Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Full company profile

uuid000i6r7

Namestring
Beasley Allen Law Firm
Legal namestring
Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1979
Descriptiontext

Beasley Allen Law Firm (legally Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.) is a private plaintiff-side civil litigation law firm founded in 1979 by Jere Locke Beasley, a former Alabama lieutenant governor and governor. The firm operates from three U.S. offices in Montgomery, Alabama (headquarters), Mobile, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia, and practices nationwide in state and federal courts. Beasley Allen is organized around 11 practice areas including Business Litigation, Civil and Human Rights, Class Actions, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Medical Devices, Medication, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Toxic Exposure, and Whistleblower representation, with active case portfolios spanning mass torts (Talcum Powder, Ozempic/GLP-1, Acetaminophen, PFAS, Camp Lejeune, Paraquat, social media addiction), product liability, and personal injury matters.

The firm operates on a contingency fee model, charging clients no upfront fees and collecting a percentage (typically 33-40%) only upon successful verdict or settlement. This model requires Beasley Allen to absorb all litigation costs and bear the risk of loss in exchange for a share of recovery. Client acquisition runs through a multi-channel marketing stack: a comprehensive website with free case evaluation forms, YouTube and social media presence, email newsletters (Co-Counsel Newsletter, The Jere Beasley Report), community involvement, and direct attorney outreach. The firm also engages co-counsel partners such as Blood Hurst & O'Reardon and C.A. Goldberg, PLLC on specific class action and mass tort matters.

Beasley Allen's technology stack is limited to standard commercial tools, with no proprietary AI, software products, or patents. The firm employs 251-500 people and reports cumulative verdicts and settlements exceeding $39 billion, including record-setting results such as a $2.8 billion Blue Cross Blue Shield antitrust settlement, a $235 million Altria/Juul settlement, a $160 million wrongful death mass shooting verdict, a $110 million personal injury settlement (largest in Alabama history), and a $162 million rollover settlement (largest in Georgia for a single automobile accident). Revenue is not publicly disclosed, and ownership structure beyond the founding principal is not transparent in available materials.

Short descriptiontext

Beasley Allen Law Firm is a private plaintiff-side civil litigation firm founded in 1979, operating from three U.S. offices in Alabama and Georgia with a nationwide practice. It represents individual plaintiffs, governments, and businesses on contingency in 11 practice areas, including personal injury, product liability, mass torts, and toxic exposure.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
251–500
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersMontgomery, United States
HQ citystring
Montgomery
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices3 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
personal injury litigation, product liability lawsuits, mass tort litigation, class action lawsuits, plaintiff civil litigation
Industry1 code
1Personal Injury & Insurance Defense
CodeBPAHAAAMPrimaryYes
NAICS code2 codes
  • Legal Services5411
  • Offices of Lawyers541110
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Plaintiff Civil Litigation Services
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Legal Services - Contingency Fees
TypeOne Time License
Description

The firm operates on a contingency fee basis where clients pay nothing if the firm does not win their case. This is standard for plaintiff-side personal injury and mass tort litigation, meaning the firm bears the upfront costs of litigation in exchange for a percentage (typically 33-40%) of any recovery.

beasleyallen.com
Marketing channels7 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
Pricing details1 tier
1Contingency fee arrangement - no win, no fee
ModelOtherBilling cadenceOther
Notes

Clients pay nothing if the firm does not win for them. Fees are only collected upon successful recovery through verdict or settlement.

beasleyallen.com
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Beasley Allen is a plaintiff-side civil litigation law firm that represents individuals, government entities, and businesses in complex lawsuits against large corporations. Its core offerings include personal injury, product liability, mass tort, class action, toxic exposure, whistleblower, and consumer protection representation on a contingency fee basis (no fee unless the firm wins). The firm has secured over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements since its founding in 1979.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 4 values shown
  • Over $39 billion in verdicts and settlements achieved
+3 more records
Product overview1 text field

Beasley Allen Law Firm is a civil litigation firm founded in 1979, representing plaintiffs in various legal matters. The firm operates across 11 practice areas including Business Litigation, Civil and Human Rights, Class Actions, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Medical Devices, Medication, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Toxic Exposure, and Whistleblower. The firm handles specialized case types including talcum powder litigation, social media addiction claims, pharmaceutical drug litigation (Ozempic, acetaminophen, Dupixent), environmental/toxic exposure cases (Camp Lejeune, Paraquat, PFAS), and product liability matters (auto defects, aviation accidents). The firm reports over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements since its founding.

