Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Center for Food Safety

Full company profile

uuid000fhp8

Namestring
Center for Food Safety
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1997
Descriptiontext

Center for Food Safety (CFS) is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit public interest organization founded in 1997 that pursues its mission through legal advocacy, regulatory engagement, and coalition-building rather than commercial products. Its work targets harmful food production technologies, pesticide regulation, GMO labeling transparency, pollinator protection, and water pollution from agricultural and food processing operations. The organization serves three primary constituencies: consumers and environmental advocates seeking safer food and transparency; farmers and agricultural workers affected by pesticide drift, contaminated water, and inadequate labeling; and natural/organic food retailers (e.g., Natural Grocers) seeking clearer GMO disclosure standards.

CFS has no proprietary technology platform, software products, or AI/ML capabilities; its primary outputs are lawsuits, amicus briefs, regulatory comments, and public education campaigns. Notable recent actions include overturning three USDA loopholes in the Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act (co-litigated with Natural Grocers), securing EPA regulation of pesticide-treated seeds in California effective January 2027, filing a federal Clean Water Act suit against BioOregon Protein for chlorine discharge violations, and filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell on pesticide manufacturer liability. The organization does not sell products or services; revenue is generated exclusively through donations, grants, and foundation support, though specific financial figures are not disclosed in the available data. Operating geographies are limited to the United States, with all identified activity occurring in federal and state-level (notably California, Iowa, Oregon) jurisdictions.

Short descriptiontext

Center for Food Safety is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit founded in 1997 that uses litigation, regulatory advocacy, and coalition partnerships to advance food safety, pesticide regulation, GMO labeling transparency, and environmental protection on behalf of consumers, farmers, and natural food retailers.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Keyword5 values
food safety advocacy, GMO labeling policy, pesticide regulation, environmental litigation, organic agriculture promotion
Industry1 code
1Recall Readiness, Crisis Management & Regulatory Liaison
CodeAFALADAGPrimaryYes
NAICS code1 code
  • Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations813312
Product category
Food Safety Advocacy
Social media profiles1 record
Marketing channels2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Center for Food Safety is a nonprofit public interest organization that advances food safety, organic and sustainable agriculture, and environmental protection through legal advocacy, strategic litigation, regulatory engagement, and public education. The organization files lawsuits, submits amicus briefs, challenges federal rules (e.g., USDA GMO labeling, EPA pesticide regulations), and builds coalitions with partner advocacy groups and retailers to drive systemic change in the U.S. food system.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 2 values shown
  • Overturned three major USDA loopholes in Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act rules requiring clear on-package GMO labeling
+1 more record
Product overview1 text field

Center for Food Safety is a nonprofit public interest organization focused on legal advocacy, policy work, and public education to protect human health and the environment. The organization engages in litigation, regulatory advocacy, and public campaigns rather than offering technology products or software services. CFS does not operate a product platform but instead advances its mission through legal actions, policy recommendations, and coalition-building with other advocacy groups.

Product and service6 records
1Public Interest Litigation Services
CategoryLegal Advocacy
Description

Legal advocacy and litigation services for consumers, environmental advocates, and partner organizations challenging pesticide manufacturers, federal agencies, and food companies over food safety, GMO labeling, and environmental protection issues.

2Regulatory Advocacy and Policy Engagement
CategoryRegulatory Advocacy
Description

Submission of amicus briefs, regulatory comments, and policy recommendations to federal agencies such as USDA, EPA, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to shape food safety, pesticide, and environmental regulations.

3GMO Labeling Transparency Campaign
CategoryConsumer Advocacy
Description

Advocacy initiative aimed at overturning loopholes in the USDA Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act to require clear, on-package GMO disclosure for consumers and natural/organic food retailers.

4Pesticide Regulation Advocacy
CategoryEnvironmental Advocacy
Description

Efforts to secure stronger EPA oversight of pesticide use, including reporting on pesticide-treated seeds planted in California (effective January 2027), and to protect farmers and agricultural workers from pesticide drift and exposure.

5Pollinator and Endangered Species Protection Advocacy
CategoryEnvironmental Advocacy
Description

Litigation and advocacy campaigns to protect endangered pollinators such as the Iowa skipper butterfly, including lawsuits against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding habitat loss and pesticide impacts.

