Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Upper Midwest Law Center

Full company profile

uuid005ixar

Namestring
Upper Midwest Law Center
Legal namestring
Upper Midwest Law Center
Websiteurl
umlc.org
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2019
Descriptiontext

Upper Midwest Law Center (UMLC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm founded in 2019 by Douglas P. Seaton and headquartered at 12600 Whitewater Dr., Suite 140, Minnetonka, Minnesota. The firm accepts cases through a Lawyers Advisory Board–vetted intake process and provides pro-freedom litigation in the areas of constitutional rights (First and Second Amendment, religious liberty, due process, equal protection), government accountability, and public union accountability. Its docket spans state and federal courts across Minnesota and the Upper Midwest and includes matters such as Schmitt v. Rebertus (Eighth Circuit religious-liberty preliminary injunction), challenges to Minnesota's 2024 Omnibus Bill, election-integrity disputes represented on behalf of Minnesota Voters Alliance, and a municipal mandamus action against the City of Minneapolis over police staffing.

UMLC operates a contingency-style model in which attorneys provide representation without charge to clients and a portion of legal recoveries is recycled to fund additional litigation. The primary funding stream is donations solicited through an Anedot donation portal, weekly email newsletter, social channels, and regional media relations. As of mid-2026 the team comprises roughly 5 employees per firmographic count with an additional 8+ credentialed attorneys including Senior Litigation Counsel Richard Morgan, Senior Litigation Attorney Rachel Paulose (former U.S. Attorney), Senior Appellate Counsel Nicholas Nelson, Senior Counsel for Religious Liberty Brent Robbins (former General Mills Deputy GC), Trial & Appellate Counsel Austin Lysy, and Trial Counsel Martha Astor, supported by a paralegal and staff. The organization does not employ proprietary technology, software products, or AI tooling; its core "technology" is legal expertise, advisory-board curation, and a co-counsel network that includes the Center of the American Experiment, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Pacific Legal Foundation, Liberty Justice Center, True North Legal, and Public Interest Legal Foundation.

Short descriptiontext

Upper Midwest Law Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm in Minnetonka, Minnesota providing pro bono constitutional, government-accountability, and public-union litigation for individuals, businesses, and advocacy organizations throughout Minnesota and the Upper Midwest.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
1–10
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersMinnetonka, United States
HQ citystring
Minnetonka
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
public interest litigation, constitutional law services, pro bono legal services, government accountability, civil rights litigation
Industry3 codes
1Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAAPrimaryYes
2Legal Aid & Client Advocacy Services
CodeBPAGAEAMPrimaryNo
3Public Defense & Legal Aid Services
CodeBPAIAFACPrimaryNo
NAICS code3 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers541110
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Public Interest Legal Services
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model2 records
1Donations and Contributions
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm, UMLC is primarily funded through donations and contributions from supporters who share its mission of protecting constitutional rights and limiting government overreach.

umlc.org
2Legal Recoveries
TypeTransaction Fee
Description

UMLC lawyers work without charge to clients, and legal recoveries are repurposed to fund additional litigation, creating a sustainable model for ongoing pro-freedom cases.

umlc.org
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Upper Midwest Law Center is a nonprofit public interest law firm that provides pro-freedom litigation services to protect citizens against government overreach, constitutional violations, special interest agendas, and public union corruption. Attorneys work without charge to clients, with legal recoveries repurposed to fund additional litigation. Practice areas include constitutional rights litigation (First Amendment, Second Amendment, due process, equal protection), government accountability litigation, election integrity cases, and public union accountability services.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • Multiple constitutional victories including striking down binary trigger ban as unconstitutional under Single Subject Clause
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Upper Midwest Law Center is a center-right, non-profit, public interest law firm founded in 2019 that provides legal services through pro-freedom litigation. Rather than offering a technology product, UMLC delivers legal services including constitutional rights litigation, government accountability cases, and public union accountability matters. Their litigation focuses on cases involving government overreach, First Amendment rights, election integrity, religious liberty, and public transparency. UMLC works without charge to clients and repurposes legal recoveries to fund additional litigation. The organization collaborates with the Center of the American Experiment think tank and has a Lawyers Advisory Board to vet cases.

