILR, along with Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ) and TCJL, submitted a letter to the Texas Supreme Court Advisory Committee advocating for mandatory disclosure of TPLF agreements in Texas state courts.

instituteforlegalreform.com
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

ATRA is the most direct peer to ILR: a national coalition dedicated to tort and civil-justice reform advocacy, publishing state liability rankings and lobbying state legislatures on the same issues (lawsuit climate, nuclear verdicts, TPLF) that drive ILR's agenda.

TypeDirect peer
Description

LCJ is a coalition of corporate defendants and law firms that files joint advocacy submissions on federal civil procedure rules alongside ILR, including the March 2025 Rule 26 TPLF disclosure filing. LCJ is essentially a co-litigant in ILR's federal rule-making strategy.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

ILR's parent organization. The Chamber is a broader business-federation advocacy group; ILR is its specialized civil-justice arm. Comparable as the institutional umbrella underwriting ILR's advocacy budget and providing political reach.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

APCIA is the leading P&C insurance trade association and a coalition ally of ILR on TPLF disclosure and tort reform. It pursues overlapping litigation-cost-reform objectives through federal and state advocacy, complementing ILR's policy work with industry-specific data.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Pacific Legal Foundation is a public-interest law firm that litigates individual cases to advance civil-justice and property-rights reforms. It is an emerging player that converts reform theory into courtroom precedents, complementing ILR's legislative strategy.

TypeEmerging player
Description

R Street is a free-market think tank that has published research on tort reform, TPLF, and civil liability. It overlaps with ILR on research output and reform advocacy but operates as a think tank rather than a business-federation advocacy arm.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The Federalist Society influences federal judicial appointments and legal doctrine, including on tort and class-action issues that intersect ILR's reform priorities. It is an adjacent influencer on the judicial environment in which ILR's reform agenda is ultimately adjudicated.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Manhattan Institute publishes policy research on liability, regulation, and the legal system that overlaps with ILR's reform agenda. It is comparable as a research-driven think tank producing citable work for legislative debates.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

NAM is the largest U.S. manufacturing trade association and frequently aligns with ILR on excessive-litigation and TPLF issues. It is comparable as a broader business-federation counterpart amplifying ILR's reform agenda across the manufacturing base.

TypeRegional player
Description

TCJL is a Texas-focused tort and civil-justice reform coalition that has co-filed with ILR on Texas Supreme Court TPLF rules. It is comparable as a regional peer pursuing the same reform agenda inside a single, high-impact state.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles7 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

Legal Reform Advocacyinstituteforlegalreform.com

What The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform does

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) is a non-profit policy research and advocacy organization founded in 1998 and headquartered at 1615 H Street NW, Washington, DC, operating as an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Its functional role is to advance civil justice reform on behalf of the U.S. business community by conducting research, publishing policy analysis, and advocating before federal and state legislatures, regulators, courts, and international policymakers on issues including tort reform, third-party litigation funding (TPLF) transparency, class action and securities litigation, arbitration, asbestos litigation, and the use (and misuse) of public nuisance doctrine.

ILR's core outputs are research publications and advocacy content rather than technology products. These include the annual State Lawsuit Climate Survey (a ranking of states based on input from in-house counsel and senior litigators), the recurring 101 Ways to Improve State Legal Systems policy guide (currently in its eighth edition), the Tort Costs in America economic impact series (with state-specific briefs such as 'ILR Briefly'), targeted issue research (e.g., Waking the Litigation Monster on public nuisance), blog and video content, podcasts, and formal letters, comments, and petitions submitted to federal and state advisory committees. The organization distributes these materials through a multi-channel approach spanning its website, social media on X, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Facebook, email newsletters, press outreach, and direct engagement with policymakers.

ILR does not sell products or services and discloses no pricing. Its funding flows through U.S. Chamber of Commerce membership dues drawn from the broader business federation, with advocacy directed at reducing litigation costs, promoting tort reform, and increasing transparency in third-party litigation funding. It is led by President Stephen Waguespack and a senior leadership team that includes specialized VPs covering legal reform policy, legal reform initiatives, political affairs, policy and research, and international initiatives, reflecting a deliberate verticalization of its reform agenda across U.S. and international jurisdictions.

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform firmographics

Firmographics
Name
The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Legal name
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
Website
https://instituteforlegalreform.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
1998
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D

Revenue model

  1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Membership Dues: ILR is part of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and likely funded through membership dues from the business community. The organization advocates for civil justice reform on behalf of the business community.

