Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Copyright Royalty Board

Full company profile

uuid00buk33

Namestring
Copyright Royalty Board
Legal namestring
Copyright Royalty Board
Websiteurl
crb.gov
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2004
Descriptiontext

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) is a U.S. federal government agency established in 2004 under the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act (CRDRA) and operating within the Library of Congress. It functions as a three-judge quasi-judicial body that determines and adjusts statutory copyright royalty rates and terms, oversees distribution of royalties deposited with the U.S. Copyright Office by statutory licensees, and adjudicates distribution controversies. The CRB's jurisdiction covers statutory licenses for digital audio transmissions (webcasting, SDARS, subscription services), cable and satellite retransmission, mechanical reproduction of musical works (phonorecords), and noncommercial educational broadcasting. Rate determinations are set on staggered five-year cycles, with the current cycle covering 2026-2030 across proceedings designated Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, and Public Broadcasting V.

The CRB's primary technology platform is eCRB (Electronic Copyright Royalty Board), an online filing and case management system that went live on June 17, 2017, and transitioned to mandatory all-electronic filing effective January 1, 2018. eCRB enables attorneys, pro se participants, and claimants to electronically submit litigation documents, claims, audit notices, comments, and hearing exhibits, and provides public access for browsing case progress, studying CRB precedent, and researching copyright royalty issues. Other services include Rate Proceedings, Distribution Proceedings, Royalty Claims processing (cable, satellite, and Digital Audio Recording Technology royalties), and Rulemakings codified in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The CRB does not operate a commercial business model. It is funded through the federal appropriations process and charges only a nominal $150 filing fee per Petition to Participate in rate determination or distribution proceedings. The three judges are appointed by the Librarian of Congress to staggered six-year terms, with statutory requirements mandating specific expertise in copyright law, economics, and judicial/quasi-judicial experience. As of December 2025, the bench consists of Interim Chief Judge Trevor Jefferson, Judge David R. Strickler (economics), and Judge Steve Ruwe (copyright). The CRB communicates through its crb.gov website, the eCRB system, GovDelivery email subscriptions, and Federal Register publications.

Short descriptiontext

The Copyright Royalty Board is a U.S. federal quasi-judicial agency within the Library of Congress that determines statutory copyright royalty rates and adjudicates royalty distribution disputes for digital audio, cable/satellite retransmission, mechanical reproduction, and noncommercial broadcasting licenses.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
copyright royalty rates, statutory licensing, royalty distribution, copyright adjudication, digital audio royalties
Industry3 codes
1Music Rights Administration & Royalty Processing (Admin, Accounting, Statements)
CodeMPAIAKADPrimaryYes
2Royalty Accounting & Payment Services (Statements, Audits, Payee Management)
CodeMPAIABALPrimaryNo
3Music & Audio Rights for Broadcast (Sync/Master/Library)
CodeMPABANAFPrimaryNo
Product category
Copyright Royalty Adjudication
No data
Marketing channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Others
Pricing details1 tier
1Filing fee for Petition to Participate in rate determination and distribution proceedings
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

$150 filing fee per Petition to Participate in rate determination or distribution proceedings. For distribution proceedings, a petitioner may alternatively submit a statement that they will not seek a distribution of more than $1000, in which case the amount distributed shall not exceed $1000.

crb.gov
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 record
1eCRB
Description

Online filing and case management system for CRB proceedings, launched June 17, 2017

crb.gov
Core offering1 text field

The Copyright Royalty Board determines and adjusts royalty rates and terms applicable to statutory copyright licenses covering digital audio transmissions (webcasting, satellite radio, subscription services), cable and satellite retransmissions, mechanical reproduction of musical works, and noncommercial broadcasting. It oversees distribution of royalties deposited with the Copyright Office by statutory licensees and adjudicates controversies relating to those distributions through quasi-judicial proceedings conducted under the eCRB electronic filing system.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 value
  • Rates determined for 5-year periods (2026-2030 for Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, Public Broadcasting V)
Product overview1 text field

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) is a U.S. government agency within the Library of Congress that oversees statutory copyright licenses. Rather than a commercial product company, CRB operates several interconnected services: the eCRB electronic filing system serves as the primary platform for all case management and document filing; Rate Proceedings handle determination of royalty rates for digital performances, satellite transmissions, and physical phonorecords; Distribution Proceedings manage allocation and distribution of collected royalties to copyright owners; Royalty Claims processing covers cable, satellite, and digital audio recording technology royalties; and Rulemakings establish regulatory frameworks. These services work together within the eCRB platform to enable qualified parties to use copyrighted works under statutory licenses without obtaining separate licenses from each copyright owner.

Product and service5 records
1eCRB Electronic Filing and Case Management System
CategoryCore platform
Description

Online filing and case management system for CRB proceedings that allows attorneys, pro se participants, and claimants to file documents electronically and manage proceedings online. Enables public access to browse case records and research copyright royalty issues.

2Rate Proceedings
CategoryCore service
Description

Proceedings to determine and adjust royalty rates and terms applicable to statutory copyright licenses, including webcasting, satellite radio, subscription services, and business establishments. Rates are set for multi-year periods (e.g., 2026-2030 for Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, Public Broadcasting V).

3Distribution Proceedings
CategoryCore service
Description

Proceedings to oversee distribution of royalties deposited with the Copyright Office by statutory licensees and adjudicate controversies relating to distributions of those royalties to copyright owners.

4Royalty Claims
CategoryCore service
Description

System for filing claims to royalty fees collected under compulsory licenses, including cable, satellite, and DART (Digital Audio Recording Technology) royalty claims.

5Rulemakings
CategoryCore service
Description

Regulatory proceedings to establish or amend CRB regulations codified in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Recent move5 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight3 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1BMI
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

BMI is a leading U.S. Performing Rights Organization that collects and distributes performance royalties for musical works. It operates in the music rights ecosystem that CRB regulates, serving songwriters, composers, and publishers who also participate in CRB statutory license proceedings.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

SoundExchange is the designated collection agent that collects and distributes digital performance royalties for sound recordings under the statutory licenses whose rates the CRB sets (non-interactive streaming, SDARS, webcasting). It is the operational counterpart to CRB's rate-setting for sound recording performance royalties.

3UK Copyright Tribunal
TypeRegional player
Description

The UK Copyright Tribunal is a specialized body within the U.K. intellectual property framework that hears disputes over copyright licensing terms and royalty rates between copyright owners and licensing bodies. It performs a structurally analogous role to the CRB in a different jurisdiction.

4ASCAP
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

ASCAP is one of the largest U.S. Performing Rights Organizations, licensing public performance rights for musical works. While CRB sets statutory license rates, ASCAP operates in the parallel voluntary licensing market for the same underlying copyright holders, making it an ecosystem incumbent alongside CRB.

TypeOthers
Description

CISAC is the international umbrella organization for PROs and collective management organizations globally. While the CRB is a regulator rather than a collective manager, CISAC's member societies interact with the U.S. statutory framework CRB administers and represent the global collective rights ecosystem.

TypeOthers
Description

The U.S. Copyright Office is the companion federal agency within the Library of Congress that handles copyright registration, records, and policy. The CRB works directly with the Copyright Office, which collects statutory license fees and deposits royalties for CRB-adjudicated distribution. Both operate under Title 17 of the U.S. Code.

TypeRegional player
Description

The Copyright Board of Canada is the Canadian federal body that sets royalty rates for statutory licenses and certifies tariffs proposed by collective societies. It is the closest international functional analog to the U.S. CRB, performing similar rate-setting and royalty distribution oversight under Canadian copyright law.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

HFA historically served as the primary mechanical licensing agent in the U.S. for the Section 115 compulsory license whose rates the CRB determines. It operates in the mechanical licensing space that the CRB regulates and that the MLC now also administers for the blanket license.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The MLC is the blanket music license administrator designated under the Music Modernization Act to administer the Section 115 mechanical license whose royalty rates the CRB sets. MLC sits in the operational layer directly downstream of CRB's rate-setting function for mechanical royalties.

10SESAC
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

SESAC is a smaller U.S. Performing Rights Organization handling public performance licensing for musical works. Like ASCAP and BMI, SESAC operates alongside the CRB's statutory framework in the music rights ecosystem, serving as a private counterpart for rights that CRB regulates under statutory licenses.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat3 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature1 record

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles5 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Copyright Royalty Board

Copyright Royalty Adjudicationcrb.gov

The Copyright Royalty Board is a U.S. federal quasi-judicial agency within the Library of Congress that determines statutory copyright royalty rates and adjudicates royalty distribution disputes for digital audio, cable/satellite retransmission, mechanical reproduction, and noncommercial broadcasting licenses.

What Copyright Royalty Board does

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) is a U.S. federal government agency established in 2004 under the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act (CRDRA) and operating within the Library of Congress. It functions as a three-judge quasi-judicial body that determines and adjusts statutory copyright royalty rates and terms, oversees distribution of royalties deposited with the U.S. Copyright Office by statutory licensees, and adjudicates distribution controversies. The CRB's jurisdiction covers statutory licenses for digital audio transmissions (webcasting, SDARS, subscription services), cable and satellite retransmission, mechanical reproduction of musical works (phonorecords), and noncommercial educational broadcasting. Rate determinations are set on staggered five-year cycles, with the current cycle covering 2026-2030 across proceedings designated Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, and Public Broadcasting V.

The CRB's primary technology platform is eCRB (Electronic Copyright Royalty Board), an online filing and case management system that went live on June 17, 2017, and transitioned to mandatory all-electronic filing effective January 1, 2018. eCRB enables attorneys, pro se participants, and claimants to electronically submit litigation documents, claims, audit notices, comments, and hearing exhibits, and provides public access for browsing case progress, studying CRB precedent, and researching copyright royalty issues. Other services include Rate Proceedings, Distribution Proceedings, Royalty Claims processing (cable, satellite, and Digital Audio Recording Technology royalties), and Rulemakings codified in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The CRB does not operate a commercial business model. It is funded through the federal appropriations process and charges only a nominal $150 filing fee per Petition to Participate in rate determination or distribution proceedings. The three judges are appointed by the Librarian of Congress to staggered six-year terms, with statutory requirements mandating specific expertise in copyright law, economics, and judicial/quasi-judicial experience. As of December 2025, the bench consists of Interim Chief Judge Trevor Jefferson, Judge David R. Strickler (economics), and Judge Steve Ruwe (copyright). The CRB communicates through its crb.gov website, the eCRB system, GovDelivery email subscriptions, and Federal Register publications.

Copyright Royalty Board firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Copyright Royalty Board
Legal name
Copyright Royalty Board
Website
https://crb.gov
Company type
Private
Founded year
2004
Operating status
Operating
Short description
The Copyright Royalty Board is a U.S. federal quasi-judicial agency within the Library of Congress that determines statutory copyright royalty rates and adjudicates royalty distribution disputes for digital audio, cable/satellite retransmission, mechanical reproduction, and noncommercial broadcasting licenses.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Copyright Royalty Board industry classification

Industry
Product category
Copyright Royalty Adjudication
akta.pro primary industry
Music Rights Administration & Royalty Processing (Admin, Accounting, Statements) (MPAIAKAD)
akta.pro secondary industries
Royalty Accounting & Payment Services (Statements, Audits, Payee Management) (MPAIABAL), Music & Audio Rights for Broadcast (Sync/Master/Library) (MPABANAF)

Keywords

  • Copyright royalty rates
  • Statutory licensing
  • Royalty distribution
  • Copyright adjudication
  • Digital audio royalties

Where Copyright Royalty Board is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Copyright Royalty Board business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Others

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherPay-as-you-goFiling fee for Petition to Participate in rate determination and distribution proceedings

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels3 records

Copyright Royalty Board product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Copyright Royalty Board determines and adjusts royalty rates and terms applicable to statutory copyright licenses covering digital audio transmissions (webcasting, satellite radio, subscription services), cable and satellite retransmissions, mechanical reproduction of musical works, and noncommercial broadcasting. It oversees distribution of royalties deposited with the Copyright Office by statutory licensees and adjudicates controversies relating to those distributions through quasi-judicial proceedings conducted under the eCRB electronic filing system.

Product overview

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) is a U.S. government agency within the Library of Congress that oversees statutory copyright licenses. Rather than a commercial product company, CRB operates several interconnected services: the eCRB electronic filing system serves as the primary platform for all case management and document filing; Rate Proceedings handle determination of royalty rates for digital performances, satellite transmissions, and physical phonorecords; Distribution Proceedings manage allocation and distribution of collected royalties to copyright owners; Royalty Claims processing covers cable, satellite, and digital audio recording technology royalties; and Rulemakings establish regulatory frameworks. These services work together within the eCRB platform to enable qualified parties to use copyrighted works under statutory licenses without obtaining separate licenses from each copyright owner.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • eCRB: Online filing and case management system for CRB proceedings, launched June 17, 2017

Products and services

  • eCRB Electronic Filing and Case Management System Online filing and case management system for CRB proceedings that allows attorneys, pro se participants, and claimants to file documents electronically and manage proceedings online. Enables public access to browse case records and research copyright royalty issues.
  • Rate Proceedings Proceedings to determine and adjust royalty rates and terms applicable to statutory copyright licenses, including webcasting, satellite radio, subscription services, and business establishments. Rates are set for multi-year periods (e.g., 2026-2030 for Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, Public Broadcasting V).
  • Distribution Proceedings Proceedings to oversee distribution of royalties deposited with the Copyright Office by statutory licensees and adjudicate controversies relating to distributions of those royalties to copyright owners.
  • Royalty Claims System for filing claims to royalty fees collected under compulsory licenses, including cable, satellite, and DART (Digital Audio Recording Technology) royalty claims.
  • Rulemakings Regulatory proceedings to establish or amend CRB regulations codified in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Rates determined for 5-year periods (2026-2030 for Web VI, SDARS IV, Phonorecords V, Public Broadcasting V)

Companies that use Copyright Royalty Board

Customer profile

Segments5 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Copyright Royalty Board technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature1 record

Copyright Royalty Board partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Recent moves5 records

Expansion highlights3 records

Copyright Royalty Board competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • BMI: BMI is a leading U.S. Performing Rights Organization that collects and distributes performance royalties for musical works. It operates in the music rights ecosystem that CRB regulates, serving songwriters, composers, and publishers who also participate in CRB statutory license proceedings.
  • SoundExchange: SoundExchange is the designated collection agent that collects and distributes digital performance royalties for sound recordings under the statutory licenses whose rates the CRB sets (non-interactive streaming, SDARS, webcasting). It is the operational counterpart to CRB's rate-setting for sound recording performance royalties.
  • ASCAP: ASCAP is one of the largest U.S. Performing Rights Organizations, licensing public performance rights for musical works. While CRB sets statutory license rates, ASCAP operates in the parallel voluntary licensing market for the same underlying copyright holders, making it an ecosystem incumbent alongside CRB.
  • Harry Fox Agency (HFA): HFA historically served as the primary mechanical licensing agent in the U.S. for the Section 115 compulsory license whose rates the CRB determines. It operates in the mechanical licensing space that the CRB regulates and that the MLC now also administers for the blanket license.
  • The Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC): The MLC is the blanket music license administrator designated under the Music Modernization Act to administer the Section 115 mechanical license whose royalty rates the CRB sets. MLC sits in the operational layer directly downstream of CRB's rate-setting function for mechanical royalties.
  • SESAC: SESAC is a smaller U.S. Performing Rights Organization handling public performance licensing for musical works. Like ASCAP and BMI, SESAC operates alongside the CRB's statutory framework in the music rights ecosystem, serving as a private counterpart for rights that CRB regulates under statutory licenses.

Regional players

  • UK Copyright Tribunal: The UK Copyright Tribunal is a specialized body within the U.K. intellectual property framework that hears disputes over copyright licensing terms and royalty rates between copyright owners and licensing bodies. It performs a structurally analogous role to the CRB in a different jurisdiction.
  • Copyright Board of Canada: The Copyright Board of Canada is the Canadian federal body that sets royalty rates for statutory licenses and certifies tariffs proposed by collective societies. It is the closest international functional analog to the U.S. CRB, performing similar rate-setting and royalty distribution oversight under Canadian copyright law.

Others

  • CISAC (International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers): CISAC is the international umbrella organization for PROs and collective management organizations globally. While the CRB is a regulator rather than a collective manager, CISAC's member societies interact with the U.S. statutory framework CRB administers and represent the global collective rights ecosystem.
  • U.S. Copyright Office: The U.S. Copyright Office is the companion federal agency within the Library of Congress that handles copyright registration, records, and policy. The CRB works directly with the Copyright Office, which collects statutory license fees and deposits royalties for CRB-adjudicated distribution. Both operate under Title 17 of the U.S. Code.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat3 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Copyright Royalty Board financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Copyright Royalty Board leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Copyright Royalty Board funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Copyright Royalty Board M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Copyright Royalty Board

What does Copyright Royalty Board do?

The Copyright Royalty Board determines and adjusts royalty rates and terms applicable to statutory copyright licenses covering digital audio transmissions (webcasting, satellite radio, subscription services), cable and satellite retransmissions, mechanical reproduction of musical works, and noncommercial broadcasting. It oversees distribution of royalties deposited with the Copyright Office by statutory licensees and adjudicates controversies relating to those distributions through quasi-judicial proceedings conducted under the eCRB electronic filing system.

Is Copyright Royalty Board a public or private company?

Copyright Royalty Board is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Copyright Royalty Board founded?

Copyright Royalty Board was founded in 2004.

Where is Copyright Royalty Board based?

Copyright Royalty Board is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Copyright Royalty Board's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are BMI, SoundExchange, ASCAP, Harry Fox Agency (HFA), The Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) and SESAC. Regional players are UK Copyright Tribunal and Copyright Board of Canada. Others are CISAC (International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers) and U.S. Copyright Office.

Does Copyright Royalty Board have an API?

No public API is recorded for Copyright Royalty Board.

What industry is Copyright Royalty Board in?

Copyright Royalty Board's product category is Copyright Royalty Adjudication. Its primary akta.pro industry code is MPAIAKAD, Music Rights Administration & Royalty Processing (Admin, Accounting, Statements), with a secondary code of MPAIABAL, Royalty Accounting & Payment Services (Statements, Audits, Payee Management).

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Digital Music NewsPhonorecords V Proposal Seeks Flat On-Demand Streaming RateThe Songwriters Guild of America and others backed a Phonorecords V proposal for a flat $0.003 per-stream mechanical rate with annual inflation adjustments. The proposal was submitted to the Copyright Royalty Board for the 2028-2032 period, following Spotify's bundling loophole. DIMA responded, citing 30% growth in U.S. publishing revenue since 2022.The National Law ReviewDC Circuit Vacates Copyright Royalty Board's Allocation 2014-2017The DC Circuit vacated the Copyright Royalty Board's 2014-2017 royalty allocation for cable retransmission and remanded for further explanation. The court found the Board failed to adequately explain how it combined the regression analysis and Bortz Survey to produce final allocations.Digital Music NewsPhonorecords V Dispute Intensifies as CRB Seeks Additional InfoThe Copyright Royalty Board ordered parties to provide additional information on the proposed Phonorecords V settlement, citing objections over a 12-cent reset rate and overlapping ownership. The order includes 10 questions, with a response deadline of October 2nd. The CRB also bifurcated the proceeding, staying physical, download, and ringtone rates pending further notice.Digital Music NewsGeorge Johnson Doubles Down on Phono V Settlement CriticismActivist songwriter George Johnson submitted detailed comments to the Copyright Royalty Board opposing the proposed Phonorecords V settlement, arguing the RIAA and NMPA engaged in self-dealing and that the settlement's static ringtone and download rates are unreasonable. He called for the CRB to reject the proposal and for participants to reconvene at arms-length. Participants must submit a joint proposed hearing schedule by August 30.Digital Music NewsPhono V Remark from 'Stevie Wonder' Urges 'Fair' Songwriter PayComments attributed to Stevie Wonder have been submitted to the Copyright Royalty Board urging fair compensation for songwriters within the ongoing Phonorecords V rate-determination proceedings. The filing argues that creators should earn from all value forms, signaling opposition to the industry-backed settlement proposal despite unconfirmed authorship. This development highlights broader reservations among various stakeholders regarding the proposed rates for physical and download formats.Digital Music NewsProposed Phonorecords V Settlement Emerges, Prompts PushbackMajor music industry groups including the major labels, NMPA, NSAI, Music Artists Coalition, and A2IM have filed a proposed Phonorecords V settlement with the Copyright Royalty Board covering mechanical royalty rates for physical formats and permanent downloads through 2032. The proposal would maintain existing Phono IV rates (currently 13.1 cents per work or 2.52 cents per minute) with only annual inflation adjustments, prompting opposition from the Songwriters Guild of America, Word Collections, and Eight Mile Style, which plan to file an objection demanding a higher 15.65-cent rate. The dispute echoes the CRB's 2022 rejection of a similar mechanical-rate freeze proposal, with critics arguing that modest rate increases fail to adequately compensate songwriters and publishers.CrbCopyright Royalty BoardThe Copyright Royalty Board announced final royalty rates and terms for digital sound recording performances and ephemeral copies for the period 2026–2030, covering various webcasters and new subscription services. Additionally, the Board initiated proceedings to determine royalty rates for phonorecord distribution, public broadcasting, and satellite radio for the 2028–2032 period. The article also notes administrative updates including a cost of living adjustment to existing rates and the appointment of an interim chief judge.BroadcastlawblogCongressional Hearing on American Music Fairness Act Proposing New Music Royalty on Radio Stations – What is Being ConsideredThe Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the American Music Fairness Act, which proposes imposing new performance royalties on over-the-air radio stations payable to SoundExchange for sound recordings. The legislation faces opposition from broadcasters who argue it would impose substantial financial burdens on an industry already facing declining revenues, while proponents like SoundExchange and musician Gene Simmons advocate for fair compensation for artists. The bill includes tiered fee structures for smaller stations but leaves rates for larger entities to be determined by the Copyright Royalty Board.BillboardSongwriters Must Keep Score on Digital Services. Here’s How (Guest Column)The NMPA's David Israelite ranks digital services by how they treat songwriters, citing Spotify's bundle plan and YouTube's low rates as major issues. He notes the Copyright Royalty Board's upcoming 2028–2032 rate-setting proceeding will be a key moment for creators.WsjSirius XM Satellite Radio to Pay Higher Royalty Rate Starting in 2018The federal Copyright Royalty Board ruled late Thursday that Sirius XM Holdings will pay nearly 41% more for music on its satellite-radio service starting in 2018. The board set the rate at 15.5% of gross revenue through 2022, with compulsory government-issued licenses decided every five years. Labels and artists said the increase still falls short.