Product and service20 records
1Business Litigation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Legal representation in complex business disputes involving contracts, fraud, intellectual property, and antitrust matters, handled in state and federal courts across the country.

2Civil and Human Rights Litigation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Representation for violations of civil and constitutional rights, including Section 1981 race discrimination, Section 1983 constitutional violations, sexual harassment, and human trafficking cases.

3Class Action Lawsuits
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Group litigation representing consumers harmed by defective products, data breaches, insurance disputes, and antitrust violations.

4Consumer Protection Litigation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Representation for individuals and families harmed by dangerous products, false advertising, warranty violations, antitrust practices, data breaches, and insurance fraud.

5Employment Law Representation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Legal services for workplace issues including sexual harassment, assault, retaliation, discrimination based on protected characteristics, and wrongful termination.

6Medical Device Litigation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Litigation representing patients injured by defective medical devices including hip implants, recalled devices, and those with poor design or missing warnings.

7Medication Lawsuits
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Legal representation for patients harmed by dangerous prescription and over-the-counter drugs, including cases involving failure to warn of known risks and improper testing.

8Personal Injury Representation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Representation for seriously injured clients including traumatic brain injuries, auto accidents, workplace injuries, defective products, and maritime accidents.

9Product Liability Claims
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Legal claims holding manufacturers, distributors, and retailers liable for defective products causing injury or death, covering design, manufacturing, and warning defects.

10Toxic Exposure Litigation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Representation for individuals and communities harmed by toxic chemical exposure including environmental disasters, occupational hazards, and water contamination cases.

11Whistleblower Representation
CategoryPractice Area
Description

Legal assistance for reporting fraud against the government under the False Claims Act and other whistleblower protection laws, including healthcare fraud and securities fraud cases.

12Talcum Powder Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Legal representation for plaintiffs alleging ovarian cancer caused by talc-based baby powder products, including cases against Johnson & Johnson.

13Social Media Addiction Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Lawsuits on behalf of teens and young adults addicted to social media platforms, focusing on anxiety, depression, and addictive design features.

14Ozempic/GLP-1 Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Investigation of cases involving gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism linked to Ozempic and similar weight loss drugs.

15Acetaminophen/Autism Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Claims linking prenatal Tylenol use to autism and ADHD in children, following federal government confirmation of this connection in 2025.

16Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Representation for people with cancer or health conditions from exposure to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune military base.

17Paraquat Exposure Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Legal claims for farmers and workers exposed to Paraquat herbicide linked to Parkinson's disease.

18Auto Products Liability Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Claims against vehicle manufacturers for defects in brakes, airbags, tires, and rollover-prone designs.

19Aviation Accident Litigation
CategoryCase Type
Description

Representation for families affected by commercial airline crashes, helicopter accidents, and small plane incidents including Boeing 737 MAX cases.

20Verdicts & Settlements Reporting
CategoryClient Results
Description

Public record of the firm's litigation victories including settlements and verdicts, totaling over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements.

Scale indicator8 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership2 partners
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel relationship in class action litigation, specifically mentioned in Toyota transmission class action filing

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel relationship in sodium nitrite litigation case

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with strong pharmaceutical and consumer protection practices. Direct peer in contingency-fee mass torts and class actions.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National plaintiff firm specializing in class actions, mass torts, and personal injury. Comparable to Beasley Allen in handling complex, high-stakes cases against large corporate defendants on contingency.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National mass-tort and class-action plaintiff firm with major practices in asbestos, pharmaceutical, and environmental litigation. Closely comparable in contingency-fee model and mass-tort focus.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side mass tort, personal injury, and class action firm. Comparable in pharmaceutical, environmental, and consumer protection mass torts.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Leading securities and antitrust class-action firm. Comparable to Beasley Allen in handling high-stakes institutional and class-action litigation on contingency.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Largest U.S. plaintiff-side personal injury and mass-tort firm, operating on contingency fees nationwide. Direct competitor in personal injury, product liability, and mass-tort pipelines with comparable scale and marketing footprint.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side litigation firm focused on mass torts, class actions, and complex civil litigation. Overlaps directly with Beasley Allen's mass-tort and whistleblower practice areas.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with overlapping pharmaceutical and consumer protection dockets. Smaller scale but comparable contingency-fee plaintiff model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National plaintiff firm specializing in environmental contamination, water pollution, and mass-tort litigation. Comparable to Beasley Allen in toxic exposure cases like Camp Lejeune and PFAS.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side mass-tort and personal injury firm with deep pharmaceutical, environmental, and product liability practices. Directly comparable contingency-fee plaintiff model and mass-tort docket.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers3 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

Integration4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Plaintiff Civil Litigation Servicesbeasleyallen.com

Beasley Allen Law Firm is a private plaintiff-side civil litigation firm founded in 1979, operating from three U.S. offices in Alabama and Georgia with a nationwide practice. It represents individual plaintiffs, governments, and businesses on contingency in 11 practice areas, including personal injury, product liability, mass torts, and toxic exposure.