Product and service4 records
1Pro-Freedom Litigation Services
CategoryConstitutional and Civil Rights Litigation
2Constitutional Rights Litigation
CategoryConstitutional Law Litigation
3Government Accountability Litigation
CategoryGovernment Accountability and Administrative Law
4Public Union Accountability Services
CategoryLabor and Public Sector Law
Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership6 partners
1Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF)
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2024-12-02
Description

UMLC serves as local counsel for PILF in federal lawsuit challenging Minnesota's exemption from National Voter Registration Act's Public Disclosure Provision.

umlc.org
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2024-09-26
Description

Joint litigation partnership filing lawsuits challenging unconstitutional laws including Minnesota's deep fake election law (Kohls v. Ellison). HLLI provides legal expertise and resources for constitutional challenges.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2024-01-24
Description

Co-counsel in Lance Nistler v. Tim Walz challenging race and sex-based discrimination in Minnesota's farming grant program.

4True North Legal
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2024-01-09
Description

Co-counsel in Schmitt v. Rebertus challenging Minnesota Department of Corrections' cancellation of Christian rehabilitation program. Joint litigation secured preliminary injunction from Eighth Circuit.

umlc.org
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2020-01-01
Description

Joint litigation partner in cases including Lackie v. Students United (challenging mandatory student fees for political speech) and CTM Holdings v. USDA (wetlands property rights).

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Minnesota's Think Tank with whom UMLC works cooperatively. UMLC represents CAE in lawsuits against Minnesota Department of Education for withholding public data.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1American Center for Law and Justice
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

ACLJ is a large, established conservative legal advocacy organization with global reach across constitutional and religious liberty litigation. It is a broad incumbent competing for aligned donors and high-profile cases but not regionally specialized like UMLC.

2Public Interest Legal Foundation
TypeDirect peer
Description

PILF is a conservative public interest law firm focused on election integrity and voter rolls. UMLC serves as local counsel for PILF in the Minnesota NVRA case, evidencing parallel mission and collaborative operating model.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Alliance Defending Freedom is the largest U.S. conservative public interest legal organization, with a national docket spanning religious liberty, free speech, and family policy. It is a broad incumbent that competes for the same donor pool and ideological plaintiffs as UMLC but operates at materially greater scale.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The Goldwater Institute is a conservative public interest law and policy organization litigating constitutional and limited-government cases across multiple states. Martha Astor's prior role at Goldwater and the substantive alignment of mission make Goldwater a direct peer in the conservative litigation space.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Pacific Legal Foundation is a national conservative public interest law firm that litigates individual rights and limited-government cases — directly paralleling UMLC's pro-freedom litigation model. PLF and UMLC are co-counsel in Nistler v. Walz, evidencing direct operational alignment.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The Institute for Free Speech litigates and advocates for First Amendment political speech rights, including campaign finance and mandatory fee cases — directly paralleling UMLC's Lackie v. Students United work. Martha Astor's prior affiliation reinforces the alignment.

7True North Legal
TypeRegional player
Description

True North Legal is a Minnesota-based conservative legal organization focused on religious liberty cases, and is a co-counsel partner with UMLC in Schmitt v. Rebertus. Operates in the same geography and overlapping substantive area.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Liberty Justice Center is a libertarian-aligned public interest law firm pursuing individual liberty and limited-government litigation. UMLC and LJC are joint litigation partners (e.g., Lackie v. Students United, CTM Holdings v. USDA), making them direct operational peers in conservative public interest law.

