Court of Arbitration for Sport
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is a Lausanne-based Swiss foundation that resolves international sports disputes through arbitration, mediation, and appeals for athletes, federations, and governing bodies.
- Company typePrivate
- Founded1984
- HeadquartersLausanne, Switzerland
- Headcount51–100
- GTM typeB2B
- OfferingServices
What Court of Arbitration for Sport does
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is an independent Swiss foundation established in 1984 and headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, that resolves sports-related disputes through arbitration, mediation, and appellate proceedings. It serves a broad constituency including individual athletes, international and national sports federations (e.g., FIFA, UEFA), national olympic committees, the International Olympic Committee, the World Anti-Doping Agency, clubs, agents, and event organizers. CAS operates under the governance of the International Council of Arbitration for Sport (ICAS) and functions as the de facto mandatory forum for international sports disputes under the Swiss Code of Obligations, with its awards enforceable under the New York Convention.
The institution's core products are its three procedural streams: ordinary arbitration procedures (commercial and disciplinary), the Anti-Doping Division and Appeals Arbitration Division (handling doping-appeal cases referred by WADA and code signatories), and mediation services. Its bench comprises more than 450 expert arbitrators drawn from roughly 100 countries. Operational infrastructure includes the principal Lausanne seat and additional alternative hearing centres in Sydney, Shanghai, Cairo, Abu Dhabi, Kuala Lumpur, and Lima to support parties across regions; a new Code of Sports-related Arbitration and Mediation took effect on 1 January 2024, and a new e-filing platform is scheduled for launch in June 2026. Caseload was 917 procedures in 2024, against a cumulative 12,000+ procedures since founding.
The business model is that of a non-profit foundation: revenue comes from filing and procedural fees set on a sliding scale by reference to amounts in dispute, alongside contributions and in-kind support from the IOC, international federations, and national olympic committees. Disciplinary and anti-doping appeals are processed free of charge to athletes, with costs absorbed by CAS and its donors. There are no equity holders, funding rounds, or dividend distributions; any surplus is reinvested in arbitrator training, hearing infrastructure, and procedural modernization.
Court of Arbitration for Sport firmographics
Firmographics- Name
- Court of Arbitration for Sport
- Legal name
- Fondation Conseil International de l'Arbitrage en matière de Sport (CIAS)
- Website
- https://tas-cas.org
- Company type
- Private
- Founded year
- 1984
- Operating status
- Operating
- Headcount range
- 51–100 employees
- Short description
- Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is a Lausanne-based Swiss foundation that resolves international sports disputes through arbitration, mediation, and appeals for athletes, federations, and governing bodies.
- Ownership category
- akta.pro rank
Court of Arbitration for Sport industry classification
Industry- Product category
- Sports Arbitration Services
- NAICS
- Legal Services (5411)
- SIC
- Services-Legal Services (8111)
- akta.pro primary industry
- Sports Compliance, Governance & Integrity Services (Safeguarding, Anti-Doping, Match Integrity) (MPAKAKAM)
- akta.pro secondary industries
- Athlete Legal & Contract Advisory (Sports Law, Arbitration, Disputes) (MPAKAMAF), Dispute Resolution, Player Complaints & ADR/Ombudsman Services (MPAEAOAL), Litigation & Dispute Resolution (BPAHAAAB), Anti-Doping & Integrity Bodies (WADA, match-fixing/integrity units) (MPAKAFAJ)
Keywords
Where Court of Arbitration for Sport is headquartered
LocationHeadquarters
- HQ city
- Lausanne
- HQ country
- Switzerland
- HQ region
- Europe
Offices7 records
Markets served
Court of Arbitration for Sport business model
Business model- GTM type
- B2B
- Offering type
- Services
- Cost components
- Personnel, Operations, Infrastructure, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Others
Revenue model
- Arbitration filing fees: Parties pay non-refundable Court Office fees upon filing requests or statements of appeal. The CAS also charges administrative costs calculated in accordance with CAS scales, costs and fees of arbitrators, fees of clerks, and contributions towards CAS expenses.
Pricing tiers
| Model | Billing | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction based/ take rate | Pay-as-you-go | Standard arbitration filing fee |
| Other | Pay-as-you-go | Disciplinary appeals (international federations) |
Distribution channels3 records
Marketing channels6 records
Court of Arbitration for Sport product offering
Product offeringCore offering
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) resolves sports disputes worldwide through binding arbitration and non-binding mediation services. Its core offerings include the Ordinary Arbitration Procedure for contract-based disputes, the Appeals Arbitration Procedure for challenging federation decisions, the CAS Anti-Doping Division (CAS ADD) for first-instance anti-doping cases, and Ad Hoc Divisions established during major sporting events to resolve disputes within 24 hours. Mediation Services are also offered for negotiated settlements in contractual disputes.