What Beasley Allen Law Firm does

Beasley Allen Law Firm (legally Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.) is a private plaintiff-side civil litigation law firm founded in 1979 by Jere Locke Beasley, a former Alabama lieutenant governor and governor. The firm operates from three U.S. offices in Montgomery, Alabama (headquarters), Mobile, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia, and practices nationwide in state and federal courts. Beasley Allen is organized around 11 practice areas including Business Litigation, Civil and Human Rights, Class Actions, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Medical Devices, Medication, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Toxic Exposure, and Whistleblower representation, with active case portfolios spanning mass torts (Talcum Powder, Ozempic/GLP-1, Acetaminophen, PFAS, Camp Lejeune, Paraquat, social media addiction), product liability, and personal injury matters.

The firm operates on a contingency fee model, charging clients no upfront fees and collecting a percentage (typically 33-40%) only upon successful verdict or settlement. This model requires Beasley Allen to absorb all litigation costs and bear the risk of loss in exchange for a share of recovery. Client acquisition runs through a multi-channel marketing stack: a comprehensive website with free case evaluation forms, YouTube and social media presence, email newsletters (Co-Counsel Newsletter, The Jere Beasley Report), community involvement, and direct attorney outreach. The firm also engages co-counsel partners such as Blood Hurst & O'Reardon and C.A. Goldberg, PLLC on specific class action and mass tort matters.

Beasley Allen's technology stack is limited to standard commercial tools, with no proprietary AI, software products, or patents. The firm employs 251-500 people and reports cumulative verdicts and settlements exceeding $39 billion, including record-setting results such as a $2.8 billion Blue Cross Blue Shield antitrust settlement, a $235 million Altria/Juul settlement, a $160 million wrongful death mass shooting verdict, a $110 million personal injury settlement (largest in Alabama history), and a $162 million rollover settlement (largest in Georgia for a single automobile accident). Revenue is not publicly disclosed, and ownership structure beyond the founding principal is not transparent in available materials.

Beasley Allen Law Firm firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Beasley Allen Law Firm
Legal name
Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.
Website
https://beasleyallen.com
Company type
Private
Founded year
1979
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
251–500 employees
Short description
Beasley Allen Law Firm is a private plaintiff-side civil litigation firm founded in 1979, operating from three U.S. offices in Alabama and Georgia with a nationwide practice. It represents individual plaintiffs, governments, and businesses on contingency in 11 practice areas, including personal injury, product liability, mass torts, and toxic exposure.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Beasley Allen Law Firm industry classification

Industry
Product category
Plaintiff Civil Litigation Services
NAICS
Legal Services (5411), Offices of Lawyers (541110)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Personal Injury & Insurance Defense (BPAHAAAM)

Keywords

  • Personal injury litigation
  • Product liability lawsuits
  • Mass tort litigation
  • Class action lawsuits
  • Plaintiff civil litigation

Where Beasley Allen Law Firm is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Montgomery
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices3 records

Markets served

Beasley Allen Law Firm business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Legal Services - Contingency Fees: The firm operates on a contingency fee basis where clients pay nothing if the firm does not win their case. This is standard for plaintiff-side personal injury and mass tort litigation, meaning the firm bears the upfront costs of litigation in exchange for a percentage (typically 33-40%) of any recovery.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherOtherContingency fee arrangement - no win, no fee

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels1 record

Marketing channels7 records

Beasley Allen Law Firm product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Beasley Allen is a plaintiff-side civil litigation law firm that represents individuals, government entities, and businesses in complex lawsuits against large corporations. Its core offerings include personal injury, product liability, mass tort, class action, toxic exposure, whistleblower, and consumer protection representation on a contingency fee basis (no fee unless the firm wins). The firm has secured over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements since its founding in 1979.

