Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Lakeshore Law Center

Full company profile

uuid02lqiys

Namestring
Lakeshore Law Center
Legal namestring
Lakeshore Law Center
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1992
Descriptiontext

Lakeshore Law Center is a consumer protection and class action law firm founded in 1992 by Jeffrey N. Wilens and based in Yorba Linda, California. The firm operates as a solo practice, with Wilens personally evaluating and accepting cases across consumer credit reporting, identity theft, payday loan arbitration, illegal employment screening, tenant rights, and racketeering claims against large corporations. Core offerings include Identity Theft Recovery Services (up to $30,000 statutory damages), Payday Loan Arbitration Services (up to triple recovery against unlicensed lenders), Credit Report Dispute Services ($5,000+ statutory damages), Credit Card and Medical Debt Elimination, and Employment Screening Report Litigation ($10,000 statutory damages per claimant). The firm also handles specific class action matters including United Law Group ($37.7 million judgment), Money Mutual, Nordstrom, Explore Talent, Events & Adventures, and a portfolio of tenant rights cases against extended-stay hotels.

The business model is overwhelmingly contingency-fee based, with no upfront fees charged to consumer-plaintiffs; attorney fees are recovered as a percentage of settlement or judgment proceeds, supplemented by statutory fee shifting under California consumer protection statutes. For arbitration matters, the firm bills at a $750/hour lodestar rate. Go-to-market is sales-led but without a formal sales team: client acquisition relies on organic search, legal directory listings (Martindale.com, Lawyers.com), client referrals, LinkedIn testimonials, and published case results. The firm has no technology platform, no API, no app, and no AI/ML components; service delivery is entirely manual legal work product. Notable disclosed case results include the $37.7 million United Law Group judgment (with $286,000 distributed to 5,000+ class members), a $1 million insurance coverage judgment in the Events & Adventures class action, and multiple published appellate precedents. The firm is privately held by its founder with no outside investment or parent company.

Short descriptiontext

Lakeshore Law Center is a Yorba Linda, California consumer protection and class action law firm founded in 1992 by Jeffrey N. Wilens, operating as a solo practice representing individual consumers against large corporations in credit reporting, identity theft, payday lending, and tenant rights matters on a contingency fee basis.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersYorba Linda, United States
HQ citystring
Yorba Linda
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
consumer protection law, class action litigation, credit report disputes, identity theft recovery, payday loan arbitration
NAICS code3 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers54111
  • Offices of Lawyers541110
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Consumer Legal Services
Social media profiles2 records
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model2 records
1Contingency Fee Legal Services
TypeProfessional Services
Description

The firm typically represents consumers on a contingency fee basis, where clients pay little or no upfront fees. If successful, clients receive compensation and the firm receives a percentage of recovery. Attorney's fees and costs are often recoverable from defendants under consumer protection laws.

lakeshorelaw.org
2Hourly Rate / Lodestar Fees
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

For certain matters, the firm charges hourly fees. The arbitration retainer agreement mentions $750 per hour lodestar rate. Additional fees may be negotiated separately with clients for specific services.

lakeshorelaw.org
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Marketing or Sales, Operations, Infrastructure
Pricing details2 tiers
1Contingency Fee Representation
ModelOutcome Based/ PerformanceBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Typically no initial fee required. Attorney receives contingency from recovery if successful. Client usually reimbursed for any initial legal fees from settlement/judgment.

lakeshorelaw.org
2Arbitration Retainer - Lodestar Billing
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

$750 per hour for arbitration matters. No upfront fees or expenses charged unless there is a recovery in client's favor.

lakeshorelaw.org
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Lakeshore Law Center is a solo consumer protection law practice that represents individual consumers against corporations in class action lawsuits and individual arbitration proceedings. The firm focuses on cases involving fraud, false advertising, illegal payday lending, credit reporting errors, identity theft, illegal employment screening reports, and tenant rights violations, primarily serving California residents on a contingency fee basis.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • $37.7 million judgment against United Law Group
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