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels7 records

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform product offering

Product offering

Core offering

ILR is a policy research and advocacy organization that publishes research reports, state legal reform guides, and policy briefs on civil justice issues, while directly lobbying federal and state policymakers for tort reform, litigation funding transparency, and lawsuit abuse prevention. The organization operates as the legal reform affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and does not sell commercial products or services.

Product overview

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) operates as the country's most influential and successful advocate for civil justice reform, functioning as a policy research and advocacy organization rather than a software product company. ILR's offerings consist of research publications, policy advocacy content, and educational resources. The core products include the annual State Lawsuit Climate Survey ranking, the 101 Ways guide to state legal reforms, state-specific liability environment reports (ILR Briefly series), blog content analyzing current legal reform developments, video content on topics like Third-Party Litigation Funding, official letters and comments submitted to policymakers, and events/podcasts featuring reform discussions. These publications and advocacy materials are distributed through the institute's website to advance pragmatic legal reform solutions with Congress, state legislatures, federal regulators, international policymakers, and courts.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Quantifiable outcome

  • Florida reforms resulted in approximately $1 billion in auto insurance rebates to 2.7 million policyholders
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles2 records

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Three partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerILR and Lawyers for Civil Justice submitted a joint filing on March 10 to the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee proposing amendments to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding. The organizations have collaborated on multiple TPLF disclosure proposals and advocacy efforts.
  • American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerAPCIA expressed support for the proposed federal rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding, aligning with proposals advanced by ILR and LCJ. APCIA linked the issue to concerns about rising legal costs and insurance premiums.
  • Texas Civil Justice League (TCJL)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerILR, along with Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ) and TCJL, submitted a letter to the Texas Supreme Court Advisory Committee advocating for mandatory disclosure of TPLF agreements in Texas state courts.

Scale indicators8 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • American Tort Reform Association (ATRA): ATRA is the most direct peer to ILR: a national coalition dedicated to tort and civil-justice reform advocacy, publishing state liability rankings and lobbying state legislatures on the same issues (lawsuit climate, nuclear verdicts, TPLF) that drive ILR's agenda.
  • Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ): LCJ is a coalition of corporate defendants and law firms that files joint advocacy submissions on federal civil procedure rules alongside ILR, including the March 2025 Rule 26 TPLF disclosure filing. LCJ is essentially a co-litigant in ILR's federal rule-making strategy.

Broad incumbents

  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce: ILR's parent organization. The Chamber is a broader business-federation advocacy group; ILR is its specialized civil-justice arm. Comparable as the institutional umbrella underwriting ILR's advocacy budget and providing political reach.
  • American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA): APCIA is the leading P&C insurance trade association and a coalition ally of ILR on TPLF disclosure and tort reform. It pursues overlapping litigation-cost-reform objectives through federal and state advocacy, complementing ILR's policy work with industry-specific data.
  • Federalist Society: The Federalist Society influences federal judicial appointments and legal doctrine, including on tort and class-action issues that intersect ILR's reform priorities. It is an adjacent influencer on the judicial environment in which ILR's reform agenda is ultimately adjudicated.
  • National Association of Manufacturers (NAM): NAM is the largest U.S. manufacturing trade association and frequently aligns with ILR on excessive-litigation and TPLF issues. It is comparable as a broader business-federation counterpart amplifying ILR's reform agenda across the manufacturing base.

Emerging players

  • Pacific Legal Foundation: Pacific Legal Foundation is a public-interest law firm that litigates individual cases to advance civil-justice and property-rights reforms. It is an emerging player that converts reform theory into courtroom precedents, complementing ILR's legislative strategy.
  • R Street Institute: R Street is a free-market think tank that has published research on tort reform, TPLF, and civil liability. It overlaps with ILR on research output and reform advocacy but operates as a think tank rather than a business-federation advocacy arm.
  • Manhattan Institute: Manhattan Institute publishes policy research on liability, regulation, and the legal system that overlaps with ILR's reform agenda. It is comparable as a research-driven think tank producing citable work for legislative debates.

Regional players

  • Texas Civil Justice League (TCJL): TCJL is a Texas-focused tort and civil-justice reform coalition that has co-filed with ILR on Texas Supreme Court TPLF rules. It is comparable as a regional peer pursuing the same reform agenda inside a single, high-impact state.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights5 records

Customer concentration

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform social profiles

Digital presence

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles7 records

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform

What does The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform do?

ILR is a policy research and advocacy organization that publishes research reports, state legal reform guides, and policy briefs on civil justice issues, while directly lobbying federal and state policymakers for tort reform, litigation funding transparency, and lawsuit abuse prevention. The organization operates as the legal reform affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and does not sell commercial products or services.

Is The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform a public or private company?

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform founded?

