Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Center for Open Science

Full company profile

uuid0003zza

Namestring
Center for Open Science
Legal namestring
Center for Open Science
Websiteurl
cos.io
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2013
Descriptiontext

The Center for Open Science (COS) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit technology and culture change organization founded in 2013 and headquartered in Washington, DC. Its mission is to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility in scientific research. COS serves academic researchers, scientific journals and publishers, research institutions and universities, and funding agencies across all scientific disciplines. The organization operates the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free, open-source web application used by over 500,000 researchers for project management, collaboration, data and materials sharing, preprint hosting, and study preregistration. Adjacent platform features include OSF Registries (time-stamped research registrations), OSF Collections (curated research outputs), and OSF Preprints. COS also develops and maintains the TOP (Transparency and Openness Promotion) Guidelines, a policy framework adopted by over 5,000 journals and organizations, and promotes the Registered Reports publishing format.

Beyond tools, COS conducts large-scale metascience research to empirically assess research credibility. Key initiatives include the SCORE (Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence) program, which evaluated 3,900 research claims across 865 collaborators and produced algorithms to predict replicability; the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, an 8-year systematic investigation that replicated 193 experiments from 53 high-impact cancer biology papers; the SMART project extending SCORE via machine and human assessments; and the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million, five-year longitudinal partnership with Baylor University, Harvard, and Gallup across 22 countries.

COS operates on a nonprofit funding model with no commercial pricing. All core tools (OSF, preregistration, Registered Reports) are provided free to users. Revenue is derived primarily from grants from government and philanthropic sources (DARPA, Arnold Ventures, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Templeton World Charity Foundation, NIH, NSF, Sloan, Hewlett) and individual donations. Documented grant inflows total approximately $28M+ across 2013-2023, supporting a staff of 11-50 employees. The organization has earned SOC 2 Type 2 accreditation, Charity Navigator's top rating, and Candid Platinum Transparency recognition.

Short descriptiontext

The Center for Open Science is a nonprofit that operates the free Open Science Framework for research management, develops the TOP Guidelines policy framework adopted by 5,000+ journals, and conducts metascience research on scientific credibility and reproducibility for academic researchers, publishers, institutions, and funders globally.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersCharlottesville, United States
HQ citystring
Charlottesville
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
open science platform, research reproducibility tools, scholarly communication software, scientific publishing infrastructure, metascience research services
Industry4 codes
1OER Authoring, Remixing & Publishing Tools/Platforms
CodeEDAGAJAMPrimaryYes
2OER Quality Review, Alignment & Certification (rubrics/standards)
CodeEDAGAJANPrimaryNo
3Knowledge Management & Scientific Collaboration / Literature Intelligence
CodeHLAGAJANPrimaryNo
4Open Access Scholarly Journals & Monographs
CodeEDAGAFAJPrimaryNo
NAICS code3 codes
  • Scientific Research and Development Services5417
  • Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities54172
  • Computer Systems Design and Related Services54151
SIC code2 codes
  • Services-Prepackaged Software7372
  • Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research8731
Product category
Open Science Research Collaboration Platform
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model2 records
1Government and Foundation Grants
TypeSubscription Recurring
Description

Primary funding source from grants including DARPA funding for SCORE (nearly $8 million), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for SMART project, Arnold Ventures for Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology (~$2 million), and Templeton World Charity Foundation for consciousness research grants ($1.125M total).

nature.com
2Donations
TypeAffiliate Referral
Description

The organization accepts tax-deductible donations from individual supporters. Donations page is prominently featured on the website as a way to support the open science movement.

cos.io
Marketing channels8 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components6 values
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeSoftware
Software
Brand1 of 5 records shown
1Open Science Framework (OSF)
Description

Web application for managing and sharing research materials, data, and code

cos.io
+4 more records
Core offering1 text field

The Center for Open Science operates the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free, open-source web application that gives researchers tools for project management, collaboration, data/materials/code sharing, preprint hosting, and study preregistration. Around the OSF, COS provides policy frameworks (TOP Guidelines), publishing innovations (Registered Reports), transparency services (Preregistration, OSF Registries, OSF Collections, OSF Preprints), and runs large-scale metascience research programs such as SCORE, Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, SMART, and the Global Flourishing Study to produce empirical evidence on research credibility.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 5 values shown
  • Journals with TOP data sharing policies had higher reproducibility rates
+4 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Center for Open Science offers a comprehensive ecosystem of products and initiatives focused on increasing openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research. At its core is the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free web application for research project management, collaboration, and open sharing. Surrounding the OSF are policy frameworks (TOP Guidelines), publishing innovations (Registered Reports), and transparency services (Preregistration, OSF Collections, OSF Registries, OSF Preprints). COS also conducts large-scale metascience research through programs like SCORE, Reproducibility Projects (Cancer Biology and Psychology), and the Global Flourishing Study. Emerging AI-driven initiatives include the Predicting Replicability Challenge and SMART Prototyping for automated credibility assessment.

Scale indicator8 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership9 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2022-01-01
Description

University of Melbourne researchers (RepliCATS team) partner with COS on the SMART project, conducting structured human expert elicitation assessments of research credibility following the IDEA protocol.

Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or IntegrationAnnounced on2022-01-01
Description

Penn State researchers serve as the AI assessment team for the SMART project, implementing and testing machine learning algorithms for predicting research replicability.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2021-12-07
Description

eLife published all outputs from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, including Registered Reports, Replication Studies, and capstone summary papers. eLife provided peer review for replication protocols before experiments were conducted and committed to publishing findings regardless of outcome.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2021-01-01
Description

Baylor University's Institute for Studies of Religion is a key partner in the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million, 5-year longitudinal research effort spanning 22 countries.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2021-01-01
Description

Harvard University's Human Flourishing Program partners with COS on the Global Flourishing Study, contributing research leadership for the $43.4 million multi-country initiative.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2021-01-01
Description

Gallup partners on the Global Flourishing Study, providing global survey expertise and data collection infrastructure across 22 countries for the 200,000+ participant study.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2020-05-05
Description

COS collaborated with Clarivate's Web of Science Group to incorporate TOP Factor scores in the Master Journal List, helping researchers identify journals with transparent and open practices.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2013-01-01
Description

Science Exchange, the world's first online R&D marketplace, partnered with COS on the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology. Science Exchange sourced laboratories through its marketplace to conduct replication experiments. This collaboration enabled systematic replication studies across high-impact cancer biology papers.

9Reagent Donors (ATCC, ABM, BioLegend, CST, Charles River, Corning, etc.)
Strategic tierMinorTypeOthersAnnounced on2013-01-01
Description

Multiple life science reagent companies donated materials for the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, including ATCC, Applied Biological Materials, BioLegend, Cell Signaling Technology, Charles River Laboratories, Corning, DDC Medical, Envigo, LI-COR Biosciences, Millipore Sigma, Mirus Bio, Novus Biologicals, and System Biosciences.

cos.io
Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Dryad
TypeDirect peer
Description

Curated open data repository partnered with journals to publish underlying datasets. Directly comparable to OSF's data-sharing and OSF Collections functions for archiving research outputs.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Researcher social/collaboration platform with preprint and data-sharing affordances. Targets the same academic-researcher persona as OSF Preprints and OSF collaboration tools.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open-access journal that partnered with COS to publish all Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology outputs. Both organizations pursue open science and operate Registered Reports, making eLife the closest publishing-stage peer to COS.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open-access publisher with TOP Guidelines-aligned policies across its journal portfolio. PLOS operates in the same open-science scholarly publishing ecosystem that COS enables through tools and policy frameworks.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Preprint and preprint-review platform used by researchers alongside OSF Preprints. Direct functional overlap in accelerating scholarly communication and offers a researcher workflow adjacent to OSF.

TypeDirect peer
Description

General-purpose research data, code, and preprint repository with adoption among institutions and funders. Overlaps directly with OSF's data/materials sharing and preprint hosting use cases.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open-source research data repository software used widely by institutions. Closely mirrors OSF's project-management + data-archive combination and serves overlapping institutional customers.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Open annotation layer for the scholarly web. Adjacent and enabling — partially overlapping with COS's open-peer-review and collaborative research goals while specializing in annotation rather than lifecycle management.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Open peer-review publishing platform using registered-report-style workflows. Operates in the same post-publication and open-review space as COS Registered Reports.

10Zenodo
TypeDirect peer
Description

CERN-hosted open repository for research outputs across disciplines. Competes for the same researcher workflow that OSF serves: file storage, DOI minting, and version-controlled sharing of data/code/preprints.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers5 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment5 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
Yes
API detail
Has APIbool
Yes

Docs URL, Description

AI capability2 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature4 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles3 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
Compliance3 records

Each record includes

Name, Class, Description

Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds21 records

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors7 records

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Open Science

Open Science Research Collaboration Platformcos.io

The Center for Open Science is a nonprofit that operates the free Open Science Framework for research management, develops the TOP Guidelines policy framework adopted by 5,000+ journals, and conducts metascience research on scientific credibility and reproducibility for academic researchers, publishers, institutions, and funders globally.

What Center for Open Science does

The Center for Open Science (COS) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit technology and culture change organization founded in 2013 and headquartered in Washington, DC. Its mission is to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility in scientific research. COS serves academic researchers, scientific journals and publishers, research institutions and universities, and funding agencies across all scientific disciplines. The organization operates the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free, open-source web application used by over 500,000 researchers for project management, collaboration, data and materials sharing, preprint hosting, and study preregistration. Adjacent platform features include OSF Registries (time-stamped research registrations), OSF Collections (curated research outputs), and OSF Preprints. COS also develops and maintains the TOP (Transparency and Openness Promotion) Guidelines, a policy framework adopted by over 5,000 journals and organizations, and promotes the Registered Reports publishing format.

Beyond tools, COS conducts large-scale metascience research to empirically assess research credibility. Key initiatives include the SCORE (Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence) program, which evaluated 3,900 research claims across 865 collaborators and produced algorithms to predict replicability; the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, an 8-year systematic investigation that replicated 193 experiments from 53 high-impact cancer biology papers; the SMART project extending SCORE via machine and human assessments; and the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million, five-year longitudinal partnership with Baylor University, Harvard, and Gallup across 22 countries.

COS operates on a nonprofit funding model with no commercial pricing. All core tools (OSF, preregistration, Registered Reports) are provided free to users. Revenue is derived primarily from grants from government and philanthropic sources (DARPA, Arnold Ventures, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Templeton World Charity Foundation, NIH, NSF, Sloan, Hewlett) and individual donations. Documented grant inflows total approximately $28M+ across 2013-2023, supporting a staff of 11-50 employees. The organization has earned SOC 2 Type 2 accreditation, Charity Navigator's top rating, and Candid Platinum Transparency recognition.

Center for Open Science firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Center for Open Science
Legal name
Center for Open Science
Website
https://cos.io
Company type
Private
Founded year
2013
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
The Center for Open Science is a nonprofit that operates the free Open Science Framework for research management, develops the TOP Guidelines policy framework adopted by 5,000+ journals, and conducts metascience research on scientific credibility and reproducibility for academic researchers, publishers, institutions, and funders globally.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Center for Open Science industry classification

Industry
Product category
Open Science Research Collaboration Platform
NAICS
Scientific Research and Development Services (5417), Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities (54172), Computer Systems Design and Related Services (54151)
SIC
Services-Prepackaged Software (7372), Services-Commercial Physical & Biological Research (8731)
akta.pro primary industry
OER Authoring, Remixing & Publishing Tools/Platforms (EDAGAJAM)
akta.pro secondary industries
OER Quality Review, Alignment & Certification (rubrics/standards) (EDAGAJAN), Knowledge Management & Scientific Collaboration / Literature Intelligence (HLAGAJAN), Open Access Scholarly Journals & Monographs (EDAGAFAJ)

Keywords

  • Open science platform
  • Research reproducibility tools
  • Scholarly communication software
  • Scientific publishing infrastructure
  • Metascience research services

Where Center for Open Science is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Charlottesville
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Center for Open Science business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Software
Cost components
Personnel, Technology or R&D, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure, Others

Revenue model

  1. Government and Foundation Grants: Primary funding source from grants including DARPA funding for SCORE (nearly $8 million), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for SMART project, Arnold Ventures for Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology (~$2 million), and Templeton World Charity Foundation for consciousness research grants ($1.125M total).
  2. Donations: The organization accepts tax-deductible donations from individual supporters. Donations page is prominently featured on the website as a way to support the open science movement.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels8 records

Center for Open Science product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Center for Open Science operates the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free, open-source web application that gives researchers tools for project management, collaboration, data/materials/code sharing, preprint hosting, and study preregistration. Around the OSF, COS provides policy frameworks (TOP Guidelines), publishing innovations (Registered Reports), transparency services (Preregistration, OSF Registries, OSF Collections, OSF Preprints), and runs large-scale metascience research programs such as SCORE, Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, SMART, and the Global Flourishing Study to produce empirical evidence on research credibility.