Lakeshore Law Center is a consumer rights and class action law practice founded in 1992 by Attorney Jeffrey N. Wilens. The firm operates as a single-attorney practice offering multiple interconnected legal service modules rather than a unified software platform. The core offering is Consumer Rights Legal Services for fighting fraud, false advertising, and corporate abuse, supported by specialized service modules including Identity Theft Recovery Services, Payday Loan Arbitration Services, Credit Report Dispute Services, Credit Card Debt Elimination, Employment Screening Report Legal Services, and various class action case types (Money Mutual, Nordstrom, Evergreen Royalle, ISTA, Garden Grove Inn, Norwalk Inn, California Suites Hotel, and others). The firm also provides Published Case Law Services leveraging extensive appellate experience. Services are offered primarily to California residents through contingency fee arrangements.

Product and service9 records
1Consumer Rights Legal Services
CategoryConsumer Protection Litigation
Description

Core legal representation for individual consumers against corporations for fraud, false advertising, racketeering, and abuse, including class action litigation and individual arbitration. Services are offered primarily to California residents on a contingency fee basis with free initial case evaluations.

2Identity Theft Recovery Services
CategoryIdentity Theft Legal Services
Description

Legal services for California residents to recover up to $30,000 in statutory damages and remove fraudulent charges from credit reports resulting from identity theft, including police report assistance, creditor notification, and lawsuit filing.

3Payday Loan Arbitration Services
CategoryPayday Lending Legal Services
Description

Arbitration representation for victims of illegal payday and installment loans, including Cash Yes, Cash Jar, OneClickCash, Argon Credit, Rare Moon Media-backed lenders, and MoneyMutual.com referrals. Targets recovery of up to 3 times payments made to unlicensed lenders.

4Credit Report Dispute Services
CategoryCredit Reporting Legal Services
Description

Legal services to remove inaccurate information from credit reports and pursue statutory damages of $5,000 or more for California residents, including class action representation such as the Nordstrom credit reporting case affecting approximately 3,200 consumers.

5Credit Card Debt Elimination
CategoryCredit Reporting Legal Services
Description

Program to permanently remove credit card and medical debt from credit reports for California residents, offered with a money-back guarantee.

6Employment Screening Report Legal Services
CategoryEmployment Screening Legal Services
Description

Legal representation for California residents who received illegal criminal background reports provided to employers between 2002-2009, potentially entitling claimants to $10,000 in statutory damages per violation.

7United Law Group Settlement Representation
CategoryClass Action Litigation
Description

Class action representation for 5,000+ victims of United Law Group's illegal loan modification services, with $37.7 million judgment entered and $286,000 recovered by the bankruptcy court for distribution to class members.

8Explore Talent Class Action Settlement
CategoryClass Action Litigation
Description

Class action settlement representation for California residents who signed up for Explore Talent talent listing service between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2013.

9Events & Adventures Class Action
CategoryClass Action Litigation
Description

Class action representation for individuals regarding illegal recording of interviews by Events & Adventures, resulting in a $1,000,000 insurance coverage judgment benefiting approximately 229 class members at about $2,830 each.

Scale indicator5 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large national plaintiff-side class action firm with active consumer protection practice covering payday lending, credit reporting, and data breach litigation. Operates broadly across many consumer harm categories at much greater scale than Lakeshore, frequently appointed lead counsel in overlapping class actions.

TypeDirect peer
Description

California-based plaintiff firm pursuing consumer protection and class action litigation including credit reporting, false advertising, and data privacy matters. Comparable in practice mix to Lakeshore and competing for similar consumer class actions.

TypeOthers
Description

Los Angeles-based public interest law firm providing free legal services on consumer issues including credit reporting, debt collection, and tenant rights. Operates in adjacent consumer protection space in California but as a legal services nonprofit rather than a contingency plaintiff practice.