TypeDirect peer
Description

HLLI is a conservative public interest law firm specializing in constitutional and economic liberty litigation. UMLC partnered with HLLI on Kohls v. Ellison challenging Minnesota's deepfake election law, evidencing near-identical case selection and litigation philosophy.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Defense of Freedom Institute is a conservative legal and policy organization focused on education, civil rights, and constitutional litigation. Martha Astor's prior role there indicates substantive overlap in case scope and ideological framing.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers6 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile2 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles12 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Upper Midwest Law Center

Public Interest Legal Servicesumlc.org

Upper Midwest Law Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm in Minnetonka, Minnesota providing pro bono constitutional, government-accountability, and public-union litigation for individuals, businesses, and advocacy organizations throughout Minnesota and the Upper Midwest.

What Upper Midwest Law Center does

Upper Midwest Law Center (UMLC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm founded in 2019 by Douglas P. Seaton and headquartered at 12600 Whitewater Dr., Suite 140, Minnetonka, Minnesota. The firm accepts cases through a Lawyers Advisory Board–vetted intake process and provides pro-freedom litigation in the areas of constitutional rights (First and Second Amendment, religious liberty, due process, equal protection), government accountability, and public union accountability. Its docket spans state and federal courts across Minnesota and the Upper Midwest and includes matters such as Schmitt v. Rebertus (Eighth Circuit religious-liberty preliminary injunction), challenges to Minnesota's 2024 Omnibus Bill, election-integrity disputes represented on behalf of Minnesota Voters Alliance, and a municipal mandamus action against the City of Minneapolis over police staffing.

UMLC operates a contingency-style model in which attorneys provide representation without charge to clients and a portion of legal recoveries is recycled to fund additional litigation. The primary funding stream is donations solicited through an Anedot donation portal, weekly email newsletter, social channels, and regional media relations. As of mid-2026 the team comprises roughly 5 employees per firmographic count with an additional 8+ credentialed attorneys including Senior Litigation Counsel Richard Morgan, Senior Litigation Attorney Rachel Paulose (former U.S. Attorney), Senior Appellate Counsel Nicholas Nelson, Senior Counsel for Religious Liberty Brent Robbins (former General Mills Deputy GC), Trial & Appellate Counsel Austin Lysy, and Trial Counsel Martha Astor, supported by a paralegal and staff. The organization does not employ proprietary technology, software products, or AI tooling; its core "technology" is legal expertise, advisory-board curation, and a co-counsel network that includes the Center of the American Experiment, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Pacific Legal Foundation, Liberty Justice Center, True North Legal, and Public Interest Legal Foundation.

Upper Midwest Law Center firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Upper Midwest Law Center
Legal name
Upper Midwest Law Center
Website
https://umlc.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2019
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
1–10 employees
Short description
Upper Midwest Law Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm in Minnetonka, Minnesota providing pro bono constitutional, government-accountability, and public-union litigation for individuals, businesses, and advocacy organizations throughout Minnesota and the Upper Midwest.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Upper Midwest Law Center industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Interest Legal Services
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers (541110), Human Rights Organizations (813311), Legal Services (5411)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy (BPAGAFAA)
akta.pro secondary industries
Legal Aid & Client Advocacy Services (BPAGAEAM), Public Defense & Legal Aid Services (BPAIAFAC)

Keywords

  • Public interest litigation
  • Constitutional law services
  • Pro bono legal services
  • Government accountability
  • Civil rights litigation

Where Upper Midwest Law Center is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Minnetonka
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Upper Midwest Law Center business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others

Revenue model

  1. Donations and Contributions: As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public interest law firm, UMLC is primarily funded through donations and contributions from supporters who share its mission of protecting constitutional rights and limiting government overreach.
  2. Legal Recoveries: UMLC lawyers work without charge to clients, and legal recoveries are repurposed to fund additional litigation, creating a sustainable model for ongoing pro-freedom cases.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels6 records

Upper Midwest Law Center product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Upper Midwest Law Center is a nonprofit public interest law firm that provides pro-freedom litigation services to protect citizens against government overreach, constitutional violations, special interest agendas, and public union corruption. Attorneys work without charge to clients, with legal recoveries repurposed to fund additional litigation. Practice areas include constitutional rights litigation (First Amendment, Second Amendment, due process, equal protection), government accountability litigation, election integrity cases, and public union accountability services.

