Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Administrative Conference of the United States

Full company profile

uuid002h3og

Namestring
Administrative Conference of the United States
Legal namestring
Administrative Conference of the United States
Websiteurl
acus.gov
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1968
Descriptiontext

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch, established in 1968, charged with identifying and promoting improvements to the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures. It serves U.S. federal executive branch agencies as its primary constituency, with secondary recipients including the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference of the United States. ACUS operates through committees of members supported by expert consultants and a small professional staff (11-50 employees) headquartered at 1120 20th St NW, Suite 706 South, Washington, DC.

ACUS's core outputs are policy recommendations adopted at twice-yearly plenary sessions, supported by consultant- and staff-prepared reports, reference guides (handbooks, sourcebooks, statements of principles), model rules (Model Adjudication Rules, EAJA implementation, representative conduct), and information interchange bulletins. It maintains the publicly searchable Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Awards Database (104,812+ records) under a congressionally mandated reporting requirement, publishes monthly adjudication updates and weekly legislative updates, and convenes roundtables, public forums, and training programs. ACUS is also actively studying how federal agencies use artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools in rulemaking and adjudication processes.

As a federal government agency, ACUS is funded through congressional appropriations rather than commercial revenue. All recommendations, reports, model rules, and the EAJA database are provided at no cost to federal agencies, Congress, the President, the Judicial Conference, and the public. The organization has no commercial pricing model, no parent company, no subsidiaries, and no investment funding rounds; its strategic position rests on its statutory mandate, 55+ years of institutional knowledge, and the consensus-based committee process that produces its recommendations.

Short descriptiontext

ACUS is an independent U.S. federal agency, operating since 1968, that issues non-partisan consensus-based recommendations and reference materials to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures for federal agencies, Congress, the President, and the Judicial Conference.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
administrative procedure reform, federal regulatory policy, rulemaking and adjudication, government agency recommendations, administrative law advisory
NAICS code2 codes
  • Public Administration92
  • Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support921
Product category
Federal Government Administrative Procedure Advisory Services
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components3 values
Personnel, Operations, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch that issues consensus-based recommendations, research reports, model rules, and reference guides to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures. It advises federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference on rulemaking, adjudication, and other administrative processes. ACUS also maintains the public EAJA Awards Database, convenes roundtables and forums, and delivers training on administrative law topics.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 value
  • Hundreds of recommendations implemented as reforms by federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference
Product overview1 text field

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is a federal agency that provides advisory recommendations, research reports, and educational resources to improve federal administrative procedures. Rather than a unified software product, ACUS offers a portfolio of knowledge products and services including policy Recommendations, Reports, Reference Guides, Model Rules, Information Interchange Bulletins, the EAJA Awards Database, monthly Adjudication Updates, weekly Legislative Updates, Roundtables, Forums, and Training programs. The EAJA Awards Database is the primary online searchable tool, while Recommendations and Reports form the core advisory products issued to agencies, Congress, the President, and the Judicial Conference.

Product and service5 records
1ACUS Recommendations
CategoryPolicy Recommendations
Description

Policy recommendations issued by ACUS to federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference to improve administrative procedure, covering rulemaking, adjudication, and other administrative processes.

2ACUS Reports
CategoryResearch Reports
Description

Consultant and staff-prepared in-depth reports on administrative procedure topics that support ACUS recommendations and analyze regulatory, adjudicative, and other administrative law topics.

3Reference Guides
CategoryReference Materials
Description

Reference materials including Handbooks, Sourcebooks, Statements of Principles, and reports such as the Sourcebook of United States Executive Agencies and the Federal Administrative Procedure Sourcebook.

4Model Rules
CategoryModel Rules
Description

ACUS-developed model rules including Model Adjudication Rules, Model Rules for Implementation of the Equal Access to Justice Act, and Model Rules of Representative Conduct.

5EAJA Awards Database
Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers7 records
1RAND Corporation
TypeOthers
Description

Nonprofit policy think tank that delivers research and analysis to government and other public-sector clients. RAND parallels ACUS in producing rigorous, nonpartisan analysis that informs federal decision-making on complex policy and procedural issues.

2Bipartisan Policy Center
TypeOthers
Description

Nonprofit organization that develops policy recommendations across a broad range of issues, often through convening of former officials from both parties. It parallels ACUS in producing consensus-based, nonpartisan recommendations directed at improving federal governance outcomes.

3Federal Judicial Center
TypeDirect peer
Description

Independent research and education agency of the U.S. federal courts. It parallels ACUS as an independent federal advisory entity that studies best practices, publishes research, and supports improvements in the procedures of a branch of the federal government.

4American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice
TypeOthers
Description

ABA professional section focused on administrative law and regulatory practice, the primary community for administrative law practitioners and scholars. While not a federal agency, it shares ACUS's subject-matter focus on administrative law and uses similar publications, committee structures, and convening events.

5National Academy of Public Administration
TypeDirect peer
Description

Independent, congressionally chartered nonprofit organization that advises the federal government on public administration. ACUS shares its mandate of improving how federal agencies operate, using similar convening, research, and recommendation frameworks to drive government-wide improvements.