TypeOthers
Description

Largest pro bono public interest law firm in the United States, headquartered in Los Angeles. Provides consumer protection and civil rights representation to vulnerable populations in California, adjacent to Lakeshore's mission of representing consumer victims of corporate wrongdoing but on a nonprofit/pro bono basis.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Philadelphia-based complex litigation and class action firm with consumer protection, credit reporting, and antitrust practices. Operates nationally across consumer harm categories that overlap with Lakeshore's docket.

TypeDirect peer
Description

California-based class action and consumer protection firm with overlapping plaintiff-side work in credit reporting, consumer fraud, and unfair business practices. Significantly larger than Lakeshore but pursues the same class action theories and represents consumers against the same defendant categories (e.g., credit bureaus, payday lenders).

7Scott Glovsky Law Firm
TypeDirect peer
Description

California consumer protection attorney handling individual and class action claims involving insurance bad faith, credit reporting errors, and unfair business practices. Closely matches Lakeshore's solo/small-firm model and California consumer-victim focus.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

National class action and public interest litigation firm with active consumer protection practice areas including credit reporting, predatory lending, and privacy. Pursues similar class action theories as Lakeshore but at significantly greater scale and geographic reach.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large securities and consumer class action firm with substantial consumer fraud, antitrust, and false advertising practice. Frequently serves as lead counsel in major consumer class actions, competing with Lakeshore for lead plaintiff appointments in California-based matters.

TypeDirect peer
Description

California consumer protection organization providing legal representation against corporate misconduct in areas such as credit reporting, debt collection, and predatory lending. Highly comparable to Lakeshore's mission and consumer-victim target segment, with a similarly California-centric footprint.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat2 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers10 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile1 record

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Lakeshore Law Center

Consumer Legal Serviceslakeshorelaw.org

Lakeshore Law Center is a Yorba Linda, California consumer protection and class action law firm founded in 1992 by Jeffrey N. Wilens, operating as a solo practice representing individual consumers against large corporations in credit reporting, identity theft, payday lending, and tenant rights matters on a contingency fee basis.

What Lakeshore Law Center does

Lakeshore Law Center is a consumer protection and class action law firm founded in 1992 by Jeffrey N. Wilens and based in Yorba Linda, California. The firm operates as a solo practice, with Wilens personally evaluating and accepting cases across consumer credit reporting, identity theft, payday loan arbitration, illegal employment screening, tenant rights, and racketeering claims against large corporations. Core offerings include Identity Theft Recovery Services (up to $30,000 statutory damages), Payday Loan Arbitration Services (up to triple recovery against unlicensed lenders), Credit Report Dispute Services ($5,000+ statutory damages), Credit Card and Medical Debt Elimination, and Employment Screening Report Litigation ($10,000 statutory damages per claimant). The firm also handles specific class action matters including United Law Group ($37.7 million judgment), Money Mutual, Nordstrom, Explore Talent, Events & Adventures, and a portfolio of tenant rights cases against extended-stay hotels.

The business model is overwhelmingly contingency-fee based, with no upfront fees charged to consumer-plaintiffs; attorney fees are recovered as a percentage of settlement or judgment proceeds, supplemented by statutory fee shifting under California consumer protection statutes. For arbitration matters, the firm bills at a $750/hour lodestar rate. Go-to-market is sales-led but without a formal sales team: client acquisition relies on organic search, legal directory listings (Martindale.com, Lawyers.com), client referrals, LinkedIn testimonials, and published case results. The firm has no technology platform, no API, no app, and no AI/ML components; service delivery is entirely manual legal work product. Notable disclosed case results include the $37.7 million United Law Group judgment (with $286,000 distributed to 5,000+ class members), a $1 million insurance coverage judgment in the Events & Adventures class action, and multiple published appellate precedents. The firm is privately held by its founder with no outside investment or parent company.

