Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Free Law Project

Full company profile

uuid000uxwr

Namestring
Free Law Project
Legal namestring
Free Law Project
Websiteurl
free.law
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2010
Descriptiontext

Free Law Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2010 and headquartered in Berkeley, California, that operates one of the largest open legal data infrastructures in the world. Its core platform, CourtListener, hosts over 10 million court opinions from more than 2,000 state and federal courts, supplemented by the RECAP Archive (400M+ federal filings, growing daily via a 30,000+ user browser extension), the largest open collection of oral argument audio (2.5M+ minutes with AI-generated transcripts), and a unique judicial financial disclosure database covering 16,000+ judges and 250,000+ pages of disclosures. The technology stack is open-source and built on Python, PostgreSQL, Django, and Django REST Framework, with public REST APIs (v4), webhooks, and bulk database replication, plus a suite of proprietary libraries (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) that are reused across the broader legal tech ecosystem.

The organization serves five primary segments: self-represented litigants, legal practitioners and law firms, journalists and researchers, legal technology companies, and legal aid organizations, with law schools and government entities as secondary audiences. Revenue is diversified across individual donations, foundation grants (NSF, Knight Foundation, Columbia Library, AWS Imagine Grant of $150K in 2025), tiered memberships ($10-$2,500/month), corporate sponsorships up to $25K/year, data services and consulting ($70-$750/hour depending on client type), and data licensing to legal tech companies such as ProPlaintiff.ai. Notable customers and users include Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, ProPublica, Harvard, OpenAI, Anthropic, and more than 1,000 verified government users.

Distribution is primarily self-serve and product-led through CourtListener.com, RECAP browser extensions (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari), Bots.law across Slack/Discord/Teams/Google Chat/Bluesky/Mastodon, and the May 2026 CourtListener MCP connector embedded in Anthropic's Claude. HeinOnline resells CourtListener case law into its institutional base, while data licensing deals extend reach to legal tech startups. Recent strategic priorities include becoming foundational open legal data infrastructure for AI applications, scaling the Justice Partner Circle for law firm engagement, and launching the Litigant Portal to serve self-represented litigants with AI-assisted workflows.

Short descriptiontext

Free Law Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit operating CourtListener and the RECAP Archive, the largest open U.S. legal data infrastructure serving self-represented litigants, journalists, legal practitioners, governments, and legal technology companies.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
1–10
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersBerkeley, United States
HQ citystring
Berkeley
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Keyword5 values
legal research platform, court data API, PACER document archive, open legal data, judicial disclosure database
Industry4 codes
1Legal Practice Management & Case Management
CodeBPAEAPACPrimaryYes
2eDiscovery, Litigation Support & Legal Hold
CodeBPAEAPAEPrimaryNo
3Legal & Regulatory Publishing (Case Law, Statutes, Treatises)
CodeMPAJACAAPrimaryNo
4Law & Legal Studies Scholarly Publishing
CodeEDAGAFAGPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Legal Services5411
  • Other Legal Services54119
SIC code3 codes
  • Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc.7370
  • Miscellaneous Publishing2741
  • Books: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing2731
Product category
Legal Research Software
GTM motion3 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model6 records
1Data Services and Consulting
TypeProfessional Services
Description

Custom data gathering, research, and reports for organizations. Services include bulk PACER data, customized research, and data analysis. Billed hourly or by project milestones with rates varying by client type (researchers/academics: $140/hr, journalists: $70-180/hr, non-profits: $140-180/hr, for-profit: $170-750/hr).

free.law
2Membership Subscriptions
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Tiered membership model providing premium access to CourtListener features including increased API rate limits, unlimited alerts, real-time alerts, and Pray & Pay requests. Individual tiers from $10-100/month ($100-1,000/year). Group tiers from $30-2,500/month based on organization size.

free.law
3Organizational Sponsorships
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Platinum sponsors at $25,000/year ($20,000 with 3-year commitment), Gold at $10,000/year, Silver at $1,000/year, Bronze at $500/year. Provides visibility and partnership benefits for organizations supporting the mission.

free.law
4Individual Donations
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Tax-deductible donations from individuals supporting the nonprofit mission. One-time and recurring donation options available.

free.law
5Data Licensing
TypeData Monetisation
Description

Licensing of case law data to legal technology companies (e.g., ProPlaintiff.ai integration of 6.7 million case law records). Data is made available via API or bulk data downloads.