6Clean Water Act Enforcement Advocacy
CategoryEnvironmental Advocacy
Description

Co-litigation with partner organizations (e.g., Northwest Environmental Defense Center) against food processors such as BioOregon Protein for alleged Clean Water Act permit violations involving chlorine discharges.

Partnership2 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-01-30
Description

CFS partnered with Northwest Environmental Defense Center to file a federal lawsuit against BioOregon Protein (subsidiary of Pacific Seafood) for alleged Clean Water Act violations, alleging chlorine discharge levels approximately 4,000% above permitted thresholds.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-01-06
Description

CFS and Natural Grocers co-litigated a successful federal appeals court challenge against USDA's Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act rules, overturning three major loopholes related to GMO labeling terminology, QR-code-only disclosures, and highly processed food exemptions.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight4 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Public-interest environmental law organization that litigates cases on pollution, food systems, and wildlife protection. Closely comparable to CFS in its litigation-led advocacy model and federal court engagement.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Wildlife and habitat advocacy organization with active litigation program, including on endangered species. Comparable to CFS's Iowa skipper butterfly lawsuit and species-protection work.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National nonprofit that advocates on food safety, factory farming, and water protection using grassroots campaigns and litigation. Directly comparable to CFS in mission, advocacy style, and reliance on donor funding.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large, established environmental advocacy group with litigation, policy, and science programs spanning food, water, climate, and energy. Broader portfolio than CFS but overlapping on food safety and pesticide litigation.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Large environmental advocacy organization with campaigns on food, agriculture, oceans, and corporate accountability. Comparable in advocacy style though significantly larger in resources and scope.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit that researches and advocates on pesticide residues, GMO labeling, and food safety transparency. Highly comparable to CFS in scientific advocacy on pesticide and labeling issues.

TypeDirect peer
Description

International network focused on pesticide regulation, alternatives to hazardous pesticides, and community health. Directly comparable in pesticide and agricultural policy advocacy.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Mass-membership environmental organization with broad advocacy scope. Overlaps with CFS on pesticide and environmental protection issues but operates across a much wider agenda.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Environmental advocacy organization working on food systems, GMOs, and corporate accountability. Comparable in policy advocacy and consumer-facing campaigns on food and agricultural issues.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Science-based advocacy organization that works on food, agriculture, and environmental safety. Shares CFS's science-driven advocacy posture but with broader issue coverage.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat3 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Food Safety

Food Safety Advocacycenterforfoodsafety.org

Center for Food Safety is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit founded in 1997 that uses litigation, regulatory advocacy, and coalition partnerships to advance food safety, pesticide regulation, GMO labeling transparency, and environmental protection on behalf of consumers, farmers, and natural food retailers.

What Center for Food Safety does

Center for Food Safety (CFS) is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit public interest organization founded in 1997 that pursues its mission through legal advocacy, regulatory engagement, and coalition-building rather than commercial products. Its work targets harmful food production technologies, pesticide regulation, GMO labeling transparency, pollinator protection, and water pollution from agricultural and food processing operations. The organization serves three primary constituencies: consumers and environmental advocates seeking safer food and transparency; farmers and agricultural workers affected by pesticide drift, contaminated water, and inadequate labeling; and natural/organic food retailers (e.g., Natural Grocers) seeking clearer GMO disclosure standards.

CFS has no proprietary technology platform, software products, or AI/ML capabilities; its primary outputs are lawsuits, amicus briefs, regulatory comments, and public education campaigns. Notable recent actions include overturning three USDA loopholes in the Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act (co-litigated with Natural Grocers), securing EPA regulation of pesticide-treated seeds in California effective January 2027, filing a federal Clean Water Act suit against BioOregon Protein for chlorine discharge violations, and filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell on pesticide manufacturer liability. The organization does not sell products or services; revenue is generated exclusively through donations, grants, and foundation support, though specific financial figures are not disclosed in the available data. Operating geographies are limited to the United States, with all identified activity occurring in federal and state-level (notably California, Iowa, Oregon) jurisdictions.

