Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Council on Strategic Risks

Full company profile

uuid000rdfm

Namestring
Council on Strategic Risks
Legal namestring
Council on Strategic Risks
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2017
Descriptiontext

The Council on Strategic Risks (CSR) is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, non-partisan security policy institute founded in 2017 by Francesco Femia and Caitlin Werrell as an expansion of the Center for Climate and Security (founded 2010). The organization is dedicated to anticipating, analyzing, and addressing core systemic risks to 21st-century security, with a distinctive thesis that climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological risks are interconnected and mutually reinforcing rather than siloed. CSR is organized around three primary research institutes — the Center for Climate and Security, the Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons (renamed in 2019 in honor of the late Dr. Janne Nolan), and the Converging Risks Lab — plus a featured Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative aimed at accelerating global resilience to the full spectrum of biological threats. Leadership is held by CEO Mallory Stewart (succeeded Christine Parthemore in 2025), with a lean staff of 1-10 employees based at 1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1000.

CSR's core outputs are original research reports, policy briefers, blog commentary, fellowship programs (Nuclear, Climate, Biological, and Ecological Security), and expert convenings — all distributed free of charge through the organization's website and across social channels (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Bluesky, YouTube, email newsletter). The organization serves policymakers, government officials, military leaders, and security practitioners as its primary audience, alongside academic researchers, scholars, and institutional partners in the nonprofit and international policy ecosystem. Its revenue model is nonprofit in nature: grants, donations, and membership programs rather than product pricing. No revenue figures, funding rounds, or commercial customers are publicly disclosed.

Short descriptiontext

The Council on Strategic Risks is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit security policy institute that produces original research, policy briefers, fellowships, and convenings on the convergence of climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological security risks. It serves policymakers, military leaders, and security practitioners globally.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
1–10
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
security policy research, climate security analysis, strategic weapons research, biosecurity policy analysis, converging risk research
Industry1 code
1Security Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Advisory
CodeBPAKADAGPrimaryYes
NAICS code3 codes
  • National Security928110
  • National Security and International Affairs9281
  • Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services54169
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Management Consulting Services8742
Product category
Security Policy Research
Marketing channels7 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 of 4 records shown
1Center for Climate & Security
Description

Research institute focused on climate and ecological security, examining climate change as a security risk and threat multiplier.

councilonstrategicrisks.org
+3 more records
Core offering1 text field

The Council on Strategic Risks is a nonprofit policy institute that produces original research, policy analysis, and expert convenings on systemic security risks in the 21st century. Its work is organized around three research institutes—the Center for Climate and Security, the Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, and the Converging Risks Lab—plus the Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative, addressing how climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological threats intersect and exacerbate one another. The organization also runs fellowship programs to develop the next generation of security practitioners.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Product overview1 text field

The Council on Strategic Risks is organized as a multi-institute research organization comprising three primary institutes (Center for Climate and Security, Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, and Converging Risks Lab) plus a featured Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative. Output includes research reports, policy briefers, blog commentary, and fellowship programs. The organization focuses on anticipating, analyzing, and addressing core systemic risks to 21st-century security, with particular emphasis on how climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological threats intersect and exacerbate one another.

Product and service6 records
1Center for Climate and Security
CategoryResearch Institute
Description

CSR's founding institute focused on climate and ecological security, examining how climate change functions as a threat multiplier and its intersection with military operations and national security. Targets policymakers, government officials, and security practitioners.

2Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons
CategoryResearch Institute
Description

An institute dedicated to strategic weapons and other catastrophic risks, named in honor of Dr. Janne Nolan. Examines nuclear security and arms control issues for policymakers and security professionals.

3Converging Risks Lab
CategoryResearch Institute
Description

An institute designed to deepen understanding of how global trends are intersecting and exacerbating one another, exploring the convergence of climate, biological, and ecological security threats. Targets policymakers, researchers, and security practitioners.

4Global Biosecurity Accelerator
CategoryInitiative
Description

A featured initiative focused on accelerating global resilience to the full spectrum of biological threats, whether natural, accidental, or deliberate, addressing hostile-state activities and misuse of biotechnology. Targets policymakers, defense officials, and biosecurity practitioners.