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform was founded in 1998. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform based?

The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

How does The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform make money?

One revenue line is on record: U.S. Chamber of Commerce Membership Dues.

Who are The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) and Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ). Broad incumbents are U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), Federalist Society and National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). Emerging players are Pacific Legal Foundation, R Street Institute and Manhattan Institute. Texas Civil Justice League (TCJL) is listed as a regional player.

Does The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform have an API?

No public API is recorded for The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Insurance JournalInsurance Companies Join Letter to Push TPLF Disclosure in Federal CourtsInsurance executives and counsel joined over 200 companies in urging a federal court rules committee to adopt a third-party litigation funding disclosure requirement. The letter, submitted September 14, endorses a rule proposed by LCJ and the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. The committee meets October 21.Insurance JournalInsurance Companies Join Letter to Push TPLF Disclosure in Federal CourtsInsurance executives and counsel joined over 200 companies in urging a federal court rules committee to adopt a third-party litigation funding disclosure requirement. The letter, submitted Sept. 14, endorses a rule proposed by Lawyers for Civil Justice and the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. The committee meets Oct. 21.The National Law ReviewFederal Rulemaking Committee Should Require the Disclosure of LitThe author argues that the federal courts' Advisory Committee on Civil Rules should adopt a new rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding (TPLF) agreements at its April 14th meeting, citing the need for transparency comparable to existing requirements for insurance agreements. The article contends that litigation funders often acquire substantial financial interests in cases, sometimes claiming 30-40% of any recovery, and exercise significant control over settlement decisions and litigation strategy. Lawyers for Civil Justice and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform have submitted a proposal for a TPLF disclosure rule, which the author argues should be adopted to maintain transparency in the federal judicial system.InstituteforlegalreformA Uniform Federal Rule for Third-Party Litigation Funding Disclosure: It's Time for TransparencyThe U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform and Lawyers for Civil Justice submitted a joint filing on March 10 to the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee proposing amendments to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) that would require parties in federal civil cases to disclose nonparty funders with financial interests in litigation and produce underlying funding agreements at the outset of each case. The proposal, modeled on existing local rules such as the Northern District of California's Local Rule 3-15, aims to address the current patchwork of inconsistent disclosure requirements across jurisdictions that allows litigation funding arrangements to remain hidden from courts and opposing parties. Parallel legislative efforts include the federal Litigation Funding Transparency Act and state-level reforms enacted in Oklahoma, Georgia, and Utah.IPWatchdog.comLegal Groups Push for Mandatory Disclosure of Litigation FundersLawyers for Civil Justice and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform submitted a rules proposal on March 10 to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, seeking an amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A) that would mandate disclosure of Third-Party Litigation Funding in federal civil litigation. Federal courts are currently divided on TPLF disclosure, with a study showing courts grant only 40% of disclosure motions while denying the remaining 60%, creating case management problems including hidden conflicts of interest and settlement delays. The proposal has drawn opposition from groups like the Inventors Defense Alliance, which argues mandatory disclosure would harm small businesses and weaken the innovation ecosystem by limiting access to litigation funding.InstituteforlegalreformWhat You Need to Know About Third Party Litigation FundingThe Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) has released research highlighting the national security risks and ethical concerns associated with the unregulated growth of third-party litigation funding (TPLF). The report warns that foreign adversaries, including entities linked to Russia and China, are using TPLF to finance lawsuits against U.S. companies in sensitive industries like defense and semiconductors. Consequently, policymakers are increasingly calling for mandatory disclosure requirements and regulatory safeguards to prevent undue influence over legal proceedings.BurfordcapitalCommon sense vs. false narratives about litigation finance disclosureChristopher Bogart argues against the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform's campaign to mandate broad disclosure of litigation finance, asserting that such requirements are unnecessary and would burden the judicial system. The article highlights existing legal precedents, such as the Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc. ruling, which distinguish litigation finance from insurance and protect funding agreements from discovery.Business InsiderThe 10 Most Ridiculous Lawsuits Of 2013The Institute for Legal Reform ranked ten lawsuits as most ridiculous in 2013, including inmates blaming brewers, a teacher suing over pedophobia, and a man suing Apple for porn access. The list also covers a Subway footlong suit, a student's grade dispute, and a robber's lawsuit against a store owner.Business InsiderThe 10 Worst States For Big Business LawsuitsThe Institute for Legal Reform released its 2010 study ranking states by litigation climate, based on interviews with 1,482 in-house general counsel and senior executives. Respondents graded states on venue, tort, contract, class action, timeliness, judges, and juries, with overall rank combining these elements. The study's design is skewed toward big business and pro-business concerns.