Crosner Legal
Crosner Legal is a plaintiff-side litigation firm founded in 2013 that represents individual employees and consumers in wage-and-hour class actions, consumer protection, and privacy rights cases across California, Washington, Oregon, and Illinois on a contingency fee basis, recovering over $300M for 100,000+ clients.
- Company typePrivate
- Founded2013
- HeadquartersBeverly Hills, United States
- Headcount11–50
- GTM typeB2C
- OfferingServices
What Crosner Legal does
Crosner Legal, P.C. is a plaintiff-side litigation law firm founded in 2013 and headquartered in Beverly Hills, California. The firm specializes in wage and hour class actions, consumer protection litigation, privacy rights cases, mass arbitration proceedings, and employment discrimination/harassment matters on behalf of individual employees and consumers against large corporate defendants. Its core service portfolio comprises seven published practice areas, led by Wage & Hour Litigation and Consumer Protection Litigation, with supporting capabilities in Privacy Rights, Mass Arbitration, Discrimination & Sexual Harassment, Individual Employment Litigation, and the recently added Mobile Home Protection practice.
The firm operates a contingency fee revenue model, advancing case costs and recovering a percentage of settlements or judgments, with free initial case evaluations as the primary client acquisition mechanism. Distribution is sales-led and direct-to-consumer: a website intake form, a 1-866-CROSNER phone line, and email intake feed a dedicated Director of Intake and a multi-attorney team structured into department-specific Managing Attorneys. Geographic reach spans four regional offices in Beverly Hills, Seattle, Portland, and Chicago, with nationwide class-action capacity. Marketing relies on SEO-optimized practice-area and location pages, Google Business Profile reviews, LinkedIn/X/Twitter presence, and published case-result testimonials.
Crosner Legal is privately held by the Crosner family with no institutional investors, no parent company, and no external funding rounds. The firm has recovered over $300 million on behalf of 100,000+ workers and consumers since founding, with a roster of Super Lawyers-recognized attorneys and litigators recruited from AmLaw 100 firms and preeminent plaintiff boutiques. Technology infrastructure is described generically as a legal case management and complex litigation platform; no proprietary AI, APIs, or partner-facing software products are offered.
Crosner Legal firmographics
Firmographics- Name
- Crosner Legal
- Legal name
- Crosner Legal, P.C.
- Website
- https://crosnerlegal.com
- Company type
- Private
- Founded year
- 2013
- Operating status
- Operating
- Headcount range
- 11–50 employees
- Short description
- Crosner Legal is a plaintiff-side litigation firm founded in 2013 that represents individual employees and consumers in wage-and-hour class actions, consumer protection, and privacy rights cases across California, Washington, Oregon, and Illinois on a contingency fee basis, recovering over $300M for 100,000+ clients.
- Ownership category
- akta.pro rank
Where Crosner Legal is headquartered
LocationHeadquarters
- HQ city
- Beverly Hills
- HQ country
- United States
- HQ region
- North America
Offices4 records
Markets served
Crosner Legal business model
Business model- GTM type
- B2C
- Offering type
- Services
- Cost components
- Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure, Technology or R&D
Revenue model
- Legal Services - Contingency Fees: Crosner Legal operates primarily on a contingency fee basis for class action and mass arbitration cases, where the firm receives a percentage of settlements or judgments recovered on behalf of clients. Individual employment litigation may also be handled on contingency or alternative fee arrangements.
Pricing tiers
| Model | Billing | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Pay-as-you-go | Free Case Evaluation |
Go-to-market motion1 record
Distribution channels3 records
Marketing channels5 records
Crosner Legal product offering
Product offeringCore offering
Crosner Legal is a plaintiff-side litigation law firm that represents individual employees and consumers against large corporations in employment, consumer protection, and privacy matters. Its core offerings include Wage & Hour class and representative actions, Consumer Protection class actions (false advertising, hidden fees, deceptive marketing), Privacy Rights litigation (data breach, biometric privacy, call recording), Mass Arbitration proceedings, and Discrimination & Sexual Harassment claims, plus individual employment litigation and Mobile Home Protection matters. Services are delivered through offices in California, Washington, Oregon, and Illinois, with nationwide reach for class actions.
Product overview
Crosner Legal is a plaintiff-side litigation law firm offering a unified portfolio of legal services rather than a software product. Its core practice areas are: Wage & Hour Litigation (class and representative actions for employee wage violations), Consumer Protection Litigation (false advertising and fraud class actions), Privacy Rights Litigation (data breach and biometric privacy cases), Mass Arbitration (coordinated individual arbitration proceedings), Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Litigation (workplace bias and harassment claims), and Individual Employment Litigation (single-plaintiff wrongful termination and discrimination matters). The firm operates from offices in California, Illinois, Washington, and Oregon, with a remote-first workforce, and handles matters nationwide.
Differentiator
Problem solved
Functional benefit
Products and services
- Wage & Hour Litigation Class action and representative litigation on behalf of employees for unpaid wages, overtime, meal/rest break violations, misclassification, and other wage theft claims. For individual employees and classes of workers across industries such as healthcare, retail, food service, transportation, and manufacturing.