5Nuclear, Climate, Biological, and Ecological Security Fellowships
CategoryFellowship Program
Description

Fellowship programs that mentor and enhance networks of active policy practitioners, future leaders, and scholars pursuing individual research and collaborative projects in security risk spaces. Targets early- and mid-career security practitioners and researchers.

6CSR Research Reports and Briefers
CategoryResearch Output
Description

Original research publications and policy-focused briefers providing timely analysis on emerging security threats and systemic risks, with policy recommendations. Distributed free to policymakers, security professionals, and the public.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

A nonpartisan nonprofit focused on reducing nuclear, biological, and chemical threats. Closely comparable to CSR's Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons and Global Biosecurity Accelerator, with overlapping focus on catastrophic systemic risks.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

A foreign policy and international affairs think tank with programs on global security, energy, and climate. Comparable to CSR's cross-domain approach but with materially larger resources and a global footprint.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

A global policy research organization with a substantial national security and emerging-threats portfolio. Comparable to CSR's analytical mission on systemic risks, though RAND operates at a far larger scale with government-funded research.

TypeDirect peer
Description

A nonpartisan policy research center working on security, governance, and international affairs. Comparable in scale and mission to CSR, with overlapping work on nuclear, climate, and biosecurity policy.

TypeDirect peer
Description

A nonprofit policy organization focused on issues including nuclear risk, climate change, and emerging technologies. Directly comparable to CSR's Converging Risks Lab thesis on intersecting 21st-century security threats.

TypeDirect peer
Description

A Washington, D.C.-based national security think tank producing policy research on defense, security, and emerging threats. Highly comparable to CSR because both operate as focused security policy institutes with strong government and expert networks.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

A major public policy research organization covering foreign policy, security, and economics. Overlaps with CSR on national security and emerging threat research but operates at a much larger scale with broader programmatic scope.

TypeEmerging player
Description

A global research organization focused on climate, energy, and environmental sustainability. Comparable to CSR's Center for Climate and Security work on climate as a threat multiplier, though focused primarily on environmental rather than security policy.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

A major international affairs think tank with programs on nuclear policy, climate, and global governance. Comparable to CSR's work on nuclear security and climate security, with much broader institutional resources.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

A major bipartisan policy research organization covering defense, security, and international policy. A larger incumbent that overlaps with CSR's national security and emerging-threats work, but on a much broader portfolio.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles8 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

Subsidiaries3 records

Each record includes

Name, Acquired on, Relationship type, Type, Business focus

No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Council on Strategic Risks

Security Policy Researchcouncilonstrategicrisks.org

The Council on Strategic Risks is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit security policy institute that produces original research, policy briefers, fellowships, and convenings on the convergence of climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological security risks. It serves policymakers, military leaders, and security practitioners globally.

What Council on Strategic Risks does

The Council on Strategic Risks (CSR) is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, non-partisan security policy institute founded in 2017 by Francesco Femia and Caitlin Werrell as an expansion of the Center for Climate and Security (founded 2010). The organization is dedicated to anticipating, analyzing, and addressing core systemic risks to 21st-century security, with a distinctive thesis that climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological risks are interconnected and mutually reinforcing rather than siloed. CSR is organized around three primary research institutes — the Center for Climate and Security, the Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons (renamed in 2019 in honor of the late Dr. Janne Nolan), and the Converging Risks Lab — plus a featured Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative aimed at accelerating global resilience to the full spectrum of biological threats. Leadership is held by CEO Mallory Stewart (succeeded Christine Parthemore in 2025), with a lean staff of 1-10 employees based at 1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1000.

CSR's core outputs are original research reports, policy briefers, blog commentary, fellowship programs (Nuclear, Climate, Biological, and Ecological Security), and expert convenings — all distributed free of charge through the organization's website and across social channels (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Bluesky, YouTube, email newsletter). The organization serves policymakers, government officials, military leaders, and security practitioners as its primary audience, alongside academic researchers, scholars, and institutional partners in the nonprofit and international policy ecosystem. Its revenue model is nonprofit in nature: grants, donations, and membership programs rather than product pricing. No revenue figures, funding rounds, or commercial customers are publicly disclosed.