Product overview

The Upper Midwest Law Center is a center-right, non-profit, public interest law firm founded in 2019 that provides legal services through pro-freedom litigation. Rather than offering a technology product, UMLC delivers legal services including constitutional rights litigation, government accountability cases, and public union accountability matters. Their litigation focuses on cases involving government overreach, First Amendment rights, election integrity, religious liberty, and public transparency. UMLC works without charge to clients and repurposes legal recoveries to fund additional litigation. The organization collaborates with the Center of the American Experiment think tank and has a Lawyers Advisory Board to vet cases.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Pro-Freedom Litigation Services
  • Constitutional Rights Litigation
  • Government Accountability Litigation
  • Public Union Accountability Services

Quantifiable outcome

  • Multiple constitutional victories including striking down binary trigger ban as unconstitutional under Single Subject Clause
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use Upper Midwest Law Center

Customer profile

Named customers6 records

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles2 records

Upper Midwest Law Center technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Upper Midwest Law Center partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Six partnerships are on record, tiered minor and core.

  • Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF)minorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 2 December 2024UMLC serves as local counsel for PILF in federal lawsuit challenging Minnesota's exemption from National Voter Registration Act's Public Disclosure Provision.
  • Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 26 September 2024Joint litigation partnership filing lawsuits challenging unconstitutional laws including Minnesota's deep fake election law (Kohls v. Ellison). HLLI provides legal expertise and resources for constitutional challenges.
  • Pacific Legal FoundationcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 24 January 2024Co-counsel in Lance Nistler v. Tim Walz challenging race and sex-based discrimination in Minnesota's farming grant program.
  • True North LegalcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 9 January 2024Co-counsel in Schmitt v. Rebertus challenging Minnesota Department of Corrections' cancellation of Christian rehabilitation program. Joint litigation secured preliminary injunction from Eighth Circuit.
  • Liberty Justice CentercoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2020Joint litigation partner in cases including Lackie v. Students United (challenging mandatory student fees for political speech) and CTM Holdings v. USDA (wetlands property rights).
  • Center of the American ExperimentcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerMinnesota's Think Tank with whom UMLC works cooperatively. UMLC represents CAE in lawsuits against Minnesota Department of Education for withholding public data.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Upper Midwest Law Center competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • American Center for Law and Justice: ACLJ is a large, established conservative legal advocacy organization with global reach across constitutional and religious liberty litigation. It is a broad incumbent competing for aligned donors and high-profile cases but not regionally specialized like UMLC.
  • Alliance Defending Freedom: Alliance Defending Freedom is the largest U.S. conservative public interest legal organization, with a national docket spanning religious liberty, free speech, and family policy. It is a broad incumbent that competes for the same donor pool and ideological plaintiffs as UMLC but operates at materially greater scale.

Direct peers

  • Public Interest Legal Foundation: PILF is a conservative public interest law firm focused on election integrity and voter rolls. UMLC serves as local counsel for PILF in the Minnesota NVRA case, evidencing parallel mission and collaborative operating model.
  • Goldwater Institute: The Goldwater Institute is a conservative public interest law and policy organization litigating constitutional and limited-government cases across multiple states. Martha Astor's prior role at Goldwater and the substantive alignment of mission make Goldwater a direct peer in the conservative litigation space.
  • Pacific Legal Foundation: Pacific Legal Foundation is a national conservative public interest law firm that litigates individual rights and limited-government cases — directly paralleling UMLC's pro-freedom litigation model. PLF and UMLC are co-counsel in Nistler v. Walz, evidencing direct operational alignment.
  • Institute for Free Speech: The Institute for Free Speech litigates and advocates for First Amendment political speech rights, including campaign finance and mandatory fee cases — directly paralleling UMLC's Lackie v. Students United work. Martha Astor's prior affiliation reinforces the alignment.
  • Liberty Justice Center: Liberty Justice Center is a libertarian-aligned public interest law firm pursuing individual liberty and limited-government litigation. UMLC and LJC are joint litigation partners (e.g., Lackie v. Students United, CTM Holdings v. USDA), making them direct operational peers in conservative public interest law.
  • Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute: HLLI is a conservative public interest law firm specializing in constitutional and economic liberty litigation. UMLC partnered with HLLI on Kohls v. Ellison challenging Minnesota's deepfake election law, evidencing near-identical case selection and litigation philosophy.
  • Defense of Freedom Institute: Defense of Freedom Institute is a conservative legal and policy organization focused on education, civil rights, and constitutional litigation. Martha Astor's prior role there indicates substantive overlap in case scope and ideological framing.

Regional players

  • True North Legal: True North Legal is a Minnesota-based conservative legal organization focused on religious liberty cases, and is a co-counsel partner with UMLC in Schmitt v. Rebertus. Operates in the same geography and overlapping substantive area.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Upper Midwest Law Center social profiles

Digital presence

Upper Midwest Law Center financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Upper Midwest Law Center leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles12 records

Upper Midwest Law Center funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Upper Midwest Law Center M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Upper Midwest Law Center

What does Upper Midwest Law Center do?

Upper Midwest Law Center is a nonprofit public interest law firm that provides pro-freedom litigation services to protect citizens against government overreach, constitutional violations, special interest agendas, and public union corruption. Attorneys work without charge to clients, with legal recoveries repurposed to fund additional litigation. Practice areas include constitutional rights litigation (First Amendment, Second Amendment, due process, equal protection), government accountability litigation, election integrity cases, and public union accountability services.

Is Upper Midwest Law Center a public or private company?

Upper Midwest Law Center is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Upper Midwest Law Center founded?

Upper Midwest Law Center was founded in 2019. It employs 1 to 10 people.

Where is Upper Midwest Law Center based?

Upper Midwest Law Center is headquartered in Minnetonka, United States, in the North America region.

How does Upper Midwest Law Center make money?

Two revenue lines are on record. Donations and Contributions are the primary driver. The others are legal Recoveries.

Who are Upper Midwest Law Center's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are American Center for Law and Justice and Alliance Defending Freedom. Direct peers are Public Interest Legal Foundation, Goldwater Institute, Pacific Legal Foundation, Institute for Free Speech, Liberty Justice Center, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute and Defense of Freedom Institute. True North Legal is listed as a regional player.

Does Upper Midwest Law Center have an API?

No public API is recorded for Upper Midwest Law Center.

What industry is Upper Midwest Law Center in?

Upper Midwest Law Center's product category is Public Interest Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAA, Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy, with a secondary code of BPAGAEAM, Legal Aid & Client Advocacy Services. Its NAICS code is 541110 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
AlphanewsMinneapolis police staffing lawsuit against Mayor Frey set for April 2027 trialA Hennepin County judge has scheduled a jury trial for April 2027 in a lawsuit filed by the Upper Midwest Law Center against Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, alleging failure to meet city charter police staffing mandates. The plaintiffs argue that the department's current strength of roughly 617 to 649 officers falls significantly short of the required minimum of 731 sworn officers. If the city cannot justify the shortfall, the court may issue remedies including contempt charges or orders to comply with the charter.KSTP.com 5 Eyewitness NewsMinnesota Supreme Court takes up case over ‘Airbnb-style’ backyard pool rentalsThe Minnesota Supreme Court agreed to hear Hittner v. Minnesota Department of Health, a case questioning whether private backyard pools rented via Swimply can be regulated like public facilities. The Upper Midwest Law Center argues reclassification would impose costly licensing and inspection rules. Oral arguments have not been scheduled.AlphanewsMinneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey ordered to increase number of police officers or face trial next yearA Hennepin County court has ordered Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey to ensure that the city's police force reaches a mandatory minimum of 731 officers by January 4, 2027, or face a civil trial. The order follows a 2022 ruling that determined Minneapolis has been below this minimum requirement, significantly impacted by a reduction in officers following the 2020 death of George Floyd. The Upper Midwest Law Center has been actively involved in this legal action, emphasizing the need for accountability in police staffing.