6Government Accountability Office
TypeDirect peer
Description

Independent, nonpartisan federal agency that investigates how the federal government spends taxpayer dollars and performs its functions. GAO parallels ACUS as another independent federal body that conducts oversight research, issues findings, and drives procedural/governance improvements across federal agencies.

7Congressional Research Service
TypeDirect peer
Description

Public policy research arm of the U.S. Congress that provides nonpartisan analysis directly to lawmakers. CRS parallels ACUS as a federally chartered research and analysis body whose outputs inform government-wide decision-making on complex procedural and policy issues.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers4 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI capability4 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles5 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Administrative Conference of the United States

Federal Government Administrative Procedure Advisory Servicesacus.gov

ACUS is an independent U.S. federal agency, operating since 1968, that issues non-partisan consensus-based recommendations and reference materials to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures for federal agencies, Congress, the President, and the Judicial Conference.

What Administrative Conference of the United States does

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch, established in 1968, charged with identifying and promoting improvements to the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures. It serves U.S. federal executive branch agencies as its primary constituency, with secondary recipients including the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference of the United States. ACUS operates through committees of members supported by expert consultants and a small professional staff (11-50 employees) headquartered at 1120 20th St NW, Suite 706 South, Washington, DC.

ACUS's core outputs are policy recommendations adopted at twice-yearly plenary sessions, supported by consultant- and staff-prepared reports, reference guides (handbooks, sourcebooks, statements of principles), model rules (Model Adjudication Rules, EAJA implementation, representative conduct), and information interchange bulletins. It maintains the publicly searchable Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Awards Database (104,812+ records) under a congressionally mandated reporting requirement, publishes monthly adjudication updates and weekly legislative updates, and convenes roundtables, public forums, and training programs. ACUS is also actively studying how federal agencies use artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools in rulemaking and adjudication processes.

As a federal government agency, ACUS is funded through congressional appropriations rather than commercial revenue. All recommendations, reports, model rules, and the EAJA database are provided at no cost to federal agencies, Congress, the President, the Judicial Conference, and the public. The organization has no commercial pricing model, no parent company, no subsidiaries, and no investment funding rounds; its strategic position rests on its statutory mandate, 55+ years of institutional knowledge, and the consensus-based committee process that produces its recommendations.

Administrative Conference of the United States firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Administrative Conference of the United States
Legal name
Administrative Conference of the United States
Website
https://acus.gov
Company type
Private
Founded year
1968
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
ACUS is an independent U.S. federal agency, operating since 1968, that issues non-partisan consensus-based recommendations and reference materials to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures for federal agencies, Congress, the President, and the Judicial Conference.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where Administrative Conference of the United States is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Administrative Conference of the United States business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Others

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels6 records

Administrative Conference of the United States product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch that issues consensus-based recommendations, research reports, model rules, and reference guides to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures. It advises federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference on rulemaking, adjudication, and other administrative processes. ACUS also maintains the public EAJA Awards Database, convenes roundtables and forums, and delivers training on administrative law topics.

Product overview

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is a federal agency that provides advisory recommendations, research reports, and educational resources to improve federal administrative procedures. Rather than a unified software product, ACUS offers a portfolio of knowledge products and services including policy Recommendations, Reports, Reference Guides, Model Rules, Information Interchange Bulletins, the EAJA Awards Database, monthly Adjudication Updates, weekly Legislative Updates, Roundtables, Forums, and Training programs. The EAJA Awards Database is the primary online searchable tool, while Recommendations and Reports form the core advisory products issued to agencies, Congress, the President, and the Judicial Conference.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • ACUS Recommendations Policy recommendations issued by ACUS to federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference to improve administrative procedure, covering rulemaking, adjudication, and other administrative processes.
  • ACUS Reports Consultant and staff-prepared in-depth reports on administrative procedure topics that support ACUS recommendations and analyze regulatory, adjudicative, and other administrative law topics.
  • Reference Guides Reference materials including Handbooks, Sourcebooks, Statements of Principles, and reports such as the Sourcebook of United States Executive Agencies and the Federal Administrative Procedure Sourcebook.
  • Model Rules ACUS-developed model rules including Model Adjudication Rules, Model Rules for Implementation of the Equal Access to Justice Act, and Model Rules of Representative Conduct.
  • EAJA Awards Database

Quantifiable outcome

  • Hundreds of recommendations implemented as reforms by federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference

Companies that use Administrative Conference of the United States

Customer profile

Named customers4 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Administrative Conference of the United States technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

AI capability4 records

Administrative Conference of the United States partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Administrative Conference of the United States competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Others

  • RAND Corporation: Nonprofit policy think tank that delivers research and analysis to government and other public-sector clients. RAND parallels ACUS in producing rigorous, nonpartisan analysis that informs federal decision-making on complex policy and procedural issues.
  • Bipartisan Policy Center: Nonprofit organization that develops policy recommendations across a broad range of issues, often through convening of former officials from both parties. It parallels ACUS in producing consensus-based, nonpartisan recommendations directed at improving federal governance outcomes.
  • American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice: ABA professional section focused on administrative law and regulatory practice, the primary community for administrative law practitioners and scholars. While not a federal agency, it shares ACUS's subject-matter focus on administrative law and uses similar publications, committee structures, and convening events.