Council on Strategic Risks firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Council on Strategic Risks
Legal name
Council on Strategic Risks
Website
https://councilonstrategicrisks.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2017
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
1–10 employees
Short description
The Council on Strategic Risks is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit security policy institute that produces original research, policy briefers, fellowships, and convenings on the convergence of climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological security risks. It serves policymakers, military leaders, and security practitioners globally.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Council on Strategic Risks industry classification

Industry
Product category
Security Policy Research
NAICS
National Security (928110), National Security and International Affairs (9281), Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services (54169)
SIC
Services-Management Consulting Services (8742)
akta.pro primary industry
Security Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Advisory (BPAKADAG)

Keywords

  • Security policy research
  • Climate security analysis
  • Strategic weapons research
  • Biosecurity policy analysis
  • Converging risk research

Where Council on Strategic Risks is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Council on Strategic Risks business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Others

Distribution channels2 records

Marketing channels7 records

Council on Strategic Risks product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Council on Strategic Risks is a nonprofit policy institute that produces original research, policy analysis, and expert convenings on systemic security risks in the 21st century. Its work is organized around three research institutes—the Center for Climate and Security, the Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, and the Converging Risks Lab—plus the Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative, addressing how climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological threats intersect and exacerbate one another. The organization also runs fellowship programs to develop the next generation of security practitioners.

Product overview

The Council on Strategic Risks is organized as a multi-institute research organization comprising three primary institutes (Center for Climate and Security, Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, and Converging Risks Lab) plus a featured Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative. Output includes research reports, policy briefers, blog commentary, and fellowship programs. The organization focuses on anticipating, analyzing, and addressing core systemic risks to 21st-century security, with particular emphasis on how climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological threats intersect and exacerbate one another.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • Center for Climate & Security: Research institute focused on climate and ecological security, examining climate change as a security risk and threat multiplier.
  • Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons
  • Converging Risks Lab
  • Global Biosecurity Accelerator

Products and services

  • Center for Climate and Security CSR's founding institute focused on climate and ecological security, examining how climate change functions as a threat multiplier and its intersection with military operations and national security. Targets policymakers, government officials, and security practitioners.
  • Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons An institute dedicated to strategic weapons and other catastrophic risks, named in honor of Dr. Janne Nolan. Examines nuclear security and arms control issues for policymakers and security professionals.
  • Converging Risks Lab An institute designed to deepen understanding of how global trends are intersecting and exacerbating one another, exploring the convergence of climate, biological, and ecological security threats. Targets policymakers, researchers, and security practitioners.
  • Global Biosecurity Accelerator A featured initiative focused on accelerating global resilience to the full spectrum of biological threats, whether natural, accidental, or deliberate, addressing hostile-state activities and misuse of biotechnology. Targets policymakers, defense officials, and biosecurity practitioners.
  • Nuclear, Climate, Biological, and Ecological Security Fellowships Fellowship programs that mentor and enhance networks of active policy practitioners, future leaders, and scholars pursuing individual research and collaborative projects in security risk spaces. Targets early- and mid-career security practitioners and researchers.
  • CSR Research Reports and Briefers Original research publications and policy-focused briefers providing timely analysis on emerging security threats and systemic risks, with policy recommendations. Distributed free to policymakers, security professionals, and the public.

Companies that use Council on Strategic Risks

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Council on Strategic Risks technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Council on Strategic Risks partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Council on Strategic Risks competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI): A nonpartisan nonprofit focused on reducing nuclear, biological, and chemical threats. Closely comparable to CSR's Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons and Global Biosecurity Accelerator, with overlapping focus on catastrophic systemic risks.
  • Stimson Center: A nonpartisan policy research center working on security, governance, and international affairs. Comparable in scale and mission to CSR, with overlapping work on nuclear, climate, and biosecurity policy.
  • Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: A nonprofit policy organization focused on issues including nuclear risk, climate change, and emerging technologies. Directly comparable to CSR's Converging Risks Lab thesis on intersecting 21st-century security threats.
  • Center for a New American Security (CNAS): A Washington, D.C.-based national security think tank producing policy research on defense, security, and emerging threats. Highly comparable to CSR because both operate as focused security policy institutes with strong government and expert networks.

Broad incumbents

  • Atlantic Council: A foreign policy and international affairs think tank with programs on global security, energy, and climate. Comparable to CSR's cross-domain approach but with materially larger resources and a global footprint.
  • RAND Corporation: A global policy research organization with a substantial national security and emerging-threats portfolio. Comparable to CSR's analytical mission on systemic risks, though RAND operates at a far larger scale with government-funded research.
  • Brookings Institution: A major public policy research organization covering foreign policy, security, and economics. Overlaps with CSR on national security and emerging threat research but operates at a much larger scale with broader programmatic scope.
  • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: A major international affairs think tank with programs on nuclear policy, climate, and global governance. Comparable to CSR's work on nuclear security and climate security, with much broader institutional resources.
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS): A major bipartisan policy research organization covering defense, security, and international policy. A larger incumbent that overlaps with CSR's national security and emerging-threats work, but on a much broader portfolio.

Emerging players

  • World Resources Institute (WRI): A global research organization focused on climate, energy, and environmental sustainability. Comparable to CSR's Center for Climate and Security work on climate as a threat multiplier, though focused primarily on environmental rather than security policy.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Council on Strategic Risks social profiles

Digital presence

Council on Strategic Risks financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Council on Strategic Risks leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles8 records

Council on Strategic Risks subsidiaries and ownership

Company hierarchy

Subsidiaries3 records

Council on Strategic Risks funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Council on Strategic Risks M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Council on Strategic Risks

What does Council on Strategic Risks do?

The Council on Strategic Risks is a nonprofit policy institute that produces original research, policy analysis, and expert convenings on systemic security risks in the 21st century. Its work is organized around three research institutes—the Center for Climate and Security, the Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, and the Converging Risks Lab—plus the Global Biosecurity Accelerator initiative, addressing how climate, nuclear, biological, and ecological threats intersect and exacerbate one another. The organization also runs fellowship programs to develop the next generation of security practitioners.

Is Council on Strategic Risks a public or private company?

Council on Strategic Risks is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Council on Strategic Risks founded?

Council on Strategic Risks was founded in 2017. It employs 1 to 10 people.

Where is Council on Strategic Risks based?

Council on Strategic Risks is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Council on Strategic Risks's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), Stimson Center, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and Center for a New American Security (CNAS). Broad incumbents are Atlantic Council, RAND Corporation, Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). World Resources Institute (WRI) is listed as an emerging player.

Does Council on Strategic Risks have an API?

No public API is recorded for Council on Strategic Risks.

What industry is Council on Strategic Risks in?

Council on Strategic Risks's product category is Security Policy Research. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAKADAG, Security Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Advisory. Its NAICS code is 928110 and its SIC code is 8742.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
CarnegieendowmentEarthshaking: Lessons from Kazakhstan for Managing Today’s Nuclear DangersCarnegie Endowment and Council on Strategic Risks will host an event on September 17, 2026, examining nuclear dangers and lessons from Kazakhstan's 1991 closure of the Semipalatinsk Test Site. The event features remarks from Kazakhstan's ambassador and U.S. lawmakers, plus a panel on risk-reduction policies amid rising nuclear threats.CouncilonstrategicrisksA Biomanufacturing Plan to Confront Future Biological ThreatsThe Council on Strategic Risks and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory released a report recommending the establishment of a robust, agile biomanufacturing economy in the United States to enhance preparedness for future biological threats. The strategy emphasizes leveraging public-private partnerships, de-risking private sector capabilities through government incentives, and utilizing existing federal authorities like the Defense Production Act to ensure rapid scale-up of medical countermeasures.CouncilonstrategicrisksAddressing the Threat of Disease SpilloverThe Council on Strategic Risks published a report examining how the United States and other nations address zoonotic disease spillover, based on expert discussions, three 2023 workshops, and independent research. It finds siloed biological and ecological security approaches, fragmented funding, and data barriers, and recommends multidisciplinary teams, standardized data methods, longer project funding, and conservation as a security measure.