Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

the office of film and literature classification

Full company profile

uuid02mfkqp

Namestring
the office of film and literature classification
Legal namestring
Office of Film and Literature Classification
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1993
Descriptiontext

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is an independent Crown entity of the New Zealand Government, established in 1993 under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. It performs statutory content classification for films, video games, publications, and other media distributed in or complained about in New Zealand, assigning age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13, R15, R16, R18, RP) and content warnings. The office serves four primary stakeholder groups: parents and whānau seeking guidance on age-appropriate content; film and video distributors requiring classification before release; enforcement agencies (NZ Police, Customs, Department of Internal Affairs, Courts) requiring forensic classification for proceedings; and commercial streaming providers that must display NZ classifications and pay annual levies.

The office's core products include the Content Classification and Ratings Service (the statutory decision-making function), the "Find a Rating" searchable public database, the NZ Register of Classification Decisions, a Forensic Classification Submission System for enforcement officials, a Self-Rating System for major commercial streaming providers (Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Neon, Crunchyroll, YouTube Movies & TV), and research publications supported by a Youth Advisory Panel. Technology is not the primary value driver; the office conducts human-led classification analysis against legal criteria. New Zealand is also one of 41 countries using the PEGI (Pan-European Game Information) system for video game classification.

Revenue is derived from three streams: government appropriations as a Crown entity, annual levies from Schedule 4 commercial streaming providers, and pay-as-you-go classification submission fees from commercial applicants. The office operates as a single-geography entity headquartered in Wellington, distributing its outputs through its website, the Film and Video Labelling Body (FVLB) for physical media labels, and mandated classification displays on regulated streaming platforms.

Short descriptiontext

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is a New Zealand independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, and publications, assigning statutory age ratings and content warnings to serve parents, distributors, streaming providers, and enforcement agencies.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWellington, New Zealand
HQ citystring
Wellington
HQ countrystring
New Zealand
HQ regionstring
Oceania
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
content classification services, media ratings, age rating system, film classification, publication classification
Industry2 codes
PRIMARYMPAFAKAO
Accessibility & Compliance Services (A11y Testing, Ratings, Privacy/Regulatory)
Media, Entertainment & Sports/Gaming & Interactive Entertainment (Video Games, Esports)/Gaming Operations & Services (QA, Localization, LiveOps, Customer Support)
SECONDARYMPAFABAL
Publishing Services Providers (Ratings, Compliance, Certification, Release Ops)
NAICS code2 codes
  • Public Administration92
  • Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities9221
SIC code2 codes
  • Services-Allied To Motion Picture Distribution7829
  • Miscellaneous Publishing2741
Product category
Content Classification and Media Regulation
Social media profiles1 record
GTM motion3 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model3 records
1Government Funding
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

As an independent Crown entity, the Classification Office is funded through government appropriations. Their activities are supported by public funds.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
2Annual Levy from Streaming Providers
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Major commercial streaming providers included on Schedule 4 of the Classification Act must pay an annual levy to fund the Classification Office's activities related to commercial video on-demand content oversight. This includes Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Disney+, Netflix, Neon, Crunchyroll, and YouTube Movies & TV.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
3Classification Submission Fees
TypeOne Time License
Description

Fees are charged for classification submissions from commercial/professional applicants (owners, makers, or distributors of publications). Public complainants seeking leave to submit may have reduced fees available. Enforcement officials from Police, Customs, and DIA have automatic right of submission with no fee.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
Marketing channels8 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components6 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Marketing or Sales, Others
Pricing details4 tiers
1Public/Complainant Submissions
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Special reduced fees available for people who do not have a commercial or professional interest in a publication. Fee waivers may also be applied for by attaching a letter explaining the circumstances.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
2Commercial/Professional Submissions
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Standard fees apply for owners, makers, or authorised distributors of publications. Urgency fees may be requested.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
3Enforcement Official Submissions
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

No fee for submissions under section 13(1)(b) by Police, Customs, Department of Internal Affairs, or courts.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
4Streaming Provider Annual Levy
ModelSubscriptionBilling cadenceAnnual
classificationoffice.govt.nz
GTM typeB2B and B2C
B2B and B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is New Zealand's independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, publications, and other entertainment content under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. It assigns age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13, R15, R16, R18, RP) and content warnings, maintains the publicly searchable Find a Rating database and NZ Register of Classification Decisions, processes forensic classification submissions from enforcement agencies and courts, and approves self-rating systems used by major commercial streaming providers operating in New Zealand.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • 91% of NZ parents and caregivers were involved in choosing content with children in the past year
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is a New Zealand government Crown entity that provides a centralized classification and ratings service for films, video games, and publications. The core product is the Content Classification and Ratings Service, which analyzes entertainment media against legal criteria under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 and assigns age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13-R18) with content warnings. This is supported by the Find a Rating searchable database, the NZ Register of Classification Decisions, and a Forensic Classification Submission System for enforcement officials. Major streaming providers can use the Self-Rating System with annual oversight. The organization also produces Research and Resources and operates a Youth Advisory Panel for stakeholder engagement.

Product and service1 record
1Content Classification and Ratings Service
Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership6 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

FVLB is a statutory body that determines appropriate age ratings (G, PG, M) for films and video games. They submit restricted content to the Classification Office and issue labels for physical media based on Classification Office decisions. The two bodies work closely together in the classification system.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

The Department investigates complaints, enforces compliance with labelling requirements, seizes objectionable material, and monitors websites. They are the primary enforcement authority for the Classification Act and support the Classification Office's work.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Police are Inspectors of Publications with OCEANZ team coordinating international operations into online child exploitation networks. Police submit publications for forensic classification and carry out prosecutions.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Customs Officers seize objectionable content to prevent it entering New Zealand. They submit publications for classification and carry out enforcement operations.

5Major Streaming Providers (Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Neon, Crunchyroll, YouTube Movies & TV)
Strategic tierCoreTypeGTM or Marketing Partner
Description

Commercial streaming providers on Schedule 4 of the Classification Act must display NZ classifications, use approved self-rating systems, and pay an annual levy. They work with the Classification Office on self-rating approvals and compliance.

classificationoffice.govt.nz
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Independent board that reviews classification decisions when parties apply for review. Provides an appeals mechanism for those unhappy with Classification Office decisions.

Recent move5 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight4 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Australian Classification Board
TypeDirect peer
Description

Australia's national content classification body, operating under a similar statutory framework to the NZ Classification Office. Directly comparable in scope, mandate, and regulatory function across films, games, and publications in a closely related jurisdiction.

TypeDirect peer
Description

UK's statutory film and video classification body that issues age ratings for cinema releases, home video, and streaming content. Directly comparable in core mandate and consumer-facing rating function, though operating as an independent non-governmental body rather than a Crown entity.

TypeDirect peer
Description

North American ratings body for video games and apps, assigning age and content descriptors similar to NZ's classification labels. Directly comparable in game-rating function and consumer-facing rating lookup tools, though operating as an industry self-regulatory body.

TypeDirect peer
Description

European video game rating system used across 41 countries including New Zealand. Directly comparable as a game rating authority, with NZ formally integrated into the PEGI network for video game classification.

TypeEmerging player
Description

US-based nonprofit that provides age-appropriate content ratings and reviews for parents across films, TV, games, books, and apps. Comparable in target audience (parents making media decisions for children) and ratings database approach, though operates as an advisory nonprofit rather than a statutory regulator.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

US-based industry body that administers the MPAA film rating system (G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17). Comparable as a film rating authority, though operates as an industry body rather than a government regulator and focuses specifically on theatrical film releases.

TypeRegional player
Description

Singapore's converged regulator for media, telecoms, and content classification. Comparable in content classification function across films, games, and publications, though with a broader communications regulatory remit and serving a different Asian jurisdiction.