- Consumer Protection Litigation Class action lawsuits against corporations for false advertising, hidden fees, deceptive marketing, and consumer fraud. For individual consumers and consumer classes harmed by corporate misconduct.
- Privacy Rights Litigation Class action and mass arbitration cases involving data breaches, biometric privacy, call recording, and unauthorized data collection. For individuals whose privacy has been violated by corporations.
- Mass Arbitration Prosecuting large volumes of individual arbitration claims simultaneously to combat corporate misconduct when class actions are restricted by arbitration clauses. For groups of employees or consumers subject to arbitration agreements.
- Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Litigation Individual and class action representation for victims of workplace discrimination based on gender, race, age, disability, pregnancy, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, or military service, as well as sexual harassment claims. For individual employees and affected classes.
- Individual Employment Litigation Individual lawsuits for wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, whistleblower retaliation, and other employment disputes. For individual employees.
- Mobile Home Protection Legal representation for mobile home residents regarding housing rights violations and related consumer protection matters. For mobile home residents.
Quantifiable outcome
- Over $300 million recovered on behalf of victims
- +2 more outcomes
Companies that use Crosner Legal
Customer profileNamed customers5 records
Segments3 records
Ideal customer profiles2 records
Crosner Legal technology and API
TechnologyTechnology focussed No
API detail
- Has API
- No
- API docs
- API detail
Core technology
AI maturity
App detail
Crosner Legal partnerships and signals
Strategic signalScale indicators4 records
Recent moves5 records
Expansion highlights5 records
Crosner Legal competitors and assessment
Company assessmentBroad incumbents
- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd: Largest securities and consumer class action firm in the U.S. Overlaps with Crosner in consumer fraud and privacy class actions, though its core is securities litigation. Comparable contingency model and case scale.
- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check: Plaintiff-side firm with significant securities and consumer class action practices. Comparable to Crosner in contingency-fee class action model and pursuit of corporate accountability through coordinated litigation.
Direct peers
- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro: Plaintiff-side class action firm with a major employment (wage & hour) and consumer protection practice. Comparable to Crosner because both run nationwide class action dockets on contingency with multi-state office footprints.
- Carlson Lynch Sweet Kipila: Pennsylvania-based plaintiff-side class action firm with strong consumer protection practice (false advertising, privacy). Comparable to Crosner's consumer protection docket and contingency fee structure.
- Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane: National plaintiff-side class action firm with employment, consumer, and mass tort practices. Comparable to Crosner in class action scale and contingency fee representation of workers and consumers.
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: National plaintiff-side complex litigation firm with leading consumer protection and employment class action practices. Closely comparable in terms of contingency-fee class action model and seven-figure settlement track record.
- Rudy Exelrod Zieff & Lowe: San Francisco-based plaintiff-side employment class action boutique with deep PAGA and wage & hour focus. Directly comparable to Crosner in practice specialization, geographic market (California), and contingency model.
- Outten & Golden: Plaintiff-side employment law firm focused on individual and class representation for discrimination, wage & hour, and executive transition matters. Comparable to Crosner's employment litigation practice and client base.
- Van Law Firm: Las Vegas-based plaintiff-side personal injury and employment firm with growing class action practice. Comparable to Crosner in contingency-fee consumer/employment representation, though smaller scale.
- Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint: Phoenix-based plaintiff-side firm specializing in consumer protection and employment class actions, including PAGA and wage & hour. Directly comparable to Crosner's wage & hour and consumer fraud focus.
Market position
Strengths5 records
Weaknesses5 records
Competitive moat4 records
Key risks7 records
Key highlights7 records
Customer concentration
Crosner Legal social profiles
Digital presenceCrosner Legal financial estimates
Financial estimateRevenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Crosner Legal leadership team
Management profileNumber of profiles
Profiles11 records
Crosner Legal funding detail
Funding detailFunding overview
Funding rounds
Investors
Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Crosner Legal M&A and investment
M&A and investmentM&A
Investments
M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Frequently asked questions about Crosner Legal
What does Crosner Legal do?
Crosner Legal is a plaintiff-side litigation law firm that represents individual employees and consumers against large corporations in employment, consumer protection, and privacy matters. Its core offerings include Wage & Hour class and representative actions, Consumer Protection class actions (false advertising, hidden fees, deceptive marketing), Privacy Rights litigation (data breach, biometric privacy, call recording), Mass Arbitration proceedings, and Discrimination & Sexual Harassment claims, plus individual employment litigation and Mobile Home Protection matters. Services are delivered through offices in California, Washington, Oregon, and Illinois, with nationwide reach for class actions.
Is Crosner Legal a public or private company?
Crosner Legal is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.
When was Crosner Legal founded?
Crosner Legal was founded in 2013. It employs 11 to 50 people.
Where is Crosner Legal based?
Crosner Legal is headquartered in Beverly Hills, United States, in the North America region.
How does Crosner Legal make money?
One revenue line is on record: legal Services - Contingency Fees.
Who are Crosner Legal's main competitors?
Broad incumbents on record are Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check. Direct peers are Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Carlson Lynch Sweet Kipila, Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Rudy Exelrod Zieff & Lowe, Outten & Golden, Van Law Firm and Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint.
Does Crosner Legal have an API?
No public API is recorded for Crosner Legal.