Direct peers

  • Federal Judicial Center: Independent research and education agency of the U.S. federal courts. It parallels ACUS as an independent federal advisory entity that studies best practices, publishes research, and supports improvements in the procedures of a branch of the federal government.
  • National Academy of Public Administration: Independent, congressionally chartered nonprofit organization that advises the federal government on public administration. ACUS shares its mandate of improving how federal agencies operate, using similar convening, research, and recommendation frameworks to drive government-wide improvements.
  • Government Accountability Office: Independent, nonpartisan federal agency that investigates how the federal government spends taxpayer dollars and performs its functions. GAO parallels ACUS as another independent federal body that conducts oversight research, issues findings, and drives procedural/governance improvements across federal agencies.
  • Congressional Research Service: Public policy research arm of the U.S. Congress that provides nonpartisan analysis directly to lawmakers. CRS parallels ACUS as a federally chartered research and analysis body whose outputs inform government-wide decision-making on complex procedural and policy issues.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks4 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Administrative Conference of the United States social profiles

Digital presence

Administrative Conference of the United States financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Administrative Conference of the United States leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Administrative Conference of the United States funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Administrative Conference of the United States M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Administrative Conference of the United States

What does Administrative Conference of the United States do?

The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch that issues consensus-based recommendations, research reports, model rules, and reference guides to improve the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of federal administrative procedures. It advises federal agencies, the President, Congress, and the Judicial Conference on rulemaking, adjudication, and other administrative processes. ACUS also maintains the public EAJA Awards Database, convenes roundtables and forums, and delivers training on administrative law topics.

Is Administrative Conference of the United States a public or private company?

Administrative Conference of the United States is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Administrative Conference of the United States founded?

Administrative Conference of the United States was founded in 1968. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Administrative Conference of the United States based?

Administrative Conference of the United States is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Administrative Conference of the United States's main competitors?

Others on record are RAND Corporation, Bipartisan Policy Center and American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. Direct peers are Federal Judicial Center, National Academy of Public Administration, Government Accountability Office and Congressional Research Service.

Does Administrative Conference of the United States have an API?

No public API is recorded for Administrative Conference of the United States.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
AcusUsing Algorithmic Tools in Regulatory EnforcementThe Administrative Conference of the United States issued a recommendation on using algorithmic tools in regulatory enforcement, covering monitoring, detection, investigation, inspection, audit and evidence gathering. It sets seven factors agencies should weigh, including bias, explainability, rights impacts and confidentiality, and requires risk assessments, oversight, training and public notice. It also directs the Chief AI Officer Council to facilitate interagency collaboration.AcusAdministrative Conference of the United StatesThe Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) has determined that it does not use or anticipate using covered artificial intelligence, in compliance with OMB Memorandum M-25-21. ACUS is actively collaborating with AI researchers to explore how federal agencies can integrate these technologies into administrative processes while adhering to legal norms.AcusIdentifying and Reducing Burdens on the Public in Administrative ProcessesThe Administrative Conference of the United States adopted a recommendation providing best practices for federal agencies to identify and reduce administrative burdens faced by the public when accessing government programs. The guidelines urge agencies to simplify processes, improve digital access, and collaborate across government levels to lower learning, compliance, and psychological costs associated with navigating benefits like Social Security and healthcare. It also directs the Office of Management and Budget to issue further guidance on measuring these burdens and facilitating data sharing.TheregreviewAgency Enforcement ManualsThe Administrative Conference of the United States studied enforcement manuals from about twenty federal agencies and issued Recommendation 2022-5 on their development and public availability. The recommendation advises agencies to create manuals if they improve communication and fair enforcement, and to make them publicly available when it promotes transparency. It also calls for periodic reviews and searchable electronic formats.PR NewswireActing on ACUS Recommendations, SSA Implements Major Overhaul of Disability Claim Regulations Governing Medical EvidenceThe Social Security Administration has implemented major changes to the rules governing administrative litigation in its disability claims program, based on recommendations from the Administrative Conference of the United States. The new regulations expand the class of healthcare professionals whose opinions can be considered in disability decisions and eliminate the "treating physician rule" that required controlling weight be given to treating physicians' opinions. The changes are expected to improve consistency and accuracy of disability decisions, increase fairness to claimants, and reduce litigation costs paid by taxpayers.PR NewswireABA endorses ACUS recommendations in advisory report to new administrationThe American Bar Association's Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice released a comprehensive advisory report entitled 'Improving the Administrative Process' to the President-elect with recommendations to improve federal administrative process during the transition to a new administration. Many of the report's recommendations rely on, cite, or are informed by work from the Administrative Conference of the United States, including proposals on ethical conduct for transition workers, transparency in rulemaking, and international regulatory cooperation. The report recommends that the incoming administration require private citizens working on the presidential transition to adhere to the Conference's Workers Code of Ethical Conduct and ensure all agencies post guidance materials on their websites.