8Film Classification Board (Ontario Film Authority, Canada)
TypeRegional player
Description

Canadian provincial film classification authority serving Ontario. Comparable as a sub-national content classification body, though operating within Canada's broader federal/provincial regulatory split and serving a different North American market.

TypeRegional player
Description

Germany's voluntary film self-regulation body that issues age ratings for cinema, home video, and streaming content. Comparable in age-rating function and consumer-facing rating labels, though operates as an industry self-regulatory body in a different European jurisdiction.

TypeRegional player
Description

South Korea's government-administered content rating board for films, games, and other media. Comparable in statutory mandate and game/film rating function, though serving the Korean market with a different cultural and regulatory context.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers9 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

the office of film and literature classification

Content Classification and Media Regulationclassificationoffice.govt.nz

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is a New Zealand independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, and publications, assigning statutory age ratings and content warnings to serve parents, distributors, streaming providers, and enforcement agencies.

What the office of film and literature classification does

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is an independent Crown entity of the New Zealand Government, established in 1993 under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. It performs statutory content classification for films, video games, publications, and other media distributed in or complained about in New Zealand, assigning age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13, R15, R16, R18, RP) and content warnings. The office serves four primary stakeholder groups: parents and whānau seeking guidance on age-appropriate content; film and video distributors requiring classification before release; enforcement agencies (NZ Police, Customs, Department of Internal Affairs, Courts) requiring forensic classification for proceedings; and commercial streaming providers that must display NZ classifications and pay annual levies.

The office's core products include the Content Classification and Ratings Service (the statutory decision-making function), the "Find a Rating" searchable public database, the NZ Register of Classification Decisions, a Forensic Classification Submission System for enforcement officials, a Self-Rating System for major commercial streaming providers (Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Neon, Crunchyroll, YouTube Movies & TV), and research publications supported by a Youth Advisory Panel. Technology is not the primary value driver; the office conducts human-led classification analysis against legal criteria. New Zealand is also one of 41 countries using the PEGI (Pan-European Game Information) system for video game classification.

Revenue is derived from three streams: government appropriations as a Crown entity, annual levies from Schedule 4 commercial streaming providers, and pay-as-you-go classification submission fees from commercial applicants. The office operates as a single-geography entity headquartered in Wellington, distributing its outputs through its website, the Film and Video Labelling Body (FVLB) for physical media labels, and mandated classification displays on regulated streaming platforms.

the office of film and literature classification firmographics

Firmographics
Name
the office of film and literature classification
Legal name
Office of Film and Literature Classification
Website
https://classificationoffice.govt.nz
Company type
Private
Founded year
1993
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is a New Zealand independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, and publications, assigning statutory age ratings and content warnings to serve parents, distributors, streaming providers, and enforcement agencies.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

the office of film and literature classification industry classification

Industry
Product category
Content Classification and Media Regulation
NAICS
Public Administration (92), Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities (9221)
SIC
Services-Allied To Motion Picture Distribution (7829), Miscellaneous Publishing (2741)
akta.pro industry
PRIMARYMPAFAKAO
Accessibility & Compliance Services (A11y Testing, Ratings, Privacy/Regulatory)
Media, Entertainment & Sports/Gaming & Interactive Entertainment (Video Games, Esports)/Gaming Operations & Services (QA, Localization, LiveOps, Customer Support)
SECONDARYMPAFABAL
Publishing Services Providers (Ratings, Compliance, Certification, Release Ops)

Keywords

  • Content classification services
  • Media ratings
  • Age rating system
  • Film classification
  • Publication classification

Where the office of film and literature classification is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Wellington
HQ country
New Zealand
HQ region
Oceania

Offices1 record

Markets served

the office of film and literature classification business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B and B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure, Marketing or Sales, Others