Product overview

The Center for Open Science offers a comprehensive ecosystem of products and initiatives focused on increasing openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research. At its core is the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free web application for research project management, collaboration, and open sharing. Surrounding the OSF are policy frameworks (TOP Guidelines), publishing innovations (Registered Reports), and transparency services (Preregistration, OSF Collections, OSF Registries, OSF Preprints). COS also conducts large-scale metascience research through programs like SCORE, Reproducibility Projects (Cancer Biology and Psychology), and the Global Flourishing Study. Emerging AI-driven initiatives include the Predicting Replicability Challenge and SMART Prototyping for automated credibility assessment.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • Open Science Framework (OSF): Web application for managing and sharing research materials, data, and code
  • TOP Guidelines
  • SCORE
  • Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology
  • SMART

Quantifiable outcome

  • Journals with TOP data sharing policies had higher reproducibility rates
  • +4 more outcomes

Companies that use Center for Open Science

Customer profile

Named customers5 records

Segments5 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Center for Open Science technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed Yes

API detail

Has API
Yes
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

AI capability2 records

Feature4 records

Center for Open Science partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Nine partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • University of MelbournecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2022University of Melbourne researchers (RepliCATS team) partner with COS on the SMART project, conducting structured human expert elicitation assessments of research credibility following the IDEA protocol.
  • Pennsylvania State UniversitycoreTechnology or Integration · 1 January 2022Penn State researchers serve as the AI assessment team for the SMART project, implementing and testing machine learning algorithms for predicting research replicability.
  • eLifecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 7 December 2021eLife published all outputs from the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, including Registered Reports, Replication Studies, and capstone summary papers. eLife provided peer review for replication protocols before experiments were conducted and committed to publishing findings regardless of outcome.
  • Baylor UniversitycoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2021Baylor University's Institute for Studies of Religion is a key partner in the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million, 5-year longitudinal research effort spanning 22 countries.
  • Harvard UniversitycoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2021Harvard University's Human Flourishing Program partners with COS on the Global Flourishing Study, contributing research leadership for the $43.4 million multi-country initiative.
  • GallupcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2021Gallup partners on the Global Flourishing Study, providing global survey expertise and data collection infrastructure across 22 countries for the 200,000+ participant study.
  • Clarivate/Web of SciencecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 5 May 2020COS collaborated with Clarivate's Web of Science Group to incorporate TOP Factor scores in the Master Journal List, helping researchers identify journals with transparent and open practices.
  • Science ExchangecoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 1 January 2013Science Exchange, the world's first online R&D marketplace, partnered with COS on the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology. Science Exchange sourced laboratories through its marketplace to conduct replication experiments. This collaboration enabled systematic replication studies across high-impact cancer biology papers.
  • Reagent Donors (ATCC, ABM, BioLegend, CST, Charles River, Corning, etc.)minorOthers · 1 January 2013Multiple life science reagent companies donated materials for the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, including ATCC, Applied Biological Materials, BioLegend, Cell Signaling Technology, Charles River Laboratories, Corning, DDC Medical, Envigo, LI-COR Biosciences, Millipore Sigma, Mirus Bio, Novus Biologicals, and System Biosciences.

