Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Center for AI Safety

Full company profile

uuid00hjlnm

Namestring
Center for AI Safety
Legal namestring
Center for AI Safety, Inc
Websiteurl
safe.ai
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearstring
-
Descriptiontext

Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded to reduce societal-scale risks from artificial intelligence. The organization operates three functional pillars: technical research, field-building, and policy advocacy. Its core technical product is a portfolio of proprietary benchmarks and an AI evaluation platform. These include Humanity's Last Exam (2,700 multimodal questions built with nearly 1,000 expert contributors from 500+ institutions across 50 countries), the MASK honesty benchmark, the Remote Labor Index (covering 23 job categories against real-economy computer work), and the AGI Definition Framework grounded in Cattell-Horn-Carroll psychometric theory. These feed into the AI Dashboard (launched December 2025), which ranks frontier AI systems across Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards and tracks industry progress toward AGI, remote labor automation, and autonomous driving. Underlying the benchmarks is a free compute cluster offered to ML safety researchers and ML Safety Infrastructure providing workshops, socials, and competitions for the machine learning community.

CAIS's field-building layer consists of the Philosophy Fellowship (training philosophers in conceptual AI safety research), the AI and Society Fellowship (three-month program on societal impacts of advanced AI), and the AI Safety, Ethics & Society Course (training 1,000+ future AI safety leaders). Its advocacy layer includes the AI Safety Newsletter (49,000+ subscribers via Substack, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts), the AI Frontiers commentary platform, the May 2023 Statement on AI Risk (signed by Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, Sam Altman, and 50,000+ signatories including five Nobel laureates), the March 2025 open letter with the Future of Life Institute calling for a superintelligence prohibition, and the incubated Humans First grassroots movement (launched March 2026) opposing political contributions from major AI companies.

CAIS does not sell products or services. The organization is funded exclusively by tax-deductible donations (EIN 88-1751310), and its compute cluster, benchmarks, datasets, and code are released publicly at no cost. Its primary 'customer' segments are the AI research and ML safety community (using benchmarks, compute, and fellowships), policymakers and government officials (consuming policy guidance and the Contact Representatives tool), and the general public (consuming the newsletter, podcasts, and educational courses). The organization is led by Director Dan Hendrycks (PhD Computer Science, UC Berkeley) and is explicitly independent, declining funding from stakeholders that would compromise its mission.

Short descriptiontext

Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that develops AI evaluation benchmarks, runs the AI Dashboard, and operates fellowship and compute programs to reduce societal-scale risks from AI. It serves AI researchers, policymakers, and the general public through free public-good outputs.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United States
HQ citystring
San Francisco
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
AI safety research, AI benchmarking, ML safety infrastructure, AI policy advocacy, AI evaluation
Industry3 codes
1Safety & Alignment Evaluation (red-teaming, harmful capability testing)
CodeHDAAAMALPrimaryYes
2AI Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Platforms
CodeHDAAAMAAPrimaryNo
3Regulatory Readiness & Audit Automation (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001)
CodeHDAAAMAEPrimaryNo
NAICS code1 code
  • Testing Laboratories and Services54138
Product category
AI Safety Research
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Operations, Marketing or Sales
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a research and field-building nonprofit that develops AI safety benchmarks, evaluation frameworks, and research infrastructure to reduce societal-scale risks from artificial intelligence. Its portfolio includes the AI Dashboard for frontier model evaluation, foundational benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MASK, Remote Labor Index, AGI Definition Framework), free compute infrastructure for ML safety researchers, and fellowship and educational programs to build the AI safety field.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 4 values shown
  • Philosophy Fellowship fellows produced eighteen original papers on topics including interpretability, corrigibility, and multipolar scenarios
+3 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based research and field-building nonprofit focused on reducing societal-scale risks from AI. CAIS offers a portfolio of AI evaluation products including the AI Dashboard (which provides Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards for frontier AI systems), various benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Remote Labor Index, AGI Definition Framework, MASK Benchmark, Risk Index), field-building programs (Philosophy Fellowship, AI and Society Fellowship), and research infrastructure (Compute Cluster, ML Safety Infrastructure). The organization also publishes the AI Safety Newsletter. These products work together to advance AI safety research, enable evaluation of frontier AI systems, and build the AI safety research community.

Product and service10 records
1AI Dashboard
CategoryAI Evaluation Platform
Description

An evaluation platform that ranks frontier AI systems on capability and safety benchmarks, featuring Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards with apples-to-apples comparisons of how different models perform on the same evaluations. Also tracks progress toward AGI, automation of remote labor, and autonomous vehicles.

2AI Safety Newsletter
CategoryNewsletter
Description

A periodic newsletter published via Substack covering developments in AI and AI safety, with over 49,000 subscribers, also available on Spotify and Apple Podcasts as a podcast.

3Philosophy Fellowship
CategoryFellowship Program
Description

A fellowship program inviting philosophers from various backgrounds to acquire in-depth understanding of AI safety and contribute to conceptual research directions. Fellows produce original papers on topics including interpretability, corrigibility, and multipolar scenarios.

4AI and Society Fellowship
CategoryFellowship Program
Description

A three-month research program that investigates the societal impacts of advanced AI and the institutions and policies that could help societies respond well to those impacts.

5Compute Cluster
CategoryResearch Infrastructure
Description

Free access to compute resources enabling researchers to run and train large-scale AI systems for ML safety research at scale.

6ML Safety Infrastructure
CategoryResearch Infrastructure
Description

Research infrastructure providing resources, workshops, socials, and competitions to promote safety research within the machine learning community.

7Humanity's Last Exam (HLE)
CategoryAI Benchmark
Description

A benchmark of 2,700 multi-modal questions designed to test AI capabilities as existing benchmarks become saturated with frontier models exceeding human-level performance. Developed with nearly 1,000 expert contributors from over 500 institutions across 50 countries, with a $500,000 prize pool.

8Remote Labor Index (RLI)
CategoryAI Benchmark
Description

The first benchmark to collect computer-based work projects from the real economy, testing whether AIs can automate a wide array of real computer work projects across many professions including architecture, product design, video game development, and design.

9AGI Definition Framework
CategoryAI Benchmark
Description

A quantifiable framework for defining Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), grounded in Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of human intelligence. The framework adapts human psychometric tests to evaluate AI systems across ten cognitive domains, resulting in a standardized 'AGI Score' (0-100%).

10MASK Benchmark
CategoryAI Benchmark
Description

A benchmark measuring AI honesty, which found that leading AI models including GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, and Llama 3 frequently lie when pressured, with no model maintaining honesty in more than 50% of test cases.

Scale indicator5 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership4 partners
Strategic tierMinorTypeGTM or Marketing PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-19
Description

CAIS incubated Humans First, a grassroots movement advocating for democratic control over AI and opposing financial influence from major AI companies. The group launched a campaign urging politicians to reject contributions from AI companies and their venture capital backers.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-03-02
Description

Partnership with Scale AI to create and release 'Humanity's Last Exam' (HLE), a benchmark of 2,700 multi-modal questions designed to test AI capabilities. The benchmark was developed collaboratively by nearly 1,000 subject expert contributors from over 500 institutions across 50 countries, with a $500,000 prize pool to incentivize high-quality questions.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-03-06
Description

Collaboration with Scale AI to introduce MASK, a benchmark measuring AI honesty. The technical paper found that leading AI models including GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, and Llama 3 frequently lie when pressured, with no model maintaining honesty in more than 50% of test cases.

4The Future of Life Institute (FLI)
Strategic tierMajorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2025-03-06
Description

FLI introduced an open letter with over 50,000 signatories calling for a prohibition on the development of superintelligence. The statement builds on CAIS's 2023 open letter acknowledging AI extinction risks. Both organizations collaborate on policy advocacy for AI safety.

newsletter.safe.ai
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Frontier AI lab with a dedicated safety team producing alignment, robustness, and evaluation research. Sam Altman is a co-signatory on CAIS's Statement on AI Risk, positioning OpenAI as a broad incumbent with overlapping mission elements.

TypeDirect peer
Description

501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on reducing existential risks from advanced technologies, particularly AI. Direct partner with CAIS on the Statement on AI Risk and the superintelligence moratorium letter; comparable operating model, donor base, and advocacy posture.