Product overview

Beasley Allen Law Firm is a civil litigation firm founded in 1979, representing plaintiffs in various legal matters. The firm operates across 11 practice areas including Business Litigation, Civil and Human Rights, Class Actions, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Medical Devices, Medication, Personal Injury, Product Liability, Toxic Exposure, and Whistleblower. The firm handles specialized case types including talcum powder litigation, social media addiction claims, pharmaceutical drug litigation (Ozempic, acetaminophen, Dupixent), environmental/toxic exposure cases (Camp Lejeune, Paraquat, PFAS), and product liability matters (auto defects, aviation accidents). The firm reports over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements since its founding.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Business Litigation Legal representation in complex business disputes involving contracts, fraud, intellectual property, and antitrust matters, handled in state and federal courts across the country.
  • Civil and Human Rights Litigation Representation for violations of civil and constitutional rights, including Section 1981 race discrimination, Section 1983 constitutional violations, sexual harassment, and human trafficking cases.
  • Class Action Lawsuits Group litigation representing consumers harmed by defective products, data breaches, insurance disputes, and antitrust violations.
  • Consumer Protection Litigation Representation for individuals and families harmed by dangerous products, false advertising, warranty violations, antitrust practices, data breaches, and insurance fraud.
  • Employment Law Representation Legal services for workplace issues including sexual harassment, assault, retaliation, discrimination based on protected characteristics, and wrongful termination.
  • Medical Device Litigation Litigation representing patients injured by defective medical devices including hip implants, recalled devices, and those with poor design or missing warnings.
  • Medication Lawsuits Legal representation for patients harmed by dangerous prescription and over-the-counter drugs, including cases involving failure to warn of known risks and improper testing.
  • Personal Injury Representation Representation for seriously injured clients including traumatic brain injuries, auto accidents, workplace injuries, defective products, and maritime accidents.
  • Product Liability Claims Legal claims holding manufacturers, distributors, and retailers liable for defective products causing injury or death, covering design, manufacturing, and warning defects.
  • Toxic Exposure Litigation Representation for individuals and communities harmed by toxic chemical exposure including environmental disasters, occupational hazards, and water contamination cases.
  • Whistleblower Representation Legal assistance for reporting fraud against the government under the False Claims Act and other whistleblower protection laws, including healthcare fraud and securities fraud cases.
  • Talcum Powder Litigation Legal representation for plaintiffs alleging ovarian cancer caused by talc-based baby powder products, including cases against Johnson & Johnson.
  • Social Media Addiction Litigation Lawsuits on behalf of teens and young adults addicted to social media platforms, focusing on anxiety, depression, and addictive design features.
  • Ozempic/GLP-1 Litigation Investigation of cases involving gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism linked to Ozempic and similar weight loss drugs.
  • Acetaminophen/Autism Litigation Claims linking prenatal Tylenol use to autism and ADHD in children, following federal government confirmation of this connection in 2025.
  • Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Litigation Representation for people with cancer or health conditions from exposure to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune military base.
  • Paraquat Exposure Litigation Legal claims for farmers and workers exposed to Paraquat herbicide linked to Parkinson's disease.
  • Auto Products Liability Litigation Claims against vehicle manufacturers for defects in brakes, airbags, tires, and rollover-prone designs.
  • Aviation Accident Litigation Representation for families affected by commercial airline crashes, helicopter accidents, and small plane incidents including Boeing 737 MAX cases.
  • Verdicts & Settlements Reporting Public record of the firm's litigation victories including settlements and verdicts, totaling over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements.

Quantifiable outcome

  • Over $39 billion in verdicts and settlements achieved
  • +3 more outcomes

Companies that use Beasley Allen Law Firm

Customer profile

Named customers3 records

Segments3 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Beasley Allen Law Firm technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Integration4 records

Beasley Allen Law Firm partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Two partnerships are on record, tiered minor.

  • Blood Hurst & O'ReardonminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel relationship in class action litigation, specifically mentioned in Toyota transmission class action filing
  • C.A. Goldberg, PLLCminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel relationship in sodium nitrite litigation case

Scale indicators8 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Beasley Allen Law Firm competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman: Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with strong pharmaceutical and consumer protection practices. Direct peer in contingency-fee mass torts and class actions.
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: National plaintiff firm specializing in class actions, mass torts, and personal injury. Comparable to Beasley Allen in handling complex, high-stakes cases against large corporate defendants on contingency.
  • Simmons Hanly Conroy: National mass-tort and class-action plaintiff firm with major practices in asbestos, pharmaceutical, and environmental litigation. Closely comparable in contingency-fee model and mass-tort focus.
  • Napoli Shkolnik: Plaintiff-side mass tort, personal injury, and class action firm. Comparable in pharmaceutical, environmental, and consumer protection mass torts.
  • Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd: Leading securities and antitrust class-action firm. Comparable to Beasley Allen in handling high-stakes institutional and class-action litigation on contingency.
  • Morgan & Morgan: Largest U.S. plaintiff-side personal injury and mass-tort firm, operating on contingency fees nationwide. Direct competitor in personal injury, product liability, and mass-tort pipelines with comparable scale and marketing footprint.
  • Motley Rice: Plaintiff-side litigation firm focused on mass torts, class actions, and complex civil litigation. Overlaps directly with Beasley Allen's mass-tort and whistleblower practice areas.
  • Baron & Budd: National plaintiff firm specializing in environmental contamination, water pollution, and mass-tort litigation. Comparable to Beasley Allen in toxic exposure cases like Camp Lejeune and PFAS.
  • Weitz & Luxenberg: Plaintiff-side mass-tort and personal injury firm with deep pharmaceutical, environmental, and product liability practices. Directly comparable contingency-fee plaintiff model and mass-tort docket.

Emerging players

  • Levin Simes Abrams: Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with overlapping pharmaceutical and consumer protection dockets. Smaller scale but comparable contingency-fee plaintiff model.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Beasley Allen Law Firm social profiles

Digital presence

Beasley Allen Law Firm financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Beasley Allen Law Firm leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Beasley Allen Law Firm funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Beasley Allen Law Firm M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Beasley Allen Law Firm

What does Beasley Allen Law Firm do?

Beasley Allen is a plaintiff-side civil litigation law firm that represents individuals, government entities, and businesses in complex lawsuits against large corporations. Its core offerings include personal injury, product liability, mass tort, class action, toxic exposure, whistleblower, and consumer protection representation on a contingency fee basis (no fee unless the firm wins). The firm has secured over $39 billion in cumulative verdicts and settlements since its founding in 1979.

Is Beasley Allen Law Firm a public or private company?

Beasley Allen Law Firm is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.

When was Beasley Allen Law Firm founded?

Beasley Allen Law Firm was founded in 1979. It employs 251 to 500 people.

Where is Beasley Allen Law Firm based?

Beasley Allen Law Firm is headquartered in Montgomery, United States, in the North America region.

How does Beasley Allen Law Firm make money?

One revenue line is on record: legal Services - Contingency Fees.

Who are Beasley Allen Law Firm's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Simmons Hanly Conroy, Napoli Shkolnik, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, Morgan & Morgan, Motley Rice, Baron & Budd and Weitz & Luxenberg. Levin Simes Abrams is listed as an emerging player.

Does Beasley Allen Law Firm have an API?

No public API is recorded for Beasley Allen Law Firm.

What industry is Beasley Allen Law Firm in?

Beasley Allen Law Firm's product category is Plaintiff Civil Litigation Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAHAAAM, Personal Injury & Insurance Defense. Its NAICS code is 5411 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
AL.com$5.5 billion settlement reached in long-running ovarian cancer lawsuit involving Alabama law firmJohnson & Johnson has agreed to pay $5.5 billion to settle nearly 80,000 outstanding lawsuits alleging its talc-based powder caused ovarian cancer, with the agreement conditional on 95% of claimants opting in. The settlement comes after a New Jersey federal court barred the Montgomery-based Beasley Allen law firm from representing consolidated cases due to an ethical breach involving collaboration with a former Johnson & Johnson attorney. The deal emerged after plaintiffs' expert witnesses failed to definitively prove talc caused individual cancers, prompting the judge to question why the claims should not be dismissed.Bloomberg Law NewsNJ Justices Refuse Beasley Allen Return to J&J Talc Cases (1)The New Jersey Supreme Court denied Beasley Allen's appeal, keeping the firm out of hundreds of state talc cases against Johnson & Johnson. The ruling upholds the firm's ethics breach disqualification and may affect its federal litigation strategy.Bloomberg Law NewsNJ Court Refuses to Pause Beasley Allen J&J Talc Ouster (2)A New Jersey appeals court refused to pause its order disqualifying Beasley Allen from lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson, maintaining pressure on the plaintiff-side leader in the national talc-based products ovarian cancer multidistrict litigation. Appellate Division Judge Mark K. Chase stated that allowing Beasley Allen to litigate cases while disqualified would not be in the interest of justice. The Alabama-based law firm is already seeking New Jersey Supreme Court reversal of the February ruling that removed it from over 400 state court cases.Law.comCourt Notes Scarcity of Case Law: Cannabis RegulationA U.S. Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey addressed a legal matter involving a request by Beasley Allen regarding the leadership of the talc multidistrict litigation. The plaintiff in the case claimed they lost $40,000 due to coordinated retaliation against them for exercising their constitutional rights. The judge's rejection of the request indicates a notable legal stance on the matter at hand.ReutersNew Jersey appeals court bars Beasley Allen from J&J talc cases over ethics breachA New Jersey appeals court on Friday barred plaintiffs' law firm Beasley Allen from representing claimants in state court lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson alleging its baby powder causes cancer, reversing a lower court ruling and finding the firm improperly coordinated with James Conlan, a former J&J attorney who represented the company in the same litigation. The court found that Conlan's prolonged access to J&J's privileged information followed by collaborative efforts with Beasley Allen warranted the firm's disqualification, with Judge Mark Chase writing that the situation raised "clear concern for the preservation of trust intrinsic to the attorney-client relationship." J&J called the ruling a victory, while Beasley Allen said it would immediately appeal to the Supreme Court of New Jersey; J&J's motion to disqualify the firm in federal court cases remains pending.The Indian ExpressGujarat: Six months after Air India plane crash, victims’ kin wait for answersThe Boeing 787 flight carrying 242 passengers crashed on June 12, resulting in the deaths of 260 individuals, including 19 on the ground. Families of the victims are now seeking answers and justice, with some pursuing legal action in London while grappling with the ongoing emotional and financial impacts of the tragedy. Attorney Mike Andrews from Beasley Allen has been engaging with the affected families to support their quest for truth and accountability.The Times of IndiaAhmedabad plane crash: 65 families who lost kin hire US-based law firm Beasley Allen - The Economic TimesAt least 65 families from India and the United Kingdom who lost kin in the June 12 Air India flight AI 171 crash have hired US-based law firm Beasley Allen to investigate the cause and pursue potential legal action. The Boeing 787-8 aircraft, en route to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, killing 241 of 242 people onboard and 19 individuals on the ground. The law firm's attorney visited the crash site and met with families in Vadodara and plans to travel to Surat and Diu, urging the Indian government to release flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder data to determine liability, with potential cases to be filed against Boeing in US federal courts.PR NewswireAttorney Andy Birchfield Reacts to Proposed J&J Bankruptcy, Settlement Offer in Talc LitigationJohnson & Johnson has proposed a $6.48 billion settlement to resolve talc-ovarian cancer litigation, contingent on 75% of claimants agreeing, which would enable the company to pursue a third bankruptcy filing of a subsidiary to package the lawsuits. Andy Birchfield of Beasley Allen Law Firm issued a statement rejecting the proposal, characterizing it as another attempt by the company to avoid legal responsibility for alleged product safety misrepresentations. The statement indicates claimants and their legal representatives intend to continue opposing the settlement effort.PR NewswireCancer Victims Applaud Senate Judiciary Committee Probe into Corporate Manipulation of Chapter 11 BankruptcyThe Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Sen. Dick Durbin, held a hearing on September 19, 2023, to investigate Johnson & Johnson's use of the "Texas two-step" bankruptcy strategy to resolve thousands of lawsuits alleging its talc products caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Bipartisan senators criticized J&J lawyer Erik Haas, with Sen. Josh Hawley referencing a $4.69 billion Missouri jury verdict and the Supreme Court's upholding of $2.2 billion for 22 plaintiffs, as evidence the company was attempting to avoid paying legitimate claims. Plaintiffs' attorneys from the Beasley Allen law firm, representing thousands of victims, vowed to continue pursuing justice in court as congressional scrutiny of corporate bankruptcy abuse intensifies.PR NewswireAttorneys for Talc Victims Say Dismissal of Second Attempted Bankruptcy by J&J Should Prompt New Trials, NegotiationsA U.S. Bankruptcy Judge formally dismissed Johnson & Johnson's second attempt to use bankruptcy protection for its LTL Management subsidiary, ruling that the company was not in immediate financial distress despite transferring liabilities via a 'Texas Two-Step' merger. Attorneys for the Beasley Allen Law Firm, representing thousands of women with ovarian cancer linked to J&J's talc products, stated this dismissal allows them to resume civil trials and negotiations that were halted during the bankruptcy proceedings.