Scale indicators8 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Center for Open Science competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Dryad: Curated open data repository partnered with journals to publish underlying datasets. Directly comparable to OSF's data-sharing and OSF Collections functions for archiving research outputs.
  • ResearchGate: Researcher social/collaboration platform with preprint and data-sharing affordances. Targets the same academic-researcher persona as OSF Preprints and OSF collaboration tools.
  • eLife: Open-access journal that partnered with COS to publish all Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology outputs. Both organizations pursue open science and operate Registered Reports, making eLife the closest publishing-stage peer to COS.
  • PLOS: Open-access publisher with TOP Guidelines-aligned policies across its journal portfolio. PLOS operates in the same open-science scholarly publishing ecosystem that COS enables through tools and policy frameworks.
  • Research Square: Preprint and preprint-review platform used by researchers alongside OSF Preprints. Direct functional overlap in accelerating scholarly communication and offers a researcher workflow adjacent to OSF.
  • figshare: General-purpose research data, code, and preprint repository with adoption among institutions and funders. Overlaps directly with OSF's data/materials sharing and preprint hosting use cases.
  • Dataverse: Open-source research data repository software used widely by institutions. Closely mirrors OSF's project-management + data-archive combination and serves overlapping institutional customers.
  • F1000 / Taylor & Francis Open Research: Open peer-review publishing platform using registered-report-style workflows. Operates in the same post-publication and open-review space as COS Registered Reports.
  • Zenodo: CERN-hosted open repository for research outputs across disciplines. Competes for the same researcher workflow that OSF serves: file storage, DOI minting, and version-controlled sharing of data/code/preprints.

Emerging players

  • Hypothesis: Open annotation layer for the scholarly web. Adjacent and enabling — partially overlapping with COS's open-peer-review and collaborative research goals while specializing in annotation rather than lifecycle management.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Center for Open Science social profiles

Digital presence

Center for Open Science compliance and trust

Trust signal

Compliance3 records

Center for Open Science financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Center for Open Science leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles3 records

Center for Open Science funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds21 records

Investors7 records

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Open Science M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Center for Open Science

What does Center for Open Science do?

The Center for Open Science operates the Open Science Framework (OSF), a free, open-source web application that gives researchers tools for project management, collaboration, data/materials/code sharing, preprint hosting, and study preregistration. Around the OSF, COS provides policy frameworks (TOP Guidelines), publishing innovations (Registered Reports), transparency services (Preregistration, OSF Registries, OSF Collections, OSF Preprints), and runs large-scale metascience research programs such as SCORE, Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, SMART, and the Global Flourishing Study to produce empirical evidence on research credibility.

Is Center for Open Science a public or private company?

Center for Open Science is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Center for Open Science founded?

Center for Open Science was founded in 2013. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Center for Open Science based?

Center for Open Science is headquartered in Charlottesville, United States, in the North America region.

How does Center for Open Science make money?

Two revenue lines are on record. Government and Foundation Grants are the primary driver. The others are donations.

Who are Center for Open Science's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Dryad, ResearchGate, eLife, PLOS, Research Square, figshare, Dataverse, F1000 / Taylor & Francis Open Research and Zenodo. Hypothesis is listed as an emerging player.

Does Center for Open Science have an API?

Yes. The Open Science Framework (OSF) provides a public API that allows developers to programmatically access, manage, and interact with research projects, registrations, preprints, and other OSF resources. The OSF API supports CRUD operations for projects, files, comments, institutions, and other components. The API is available for developers to build integrations and automate workflows. Developer documentation is at developer.osf.io.

What industry is Center for Open Science in?

Center for Open Science's product category is Open Science Research Collaboration Platform. Its primary akta.pro industry code is EDAGAJAM, OER Authoring, Remixing & Publishing Tools/Platforms, with a secondary code of EDAGAJAN, OER Quality Review, Alignment & Certification (rubrics/standards). Its NAICS code is 5417 and its SIC code is 7372.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
The New York TimesCan Science Predict When a Study Won’t Hold Up?A seven-year research project called SCORE, funded by DARPA and led by the Center for Open Science with 865 researchers, found that artificial intelligence cannot yet reliably predict whether scientific studies will replicate successfully. The team analyzed 3,900 papers, replicating 164 of them and finding that only about half yielded the same results as the originals, while AI predictions fell far short of the accuracy needed for practical use. Experts guessed correctly about 75 percent of the time, suggesting human judgment remains more reliable than current AI systems for assessing research trustworthiness.NatureWhy science has a credibility problem — and how to address itPsychologist Brian Nosek, co-founder of the Center for Open Science, is releasing results from the SCORE project showing that only about half of 145 social-science papers successfully reproduced when reanalyzed with the same data, and only 49% of 164 papers replicated in studies using fresh data. The article discusses the credibility crisis in science, where publication incentives prioritize novelty over rigor and transparency, and explores proposed reforms such as Registered Reports and continuous evaluation through initiatives like Lifecycle Journal. Nosek argues that the low replicability findings are the beginning of a conversation about improving research practices rather than a verdict on scientific integrity.PR NewswireAMID ESCALATING TENSIONS, HARVARD RESEARCHERS UNVEIL GROUNDBREAKING FINDINGS ON FLOURISHINGHarvard University and Baylor University unveiled findings from the Global Flourishing Study, a large-scale research project conducted in partnership with Gallup and the Center for Open Science involving over 200,000 participants across 22 countries. The study identified lower flourishing among youth aged 18-24 and found that middle-income nations like Indonesia, Mexico, and the Philippines reported higher levels of meaning and social connectedness than wealthier countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom.BenzingaMeta Steps Up for Child Online Safety: Zuckerberg to Testify as Company Tightens Privacy Controls - MetaMeta Platforms Inc. has partnered with the Center for Open Science to share privacy-preserving data ahead of a congressional hearing on children's online safety, during which CEO Mark Zuckerberg will testify. In anticipation of this scrutiny, Meta implemented new restrictions on messaging for users under 16 and expanded parental controls to limit exposure to harmful content.GW TodayEmerging Open Science Platforms to Support Open Science PracticesUNESCO developed a Recommendation on Open Science in 2021 that calls for scientific publications, research data, software, and source code to be openly available to researchers internationally. The Open Science Framework (OSF), a free platform maintained by the non-profit Center for Open Science, provides researchers tools to design studies, collect and analyze data, and publish and share results with version control and attribution features. Nature and Code Ocean recently announced a partnership to launch the Open Science Library, which contains research software from Nature journal articles in "compute capsules" enabling reproducibility and collaboration.PR NewswireEffort to repeat key cancer biology experiments reveals challenges and opportunities to improve replicabilityThe Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, an 8-year initiative led by the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange with funding from Arnold Ventures, published its final findings in eLife after attempting to replicate 193 experiments from 53 high-impact preclinical cancer biology papers published between 2010 and 2012. The project completed only 50 replication experiments from 23 papers due to challenges including insufficient methodological detail, limited author cooperation (32% were unhelpful or non-responsive), and protocol modifications needed when model systems did not behave as originally reported. The meta-analysis found that replication effect sizes were 85% smaller on average than original findings, and 54% of completed replications failed on more assessment criteria than they succeeded, indicating weaker evidence than initially reported and highlighting substantial challenges for replicability in preclinical cancer research.PR NewswireThe Center for Open Science receives the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in ResearchThe Center for Open Science (COS) was selected as the inaugural institutional recipient of the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research, recognizing its efforts to enhance research rigor and transparency. The award highlights COS's development of the Open Science Framework and its collaboration with major publishers to transform publishing culture. This recognition coincides with the upcoming publication of findings from a large-scale investigation into replicating cancer biology experiments.PR NewswireBaylor и Harvard проводят совместное долгосрочное глобальное исследованиеResearchers from Harvard University and Baylor University, in partnership with Gallup and the Center for Open Science, launched 'The Global Flourishing Study' — a five-year, $43.4 million research initiative tracking 240,000 participants across 22 countries to examine factors influencing human flourishing. The study will collect annual data on social, psychological, spiritual, political, economic, and health-related components of well-being. The research team aims to create an open data resource that will influence the direction of social policy and healthcare globally.PR NewswireBaylor and Harvard Researchers Partner in Long-Term, Global Study of Human FlourishingResearchers at Harvard University and Baylor University, in partnership with Gallup and the Center for Open Science, have launched the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million five-year longitudinal study tracking 240,000 individuals across 22 countries to investigate determinants of human flourishing. The study will collect annual data on social, psychological, spiritual, political, economic, and health-related factors, with all data made open-access for researchers, policymakers, and educators worldwide. The initiative is funded by a consortium of foundations including the John Templeton Foundation and Templeton Religion Trust, and represents the largest and most comprehensive study of its kind in terms of global scope and sample size.PR NewswireNaukowcy z Baylor i Harvardu podejmują współpracę w ramach długotrwałych, międzynarodowych badań nad ludzkim dobrobytemHarvard University and Baylor University have launched the Global Flourishing Study, a $43.4 million, five-year initiative to investigate factors influencing human well-being. The project involves annual surveys of 240,000 individuals across 22 countries, with Gallup providing data collection expertise and the Center for Open Science coordinating open science efforts.