New Civil Liberties Alliance

What New Civil Liberties Alliance does

The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) is a 501(c)(3) public-interest law firm founded in 2017 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, that litigates against what it characterizes as the unconstitutional "administrative state." Its core work consists of filing original lawsuits and amicus curiae briefs in federal trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, on behalf of individuals, businesses, trade associations, and religious organizations whose constitutional rights it alleges have been infringed by federal agencies. The organization has built a visible track record in cases involving SEC enforcement (notably SEC v. Jarkesy on Seventh Amendment jury-trial rights), FTC removal authority, Title IX rulemaking, government-coordinated social-media censorship (Missouri v. Biden), surveillance programs, and IEEPA-based tariffs.

NCLA's core "products" are litigation output — original complaints, amicus briefs, and regulatory comments — supplemented by non-litigation assets including a constitutional-law fellowship and training program for attorneys and a podcast. There is no proprietary technology platform disclosed in the source data; legal work is produced by a small bench of experienced constitutional litigators and policy staff. The organization's stated headcount falls in the 11–50 employee range.

NCLA operates as a donor-supported nonprofit rather than a fee-for-service firm. Plaintiffs are typically represented without charge, and revenue is generated through charitable contributions and grants from individuals, foundations, and allied advocacy organizations. Strategic partnerships with groups such as Americans for Prosperity, the Buckeye Institute, and the National Center for Public Policy Research extend NCLA's case origination, co-counsel, and amicus networks. No pricing model, fee structure, or audited financial disclosures were available in the input data, so the organization's revenue scale must be inferred from headcount and comparable nonprofit benchmarks.

Name

New Civil Liberties Alliance

Legal name

New Civil Liberties Alliance

Website

https://ncla.legal

Company type

Private

Founded year

2017

Operating status

Operating

Headcount range

11–50 employees

Short description

The New Civil Liberties Alliance is a 501(c)(3) public-interest law firm, founded in 2017 in Arlington, Virginia, that litigates constitutional challenges to federal agency overreach on behalf of individuals, businesses, trade associations, and religious organizations.

Ownership category

akta.pro rank

Headquarters

HQ city

Arlington

HQ country

United States

HQ region

North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

GTM type

B2B

Offering type

Services

Cost components

Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales

Revenue model

1. Donations and Charitable Contributions: NCLA operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization funded primarily through donations from individuals, foundations, and aligned organizations. EIN: 81-3474290.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels10 records

Core offering

New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal organization that files original lawsuits and amicus curiae briefs in state and federal courts challenging unconstitutional actions by federal administrative agencies that violate civil liberties. The organization also submits official regulatory comments and petitions to agencies such as the SEC. Services are organized around seven focus areas: Judicial Deference, Due Process of Law, Scope of Authority/Nondelegation, Free Speech, Unreasonable Searches, Guidance Abuse, and Conditions on Spending.

Product overview

New Civil Liberties Alliance is a legal nonprofit organization that offers a portfolio of legal services and advocacy programs focused on challenging unconstitutional administrative state power. The core offerings include original litigation (lawsuits on behalf of clients), amicus curiae briefs filed in support of constitutional principles, and official regulatory comments/petitions. These legal services are organized around seven focus areas: Judicial Deference, Due Process of Law, Scope of Authority/Nondelegation, Free Speech, Unreasonable Searches, Guidance Abuse, and Conditions on Spending. Supporting programs include the Constitutional Litigation Fellowship (CLiF) for training new litigators, the annual King George III Prize recognizing constitutional advocacy, and the Unwritten Law Podcast for public education.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

• Original Litigation Services NCLA files original lawsuits on behalf of clients (individuals, businesses, religious organizations, and trade associations) challenging unconstitutional government actions by federal agencies that violate civil liberties. Cases are selected based on precedent-setting potential and mission alignment with administrative state reform.

Quantifiable outcome

• Supreme Court victory in Trump v. Internal Revenue Service (removing Chevron deference) and IEEPA tariff rulings
• +3 more outcomes

Named customers9 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API

No

API docs

API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Partnerships

Five partnerships are on record, tiered core, notable and adverse.

• Americans for Prosperity FoundationcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerJointly filed amicus curiae brief with NCLA before the Supreme Court in Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, urging the Court to overturn Atlas Roofing and eliminate the 'public rights' exception to Article III jurisdiction.
• The Buckeye InstitutecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-filed amicus brief with NCLA in Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards at the Supreme Court, arguing for restoration of Article III court adjudication rights in regulatory cases.
• National Center for Public Policy ResearchcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerFiled official comments with NCLA urging the SEC to rescind climate-disclosure rules and acknowledge lack of statutory authority, invoking Major Questions Doctrine and Relentless decision eliminating Chevron deference.
• Mark CubannotableStrategic or Co-development PartnerFiled amicus brief supporting NCLA's petition for rehearing in Eric S. Smith v. SEC and FINRA, challenging punitive sanctions without Article III jury trials.
• Circular Action AllianceadverseOthersPrivate organization designated by Colorado's Producer Responsibility Program to control fee-setting; NCLA challenges this as unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to private entity.

Scale indicators2 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights4 records

Direct peers

• Pacific Legal Foundation: Pacific Legal Foundation is a nonprofit public-interest law firm that litigates to advance individual liberty and limit government overreach. It is highly comparable to NCLA in mission, structure (501(c)(3) legal nonprofit), and case-selection philosophy (precedent-setting constitutional litigation).
• Institute for Justice: Institute for Justice is a libertarian public-interest law firm litigating constitutional and economic liberty cases. It is directly comparable to NCLA in business model (nonprofit legal advocacy), target plaintiffs, and precedent-driven litigation strategy.
• Center for Individual Rights: Center for Individual Rights is a public-interest law firm that litigates high-impact constitutional and civil-rights cases. Comparable to NCLA in case-selection approach and focus on individual rights against administrative action.
• Goldwater Institute: Goldwater Institute is a constitutional litigation and policy organization litigating to defend individual liberty and limited government. Direct comparable in mission, amicus activity, and state-level precedent work.
• The Buckeye Institute: The Buckeye Institute is a state-level legal advocacy organization that litigates and files amicus briefs to defend constitutional liberties. It is an existing NCLA coalition partner and is comparable in litigation focus.
• Mountain States Legal Foundation: Mountain States Legal Foundation litigates to defend constitutional rights, limited government, and free enterprise. Comparable to NCLA in mission, structure, and donor base.

Broad incumbents

• Cato Institute: Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank that litigates through affiliated legal efforts and files amicus briefs on administrative-state issues. Comparable as an ideological and operational peer but broader in scope (think tank plus litigation).
• Competitive Enterprise Institute: Competitive Enterprise Institute is a policy organization that litigates and advocates against regulatory overreach. Comparable to NCLA's administrative-state focus but broader as a think tank.
• Americans for Prosperity Foundation: Americans for Prosperity Foundation is a policy and advocacy organization that co-files amicus briefs with NCLA (e.g., Sun Valley Orchards). Comparable as a strategic litigation partner and donor-base peer with broader policy scope.
• American Civil Liberties Union: ACLU is the largest U.S. civil liberties legal organization, with constitutional litigation across free speech, due process, and administrative-state issues. Comparable as a peer in organizational mission (civil liberties constitutional litigation) but with an opposing ideological lens and far greater scale.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat3 records

Customer concentration

• Xx.com/NCLAlegal
• Facebookfacebook.com/NewCivilLibertiesAlliance
• LinkedInlinkedin.com/company/ncla-legal
• Instagraminstagram.com/nclalegal

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Number of profiles

Profiles5 records

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about New Civil Liberties Alliance