Revenue model

  1. Government Funding: As an independent Crown entity, the Classification Office is funded through government appropriations. Their activities are supported by public funds.
  2. Annual Levy from Streaming Providers: Major commercial streaming providers included on Schedule 4 of the Classification Act must pay an annual levy to fund the Classification Office's activities related to commercial video on-demand content oversight. This includes Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Disney+, Netflix, Neon, Crunchyroll, and YouTube Movies & TV.
  3. Classification Submission Fees: Fees are charged for classification submissions from commercial/professional applicants (owners, makers, or distributors of publications). Public complainants seeking leave to submit may have reduced fees available. Enforcement officials from Police, Customs, and DIA have automatic right of submission with no fee.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherPay-as-you-goPublic/Complainant Submissions
OtherPay-as-you-goCommercial/Professional Submissions
OtherPay-as-you-goEnforcement Official Submissions
SubscriptionAnnualStreaming Provider Annual Levy

Go-to-market motion3 records

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels8 records

the office of film and literature classification product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is New Zealand's independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, publications, and other entertainment content under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. It assigns age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13, R15, R16, R18, RP) and content warnings, maintains the publicly searchable Find a Rating database and NZ Register of Classification Decisions, processes forensic classification submissions from enforcement agencies and courts, and approves self-rating systems used by major commercial streaming providers operating in New Zealand.

Product overview

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is a New Zealand government Crown entity that provides a centralized classification and ratings service for films, video games, and publications. The core product is the Content Classification and Ratings Service, which analyzes entertainment media against legal criteria under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 and assigns age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13-R18) with content warnings. This is supported by the Find a Rating searchable database, the NZ Register of Classification Decisions, and a Forensic Classification Submission System for enforcement officials. Major streaming providers can use the Self-Rating System with annual oversight. The organization also produces Research and Resources and operates a Youth Advisory Panel for stakeholder engagement.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Content Classification and Ratings Service

Quantifiable outcome

  • 91% of NZ parents and caregivers were involved in choosing content with children in the past year
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use the office of film and literature classification

Customer profile

Named customers9 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

the office of film and literature classification technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

the office of film and literature classification partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Six partnerships are on record, tiered core.

  • Film and Video Labelling Body (FVLB)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerFVLB is a statutory body that determines appropriate age ratings (G, PG, M) for films and video games. They submit restricted content to the Classification Office and issue labels for physical media based on Classification Office decisions. The two bodies work closely together in the classification system.
  • Department of Internal AffairscoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerThe Department investigates complaints, enforces compliance with labelling requirements, seizes objectionable material, and monitors websites. They are the primary enforcement authority for the Classification Act and support the Classification Office's work.
  • New Zealand PolicecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPolice are Inspectors of Publications with OCEANZ team coordinating international operations into online child exploitation networks. Police submit publications for forensic classification and carry out prosecutions.
  • New Zealand Customs ServicecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCustoms Officers seize objectionable content to prevent it entering New Zealand. They submit publications for classification and carry out enforcement operations.
  • Major Streaming Providers (Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Neon, Crunchyroll, YouTube Movies & TV)coreGTM or Marketing PartnerCommercial streaming providers on Schedule 4 of the Classification Act must display NZ classifications, use approved self-rating systems, and pay an annual levy. They work with the Classification Office on self-rating approvals and compliance.
  • Classification Review BoardcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerIndependent board that reviews classification decisions when parties apply for review. Provides an appeals mechanism for those unhappy with Classification Office decisions.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves5 records

Expansion highlights4 records

the office of film and literature classification competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Australian Classification Board: Australia's national content classification body, operating under a similar statutory framework to the NZ Classification Office. Directly comparable in scope, mandate, and regulatory function across films, games, and publications in a closely related jurisdiction.
  • British Board of Film Classification (BBFC): UK's statutory film and video classification body that issues age ratings for cinema releases, home video, and streaming content. Directly comparable in core mandate and consumer-facing rating function, though operating as an independent non-governmental body rather than a Crown entity.
  • Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB): North American ratings body for video games and apps, assigning age and content descriptors similar to NZ's classification labels. Directly comparable in game-rating function and consumer-facing rating lookup tools, though operating as an industry self-regulatory body.
  • Pan European Game Information (PEGI): European video game rating system used across 41 countries including New Zealand. Directly comparable as a game rating authority, with NZ formally integrated into the PEGI network for video game classification.

Emerging players

  • Common Sense Media: US-based nonprofit that provides age-appropriate content ratings and reviews for parents across films, TV, games, books, and apps. Comparable in target audience (parents making media decisions for children) and ratings database approach, though operates as an advisory nonprofit rather than a statutory regulator.

Broad incumbents

  • Motion Picture Association (MPA): US-based industry body that administers the MPAA film rating system (G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17). Comparable as a film rating authority, though operates as an industry body rather than a government regulator and focuses specifically on theatrical film releases.

Regional players

  • Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) - Singapore: Singapore's converged regulator for media, telecoms, and content classification. Comparable in content classification function across films, games, and publications, though with a broader communications regulatory remit and serving a different Asian jurisdiction.
  • Film Classification Board (Ontario Film Authority, Canada): Canadian provincial film classification authority serving Ontario. Comparable as a sub-national content classification body, though operating within Canada's broader federal/provincial regulatory split and serving a different North American market.
  • Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle der Filmwirtschaft (FSK): Germany's voluntary film self-regulation body that issues age ratings for cinema, home video, and streaming content. Comparable in age-rating function and consumer-facing rating labels, though operates as an industry self-regulatory body in a different European jurisdiction.
  • Korea Media Rating Board (KMRB): South Korea's government-administered content rating board for films, games, and other media. Comparable in statutory mandate and game/film rating function, though serving the Korean market with a different cultural and regulatory context.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

the office of film and literature classification social profiles

Digital presence

the office of film and literature classification financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

the office of film and literature classification leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

the office of film and literature classification funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

the office of film and literature classification M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about the office of film and literature classification

What does the office of film and literature classification do?

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (Te Mana Whakaatu) is New Zealand's independent Crown entity that classifies films, video games, publications, and other entertainment content under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. It assigns age-based ratings (G, PG, M, R13, R15, R16, R18, RP) and content warnings, maintains the publicly searchable Find a Rating database and NZ Register of Classification Decisions, processes forensic classification submissions from enforcement agencies and courts, and approves self-rating systems used by major commercial streaming providers operating in New Zealand.

Is the office of film and literature classification a public or private company?

the office of film and literature classification is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was the office of film and literature classification founded?

the office of film and literature classification was founded in 1993. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is the office of film and literature classification based?

the office of film and literature classification is headquartered in Wellington, New Zealand, in the Oceania region.

How does the office of film and literature classification make money?

Three revenue lines are on record. Government Funding is the primary driver. The others are annual Levy from Streaming Providers and classification Submission Fees.

Who are the office of film and literature classification's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Australian Classification Board, British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) and Pan European Game Information (PEGI). Common Sense Media is listed as an emerging player. Motion Picture Association (MPA) is listed as a broad incumbent. Regional players are Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) - Singapore, Film Classification Board (Ontario Film Authority, Canada), Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle der Filmwirtschaft (FSK) and Korea Media Rating Board (KMRB).

Does the office of film and literature classification have an API?

No public API is recorded for the office of film and literature classification.

What industry is the office of film and literature classification in?

the office of film and literature classification's product category is Content Classification and Media Regulation. Its primary akta.pro industry code is MPAFAKAO, Accessibility & Compliance Services (A11y Testing, Ratings, Privacy/Regulatory), with a secondary code of MPAFABAL, Publishing Services Providers (Ratings, Compliance, Certification, Release Ops). Its NAICS code is 92 and its SIC code is 7829.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales