Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia

What Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia does

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (MA), established in 1945 under the 1945 Constitution, is the highest judicial authority in Indonesia and the apex court overseeing four parallel court environments: General Courts (Peradilan Umum), Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama), Military Courts (Peradilan Militer), and Administrative Courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara). Following the 2004 implementation of the Sistem Satu Atap (One Roof System), all judicial administration in Indonesia is consolidated under MA's direct supervision, and the institution serves every Indonesian citizen, litigant, and government body with appellate and cassation jurisdiction, as well as nationwide supervision of lower courts.

MA operates a portfolio of integrated digital platforms that constitute the operational backbone of the Indonesian judiciary, including SIPP (case tracking), E-Court (electronic filing and e-payment), SIKEP (personnel information system), E-BIMA (financial and budget administration), PNBP (non-tax state revenue management), KOMDANAS (national communications command center), SIMARI (marriage-license information), Putusan3 (judgment repository), JDIH (legal documentation network), and e-SADEWA. This technology ecosystem supports 859 court websites across the country, with 78.58% operational online, and underpins the institution's accountability record of 13 consecutive unqualified audit opinions (WTP) from the Supreme Audit Agency.

MA's funding model is non-commercial: the institution is financed 100% through the Indonesian state budget (APBN), historically receiving approximately 0.36% of total state spending, with allocations ranging from Rp 8.3 trillion (2017) to Rp 11.9 trillion (2023), and Rp 10.87 trillion projected for 2026. Recent strategic positioning — including Constitutional Court Case No. 189/PUU-XXIII/2025 seeking budget autonomy, the 280% judicial salary increase announced by President Prabowo in 2025, regional leadership in the Conference of ASEAN Chief Justices (CACJ) with adoption of the Denpasar Principles, and partnerships with UNODC and the ASEAN Law Association — reflects an institutional push toward greater fiscal independence, talent retention, and regional judicial influence.

Name

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia

Legal name

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia

Website

https://mahkamahagung.go.id

Company type

Private

Founded year

1945

Operating status

Operating

Headcount range

5,001–10,000 employees

Short description

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia is the highest judicial authority in Indonesia, supervising all courts nationwide and serving Indonesian citizens and government bodies through appellate jurisdiction and a digital case-management ecosystem funded by the state budget.

Ownership category

akta.pro rank

Product category

Judicial Services

NAICS

Courts (92211), Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities (922)

SIC

Services-Legal Services (8111)

akta.pro primary industry

Judicial Courts & Court Administration (BPAIAFAA)

akta.pro secondary industries

Court Services & Operations (Clerks, Records, Jury, Interpreters) (BPAIAFAH), Litigation & Dispute Resolution (BPAHAAAB)

Keywords

• Judicial services
• Court administration
• Electronic case filing
• Legal dispute resolution
• Judiciary information systems

Headquarters

HQ city

Jakarta Pusat

HQ country

Indonesia

HQ region

Asia

Offices1 record

Markets served

GTM type

B2C

Offering type

Services

Cost components

Personnel, Operations, Infrastructure, Technology or R&D, Others

Revenue model

1. Court Fees and Legal Services: Revenue generated from court filing fees, case fees, and legal document services across all court levels. Non-tax state revenue (PNBP) managed through the PNBP application system.
2. State Budget (APBN) Funding: Annual state budget allocation from the Government of Indonesia. Budget increased from Rp 8.3 trillion (2017) to Rp 11.9 trillion (2023), representing 0.36% of total state budget. For 2026, budget is Rp 10.87 trillion.

Pricing tiers

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels3 records

Core offering

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia is the highest judicial authority in Indonesia that adjudicates and administers justice across four court environments: General Courts (Peradilan Umum), Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama), Military Courts (Peradilan Militer), and Administrative Courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara). It delivers civil, criminal, religious, military, and administrative dispute resolution services to citizens, legal entities, and government institutions through a hierarchical nationwide court structure. The institution also operates digital platforms (E-Court, SIPP, Putusan, JDIH) for electronic case filing, case tracking, public access to court decisions, and legal documentation.

Product overview

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia operates a comprehensive digital ecosystem comprising internal and external applications supporting court operations. The core systems include SIPP (case management), E-Court (electronic filing), and E-BIMA (budget management). Internal applications cover personnel (SIKEP), archives (SIMARI), monitoring (KOMDANAS), budget planning (e-SADEWA), and non-tax revenue (PNBP). External facing systems provide public access to rulings (Putusan), legal documentation (JDIH), procurement (LPSE), complaints (SIWAS), and appellate case tracking (SIPP Banding). The overall architecture follows a platform-based approach with specialized modules serving different stakeholder groups.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

• SIPP: Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara (Case Tracking Information System) - Court case management system
• E-Court
• SIKEP
• E-BIMA
• E-SADEWA
• PNBP
• PERMA
• SALMAN
• Badilag
• Badilum
• Badimiltun
• CACJ
• Denpasar Principles

Products and services

• E-Court Electronic court system enabling online case filing, payment, and case tracking for court users (litigants and advocates).
• SIPP (Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara) Case information tracking system for managing and monitoring court cases throughout the judicial process, accessible to litigants and the public.
• Putusan (Court Decision Portal) Court ruling database and search system providing public access to judicial decisions from all subordinate courts.
• General Courts (Peradilan Umum) General court services addressing civil disputes, criminal cases, commercial disputes, and land acquisition objections for Indonesian citizens and legal entities.
• Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama) Religious court services for Islamic family law matters including marriage, divorce, inheritance, waqf, hibah, and sharia economics, administered through Badan Peradilan Agama (Badilag).
• Military Courts (Peradilan Militer) Military court services for resolution of military justice matters, disciplinary cases, and military personnel disputes.
• Administrative Courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) Administrative court services for citizens and organizations challenging government administrative decisions through state administrative courts.
• JDIH (Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum) Legal documentation and information network for accessing laws, regulations, and legal references.

Quantifiable outcome

• 100% case resolution rate achieved by PTA Yogyakarta in 2025
• +2 more outcomes

Named customers3 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API

No

API docs

API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature6 records

Partnerships

Three partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

• Council of ASEAN Chief Justices (CACJ)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 22 July 2026MA RI is a member of CACJ, participating in annual meetings to discuss judicial cooperation, harmonization of court procedures, and shared initiatives such as the adoption of the Denpasar Principles on Judicial Well-Being. CACJ is an associated entity of ASEAN since 2017.
• ASEAN Law Association (ALA)minorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 22 July 2026MA RI participated in the 15th General Assembly of ALA in Bangkok, Thailand alongside the 13th CACJ meeting, discussing ASEAN legal harmonization.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 March 2026UNODC collaborated with MA RI to organize the 1st ASEAN Judicial Well-Being Workshop in Denpasar, Bali in March 2026, which led to the development of the Denpasar Principles adopted by CACJ.

Scale indicators5 records

Recent moves9 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Regional players

• Supreme Court of Singapore: Apex court of Singapore and a CACJ member. Although smaller in scale, it is widely regarded as a regional leader in court technology and case management, providing a natural benchmark for MA RI's E-Court and SIPP modernization initiatives.
• Supreme Court of Thailand: Highest court of Thailand and CACJ member. Operates a parallel four-track structure and is a regional cooperation partner, providing a direct comparison point for MA RI across the ASEAN judiciary landscape.
• Supreme Court of the Philippines: Highest court of the Philippines and fellow ASEAN member. Operates a comparable hierarchical structure covering civil, criminal, and special jurisdictions, and is a CACJ member engaging in the same regional judicial cooperation forums as MA RI.
• Supreme Court of Malaysia: Highest court of Malaysia and fellow ASEAN member. Operates a similar federal structure with parallel civil and Sharia court tracks and is a member of CACJ alongside MA RI, making it a directly comparable regional peer in jurisdiction, scale, and digital reform trajectory.

Broad incumbents

• Supreme Court of India: Apex court of India overseeing one of the largest judicial systems in the world. Comparable in constitutional mandate, scale (multi-thousand judge footprint), and active digital reform agenda, providing a reference model for high-volume case management.
• Supreme Court of the United States: Highest court of the U.S. federal judiciary. Comparable as a constitutional apex court with public-facing digital infrastructure (case dockets, opinion publication), albeit with a smaller caseload and different appointment model.
• Federal Constitutional Court of Germany: Constitutional court of a major federal democracy. Comparable as a constitutionally anchored judicial authority with strong institutional independence, providing a benchmark for budget autonomy and judicial reform governance.

Others

• Tyler Technologies (Court & Justice Solutions): U.S.-listed vendor of court management and justice software (Odyssey) widely used by U.S. state courts. Comparable as the type of integrated case-management ecosystem MA RI has built in-house with SIPP and E-Court, relevant as a technology benchmark.

Direct peers

• Federal Court of Australia: Australia's federal appellate court with constitutional status and a national caseload. Comparable in function as a final appellate authority and in deploying digital filing and case-tracking systems, making it a structurally similar peer.
• Constitutional Court of South Korea: Apex constitutional court of South Korea recognized regionally for its integrated digital case management platform. Comparable in operating a comprehensive electronic filing and decision publication ecosystem similar to MA RI's SIPP and Putusan3.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

• YouTubeyoutube.com/channel/UCOtpmZ2yK7_4n07nbRHDJVQ/featured
• Xx.com/MahkamahAgung
• Facebookfacebook.com/humasma123
• LinkedInlinkedin.com/company/mahkamah-agung-republik-indonesia

Compliance2 records

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Subsidiaries7 records

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia