Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Full company profile

uuid006c21n

Namestring
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Legal namestring
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Websiteurl
mn.gov
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1858
Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
51–100
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSaint Paul, United States
HQ citystring
Saint Paul
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
utility rate regulation, public utility oversight, energy regulation services, telecommunications regulation, consumer protection utilities
Industry1 code
1Energy, Utilities & Natural Resources Regulators
CodeBPAIAOAJPrimaryYes
NAICS code3 codes
  • Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities92613
  • Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities926130
  • Public Administration92
SIC code2 codes
  • Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services4900
  • Electric Services4911
Product category
Public Utility Regulation
No data
Cost components3 values
Personnel, Operations, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) is a quasi-judicial state government regulatory agency that regulates the state's electricity, natural gas, and telephone industries. It reviews and approves utility rate cases, evaluates infrastructure and renewable energy project proposals, and resolves consumer complaints to ensure safe, adequate, and reliable utility services at just and reasonable rates for Minnesota residents and businesses.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Product and service4 records
1Electric Rate Case Review
CategoryRegulatory Services
2Natural Gas Rate Case Settlement Review
CategoryRegulatory Services
3Energy Infrastructure Project Approval
CategoryRegulatory Services
4Utility Consumer Complaint Resolution
CategoryConsumer Protection Services
Recent move3 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight3 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Oregon Public Utility Commission
TypeDirect peer
Description

Oregon's state regulator of electric, natural gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. A strong peer to MPUC given overlapping jurisdictions, active clean energy transition oversight, and similar state-agency governance structure.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Pennsylvania's state regulatory commission for electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and wastewater utilities. Comparable to MPUC in adjudicative authority, multi-utility jurisdiction, and consumer-protection mandate.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Texas's state regulator for electric and telecommunications utilities. Comparable to MPUC in its statutory jurisdiction over electric and telecom providers, with similar oversight of rate cases and infrastructure approvals.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Wisconsin's neighboring state PUC regulating electric, natural gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. Highly comparable to MPUC in Midwestern regulatory culture, scope, and adjudicative rate-case process.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Florida's state commission regulating electric, natural gas, and telecommunications utilities. Direct peer to MPUC in scope of regulated industries and formal rate-case review process, though with a different governance structure (clerk-appointed commissioners).

TypeDirect peer
Description

Illinois's state regulatory agency overseeing electric, natural gas, water, sewer, and telecommunications utilities. Direct peer to MPUC given overlapping electric/gas/telecom jurisdiction and quasi-judicial adjudication of rate cases.

TypeDirect peer
Description

California's state utility regulator with the broadest jurisdiction of any U.S. state PUC, regulating electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and rail. Directly comparable to the MPUC in scope and quasi-judicial authority, though with significantly larger ratepayer base and renewable energy mandates.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Washington state's regulatory agency overseeing electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and transportation services. Comparable to MPUC as a state commission with multi-sector utility jurisdiction and active consumer-protection mandate.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Ohio's state commission overseeing electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and certain transportation utilities. Directly comparable to MPUC in statutory structure, adjudication of utility rate cases, and energy-transition oversight responsibilities.

TypeDirect peer
Description

New York's state public service commission regulating electric, gas, steam, telecommunications, and water utilities. Directly comparable to MPUC as a fellow state quasi-judicial body overseeing investor-owned utilities with active rate-case and energy transition dockets.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat2 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers3 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Public Utility Regulationmn.gov

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Legal name
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Website
https://mn.gov
Company type
Private
Founded year
1858
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
51–100 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Utility Regulation
NAICS
Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities (92613), Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities (926130), Public Administration (92)
SIC
Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services (4900), Electric Services (4911)
akta.pro primary industry
Energy, Utilities & Natural Resources Regulators (BPAIAOAJ)

Keywords

  • Utility rate regulation
  • Public utility oversight
  • Energy regulation services
  • Telecommunications regulation
  • Consumer protection utilities

Where Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Saint Paul
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Others

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) is a quasi-judicial state government regulatory agency that regulates the state's electricity, natural gas, and telephone industries. It reviews and approves utility rate cases, evaluates infrastructure and renewable energy project proposals, and resolves consumer complaints to ensure safe, adequate, and reliable utility services at just and reasonable rates for Minnesota residents and businesses.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Electric Rate Case Review
  • Natural Gas Rate Case Settlement Review
  • Energy Infrastructure Project Approval
  • Utility Consumer Complaint Resolution

Companies that use Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Customer profile

Named customers3 records

Segments2 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Recent moves3 records

Expansion highlights3 records

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Oregon Public Utility Commission: Oregon's state regulator of electric, natural gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. A strong peer to MPUC given overlapping jurisdictions, active clean energy transition oversight, and similar state-agency governance structure.
  • Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission: Pennsylvania's state regulatory commission for electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and wastewater utilities. Comparable to MPUC in adjudicative authority, multi-utility jurisdiction, and consumer-protection mandate.
  • Public Utility Commission of Texas: Texas's state regulator for electric and telecommunications utilities. Comparable to MPUC in its statutory jurisdiction over electric and telecom providers, with similar oversight of rate cases and infrastructure approvals.
  • Public Service Commission of Wisconsin: Wisconsin's neighboring state PUC regulating electric, natural gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. Highly comparable to MPUC in Midwestern regulatory culture, scope, and adjudicative rate-case process.
  • Florida Public Service Commission: Florida's state commission regulating electric, natural gas, and telecommunications utilities. Direct peer to MPUC in scope of regulated industries and formal rate-case review process, though with a different governance structure (clerk-appointed commissioners).
  • Illinois Commerce Commission: Illinois's state regulatory agency overseeing electric, natural gas, water, sewer, and telecommunications utilities. Direct peer to MPUC given overlapping electric/gas/telecom jurisdiction and quasi-judicial adjudication of rate cases.
  • California Public Utilities Commission: California's state utility regulator with the broadest jurisdiction of any U.S. state PUC, regulating electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and rail. Directly comparable to the MPUC in scope and quasi-judicial authority, though with significantly larger ratepayer base and renewable energy mandates.
  • Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission: Washington state's regulatory agency overseeing electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, and transportation services. Comparable to MPUC as a state commission with multi-sector utility jurisdiction and active consumer-protection mandate.
  • Public Utilities Commission of Ohio: Ohio's state commission overseeing electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and certain transportation utilities. Directly comparable to MPUC in statutory structure, adjudication of utility rate cases, and energy-transition oversight responsibilities.
  • New York State Department of Public Service / Public Service Commission: New York's state public service commission regulating electric, gas, steam, telecommunications, and water utilities. Directly comparable to MPUC as a fellow state quasi-judicial body overseeing investor-owned utilities with active rate-case and energy transition dockets.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat2 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights5 records

Customer concentration

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

What does Minnesota Public Utilities Commission do?

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) is a quasi-judicial state government regulatory agency that regulates the state's electricity, natural gas, and telephone industries. It reviews and approves utility rate cases, evaluates infrastructure and renewable energy project proposals, and resolves consumer complaints to ensure safe, adequate, and reliable utility services at just and reasonable rates for Minnesota residents and businesses.

Is Minnesota Public Utilities Commission a public or private company?

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Minnesota Public Utilities Commission founded?

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission was founded in 1858. It employs 51 to 100 people.

Where is Minnesota Public Utilities Commission based?

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is headquartered in Saint Paul, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Oregon Public Utility Commission, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Florida Public Service Commission, Illinois Commerce Commission, California Public Utilities Commission, Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and New York State Department of Public Service / Public Service Commission.

Does Minnesota Public Utilities Commission have an API?

No public API is recorded for Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.

What industry is Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in?

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's product category is Public Utility Regulation. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIAOAJ, Energy, Utilities & Natural Resources Regulators. Its NAICS code is 92613 and its SIC code is 4900.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
The Cool DownMinnesota orders Xcel to explain billing spike after missing solar credits and $6,500 in late feesMinnesota's Public Utilities Commission ordered Xcel Energy to explain a billing spike after complaints of missing solar credits and late fees. The utility serves 1.5 million customers, and the commission directed monthly error counts. Xcel disputes the need for an independent audit, citing internal improvements.YahooMinnesota orders Xcel to explain billing spike after missing solar credits and $6,500 in late feesMinnesota's Public Utilities Commission ordered Xcel Energy to explain a billing spike after complaints of missing solar credits and late fees. The utility serves about 1.5 million customers, and the state directed it to report monthly billing issues. Xcel disputes the need for an independent audit, citing internal progress.YahooXcel’s faulty billing has residents, businesses and cities fired upXcel Energy's billing errors have triggered complaints from Minnesota residents, businesses, and cities, including late fees and cancelled invoices. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission launched a yearlong investigation after complaints rose sharply since 2022, and the attorney general's office questioned Xcel's error reporting.CleanTechnicaMN Power Ordered to Continue Investigating Alternatives to New Gas PlantThe Minnesota Public Utilities Commission rejected Minnesota Power's request to build a new gas plant and ordered the utility to investigate alternatives. The decision preserves options for the state's 100% carbon-free energy law by 2040 and requires near-term clean resource actions.Shanghai Metals MarketAugust 28 news from international media: Andrada Mining announced thatThe Minnesota Public Utilities Commission reviewed an addendum to the 80 MW Cottage Grove Battery Energy Storage System project and a draft site permit at its August 20, 2026 meeting. The project, proposed by LSP CG Storage, LLC, is a utility-scale storage development in the Upper Midwest.Shanghai Metals MarketNextEnergy Capital, through its private fund NextEnergy UK I (NEUK I),The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission reviewed an addendum to the 80 MW Cottage Grove Battery Energy Storage System project and a draft site permit. The project is proposed by LSP CG Storage, LLC, and represents a utility-scale storage development in the Upper Midwest.AmericanexperimentHands off my gas! Have your say by October 14-21CenterPoint Energy and Xcel Energy have submitted their 2025 annual reports to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission regarding progress under the Natural Gas Innovation Act, seeking rate increases to recover pilot program costs. The filings highlight significant challenges in decarbonization technologies, including higher-than-anticipated geothermal costs and supplier issues with heat pumps and hydrogen systems.ABC 6 NewsMore local communities push back on energy projectResidents in southeast Minnesota are opposing a proposed 765 kV transmission line that would cross their area, with Houston County passing a resolution requesting more information. Dairyland Power says the project is the best option, but the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission must still approve the route, with studies planned.CleanTechnicaMassive Solar Plus Storage Facility To Replace Coal And Gas, TooXcel Energy filed plans on November 3 with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to expand the Sherco Energy Hub with a 600-megawatt battery storage system (the largest in the Midwest), a new 200-megawatt solar array, and expansion of the existing 710-megawatt Sherco Solar plant, totaling 910 megawatts of new renewable capacity that exceeds the $1 billion gas plant previously rejected by state regulators. The battery storage projects are slated for construction beginning in 2026 and to serve customers by late 2027, leveraging existing grid connections to store energy from Xcel's wind, solar, nuclear, and gas facilities. The expansion will enable the retirement of all remaining coal units at the site by 2030, with federal tax credits potentially covering 30-40% of project costs.YahooALLETE Obtains Regulatory Approval from Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for Partnership with CPP Investments and Global Infrastructure PartnersThe Minnesota Public Utilities Commission unanimously approved ALLETE's acquisition by CPP Investments and Global Infrastructure Partners. The deal includes approximately $200 million in customer benefits, a one-year rate freeze, and a $50 million clean-energy fund, with closing expected in late 2025.