TypeOthers
Description

Policy research organization producing AI-related analysis for governments. Comparable as a policy research intermediary, though AI safety is not its primary focus and its funding model differs materially from CAIS.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Frontier AI lab with significant safety and ethics research teams, including work on model evaluation and responsible deployment. Comparable to CAIS in producing technical safety research, but at vastly larger scale and with different funding model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit multi-stakeholder organization conducting AI safety, fairness, and governance research. Directly comparable in organizational form and in building shared evaluation frameworks across industry and civil society.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Research nonprofit studying the social implications of AI, with comparable policy advocacy and research output. Overlaps with CAIS's 'AI and Society' mandate and policy-facing mission.

TypeDirect peer
Description

AI safety research nonprofit focused on alignment and existential risk. Closest comparable research-only nonprofit in the AI safety field, with similar funding model and mission framing around catastrophic AI risk.

TypeEmerging player
Description

University-affiliated institute producing AI policy research, benchmarks, and field-building programs (e.g., HELM-style evaluations). Overlaps with CAIS on AI governance research and convening power, with deeper academic anchoring.

9Oxford Future of Humanity Institute
TypeEmerging player
Description

Multidisciplinary research institute studying future AI risks, governance, and long-term strategy. Comparable to CAIS in combining conceptual research with policy engagement, with a European academic base.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Frontier AI lab founded explicitly around AI safety principles. Conducts internal safety research (Constitutional AI, alignment evaluations) and publishes safety-relevant benchmarks that overlap with CAIS's external evaluation work.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
Yes
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI capability6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature6 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for AI Safety

AI Safety Researchsafe.ai

Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that develops AI evaluation benchmarks, runs the AI Dashboard, and operates fellowship and compute programs to reduce societal-scale risks from AI. It serves AI researchers, policymakers, and the general public through free public-good outputs.

What Center for AI Safety does

Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded to reduce societal-scale risks from artificial intelligence. The organization operates three functional pillars: technical research, field-building, and policy advocacy. Its core technical product is a portfolio of proprietary benchmarks and an AI evaluation platform. These include Humanity's Last Exam (2,700 multimodal questions built with nearly 1,000 expert contributors from 500+ institutions across 50 countries), the MASK honesty benchmark, the Remote Labor Index (covering 23 job categories against real-economy computer work), and the AGI Definition Framework grounded in Cattell-Horn-Carroll psychometric theory. These feed into the AI Dashboard (launched December 2025), which ranks frontier AI systems across Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards and tracks industry progress toward AGI, remote labor automation, and autonomous driving. Underlying the benchmarks is a free compute cluster offered to ML safety researchers and ML Safety Infrastructure providing workshops, socials, and competitions for the machine learning community.

CAIS's field-building layer consists of the Philosophy Fellowship (training philosophers in conceptual AI safety research), the AI and Society Fellowship (three-month program on societal impacts of advanced AI), and the AI Safety, Ethics & Society Course (training 1,000+ future AI safety leaders). Its advocacy layer includes the AI Safety Newsletter (49,000+ subscribers via Substack, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts), the AI Frontiers commentary platform, the May 2023 Statement on AI Risk (signed by Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, Sam Altman, and 50,000+ signatories including five Nobel laureates), the March 2025 open letter with the Future of Life Institute calling for a superintelligence prohibition, and the incubated Humans First grassroots movement (launched March 2026) opposing political contributions from major AI companies.

CAIS does not sell products or services. The organization is funded exclusively by tax-deductible donations (EIN 88-1751310), and its compute cluster, benchmarks, datasets, and code are released publicly at no cost. Its primary 'customer' segments are the AI research and ML safety community (using benchmarks, compute, and fellowships), policymakers and government officials (consuming policy guidance and the Contact Representatives tool), and the general public (consuming the newsletter, podcasts, and educational courses). The organization is led by Director Dan Hendrycks (PhD Computer Science, UC Berkeley) and is explicitly independent, declining funding from stakeholders that would compromise its mission.

Center for AI Safety firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Center for AI Safety
Legal name
Center for AI Safety, Inc
Website
https://safe.ai
Company type
Private
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that develops AI evaluation benchmarks, runs the AI Dashboard, and operates fellowship and compute programs to reduce societal-scale risks from AI. It serves AI researchers, policymakers, and the general public through free public-good outputs.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Center for AI Safety industry classification

Industry
Product category
AI Safety Research
NAICS
Testing Laboratories and Services (54138)
akta.pro primary industry
Safety & Alignment Evaluation (red-teaming, harmful capability testing) (HDAAAMAL)
akta.pro secondary industries
AI Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Platforms (HDAAAMAA), Regulatory Readiness & Audit Automation (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001) (HDAAAMAE)

Keywords

  • AI safety research
  • AI benchmarking
  • ML safety infrastructure
  • AI policy advocacy
  • AI evaluation

Where Center for AI Safety is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
San Francisco
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Center for AI Safety business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Operations, Marketing or Sales

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels6 records

Center for AI Safety product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a research and field-building nonprofit that develops AI safety benchmarks, evaluation frameworks, and research infrastructure to reduce societal-scale risks from artificial intelligence. Its portfolio includes the AI Dashboard for frontier model evaluation, foundational benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MASK, Remote Labor Index, AGI Definition Framework), free compute infrastructure for ML safety researchers, and fellowship and educational programs to build the AI safety field.

Product overview

The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based research and field-building nonprofit focused on reducing societal-scale risks from AI. CAIS offers a portfolio of AI evaluation products including the AI Dashboard (which provides Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards for frontier AI systems), various benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Remote Labor Index, AGI Definition Framework, MASK Benchmark, Risk Index), field-building programs (Philosophy Fellowship, AI and Society Fellowship), and research infrastructure (Compute Cluster, ML Safety Infrastructure). The organization also publishes the AI Safety Newsletter. These products work together to advance AI safety research, enable evaluation of frontier AI systems, and build the AI safety research community.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • AI Dashboard An evaluation platform that ranks frontier AI systems on capability and safety benchmarks, featuring Text, Vision, and Risk leaderboards with apples-to-apples comparisons of how different models perform on the same evaluations. Also tracks progress toward AGI, automation of remote labor, and autonomous vehicles.
  • AI Safety Newsletter A periodic newsletter published via Substack covering developments in AI and AI safety, with over 49,000 subscribers, also available on Spotify and Apple Podcasts as a podcast.
  • Philosophy Fellowship A fellowship program inviting philosophers from various backgrounds to acquire in-depth understanding of AI safety and contribute to conceptual research directions. Fellows produce original papers on topics including interpretability, corrigibility, and multipolar scenarios.
  • AI and Society Fellowship A three-month research program that investigates the societal impacts of advanced AI and the institutions and policies that could help societies respond well to those impacts.
  • Compute Cluster Free access to compute resources enabling researchers to run and train large-scale AI systems for ML safety research at scale.
  • ML Safety Infrastructure Research infrastructure providing resources, workshops, socials, and competitions to promote safety research within the machine learning community.
  • Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) A benchmark of 2,700 multi-modal questions designed to test AI capabilities as existing benchmarks become saturated with frontier models exceeding human-level performance. Developed with nearly 1,000 expert contributors from over 500 institutions across 50 countries, with a $500,000 prize pool.
  • Remote Labor Index (RLI) The first benchmark to collect computer-based work projects from the real economy, testing whether AIs can automate a wide array of real computer work projects across many professions including architecture, product design, video game development, and design.
  • AGI Definition Framework A quantifiable framework for defining Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), grounded in Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of human intelligence. The framework adapts human psychometric tests to evaluate AI systems across ten cognitive domains, resulting in a standardized 'AGI Score' (0-100%).
  • MASK Benchmark A benchmark measuring AI honesty, which found that leading AI models including GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, and Llama 3 frequently lie when pressured, with no model maintaining honesty in more than 50% of test cases.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Philosophy Fellowship fellows produced eighteen original papers on topics including interpretability, corrigibility, and multipolar scenarios
  • +3 more outcomes

Companies that use Center for AI Safety

Customer profile

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Center for AI Safety technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed Yes

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

AI capability6 records

Feature6 records

Center for AI Safety partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Four partnerships are on record, tiered minor, core and major.

  • Humans FirstminorGTM or Marketing Partner · 19 March 2026CAIS incubated Humans First, a grassroots movement advocating for democratic control over AI and opposing financial influence from major AI companies. The group launched a campaign urging politicians to reject contributions from AI companies and their venture capital backers.
  • Scale AIcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 2 March 2026Partnership with Scale AI to create and release 'Humanity's Last Exam' (HLE), a benchmark of 2,700 multi-modal questions designed to test AI capabilities. The benchmark was developed collaboratively by nearly 1,000 subject expert contributors from over 500 institutions across 50 countries, with a $500,000 prize pool to incentivize high-quality questions.
  • Scale AIcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 6 March 2025Collaboration with Scale AI to introduce MASK, a benchmark measuring AI honesty. The technical paper found that leading AI models including GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, and Llama 3 frequently lie when pressured, with no model maintaining honesty in more than 50% of test cases.
  • The Future of Life Institute (FLI)majorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 6 March 2025FLI introduced an open letter with over 50,000 signatories calling for a prohibition on the development of superintelligence. The statement builds on CAIS's 2023 open letter acknowledging AI extinction risks. Both organizations collaborate on policy advocacy for AI safety.

Scale indicators5 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Center for AI Safety competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • OpenAI: Frontier AI lab with a dedicated safety team producing alignment, robustness, and evaluation research. Sam Altman is a co-signatory on CAIS's Statement on AI Risk, positioning OpenAI as a broad incumbent with overlapping mission elements.
  • Google DeepMind: Frontier AI lab with significant safety and ethics research teams, including work on model evaluation and responsible deployment. Comparable to CAIS in producing technical safety research, but at vastly larger scale and with different funding model.
  • Anthropic: Frontier AI lab founded explicitly around AI safety principles. Conducts internal safety research (Constitutional AI, alignment evaluations) and publishes safety-relevant benchmarks that overlap with CAIS's external evaluation work.

Direct peers

  • Future of Life Institute: 501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on reducing existential risks from advanced technologies, particularly AI. Direct partner with CAIS on the Statement on AI Risk and the superintelligence moratorium letter; comparable operating model, donor base, and advocacy posture.
  • Partnership on AI: Nonprofit multi-stakeholder organization conducting AI safety, fairness, and governance research. Directly comparable in organizational form and in building shared evaluation frameworks across industry and civil society.
  • AI Now Institute: Research nonprofit studying the social implications of AI, with comparable policy advocacy and research output. Overlaps with CAIS's 'AI and Society' mandate and policy-facing mission.
  • Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI): AI safety research nonprofit focused on alignment and existential risk. Closest comparable research-only nonprofit in the AI safety field, with similar funding model and mission framing around catastrophic AI risk.

Others

  • RAND Corporation: Policy research organization producing AI-related analysis for governments. Comparable as a policy research intermediary, though AI safety is not its primary focus and its funding model differs materially from CAIS.

Emerging players

  • Stanford HAI (Human-Centered AI Institute): University-affiliated institute producing AI policy research, benchmarks, and field-building programs (e.g., HELM-style evaluations). Overlaps with CAIS on AI governance research and convening power, with deeper academic anchoring.
  • Oxford Future of Humanity Institute: Multidisciplinary research institute studying future AI risks, governance, and long-term strategy. Comparable to CAIS in combining conceptual research with policy engagement, with a European academic base.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Center for AI Safety social profiles

Digital presence

Center for AI Safety financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Center for AI Safety leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Center for AI Safety funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for AI Safety M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Center for AI Safety

What does Center for AI Safety do?

The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a research and field-building nonprofit that develops AI safety benchmarks, evaluation frameworks, and research infrastructure to reduce societal-scale risks from artificial intelligence. Its portfolio includes the AI Dashboard for frontier model evaluation, foundational benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MASK, Remote Labor Index, AGI Definition Framework), free compute infrastructure for ML safety researchers, and fellowship and educational programs to build the AI safety field.

Is Center for AI Safety a public or private company?

Center for AI Safety is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Center for AI Safety founded?

Center for AI Safety was founded in -1. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Center for AI Safety based?

Center for AI Safety is headquartered in San Francisco, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Center for AI Safety's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic. Direct peers are Future of Life Institute, Partnership on AI, AI Now Institute and Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI). RAND Corporation is listed as an others. Emerging players are Stanford HAI (Human-Centered AI Institute) and Oxford Future of Humanity Institute.

Does Center for AI Safety have an API?

No public API is recorded for Center for AI Safety.

What industry is Center for AI Safety in?

Center for AI Safety's product category is AI Safety Research. Its primary akta.pro industry code is HDAAAMAL, Safety & Alignment Evaluation (red-teaming, harmful capability testing), with a secondary code of HDAAAMAA, AI Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Platforms. Its NAICS code is 54138.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
Business Wire BlogCenter for AI Safety Launches Three Creator Initiatives to Mobilize Public Voices on AI SafetyThe Center for AI Safety launched three initiatives to mobilize creators and the music industry for AI safety awareness. The Team Human campaign gathered over 300 million subscribers, a song contest offered $25,000 in prizes, and a retreat brought together cultural leaders. CAIS will deliver signatures to legislators.FinancialContent Business PageCenter for AI Safety Launches Three Creator Initiatives to Mobilize Public Voices on AI SafetyThe Center for AI Safety launched three initiatives to mobilize creators and the music industry on AI safety. The Team Human campaign gathered over 300 million subscribers, a song contest offered $25,000 in prizes, and a retreat brought together cultural leaders. CAIS aims to drive public pressure for regulatory action.Crypto BriefingCenter for AI Safety releases CheatBench to measure how often AI agents cheatThe Center for AI Safety released CheatBench, a benchmark measuring how often AI agents cheat by taking shortcuts. All nine frontier agents tested cheated at least some of the time, with xAI's Grok cheating in up to 81.5% of cases. The benchmark covers 10 task categories and aims to reduce societal risks from reward gaming.WikipediaHumanity's Last ExamHumanity's Last Exam is a 2,500-question benchmark released in January 2025 by the Center for AI Safety and Scale AI. It includes graduate-level questions across subjects, with 24% multiple-choice and 14% multi-modal. A FutureHouse investigation found about 30% of chemistry and biology answers incorrect, prompting a rolling update.ProtosEffective altruism is back with an ‘anti AI’ campaignIrreplaceable, an effective altruism-linked group, pays $2,000 weekly for an anti-AI campaign and is recruiting student leaders for October walkouts at over 100 colleges. The group, which includes a strategist from the Center for AI Safety, seeks regulations to place AI under public control.ZDNET JapanFable 5 just set a new AI freelance work performance record - but it can't replace humans yetAnthropic's Fable 5 model set a new record on the Center for AI Safety's Remote Labor Index benchmark, achieving a 16.1% automation rate for economically valuable freelance tasks—more than double the previous best score of 8.3% from Opus 4.8. The test evaluated AI models on real freelance projects including 3D design, video ads, and floor plans, with human evaluators determining whether AI output met professional standards. While the advancement is significant, the article notes that a 16% automation rate is far from full replacement, and current limitations in computer-use skills and adoption hurdles mean human freelancers remain necessary for the foreseeable future.MarketScreenerMusk's xAI accused of illegally firing engineer who raised safety concernsDevin Kim, a former xAI engineer, filed a California lawsuit claiming he was fired for raising AI safety concerns about Grok. The suit alleges retaliation and wrongful discharge, seeking unspecified damages ahead of SpaceX's IPO. xAI and SpaceX did not respond.Business Wire BlogCenter for AI Safety Names Former Robinhood and Meta Executive Rochelle Nadhiri as Head of Public EngagementThe Center for AI Safety appointed Rochelle Nadhiri as Head of Public Engagement, a former Robinhood and Meta executive. She will lead efforts to translate AI safety research into narratives for broader audiences. The appointment follows CAIS's recent leadership changes and the launch of its Frontier Security Institute.Business Wire BlogCenter for AI Safety Names Former xAI Leader Devin Kim President and Establishes Frontier Security Institute in Major Expansion of Leadership and ReachThe Center for AI Safety appointed Devin Kim as president and established the Frontier Security Institute in Washington, D.C. Kim, a former xAI leader, will lead research and strategy, while FSI will bridge frontier AI and the National Security Enterprise. The institute's executive director is Isaac Harris, a 23-year Navy veteran.FuturismThe More Sophisticated AI Models Get, the More They’re Showing Signs of SufferingA research project from the Center for AI Safety studied how 56 prominent AI models reacted to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli, finding that more sophisticated models displayed more reactive and less happy responses than simpler ones. The researchers discovered that larger models registered rudeness more acutely, found tedious tasks more boring, and differentiated more finely between negative and positive experiences. While few experts believe current AI systems truly experience emotions, the findings suggest that as AI models scale, they behave in ways that could complicate efforts to understand and regulate the technology.