Center for Food Safety firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Center for Food Safety
Website
https://centerforfoodsafety.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
1997
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Center for Food Safety is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit founded in 1997 that uses litigation, regulatory advocacy, and coalition partnerships to advance food safety, pesticide regulation, GMO labeling transparency, and environmental protection on behalf of consumers, farmers, and natural food retailers.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Center for Food Safety industry classification

Industry
Product category
Food Safety Advocacy
NAICS
Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations (813312)
akta.pro primary industry
Recall Readiness, Crisis Management & Regulatory Liaison (AFALADAG)

Keywords

  • Food safety advocacy
  • GMO labeling policy
  • Pesticide regulation
  • Environmental litigation
  • Organic agriculture promotion

Where Center for Food Safety is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Markets served

Center for Food Safety business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others

Marketing channels2 records

Center for Food Safety product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Center for Food Safety is a nonprofit public interest organization that advances food safety, organic and sustainable agriculture, and environmental protection through legal advocacy, strategic litigation, regulatory engagement, and public education. The organization files lawsuits, submits amicus briefs, challenges federal rules (e.g., USDA GMO labeling, EPA pesticide regulations), and builds coalitions with partner advocacy groups and retailers to drive systemic change in the U.S. food system.

Product overview

Center for Food Safety is a nonprofit public interest organization focused on legal advocacy, policy work, and public education to protect human health and the environment. The organization engages in litigation, regulatory advocacy, and public campaigns rather than offering technology products or software services. CFS does not operate a product platform but instead advances its mission through legal actions, policy recommendations, and coalition-building with other advocacy groups.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Public Interest Litigation Services Legal advocacy and litigation services for consumers, environmental advocates, and partner organizations challenging pesticide manufacturers, federal agencies, and food companies over food safety, GMO labeling, and environmental protection issues.
  • Regulatory Advocacy and Policy Engagement Submission of amicus briefs, regulatory comments, and policy recommendations to federal agencies such as USDA, EPA, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to shape food safety, pesticide, and environmental regulations.
  • GMO Labeling Transparency Campaign Advocacy initiative aimed at overturning loopholes in the USDA Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act to require clear, on-package GMO disclosure for consumers and natural/organic food retailers.
  • Pesticide Regulation Advocacy Efforts to secure stronger EPA oversight of pesticide use, including reporting on pesticide-treated seeds planted in California (effective January 2027), and to protect farmers and agricultural workers from pesticide drift and exposure.
  • Pollinator and Endangered Species Protection Advocacy Litigation and advocacy campaigns to protect endangered pollinators such as the Iowa skipper butterfly, including lawsuits against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding habitat loss and pesticide impacts.
  • Clean Water Act Enforcement Advocacy Co-litigation with partner organizations (e.g., Northwest Environmental Defense Center) against food processors such as BioOregon Protein for alleged Clean Water Act permit violations involving chlorine discharges.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Overturned three major USDA loopholes in Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act rules requiring clear on-package GMO labeling
  • +1 more outcomes

Companies that use Center for Food Safety

Customer profile

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Center for Food Safety technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Center for Food Safety partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Two partnerships are on record, tiered core.

  • Northwest Environmental Defense CentercoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 30 January 2026CFS partnered with Northwest Environmental Defense Center to file a federal lawsuit against BioOregon Protein (subsidiary of Pacific Seafood) for alleged Clean Water Act violations, alleging chlorine discharge levels approximately 4,000% above permitted thresholds.
  • Natural GrocerscoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 6 January 2026CFS and Natural Grocers co-litigated a successful federal appeals court challenge against USDA's Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act rules, overturning three major loopholes related to GMO labeling terminology, QR-code-only disclosures, and highly processed food exemptions.

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights4 records

Center for Food Safety competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Earthjustice: Public-interest environmental law organization that litigates cases on pollution, food systems, and wildlife protection. Closely comparable to CFS in its litigation-led advocacy model and federal court engagement.
  • Defenders of Wildlife: Wildlife and habitat advocacy organization with active litigation program, including on endangered species. Comparable to CFS's Iowa skipper butterfly lawsuit and species-protection work.
  • Food & Water Watch: National nonprofit that advocates on food safety, factory farming, and water protection using grassroots campaigns and litigation. Directly comparable to CFS in mission, advocacy style, and reliance on donor funding.
  • Environmental Working Group: Nonprofit that researches and advocates on pesticide residues, GMO labeling, and food safety transparency. Highly comparable to CFS in scientific advocacy on pesticide and labeling issues.
  • Pesticide Action Network: International network focused on pesticide regulation, alternatives to hazardous pesticides, and community health. Directly comparable in pesticide and agricultural policy advocacy.
  • Friends of the Earth: Environmental advocacy organization working on food systems, GMOs, and corporate accountability. Comparable in policy advocacy and consumer-facing campaigns on food and agricultural issues.

Broad incumbents

  • Natural Resources Defense Council: Large, established environmental advocacy group with litigation, policy, and science programs spanning food, water, climate, and energy. Broader portfolio than CFS but overlapping on food safety and pesticide litigation.
  • Greenpeace USA: Large environmental advocacy organization with campaigns on food, agriculture, oceans, and corporate accountability. Comparable in advocacy style though significantly larger in resources and scope.
  • Sierra Club: Mass-membership environmental organization with broad advocacy scope. Overlaps with CFS on pesticide and environmental protection issues but operates across a much wider agenda.
  • Union of Concerned Scientists: Science-based advocacy organization that works on food, agriculture, and environmental safety. Shares CFS's science-driven advocacy posture but with broader issue coverage.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat3 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Center for Food Safety social profiles

Digital presence

Center for Food Safety financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Center for Food Safety leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Center for Food Safety funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Center for Food Safety M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Center for Food Safety

What does Center for Food Safety do?

Center for Food Safety is a nonprofit public interest organization that advances food safety, organic and sustainable agriculture, and environmental protection through legal advocacy, strategic litigation, regulatory engagement, and public education. The organization files lawsuits, submits amicus briefs, challenges federal rules (e.g., USDA GMO labeling, EPA pesticide regulations), and builds coalitions with partner advocacy groups and retailers to drive systemic change in the U.S. food system.

Is Center for Food Safety a public or private company?

Center for Food Safety is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Center for Food Safety founded?

Center for Food Safety was founded in 1997. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Center for Food Safety based?

Center for Food Safety is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

Who are Center for Food Safety's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Earthjustice, Defenders of Wildlife, Food & Water Watch, Environmental Working Group, Pesticide Action Network and Friends of the Earth. Broad incumbents are Natural Resources Defense Council, Greenpeace USA, Sierra Club and Union of Concerned Scientists.

Does Center for Food Safety have an API?

No public API is recorded for Center for Food Safety.

What industry is Center for Food Safety in?

Center for Food Safety's product category is Food Safety Advocacy. Its primary akta.pro industry code is AFALADAG, Recall Readiness, Crisis Management & Regulatory Liaison. Its NAICS code is 813312.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
PR NewswireThe Center for Food Safety: Trump Administration Sued for Approving 'Forever Chemical' Pesticide TrifludimoxazinThree environmental groups sued the Trump administration over EPA approval of trifludimoxazin, a PFAS pesticide linked to cancer. The EPA approved it for crops like corn and almonds, despite acknowledging potential harms. The pesticide company had voluntarily stopped production in 2022, but the EPA re-approved it in 2026.SeafoodSourceCenter for Food Safety sues Pacific Seafood for alleged Clean Water Act violationsThe Center for Food Safety filed a lawsuit against Pacific Seafood on 4 August 2026 for alleged Clean Water Act violations at the company's industrial shellfish hatchery on Washington's Hood Canal. The complaint specifically targets Pacific Seafood's wholly owned subsidiary Pacific Shellfish in Quilcene, Washington, alleging the facility is polluting surrounding waters. The lawsuit follows a 60-day notice letter sent by the Center for Food Safety in May, indicating the environmental organization pursued formal legal action after pre-litigation negotiations failed.Progressive GrocerFederal Court Rules in Favor of GMO/Bionengineered Food TransparencyA federal district court in Northern California ruled in favor of increased transparency for GMO/biotech food labeling, striking down the USDA's 2021 regulations considered unlawful. The ruling was part of ongoing litigation led by the Center for Food Safety representing various organic retailers and nonprofits.PR NewswireFederal Court Sides with the Public's Right to Know in GMO/Bioengineered Food Labeling CaseA federal district court issued a final remedy decision on August 4, 2026, upholding the plaintiffs' arguments in the long-running Center for Food Safety v. USDA litigation over bioengineered food labeling regulations. The court struck down USDA's 2021 regulations that unlawfully excluded ultra-processed GMO foods from disclosure requirements and permitted inaccessible QR code-only labeling, rejecting USDA's proposed delay until 2029 in favor of a January 1, 2028 deadline for the agency to issue new comprehensive rules.PR NewswireFederal Trial Begins in Center for Food Safety Lawsuit Challenging River Pollution from Industrial DairyA federal trial began in Syracuse, New York on July 21, 2026, in a lawsuit filed by the Center for Food Safety against Wood Farms LLC, a large industrial dairy accused of unlawfully discharging pollutants into Wheeler Creek and the St. Lawrence River over 1,000 times since 2018. The lawsuit alleges the facility, which confines more than 3,000 dairy cows and generates waste equivalent to a city of 400,000 people, repeatedly violated the Clean Water Act through improper manure discharge and failure to comply with permit requirements. The case will test whether the factory farm can be held accountable under federal environmental law, with CFS seeking court orders to halt pollution, remediate damage, and pay civil penalties.The Cool DownOregon groups sue over factory farm permit, saying it leaves rural drinking water at riskEnvironmental organizations Animal Legal Defense Fund, Center for Food Safety, Food & Water Watch, and Willamette Riverkeeper filed suit against Oregon's state agriculture and environmental quality agencies, alleging the state's updated factory farm permit fails to adequately protect rural communities from manure-related pollution. The permit covers approximately 350 large livestock operations responsible for over 65% of Oregon's factory farms, while groundwater provides 80% of rural Oregonians' drinking water and the state has 122,800 miles of impaired waterways. The groups are asking the court to require stronger monitoring, clearer enforcement, and protections that better reflect how industrial livestock waste can reach streams and groundwater.MorningstarAfter Durnell: Why the Fight Against Pesticides and their Health Harms Is Entering a New ChapterThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Monsanto v. Durnell that state failure-to-warn claims are preempted by federal pesticide law, closing one avenue for pesticide victims. The Center for Food Safety says the decision makes watchdog advocacy more urgent, citing EPA's failure to require cancer warnings on 200+ carcinogenic pesticides.PR NewswireThis Butterfly Is a Warning About the Future of the Food SystemThe article reports on a lawsuit by the Center for Food Safety against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the protection status of the Iowa skipper butterfly, an endangered pollinator affected by habitat loss and pesticide use. It highlights the broader ecological and food system risks posed by declining pollinator populations, with existing agricultural practices contributing to this decline.PR NewswireCenter for Food Safety Leads Movement for Science-Based Advocacy Against Industrial AgricultureThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell on April 27, 2026, a case that could determine whether pesticide manufacturers can avoid legal responsibility for failing to warn the public about health risks of their products, with Center for Food Safety (CFS) filing a brief as a party to the case. The outcome could have sweeping implications for Americans' right-to-know about pesticide hazards, states' ability to protect citizens from toxic pesticides, and the legal liability of pesticide makers broadly. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, has settled approximately 100,000 cases for roughly $10 billion, with about 61,000 cases still pending, and a decision is expected by the end of June.FoodandwaterwatchNonprofits Tell U.S. Supreme Court Not to Grant Pesticide Companies Immunity from Cancer WarningsA coalition of consumer, public health, and environmental organizations represented by Center for Food Safety filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Monsanto v. Durnell arguing against granting pesticide companies immunity from state-level cancer warning requirements for products like Roundup. Monsanto (now Bayer) is seeking Supreme Court protection from billions of dollars in jury verdicts stemming from cases where juries found the company failed to warn users that its flagship herbicide could cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The nonprofits argue that EPA's oversight is inadequate and states must retain the authority to warn citizens about pesticide health hazards, with oral arguments scheduled for April 27th and approximately 61,000 cancer cases still pending against Bayer.