einpresswire.com
6Grants
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Grant funding from foundations and organizations supporting access to justice and legal technology. Notable grants include AWS Imagine Grant ($150,000 in 2025), NSF grants, and Knight Foundation support for judicial database development.

free.law
Marketing channels9 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels8 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components6 values
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others
Pricing details9 tiers
1Individual Tier 1 - $10/month or $100/year
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Includes 5 docket alerts (10 with RECAP extension), unlimited opinion search alerts, 10 RECAP search alerts (5 real-time), 15 Pray & Pay requests, API access at 10/minute, 75/hour, 300/day with community support.

free.law
2Individual Tier 2 - $25/month or $250/year
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Includes unlimited docket and opinion alerts, 25 RECAP search alerts (10 real-time), API access at 15/minute, 150/hour, 600/day with community support, plus $38 store credits.

free.law
3Individual Tier 3 - $50/month or $500/year
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Includes unlimited alerts across all types, 50 RECAP search alerts (25 real-time), API access at 20/minute, 250/hour, 1,000/day with community support, plus $75 store credits.

free.law
4Individual Tier 4 - $100/month or $1,000/year
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Includes unlimited alerts across all types, 100 RECAP search alerts (50 real-time), API access at 25/minute, 300/hour, 1,400/day with private support, plus $150 store credits.

free.law
5Group Memberships - $30-2,500/month based on size
ModelPer seatBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Tier 1 (1-5 users): $30/month base; Tier 2 (up to 15): $75/month; Tier 3 (up to 25): $150/month; Tier 4 (up to 50): $375/month; Tier 5 (up to 100): $750/month. Each tier has 4 levels of features. Custom pricing for 100+ users.

free.law
6EDU Memberships - Free
ModelFreemiumBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Complimentary memberships for faculty, students, and researchers with valid .edu email address. Provides access to tools ensuring next generation of legal scholars can engage with open legal data.

free.law
7LSO Memberships - Free
ModelFreemiumBilling cadenceMonthly
Notes

Free group memberships for non-profit U.S.-based civil legal aid offices and legal services organizations. Includes Tier 1 membership benefits for each individual in the organization.

free.law
8Sponsorship Tiers
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceAnnual
Notes

Platinum: $25,000/year ($20,000 with 3-year commitment); Gold: $10,000/year; Silver: $1,000/year; Bronze: $500/year.

free.law
9Data Services Hourly Rates
ModelUnit PricingBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Researchers & Academics: $140/hour; Journalists: $70-180/hour according to means; Non-Profits: $140-180/hour; For-Profit Organizations: $170-750/hour. One hour minimum, billing rounded up to nearest half hour.

free.law
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeSoftware
Software
Brand1 of 3 records shown
1CourtListener
Description

Fully-searchable and accessible archive of court data including opinions, oral arguments, judges, judicial financial records, and federal filings. Hosts over 10 million court opinions and serves millions of users.

free.law
+2 more records
Core offering1 text field

Free Law Project operates CourtListener, a fully searchable archive of U.S. court opinions, oral arguments, judges, judicial financial records, and federal filings, supplemented by the RECAP Suite (browser extensions that liberate PACER documents into a free archive) and Bots.law (case-monitoring bots for chat and social platforms). The nonprofit organization also develops open-source legal data tools (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) and offers paid data services, tiered memberships, organizational sponsorships, and bulk data licensing to legal technology companies and researchers.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 5 values shown
  • 500,000+ weekly users on CourtListener
+4 more records
Product overview1 text field

Free Law Project operates a platform-plus-modules architecture centered on CourtListener as the primary research and monitoring interface, supplemented by the RECAP Suite for PACER data liberation, Bots.law for case notification delivery, and a suite of open-source tools (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) for data collection, citation extraction, document processing, and semantic search. The organization curates and provides access to multiple legal datasets (case law, RECAP archive, judge/disclosure database, reporters, courts, oral arguments, judicial portraits, court seals) and offers data services for custom research and consulting. Recent additions include an MCP integration connecting CourtListener to Anthropic's Claude AI and the Litigant Portal for self-represented litigants.

Product and service6 records
1CourtListener
CategoryLegal Research Platform
Description

Flagship legal research platform providing fully searchable access to over 10 million court opinions from 2,000+ courts, oral argument recordings, judge biographies, judicial financial disclosures, and federal filings; serves over 1 million visitors weekly and offers tiered membership plans.

2RECAP Suite
CategoryPACER Document Archive Tools
Description

Collection of PACER-liberation tools including browser extensions for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari that automatically upload PACER purchases into the public RECAP Archive, plus docket alerts, search alerts, and the @recap.email notification handler for attorneys.

3Bots.law
CategoryCase Monitoring Software
Description

Case-monitoring bot system that posts updates to Slack, Discord, MS Teams, Google Chat, Bluesky, and Mastodon; Big Cases Bot follows important federal cases and Little Cases Bot enables custom topic-based tracking.

4Data Services and Consulting
CategoryProfessional Data Services
Description

Custom data gathering, research, and reports for organizations, including bulk PACER data acquisition and customized legal data analysis; billed hourly or by project milestones with rates ranging from $70-$750/hour depending on client type.

5Litigant Portal
CategorySelf-Represented Litigant Software
Description

Next-generation web application providing personalized legal guidance to self-represented litigants using AI, AI-assisted form preparation, document automation, and integrated eFiling workflows.

6CourtListener MCP Integration
CategoryAI Integration Connector
Description

Model Context Protocol connector that enables Claude and other AI assistants to query CourtListener data in real time, including federal and state court decisions, PACER data, citation networks, and oral argument audio.

Scale indicator17 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership11 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or IntegrationAnnounced on2026-05-12
Description

CourtListener MCP integration for Claude AI, providing AI assistants native access to case law, PACER data, citation analysis, oral arguments, and judge data. The integration is free to anyone, positioning CourtListener as foundational legal data infrastructure for AI applications.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-05-12
Description

FLP named as access to justice partner in Anthropic's Claude for Legal launch, alongside Courtroom5, BoardWise, and Descrybe. First time a leading AI company explicitly named access to justice as a foundational pillar.

Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or IntegrationAnnounced on2026-05-12
Description

Both Thomson Reuters and Free Law Project announced MCP integrations with Anthropic's Claude on the same day, connecting their databases to AI assistants. Thomson Reuters connects CoCounsel to 1.9 billion documents.

Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or IntegrationAnnounced on2025-12-10
Description

HeinOnline announced a new case law offering powered by CourtListener, making FLP's open legal data available through HeinOnline's platform.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-09-25
Description

Partnership to explore how AI can unlock court data and make legal research smarter, faster, and more accessible. FLP is partnering with the Clearinghouse to look at ways AI can improve access to civil rights litigation data.

Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or IntegrationAnnounced on2024-03-26
Description

Harvard Caselaw Access Project data (millions of digitized case law records) incorporated into CourtListener, completing coverage of American case law.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2022-09-12
Description

Partnership to build a complete, updated, and audited open case law database. With vLex's support, FLP is working to create the first comprehensive free collection of American case law.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Collaboration on judicial analytics database, combining Pre/Dicta's expertise with FLP's judicial financial disclosure data.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Collaboration on judicial database, contributing to the comprehensive structured database of judges and their financial interests.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Academic collaboration on judicial analytics research, working with FLP's comprehensive judicial database.

11Harvard Library Innovation Lab
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Collaboration on Eyecite citation extraction tool development, combining FLP's reporter database with Harvard's caselaw data.

free.law
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeOthers
Description

Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab project that digitized millions of historical American case law records and partnered with Free Law Project in 2024 to integrate data into CourtListener. Comparable as a large-scale open case law initiative with shared mission and overlapping academic/journalist audience.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Premier legal research platform operated by Thomson Reuters; on the same day as FLP's MCP announcement, Westlaw's CoCounsel was also integrated with Claude AI. Comparable as the dominant paid legal research platform and the primary commercial competitor to CourtListener for legal AI infrastructure.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Legal analytics startup collaborating with Free Law Project on the judicial database. Comparable as a judicial analytics and litigation prediction platform using FLP's underlying data — overlapping technology category and customer base (law firms, litigators).

TypeDirect peer
Description

Global legal research platform and Free Law Project's strategic partner (2022) co-developing a complete, updated, and audited open American case law database. Comparable in that both aggregate large-scale case law and offer APIs, but vLex is a commercial incumbent with broader international coverage and paid subscription model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Free legal information platform collaborating with Free Law Project on the judicial database. Comparable as a mission-driven legal information provider offering free case law, codes, and judge data, with a freemium model and audience of self-represented litigants and lawyers.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Legal research database that partnered with Free Law Project in December 2025 to power a new case law offering from CourtListener data. Comparable as a long-form legal publisher/research platform; both serve law schools, libraries, and legal professionals with comprehensive case law coverage.

TypeRegional player
Description

Nonprofit organization partnering with Free Law Project in 2025 to explore AI applications for civil rights litigation data. Comparable as a mission-driven legal data organization targeting public-interest litigation, with shared nonprofit ethos and overlapping user base of legal aid organizations and researchers.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Largest commercial legal research incumbent alongside Westlaw. Comparable in aggregating case law, dockets, and judicial information at massive scale, but as a paid, proprietary platform serving large law firms and corporate legal departments — represents the traditional model FLP's open infrastructure is disrupting.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Guided self-representation platform named alongside Free Law Project as an access-to-justice partner in Anthropic's Claude for Legal launch. Comparable as a direct-to-litigant legal technology targeting the same self-represented market segment, with overlapping mission and AI-enabled workflows.

TypeDirect peer
Description

AI-powered legal research platform acquired by Thomson Reuters; now part of CoCounsel. Directly comparable as an AI-native legal research competitor leveraging large case law corpora, and a potential future distribution channel or competitor to Free Law Project's open MCP approach.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat6 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers17 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile6 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
Yes
API detail
Has APIbool
Yes

Docs URL, Description

Integration8 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Description, Source

AI capability8 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature14 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles9 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Free Law Project

Legal Research Softwarefree.law

Free Law Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit operating CourtListener and the RECAP Archive, the largest open U.S. legal data infrastructure serving self-represented litigants, journalists, legal practitioners, governments, and legal technology companies.

What Free Law Project does

Free Law Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2010 and headquartered in Berkeley, California, that operates one of the largest open legal data infrastructures in the world. Its core platform, CourtListener, hosts over 10 million court opinions from more than 2,000 state and federal courts, supplemented by the RECAP Archive (400M+ federal filings, growing daily via a 30,000+ user browser extension), the largest open collection of oral argument audio (2.5M+ minutes with AI-generated transcripts), and a unique judicial financial disclosure database covering 16,000+ judges and 250,000+ pages of disclosures. The technology stack is open-source and built on Python, PostgreSQL, Django, and Django REST Framework, with public REST APIs (v4), webhooks, and bulk database replication, plus a suite of proprietary libraries (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) that are reused across the broader legal tech ecosystem.

The organization serves five primary segments: self-represented litigants, legal practitioners and law firms, journalists and researchers, legal technology companies, and legal aid organizations, with law schools and government entities as secondary audiences. Revenue is diversified across individual donations, foundation grants (NSF, Knight Foundation, Columbia Library, AWS Imagine Grant of $150K in 2025), tiered memberships ($10-$2,500/month), corporate sponsorships up to $25K/year, data services and consulting ($70-$750/hour depending on client type), and data licensing to legal tech companies such as ProPlaintiff.ai. Notable customers and users include Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, ProPublica, Harvard, OpenAI, Anthropic, and more than 1,000 verified government users.

Distribution is primarily self-serve and product-led through CourtListener.com, RECAP browser extensions (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari), Bots.law across Slack/Discord/Teams/Google Chat/Bluesky/Mastodon, and the May 2026 CourtListener MCP connector embedded in Anthropic's Claude. HeinOnline resells CourtListener case law into its institutional base, while data licensing deals extend reach to legal tech startups. Recent strategic priorities include becoming foundational open legal data infrastructure for AI applications, scaling the Justice Partner Circle for law firm engagement, and launching the Litigant Portal to serve self-represented litigants with AI-assisted workflows.

Free Law Project firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Free Law Project
Legal name
Free Law Project
Website
https://free.law
Company type
Private
Founded year
2010
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
1–10 employees
Short description
Free Law Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit operating CourtListener and the RECAP Archive, the largest open U.S. legal data infrastructure serving self-represented litigants, journalists, legal practitioners, governments, and legal technology companies.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Free Law Project industry classification

Industry
Product category
Legal Research Software
NAICS
Legal Services (5411), Other Legal Services (54119)
SIC
Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. (7370), Miscellaneous Publishing (2741), Books: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing (2731)
akta.pro primary industry
Legal Practice Management & Case Management (BPAEAPAC)
akta.pro secondary industries
eDiscovery, Litigation Support & Legal Hold (BPAEAPAE), Legal & Regulatory Publishing (Case Law, Statutes, Treatises) (MPAJACAA), Law & Legal Studies Scholarly Publishing (EDAGAFAG)

Keywords

  • Legal research platform
  • Court data API
  • PACER document archive
  • Open legal data
  • Judicial disclosure database

Where Free Law Project is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Berkeley
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Markets served

Free Law Project business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Software
Cost components
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others

Revenue model

  1. Data Services and Consulting: Custom data gathering, research, and reports for organizations. Services include bulk PACER data, customized research, and data analysis. Billed hourly or by project milestones with rates varying by client type (researchers/academics: $140/hr, journalists: $70-180/hr, non-profits: $140-180/hr, for-profit: $170-750/hr).
  2. Membership Subscriptions: Tiered membership model providing premium access to CourtListener features including increased API rate limits, unlimited alerts, real-time alerts, and Pray & Pay requests. Individual tiers from $10-100/month ($100-1,000/year). Group tiers from $30-2,500/month based on organization size.
  3. Organizational Sponsorships: Platinum sponsors at $25,000/year ($20,000 with 3-year commitment), Gold at $10,000/year, Silver at $1,000/year, Bronze at $500/year. Provides visibility and partnership benefits for organizations supporting the mission.
  4. Individual Donations: Tax-deductible donations from individuals supporting the nonprofit mission. One-time and recurring donation options available.
  5. Data Licensing: Licensing of case law data to legal technology companies (e.g., ProPlaintiff.ai integration of 6.7 million case law records). Data is made available via API or bulk data downloads.
  6. Grants: Grant funding from foundations and organizations supporting access to justice and legal technology. Notable grants include AWS Imagine Grant ($150,000 in 2025), NSF grants, and Knight Foundation support for judicial database development.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
SubscriptionMonthlyIndividual Tier 1 - $10/month or $100/year
SubscriptionMonthlyIndividual Tier 2 - $25/month or $250/year
SubscriptionMonthlyIndividual Tier 3 - $50/month or $500/year
SubscriptionMonthlyIndividual Tier 4 - $100/month or $1,000/year
Per seatMonthlyGroup Memberships - $30-2,500/month based on size
FreemiumMonthlyEDU Memberships - Free
FreemiumMonthlyLSO Memberships - Free
SubscriptionAnnualSponsorship Tiers
Unit PricingPay-as-you-goData Services Hourly Rates

Go-to-market motion3 records

Distribution channels8 records

Marketing channels9 records

Free Law Project product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Free Law Project operates CourtListener, a fully searchable archive of U.S. court opinions, oral arguments, judges, judicial financial records, and federal filings, supplemented by the RECAP Suite (browser extensions that liberate PACER documents into a free archive) and Bots.law (case-monitoring bots for chat and social platforms). The nonprofit organization also develops open-source legal data tools (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) and offers paid data services, tiered memberships, organizational sponsorships, and bulk data licensing to legal technology companies and researchers.

Product overview

Free Law Project operates a platform-plus-modules architecture centered on CourtListener as the primary research and monitoring interface, supplemented by the RECAP Suite for PACER data liberation, Bots.law for case notification delivery, and a suite of open-source tools (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) for data collection, citation extraction, document processing, and semantic search. The organization curates and provides access to multiple legal datasets (case law, RECAP archive, judge/disclosure database, reporters, courts, oral arguments, judicial portraits, court seals) and offers data services for custom research and consulting. Recent additions include an MCP integration connecting CourtListener to Anthropic's Claude AI and the Litigant Portal for self-represented litigants.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • CourtListener: Fully-searchable and accessible archive of court data including opinions, oral arguments, judges, judicial financial records, and federal filings. Hosts over 10 million court opinions and serves millions of users.
  • RECAP Suite
  • Bots.law

Products and services

  • CourtListener Flagship legal research platform providing fully searchable access to over 10 million court opinions from 2,000+ courts, oral argument recordings, judge biographies, judicial financial disclosures, and federal filings; serves over 1 million visitors weekly and offers tiered membership plans.
  • RECAP Suite Collection of PACER-liberation tools including browser extensions for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari that automatically upload PACER purchases into the public RECAP Archive, plus docket alerts, search alerts, and the @recap.email notification handler for attorneys.
  • Bots.law Case-monitoring bot system that posts updates to Slack, Discord, MS Teams, Google Chat, Bluesky, and Mastodon; Big Cases Bot follows important federal cases and Little Cases Bot enables custom topic-based tracking.
  • Data Services and Consulting Custom data gathering, research, and reports for organizations, including bulk PACER data acquisition and customized legal data analysis; billed hourly or by project milestones with rates ranging from $70-$750/hour depending on client type.
  • Litigant Portal Next-generation web application providing personalized legal guidance to self-represented litigants using AI, AI-assisted form preparation, document automation, and integrated eFiling workflows.
  • CourtListener MCP Integration Model Context Protocol connector that enables Claude and other AI assistants to query CourtListener data in real time, including federal and state court decisions, PACER data, citation networks, and oral argument audio.

Quantifiable outcome

  • 500,000+ weekly users on CourtListener
  • +4 more outcomes

Companies that use Free Law Project

Customer profile

Named customers17 records

Segments6 records

Ideal customer profiles6 records

Free Law Project technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed Yes

API detail

Has API
Yes
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Integration8 records

AI capability8 records

Feature14 records

Free Law Project partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Eleven partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • AnthropiccoreTechnology or Integration · 12 May 2026CourtListener MCP integration for Claude AI, providing AI assistants native access to case law, PACER data, citation analysis, oral arguments, and judge data. The integration is free to anyone, positioning CourtListener as foundational legal data infrastructure for AI applications.
  • Justice Technology AssociationcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 12 May 2026FLP named as access to justice partner in Anthropic's Claude for Legal launch, alongside Courtroom5, BoardWise, and Descrybe. First time a leading AI company explicitly named access to justice as a foundational pillar.
  • Thomson ReuterscoreTechnology or Integration · 12 May 2026Both Thomson Reuters and Free Law Project announced MCP integrations with Anthropic's Claude on the same day, connecting their databases to AI assistants. Thomson Reuters connects CoCounsel to 1.9 billion documents.
  • HeinOnlinecoreTechnology or Integration · 10 December 2025HeinOnline announced a new case law offering powered by CourtListener, making FLP's open legal data available through HeinOnline's platform.
  • Civil Rights Litigation ClearinghousecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 25 September 2025Partnership to explore how AI can unlock court data and make legal research smarter, faster, and more accessible. FLP is partnering with the Clearinghouse to look at ways AI can improve access to civil rights litigation data.
  • Harvard Law School (Caselaw Access Project)coreTechnology or Integration · 26 March 2024Harvard Caselaw Access Project data (millions of digitized case law records) incorporated into CourtListener, completing coverage of American case law.
  • vLexcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 12 September 2022Partnership to build a complete, updated, and audited open case law database. With vLex's support, FLP is working to create the first comprehensive free collection of American case law.
  • Pre/DictaminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCollaboration on judicial analytics database, combining Pre/Dicta's expertise with FLP's judicial financial disclosure data.
  • JustiaminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCollaboration on judicial database, contributing to the comprehensive structured database of judges and their financial interests.
  • Elliott Ash (Princeton University)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerAcademic collaboration on judicial analytics research, working with FLP's comprehensive judicial database.
  • Harvard Library Innovation LabcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCollaboration on Eyecite citation extraction tool development, combining FLP's reporter database with Harvard's caselaw data.

Scale indicators17 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Free Law Project competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Others

  • CourtListener (Harvard Caselaw Access Project): Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab project that digitized millions of historical American case law records and partnered with Free Law Project in 2024 to integrate data into CourtListener. Comparable as a large-scale open case law initiative with shared mission and overlapping academic/journalist audience.

Broad incumbents

  • Westlaw (Thomson Reuters): Premier legal research platform operated by Thomson Reuters; on the same day as FLP's MCP announcement, Westlaw's CoCounsel was also integrated with Claude AI. Comparable as the dominant paid legal research platform and the primary commercial competitor to CourtListener for legal AI infrastructure.
  • LexisNexis: Largest commercial legal research incumbent alongside Westlaw. Comparable in aggregating case law, dockets, and judicial information at massive scale, but as a paid, proprietary platform serving large law firms and corporate legal departments — represents the traditional model FLP's open infrastructure is disrupting.

Direct peers

  • Pre/Dicta: Legal analytics startup collaborating with Free Law Project on the judicial database. Comparable as a judicial analytics and litigation prediction platform using FLP's underlying data — overlapping technology category and customer base (law firms, litigators).
  • vLex: Global legal research platform and Free Law Project's strategic partner (2022) co-developing a complete, updated, and audited open American case law database. Comparable in that both aggregate large-scale case law and offer APIs, but vLex is a commercial incumbent with broader international coverage and paid subscription model.
  • Justia: Free legal information platform collaborating with Free Law Project on the judicial database. Comparable as a mission-driven legal information provider offering free case law, codes, and judge data, with a freemium model and audience of self-represented litigants and lawyers.
  • HeinOnline: Legal research database that partnered with Free Law Project in December 2025 to power a new case law offering from CourtListener data. Comparable as a long-form legal publisher/research platform; both serve law schools, libraries, and legal professionals with comprehensive case law coverage.
  • Casetext (Thomson Reuters): AI-powered legal research platform acquired by Thomson Reuters; now part of CoCounsel. Directly comparable as an AI-native legal research competitor leveraging large case law corpora, and a potential future distribution channel or competitor to Free Law Project's open MCP approach.

Regional players

  • Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse: Nonprofit organization partnering with Free Law Project in 2025 to explore AI applications for civil rights litigation data. Comparable as a mission-driven legal data organization targeting public-interest litigation, with shared nonprofit ethos and overlapping user base of legal aid organizations and researchers.

Emerging players

  • Courtroom5: Guided self-representation platform named alongside Free Law Project as an access-to-justice partner in Anthropic's Claude for Legal launch. Comparable as a direct-to-litigant legal technology targeting the same self-represented market segment, with overlapping mission and AI-enabled workflows.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat6 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Free Law Project social profiles

Digital presence

Free Law Project financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Free Law Project leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles9 records

Free Law Project funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Free Law Project M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Free Law Project

What does Free Law Project do?

Free Law Project operates CourtListener, a fully searchable archive of U.S. court opinions, oral arguments, judges, judicial financial records, and federal filings, supplemented by the RECAP Suite (browser extensions that liberate PACER documents into a free archive) and Bots.law (case-monitoring bots for chat and social platforms). The nonprofit organization also develops open-source legal data tools (Juriscraper, Eyecite, X-Ray, Doctor, Inception) and offers paid data services, tiered memberships, organizational sponsorships, and bulk data licensing to legal technology companies and researchers.

Is Free Law Project a public or private company?

Free Law Project is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Free Law Project founded?

Free Law Project was founded in 2010. It employs 1 to 10 people.

Where is Free Law Project based?

Free Law Project is headquartered in Berkeley, United States, in the North America region.

How does Free Law Project make money?

Six revenue lines are on record. Data Services and Consulting is the primary driver. The others are membership Subscriptions, organizational Sponsorships, individual Donations, data Licensing and grants.

Who are Free Law Project's main competitors?

CourtListener (Harvard Caselaw Access Project) is listed as an others. Broad incumbents are Westlaw (Thomson Reuters) and LexisNexis. Direct peers are Pre/Dicta, vLex, Justia, HeinOnline and Casetext (Thomson Reuters). Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is listed as a regional player. Courtroom5 is listed as an emerging player.

Does Free Law Project have an API?

Yes. CourtListener provides a public REST API (v4) for accessing opinions, filings, judges, financial disclosures, and more. The API is available via membership tiers with rate limits ranging from 5/minute (free tier) to 25/minute (Tier 4), with daily limits from 125/day to 1,400/day. Free tier provides community support while higher tiers include private support. The API is for small law firms, governmental bodies, legal service organizations, small media outlets, academics, and pre-revenue organizations — not for large or funded organizations. Bulk data and database replication are also available. Webhooks are supported for triggering workflows in external systems. Developer documentation is at wiki.free.law/c/courtlistener/help/api.

What industry is Free Law Project in?

Free Law Project's product category is Legal Research Software. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAEAPAC, Legal Practice Management & Case Management, with a secondary code of BPAEAPAE, eDiscovery, Litigation Support & Legal Hold. Its NAICS code is 5411 and its SIC code is 7370.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Artificial LawyerAstra for Law’s 26 Legal Tech Plugins + 1 Million More :)OpenAI launched Astra for Law with 26 partner-built plugins and a legal search index covering over 230 million URLs. The index includes Free Law Project's case-law collection covering 99.9% of US precedential case law. The platform also allows developers to build custom private plugins.LawSitesOn LawNext: Legal Research for Everyone: Inside the CourtListener-Claude PartnershipAnthropic, developer of the AI assistant Claude, announced a partnership with the Free Law Project to integrate its CourtListener free legal research platform into Claude's legal capabilities. The collaboration aims to provide verified, authoritative legal materials to anyone with a legal question, reducing the risk of using general AI for legal queries. A LawNext podcast episode featured discussions with Free Law Project's executive director Mike Lissner and AI developer Nathan Dahlberg on the technical workings and broader implications for access to justice.Emerging EuropeClaude for Legal arrivesAnthropic released Claude for Legal on May 12, adding 20+ integrations and 12 practice-area plugins for contracts, eDiscovery, and research. The release includes a Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal connector and a setup interview that captures each team's playbook, raising questions about vendor lock-in and consolidation pressure on legal-AI vendors.LawSitesTwo Legal Research Providers Launch MCP Integrations with Claude: Thomson Reuters and Free Law Project Connect Their Data to AITwo legal research providers—Thomson Reuters and Free Law Project (CourtListener)—announced on the same day that they have integrated their databases with Anthropic's Claude AI using the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard enabling AI assistants to query live data sources in real time. Thomson Reuters is connecting Claude to its CoCounsel Legal professional AI system, which draws on 1.9 billion Westlaw and Practical Law documents and is being rebuilt on Anthropic's Claude Agent SDK, targeting law firms, corporate legal departments, and government agencies. Free Law Project is offering CourtListener's MCP integration for free to anyone, providing access to millions of federal and state court decisions, PACER data, citation networks, and oral argument audio, with a stated focus on supporting access to justice for self-represented litigants and legal aid organizations.Law.comThe Legal Research Renaissance: What’s Behind the Explosion of New Startups?A new wave of legal research startups—including Midpage, Alexi, Descrybe, and BlueShoe—has emerged since the early 2020s, driven by advances in generative and agentic AI that have lowered the barriers previously required to build case law databases. Organizations such as Harvard Law School's Caselaw Access Project and the Free Law Project have further enabled this growth by making primary law data freely accessible to startups. However, consolidation among legacy players—Thomson Reuters, LexisNexis, and Clio—continues to reshape the competitive landscape, with Clio-owned Fastcase suing Alexi in 2025 over alleged unauthorized use of its case law database, significantly impacting Alexi's operations.FreeFree Law Project Is Scanning America's Case LawFree Law Project announced a large-scale initiative to scan and digitize thousands of published legal books to complete the CourtListener database, aiming to reach 2.5 million pages by fall. The organization utilizes its proprietary machine learning tool, Blackletter, to automate the removal of editorial material from scans, ensuring that only public domain legal opinions are made available. This effort addresses historical access barriers to authoritative case law by providing free, citable digital records for self-represented litigants and attorneys.FreeSemantic Search API Now Live!The Free Law Project has launched its Semantic Search API on CourtListener, enabling users to search legal case law using natural language and hybrid keyword-semantic queries. This update utilizes machine learning embeddings to improve the retrieval of relevant precedents compared to traditional keyword searches. The organization is also providing open access to these embeddings for download while requesting donations to support the associated infrastructure costs.EIN PresswireProPlaintiff.ai Now Includes 6.7 Million Case Law RecordsProPlaintiff.ai announced the integration of 6.7 million verified U.S. case law records into its AI Paralegal platform, powered through a partnership with the Free Law Project nonprofit organization. The database includes 40 million pages of federal and state court decisions spanning over 365 years of jurisprudence, sourced from the Caselaw Access Project, CourtListener, and 479 courts nationwide. The feature is immediately available to all subscribers across every subscription tier, enabling personal injury attorneys to conduct legal research, draft motions, and verify citations within a single workspace.FreeAnnouncing the Justice Partner Circle: Partnering with Law Firms to Advance Legal InnovationThe Free Law Project has launched the Justice Partner Circle, a new initiative designed to partner with law firms to advance legal innovation and access to justice. The program offers member firms tiered benefits, including access to open-source tools like CourtListener and RECAP, as well as support for integrating these technologies into their workflows.FreeEnhancing Legal Research with Domain-Adapted Semantic SearchFree Law Project announced the development of a new domain-adapted semantic search engine, focusing on legal research, using their embedding generation tool and machine learning model. This semantic search will utilize advanced techniques to enhance the accessibility of legal information, particularly benefitting self-represented litigants. The technology will be initially released as an API and as part of CourtListener in the coming weeks.