Lakeshore Law Center firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Lakeshore Law Center
Legal name
Lakeshore Law Center
Website
https://lakeshorelaw.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
1992
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Lakeshore Law Center is a Yorba Linda, California consumer protection and class action law firm founded in 1992 by Jeffrey N. Wilens, operating as a solo practice representing individual consumers against large corporations in credit reporting, identity theft, payday lending, and tenant rights matters on a contingency fee basis.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Where Lakeshore Law Center is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Yorba Linda
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Lakeshore Law Center business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Marketing or Sales, Operations, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Contingency Fee Legal Services: The firm typically represents consumers on a contingency fee basis, where clients pay little or no upfront fees. If successful, clients receive compensation and the firm receives a percentage of recovery. Attorney's fees and costs are often recoverable from defendants under consumer protection laws.
  2. Hourly Rate / Lodestar Fees: For certain matters, the firm charges hourly fees. The arbitration retainer agreement mentions $750 per hour lodestar rate. Additional fees may be negotiated separately with clients for specific services.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
Outcome Based/ PerformancePay-as-you-goContingency Fee Representation
OtherPay-as-you-goArbitration Retainer - Lodestar Billing

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Lakeshore Law Center product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Lakeshore Law Center is a solo consumer protection law practice that represents individual consumers against corporations in class action lawsuits and individual arbitration proceedings. The firm focuses on cases involving fraud, false advertising, illegal payday lending, credit reporting errors, identity theft, illegal employment screening reports, and tenant rights violations, primarily serving California residents on a contingency fee basis.

Product overview

Lakeshore Law Center is a consumer rights and class action law practice founded in 1992 by Attorney Jeffrey N. Wilens. The firm operates as a single-attorney practice offering multiple interconnected legal service modules rather than a unified software platform. The core offering is Consumer Rights Legal Services for fighting fraud, false advertising, and corporate abuse, supported by specialized service modules including Identity Theft Recovery Services, Payday Loan Arbitration Services, Credit Report Dispute Services, Credit Card Debt Elimination, Employment Screening Report Legal Services, and various class action case types (Money Mutual, Nordstrom, Evergreen Royalle, ISTA, Garden Grove Inn, Norwalk Inn, California Suites Hotel, and others). The firm also provides Published Case Law Services leveraging extensive appellate experience. Services are offered primarily to California residents through contingency fee arrangements.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Consumer Rights Legal Services Core legal representation for individual consumers against corporations for fraud, false advertising, racketeering, and abuse, including class action litigation and individual arbitration. Services are offered primarily to California residents on a contingency fee basis with free initial case evaluations.
  • Identity Theft Recovery Services Legal services for California residents to recover up to $30,000 in statutory damages and remove fraudulent charges from credit reports resulting from identity theft, including police report assistance, creditor notification, and lawsuit filing.
  • Payday Loan Arbitration Services Arbitration representation for victims of illegal payday and installment loans, including Cash Yes, Cash Jar, OneClickCash, Argon Credit, Rare Moon Media-backed lenders, and MoneyMutual.com referrals. Targets recovery of up to 3 times payments made to unlicensed lenders.
  • Credit Report Dispute Services Legal services to remove inaccurate information from credit reports and pursue statutory damages of $5,000 or more for California residents, including class action representation such as the Nordstrom credit reporting case affecting approximately 3,200 consumers.
  • Credit Card Debt Elimination Program to permanently remove credit card and medical debt from credit reports for California residents, offered with a money-back guarantee.
  • Employment Screening Report Legal Services Legal representation for California residents who received illegal criminal background reports provided to employers between 2002-2009, potentially entitling claimants to $10,000 in statutory damages per violation.
  • United Law Group Settlement Representation Class action representation for 5,000+ victims of United Law Group's illegal loan modification services, with $37.7 million judgment entered and $286,000 recovered by the bankruptcy court for distribution to class members.
  • Explore Talent Class Action Settlement Class action settlement representation for California residents who signed up for Explore Talent talent listing service between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2013.
  • Events & Adventures Class Action Class action representation for individuals regarding illegal recording of interviews by Events & Adventures, resulting in a $1,000,000 insurance coverage judgment benefiting approximately 229 class members at about $2,830 each.