Product overview
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is an independent organization that resolves sports disputes worldwide through arbitration and mediation. The core offering consists of four main procedural types: the Ordinary Arbitration Procedure for contract-based disputes, the Appeals Arbitration Procedure for challenging federation decisions, the CAS Anti-Doping Division (CAS ADD) as a first-instance authority for doping cases, and Mediation Services for negotiated settlements. CAS also operates temporary Ad Hoc Divisions during major sporting events. The organization recently launched a new E-Filing System in 2026 to streamline procedure initiation and document submission. All procedures are governed by the Code of Sports-related Arbitration, with recent updates effective July 2025. CAS publishes a Bulletin and Annual Report for institutional transparency.
Differentiator
Problem solved
Functional benefit
Products and services
- Ordinary Arbitration Procedure A dispute resolution process applicable when parties have an arbitration clause in a contract or federation statutes, or when parties agree on a one-off basis after a dispute has arisen. Used for contractual disputes involving employment contracts, sponsorship, television rights, and event organisation.
- Appeals Arbitration Procedure An appeal process against decisions rendered by federations or sports bodies, where the organization's statutes contain an arbitration clause allowing appeals to CAS. Internal legal remedies must be exhausted before filing. Average duration is 6 to 9 months.
- CAS Anti-Doping Division (CAS ADD) A first-instance authority that adjudicates anti-doping cases in accordance with the World Anti-Doping Code, operating year-round and at international sporting events with tailored accelerated procedures.
- CAS Ad Hoc Divisions Temporary divisions established during major sports events (Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, UEFA EURO, Asian Games, Commonwealth Games) to resolve disputes within expedited timeframes, sometimes within 24 hours.
- Mediation Services A non-binding, informal procedure where parties negotiate in good faith with the assistance of a CAS mediator to reach settlement. Primarily offered for contractual disputes; disciplinary matters such as doping and match-fixing are generally excluded.
- CAS E-Filing System A digital portal enabling parties to initiate CAS procedures and submit documents related to arbitration proceedings. Operates as the digital front door for filing requests and statements of appeal.
Quantifiable outcome
- Average duration of Appeals Arbitration Procedure: 6 to 9 months; Award must be notified within four months of end of evidentiary proceedings.
- +1 more outcomes
Companies that use Court of Arbitration for Sport
Customer profileSegments4 records
Ideal customer profiles4 records
Court of Arbitration for Sport technology and API
TechnologyTechnology focussed No
API detail
- Has API
- No
- API docs
- API detail
Core technology
AI maturity
App detail
Feature1 record
Court of Arbitration for Sport partnerships and signals
Strategic signalPartnerships
Eleven partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.
- World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)coreWADA wrote CAS into the World Anti-Doping Code in 2003. CAS operates the Anti-Doping Division (ADD) as a first instance authority for anti-doping cases under the WADC.
- Association of Summer Olympic International Federations (ASOIF)coreASOIF participated in the 1994 reforms (Paris Agreement) that created ICAS. ASOIF appoints 5 of the 22 ICAS members and participates in governance.
- Association of National Olympic Committees (ANOC)coreANOC signed the 1994 Paris Agreement and appoints 4 of the 22 ICAS members. ANOC represents National Olympic Committees in CAS governance structure.
- Association of Winter Olympic International Federations (AIOWF)coreAIOWF participated in the 1994 reforms and appoints 1 of the 22 ICAS members.
- International Equestrian Federation (FEI)minorFEI was the first sports body to adopt the CAS arbitration clause in 1991, providing recourse to CAS for disputes that could not be settled amicably.
- International Olympic Committee (IOC)coreThe IOC founded CAS and ratified the first Statutes in 1983. CAS was created at the initiative of IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch. The IOC delegates powers to CAS for anti-doping matters and Olympic-related disputes.
- FIFAcoreFIFA has CAS arbitration clauses in its statutes. CAS established ad hoc divisions for FIFA World Cup since 2006. FIFA's disputes including governance and disciplinary matters are heard at CAS.
- UEFAcoreUEFA has CAS arbitration clauses in its statutes. CAS established ad hoc divisions for the UEFA European Football Championship since 2000.
- Asian Games FederationminorCAS established ad hoc divisions for the Asian Games since 2014, resolving disputes during the event.
- Commonwealth Games FederationminorCAS established ad hoc divisions for the Commonwealth Games to resolve disputes during the event.
- Swiss Bar AssociationcoreThe Swiss Bar Association co-organises the biannual International Sport Arbitration Seminar with CAS. The 10th edition will take place in September 2026 in Montreux, Switzerland.
Scale indicators6 records
Recent moves10 records
Expansion highlights4 records
Court of Arbitration for Sport competitors and assessment
Company assessmentDirect peers
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center: WIPO is a UN-specialised agency that runs a specialised international arbitration and mediation centre for intellectual property and technology disputes. Its niche-focus, specialised procedural rules, and global panel of arbitrators make it a structural parallel to CAS as a sector-specific international dispute resolution body.
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA): The LCIA is a leading international arbitration institution administering commercial disputes globally under its own rules, with a comparable fee-based model and arbitrator roster. CAS and LCIA share the same business model of providing neutral institutional arbitration services with enforceable awards under the New York Convention.
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC): SIAC is a premier international arbitration institution administering complex cross-border disputes, particularly those involving Asian parties. It mirrors CAS's institutional model, case administration infrastructure, and revenue model based on filing/administrative fees and arbitrator charges.
- Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC): HKIAC administers domestic and international arbitrations and is recognised as a leading Asian-seated arbitral institution. Like CAS, it operates specialised procedural rules, a roster of arbitrators, and hearing facilities — and increasingly competes for sports and commercial disputes originating in Asia.
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration: The ICC's International Court of Arbitration is the world's leading institution for resolving international commercial disputes through arbitration. Like CAS, it is headquartered in a major arbitration hub, administers cases under its own procedural rules, maintains a global roster of arbitrators, and is the default seat for many cross-border disputes — making it the closest functional analogue to CAS.
Emerging players
- Sports Resolutions (UK): Sports Resolutions is a UK-based independent ADR body providing arbitration and mediation services specifically for sports disputes. It operates as a focused national alternative to CAS in the UK market, with overlapping expertise in sports law and athlete disputes.
- Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC): SDRCC is a Canadian independent ADR body providing dispute resolution services for sport in Canada. It mirrors CAS's specialised sports-arbitration model at a national level and represents the type of regional ADR institution that could in principle draw caseload away from CAS for North American matters.
Broad incumbents
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): ICSID administers investor-state arbitration under its own specialised rules and a global panel of arbitrators, paralleling CAS's model for resolving specialised cross-border disputes. It is a broader incumbent in international dispute resolution rather than a direct competitor to sports arbitration.
Regional players
- Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC): DIAC is the leading arbitration institution in the Middle East, administering commercial and sports-related disputes under its own rules. It is comparable to CAS as an institutional arbitration provider, but is regionally focused on the Gulf and does not directly compete in CAS's global sports-arbitration niche.
- Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre (QICDRC): QICDRC operates civil and commercial courts alongside arbitration and mediation services, including for sports disputes connected to major regional events. Its institutional model and dispute-resolution scope make it a regional parallel to CAS, particularly for matters linked to Gulf-hosted competitions.
Market position
Strengths5 records
Weaknesses5 records
Competitive moat5 records
Key risks7 records
Key highlights7 records
Customer concentration
Court of Arbitration for Sport social profiles
Digital presenceCourt of Arbitration for Sport financial estimates
Financial estimateRevenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Court of Arbitration for Sport leadership team
Management profileNumber of profiles
Profiles6 records
Court of Arbitration for Sport funding detail
Funding detailFunding overview
Funding rounds
Investors
Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Court of Arbitration for Sport M&A and investment
M&A and investmentM&A
Investments
M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Frequently asked questions about Court of Arbitration for Sport
What does Court of Arbitration for Sport do?
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) resolves sports disputes worldwide through binding arbitration and non-binding mediation services. Its core offerings include the Ordinary Arbitration Procedure for contract-based disputes, the Appeals Arbitration Procedure for challenging federation decisions, the CAS Anti-Doping Division (CAS ADD) for first-instance anti-doping cases, and Ad Hoc Divisions established during major sporting events to resolve disputes within 24 hours. Mediation Services are also offered for negotiated settlements in contractual disputes.
Is Court of Arbitration for Sport a public or private company?
Court of Arbitration for Sport is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.
When was Court of Arbitration for Sport founded?
Court of Arbitration for Sport was founded in 1984. It employs 51 to 100 people.
Where is Court of Arbitration for Sport based?
Court of Arbitration for Sport is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, in the Europe region.
How does Court of Arbitration for Sport make money?
One revenue line is on record: arbitration filing fees.
Who are Court of Arbitration for Sport's main competitors?
Direct peers on record are World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center, London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) and International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration. Emerging players are Sports Resolutions (UK) and Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC). International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is listed as a broad incumbent. Regional players are Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre (QICDRC).
Does Court of Arbitration for Sport have an API?
No public API is recorded for Court of Arbitration for Sport.
What industry is Court of Arbitration for Sport in?
Court of Arbitration for Sport's product category is Sports Arbitration Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is MPAKAKAM, Sports Compliance, Governance & Integrity Services (Safeguarding, Anti-Doping, Match Integrity), with a secondary code of MPAKAMAF, Athlete Legal & Contract Advisory (Sports Law, Arbitration, Disputes). Its NAICS code is 5411 and its SIC code is 8111.