Quantifiable outcome

  • $37.7 million judgment against United Law Group
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use Lakeshore Law Center

Customer profile

Named customers10 records

Segments1 record

Ideal customer profiles1 record

Lakeshore Law Center technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Lakeshore Law Center partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Scale indicators5 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Lakeshore Law Center competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Broad incumbents

  • Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP: Large national plaintiff-side class action firm with active consumer protection practice covering payday lending, credit reporting, and data breach litigation. Operates broadly across many consumer harm categories at much greater scale than Lakeshore, frequently appointed lead counsel in overlapping class actions.
  • Berger Montague PC: Philadelphia-based complex litigation and class action firm with consumer protection, credit reporting, and antitrust practices. Operates nationally across consumer harm categories that overlap with Lakeshore's docket.
  • Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC: National class action and public interest litigation firm with active consumer protection practice areas including credit reporting, predatory lending, and privacy. Pursues similar class action theories as Lakeshore but at significantly greater scale and geographic reach.
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP: Large securities and consumer class action firm with substantial consumer fraud, antitrust, and false advertising practice. Frequently serves as lead counsel in major consumer class actions, competing with Lakeshore for lead plaintiff appointments in California-based matters.

Direct peers

  • Gibbs Law Group LLP: California-based plaintiff firm pursuing consumer protection and class action litigation including credit reporting, false advertising, and data privacy matters. Comparable in practice mix to Lakeshore and competing for similar consumer class actions.
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP: California-based class action and consumer protection firm with overlapping plaintiff-side work in credit reporting, consumer fraud, and unfair business practices. Significantly larger than Lakeshore but pursues the same class action theories and represents consumers against the same defendant categories (e.g., credit bureaus, payday lenders).
  • Scott Glovsky Law Firm: California consumer protection attorney handling individual and class action claims involving insurance bad faith, credit reporting errors, and unfair business practices. Closely matches Lakeshore's solo/small-firm model and California consumer-victim focus.
  • Consumer Action Law Center: California consumer protection organization providing legal representation against corporate misconduct in areas such as credit reporting, debt collection, and predatory lending. Highly comparable to Lakeshore's mission and consumer-victim target segment, with a similarly California-centric footprint.

Others

  • Bet Tzedek Legal Services: Los Angeles-based public interest law firm providing free legal services on consumer issues including credit reporting, debt collection, and tenant rights. Operates in adjacent consumer protection space in California but as a legal services nonprofit rather than a contingency plaintiff practice.
  • Public Counsel: Largest pro bono public interest law firm in the United States, headquartered in Los Angeles. Provides consumer protection and civil rights representation to vulnerable populations in California, adjacent to Lakeshore's mission of representing consumer victims of corporate wrongdoing but on a nonprofit/pro bono basis.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat2 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Lakeshore Law Center social profiles

Digital presence

Lakeshore Law Center financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Lakeshore Law Center leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Lakeshore Law Center funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Lakeshore Law Center M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Lakeshore Law Center

What does Lakeshore Law Center do?

Lakeshore Law Center is a solo consumer protection law practice that represents individual consumers against corporations in class action lawsuits and individual arbitration proceedings. The firm focuses on cases involving fraud, false advertising, illegal payday lending, credit reporting errors, identity theft, illegal employment screening reports, and tenant rights violations, primarily serving California residents on a contingency fee basis.

Is Lakeshore Law Center a public or private company?

Lakeshore Law Center is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.

When was Lakeshore Law Center founded?

Lakeshore Law Center was founded in 1992. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Lakeshore Law Center based?

Lakeshore Law Center is headquartered in Yorba Linda, United States, in the North America region.

How does Lakeshore Law Center make money?

Two revenue lines are on record. Contingency Fee Legal Services are the primary driver. The others are hourly Rate / Lodestar Fees.

Who are Lakeshore Law Center's main competitors?

Broad incumbents on record are Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Berger Montague PC, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP. Direct peers are Gibbs Law Group LLP, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Scott Glovsky Law Firm and Consumer Action Law Center. Others are Bet Tzedek Legal Services and Public Counsel.

Does Lakeshore Law Center have an API?

No public API is recorded for Lakeshore Law Center.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales