Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Full company profile

uuid000nwlc

Namestring
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Legal namestring
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Websiteurl
eac.gov
Company typeenum
Public
Founded yearint
2002
Descriptiontext

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal agency established by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, headquartered in Washington, DC. It is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, operating with a small staff (11-50) under a four-Commissioner governance structure appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Its core mandate covers three functional pillars: (1) developing federal voting system standards through the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0), (2) testing and certifying voting systems via the Testing & Certification (T&C), Election Supporting Technology Evaluation Program (ESTEP), and Field Services (FSP) programs at accredited Voting System Test Labs, and (3) serving as the national clearinghouse for election administration information, distributing toolkits, guides, training, and research to all 50 states, four territories, and DC.

The EAC's product portfolio is best understood as a curated suite of programs and resources rather than a unified software product. Major offerings include the EAC Learning Lab (now offering professional certification), the biennial Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS), the Accessible Voting Technology Initiative (AVTI), 26 Quick Start Guides, Election Management Guidelines spanning 19 chapters, Language Access Resources with 1,843+ translated election terms in 20+ languages, Election Security Preparedness resources co-developed with CISA, and the National Clearinghouse Awards (Clearies) program recognizing innovation across nine categories. Technology outputs include the Election Security Risk Profile Tool (joint with CISA), the Accessible Voting Machines Calculator (with the University of Rhode Island), and an AI Toolkit for Election Officials addressing AI-generated content risks.

The EAC does not operate a commercial business model and generates no revenue. All resources, training, and certification services are provided free of charge to election officials and voters. Funding flows from annual federal appropriations, and the EAC administers HAVA grant programs that pass funds to states for election infrastructure, voting system upgrades, and cybersecurity measures. Customers are distributed across 8,000+ election jurisdictions, with primary segments being state and local election officials, voters (including UOCAVA military/overseas and voters with disabilities), and federal partners (CISA, NIST, FVAP, DOJ, DHS). The EAC's value proposition rests on its unique statutory authority as the sole federal standards body for voting systems and as the mandated clearinghouse, supported by deep integrations with NIST, CISA, Mandiant, Rutgers University, and other partners.

Short descriptiontext

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, developing voting system certification standards (VVSG) and serving as the national clearinghouse for 8,000+ state and local election jurisdictions. It is funded by federal appropriations and distributes HAVA grants, training, toolkits, and research resources at no cost.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSilver Spring, United States
HQ citystring
Silver Spring
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
election administration services, voting system certification, election security resources, election official training, voter accessibility programs
Industry1 code
1Electoral Support & Election Observation
CodeBPADAGAAPrimaryYes
NAICS code1 code
  • Public Administration92
Product category
Federal Election Administration
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Federal Appropriations and HAVA Grants
TypeLicensing Royalties
Description

The EAC is funded through annual federal appropriations and distributes Help America Vote Act (HAVA) grant funds to states for election administration improvements, voting system upgrades, and cybersecurity measures. The agency does not generate commercial revenue.

eac.gov
Marketing channels9 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Others
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal commission that serves as the national clearinghouse for election administration under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002. It develops Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), operates testing and certification programs for voting systems, distributes HAVA grants to states, and provides professional training, toolkits, and accessibility resources to state and local election officials and voters.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 4 values shown
  • Over 330 jurisdictions covered under VRA language assistance requirements served with translated materials
+3 more records
Product overview1 text field

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal agency that serves as the national clearinghouse for election administration. Rather than a unified software product, EAC offers a portfolio of programs and resources organized around core functions: voting system testing and certification (T&C, ESTEP, FSP), professional development (Learning Lab with certification, Quick Start Guides, Toolkits), research and data collection (EAVS surveys, Rutgers partnership studies), and resource dissemination (Clearinghouse Awards, VVSG guidelines, security resources). These offerings work together to support election officials across the entire election cycle—from equipment certification through security preparedness, accessibility, language access, poll worker training, and post-election auditing.

Product and service10 records
1Voting System Testing & Certification Program (T&C)
CategoryCertification Program
Description

Federal program that evaluates election hardware and software against Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) standards through testing at accredited Voting System Test Labs (VSTL).

2Election Supporting Technology Evaluation Program (ESTEP)
CategoryCertification Program
Description

Federal program providing testing, certification, and support for election-supporting technologies that assist in election administration.

3Field Services Program (FSP)
CategoryCertification Program
Description

Program that assists states and local jurisdictions in post-certification activities including systems verification and ongoing support for voting systems.

4Election Management Guidelines (EMG)
CategoryGuidelines Publication
Description

Comprehensive guidelines covering 19 chapters to assist state and local election officials in effectively managing and administering elections, including security, accessibility, ballot building, and post-election audits.

5EAC Learning Lab
CategoryTraining Platform
Description

Online platform providing free on-demand training on election administration topics, now offering professional certification for election officials completing the program.

6Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS)
CategoryResearch Data
Description

Comprehensive biennial survey collecting state-by-state data on election administration topics, serving as the most comprehensive nationwide data source on U.S. elections.

7National Clearinghouse Awards (Clearies)
CategoryRecognition Program
Description

Annual awards program recognizing innovative election administration efforts across nine categories including Security, HAVA Grants, Communications, Contingency Planning, Accessibility, and Poll Workers.

8Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG)
CategoryFederal Standards
Description

Federal standards (VVSG 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0) against which voting systems are tested and certified, representing a forward-looking approach acknowledging evolving election technology landscapes.

9Accessible Voting Technology Initiative (AVTI)
CategoryResearch Program
Description

Initiative supporting accessibility research on transformative technologies for voters with disabilities, having produced over 45 solutions for assisting voters with disabilities.

10Quick Start Guides
Scale indicator7 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership14 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

EAC works jointly with CISA on election security initiatives including the Election Infrastructure Incident Response Communications Guide, quarterly Election Threat Intelligence Briefings with Mandiant, and the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative (JCDC). CISA developed the Protecting U.S. Elections: A Cybersecurity Toolkit in partnership with EAC and distributes free cybersecurity services and tools for election officials.

Strategic tierCoreTypeTechnology or Integration
Description

EAC partners with Mandiant to host quarterly Election Threat Intelligence Briefings for election officials, IT, and cyber staff, covering observed cyber activity, threat landscapes, and strategic outlook for election security.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

EAC collaborates with Rutgers University researchers on studies analyzing voting experiences of voters with disabilities, including the 2020, 2022, and ongoing disability and voting accessibility studies conducted under HAVA's clearinghouse and research mandates.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

NIST co-develops the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) with EAC and provides technical support for UOCAVA remote electronic voting pilot programs. NIST contributes election terminology glossaries and security best practices documents for election officials.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

FVAP, part of the U.S. Department of Defense, works with EAC on military and overseas citizen voting (UOCAVA). The MOVE Act mandated that EAC and NIST provide guidelines and best practices to support FVAP's remote electronic voting pilot programs.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

EAC partnered with CTCL to offer no-cost online cybersecurity training for all election officials and election-related staff, delivered through CTCL's platform in three courses: Cybersecurity 101, 201, and 301.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Jointly created the 2024 U.S. Federal Elections: The Insider Threat report outlining election security-related insider threat examples, potential scenarios, and mitigation recommendations for election officials.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

EAC coordinates with DOJ on UOCAVA enforcement, voting rights provisions, and federal observer programs. DOJ provides legal context for Voting Rights Act language minority requirements and enforcement actions.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

MITRE developed Recommended Security Controls for Voter Registration systems, providing actionable security controls for state and local governments maintaining voter registration systems.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

CIS publishes the Handbook for Election Infrastructure Security and developed the Election Infrastructure Assessment Tool (EIAT) to help election officials conduct security self-assessments.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Partnership to develop the Accessible Voting Machines Calculator, helping election officials and policymakers determine optimal accessible voting machine deployment numbers for minimal wait times.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

NCSL produces resources on election security state policies, exploring election processes and procedures, and identifying options for state legislators to improve election security.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Census Bureau determinations under Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act publish which jurisdictions must provide language assistance. EAC uses Census data for language access designations and mapping.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

EAC and NCSL jointly developed 'Helping America Vote: Election Administration in the United States 2024,' a comprehensive nonpartisan guide on how elections are managed across the country.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC)
TypeDirect peer
Description

Run by the Center for Internet Security (CIS), it provides operational threat intelligence to election officials in partnership with EAC. Direct peer in the election-cybersecurity sub-segment where EAC's preparedness resources are distributed.

TypeRegional player
Description

Intergovernmental organization supporting democratic elections and providing comparative data on election administration worldwide. Comparable to EAC's clearinghouse/methodology role but operating globally rather than U.S.-only.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Independent federal agency that administers and enforces campaign finance law. It is the closest sister agency to the EAC in mission scope (federal elections) and structure (independent bipartisan commission), making it the most direct institutional peer.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Nonprofit that provides technical assistance on election administration globally. Comparable to EAC in professionalizing election administration and producing practitioner-facing guidance, though focused on non-U.S. contexts.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Federal agency co-developing election security resources and toolkits with EAC (e.g., Election Security Risk Profile Tool, Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative). Its election security subsector work makes it a co-functioning federal peer rather than a competitor.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Nonpartisan professional association of state secretaries of state, many of whom are chief state election officials. Comparable as a national convener of the election official community and co-developer (with EAC and NCSL) of election administration guides.

7National Association of State Election Directors (NASED)
TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Membership organization of state-level election directors that works closely with EAC on testing/certification and election administration best practices. Comparable to EAC in serving election officials but organized as a member-driven association rather than a federal agency.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Co-develops the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) with EAC and supports UOCAVA pilots. NIST's standards co-development role places it in a directly comparable technical-standards capacity to EAC's core product.

TypeOthers
Description

U.S. nonprofit advocating for verifiably secure election technology. Operates in an adjacent advocacy and standards-monitoring niche to EAC's certification and VVSG work, but does not deliver federal programs.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Department of Defense program responsible for absentee voting for Uniformed and Overseas Citizens. EAC and FVAP have a direct operational partnership on UOCAVA resources, making FVAP a tightly scoped peer in voter services for a specific population.

Market position
Strengths4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses4 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat6 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers6 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile1 record

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature4 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Federal Election Administrationeac.gov

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, developing voting system certification standards (VVSG) and serving as the national clearinghouse for 8,000+ state and local election jurisdictions. It is funded by federal appropriations and distributes HAVA grants, training, toolkits, and research resources at no cost.

What U.S. Election Assistance Commission does

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal agency established by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, headquartered in Washington, DC. It is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, operating with a small staff (11-50) under a four-Commissioner governance structure appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Its core mandate covers three functional pillars: (1) developing federal voting system standards through the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0), (2) testing and certifying voting systems via the Testing & Certification (T&C), Election Supporting Technology Evaluation Program (ESTEP), and Field Services (FSP) programs at accredited Voting System Test Labs, and (3) serving as the national clearinghouse for election administration information, distributing toolkits, guides, training, and research to all 50 states, four territories, and DC.

The EAC's product portfolio is best understood as a curated suite of programs and resources rather than a unified software product. Major offerings include the EAC Learning Lab (now offering professional certification), the biennial Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS), the Accessible Voting Technology Initiative (AVTI), 26 Quick Start Guides, Election Management Guidelines spanning 19 chapters, Language Access Resources with 1,843+ translated election terms in 20+ languages, Election Security Preparedness resources co-developed with CISA, and the National Clearinghouse Awards (Clearies) program recognizing innovation across nine categories. Technology outputs include the Election Security Risk Profile Tool (joint with CISA), the Accessible Voting Machines Calculator (with the University of Rhode Island), and an AI Toolkit for Election Officials addressing AI-generated content risks.

The EAC does not operate a commercial business model and generates no revenue. All resources, training, and certification services are provided free of charge to election officials and voters. Funding flows from annual federal appropriations, and the EAC administers HAVA grant programs that pass funds to states for election infrastructure, voting system upgrades, and cybersecurity measures. Customers are distributed across 8,000+ election jurisdictions, with primary segments being state and local election officials, voters (including UOCAVA military/overseas and voters with disabilities), and federal partners (CISA, NIST, FVAP, DOJ, DHS). The EAC's value proposition rests on its unique statutory authority as the sole federal standards body for voting systems and as the mandated clearinghouse, supported by deep integrations with NIST, CISA, Mandiant, Rutgers University, and other partners.

U.S. Election Assistance Commission firmographics

Firmographics
Name
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Legal name
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Website
https://eac.gov
Company type
Public
Founded year
2002
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
The U.S. Election Assistance Commission is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, developing voting system certification standards (VVSG) and serving as the national clearinghouse for 8,000+ state and local election jurisdictions. It is funded by federal appropriations and distributes HAVA grants, training, toolkits, and research resources at no cost.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

U.S. Election Assistance Commission industry classification

Industry
Product category
Federal Election Administration
NAICS
Public Administration (92)
akta.pro primary industry
Electoral Support & Election Observation (BPADAGAA)

Keywords

  • Election administration services
  • Voting system certification
  • Election security resources
  • Election official training
  • Voter accessibility programs

Where U.S. Election Assistance Commission is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Silver Spring
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

U.S. Election Assistance Commission business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Others

Revenue model

  1. Federal Appropriations and HAVA Grants: The EAC is funded through annual federal appropriations and distributes Help America Vote Act (HAVA) grant funds to states for election administration improvements, voting system upgrades, and cybersecurity measures. The agency does not generate commercial revenue.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels4 records

Marketing channels9 records

U.S. Election Assistance Commission product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal commission that serves as the national clearinghouse for election administration under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002. It develops Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), operates testing and certification programs for voting systems, distributes HAVA grants to states, and provides professional training, toolkits, and accessibility resources to state and local election officials and voters.

Product overview

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal agency that serves as the national clearinghouse for election administration. Rather than a unified software product, EAC offers a portfolio of programs and resources organized around core functions: voting system testing and certification (T&C, ESTEP, FSP), professional development (Learning Lab with certification, Quick Start Guides, Toolkits), research and data collection (EAVS surveys, Rutgers partnership studies), and resource dissemination (Clearinghouse Awards, VVSG guidelines, security resources). These offerings work together to support election officials across the entire election cycle—from equipment certification through security preparedness, accessibility, language access, poll worker training, and post-election auditing.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Voting System Testing & Certification Program (T&C) Federal program that evaluates election hardware and software against Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) standards through testing at accredited Voting System Test Labs (VSTL).
  • Election Supporting Technology Evaluation Program (ESTEP) Federal program providing testing, certification, and support for election-supporting technologies that assist in election administration.
  • Field Services Program (FSP) Program that assists states and local jurisdictions in post-certification activities including systems verification and ongoing support for voting systems.
  • Election Management Guidelines (EMG) Comprehensive guidelines covering 19 chapters to assist state and local election officials in effectively managing and administering elections, including security, accessibility, ballot building, and post-election audits.
  • EAC Learning Lab Online platform providing free on-demand training on election administration topics, now offering professional certification for election officials completing the program.
  • Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) Comprehensive biennial survey collecting state-by-state data on election administration topics, serving as the most comprehensive nationwide data source on U.S. elections.
  • National Clearinghouse Awards (Clearies) Annual awards program recognizing innovative election administration efforts across nine categories including Security, HAVA Grants, Communications, Contingency Planning, Accessibility, and Poll Workers.
  • Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Federal standards (VVSG 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0) against which voting systems are tested and certified, representing a forward-looking approach acknowledging evolving election technology landscapes.
  • Accessible Voting Technology Initiative (AVTI) Initiative supporting accessibility research on transformative technologies for voters with disabilities, having produced over 45 solutions for assisting voters with disabilities.
  • Quick Start Guides

Quantifiable outcome

  • Over 330 jurisdictions covered under VRA language assistance requirements served with translated materials
  • +3 more outcomes

Companies that use U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Customer profile

Named customers6 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles1 record

U.S. Election Assistance Commission technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Feature4 records

U.S. Election Assistance Commission partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

14 partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerEAC works jointly with CISA on election security initiatives including the Election Infrastructure Incident Response Communications Guide, quarterly Election Threat Intelligence Briefings with Mandiant, and the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative (JCDC). CISA developed the Protecting U.S. Elections: A Cybersecurity Toolkit in partnership with EAC and distributes free cybersecurity services and tools for election officials.
  • MandiantcoreTechnology or IntegrationEAC partners with Mandiant to host quarterly Election Threat Intelligence Briefings for election officials, IT, and cyber staff, covering observed cyber activity, threat landscapes, and strategic outlook for election security.
  • Rutgers UniversitycoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerEAC collaborates with Rutgers University researchers on studies analyzing voting experiences of voters with disabilities, including the 2020, 2022, and ongoing disability and voting accessibility studies conducted under HAVA's clearinghouse and research mandates.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerNIST co-develops the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) with EAC and provides technical support for UOCAVA remote electronic voting pilot programs. NIST contributes election terminology glossaries and security best practices documents for election officials.
  • Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerFVAP, part of the U.S. Department of Defense, works with EAC on military and overseas citizen voting (UOCAVA). The MOVE Act mandated that EAC and NIST provide guidelines and best practices to support FVAP's remote electronic voting pilot programs.
  • Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerEAC partnered with CTCL to offer no-cost online cybersecurity training for all election officials and election-related staff, delivered through CTCL's platform in three courses: Cybersecurity 101, 201, and 301.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FBI, and EACcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerJointly created the 2024 U.S. Federal Elections: The Insider Threat report outlining election security-related insider threat examples, potential scenarios, and mitigation recommendations for election officials.
  • U.S. Department of JusticecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerEAC coordinates with DOJ on UOCAVA enforcement, voting rights provisions, and federal observer programs. DOJ provides legal context for Voting Rights Act language minority requirements and enforcement actions.
  • MITREminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerMITRE developed Recommended Security Controls for Voter Registration systems, providing actionable security controls for state and local governments maintaining voter registration systems.
  • Center for Internet SecurityminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerCIS publishes the Handbook for Election Infrastructure Security and developed the Election Infrastructure Assessment Tool (EIAT) to help election officials conduct security self-assessments.
  • University of Rhode Island's Engineering for Democracy InstituteminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerPartnership to develop the Accessible Voting Machines Calculator, helping election officials and policymakers determine optimal accessible voting machine deployment numbers for minimal wait times.
  • National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerNCSL produces resources on election security state policies, exploring election processes and procedures, and identifying options for state legislators to improve election security.
  • U.S. Census BureaucoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCensus Bureau determinations under Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act publish which jurisdictions must provide language assistance. EAC uses Census data for language access designations and mapping.
  • National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerEAC and NCSL jointly developed 'Helping America Vote: Election Administration in the United States 2024,' a comprehensive nonpartisan guide on how elections are managed across the country.

Scale indicators7 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

U.S. Election Assistance Commission competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC): Run by the Center for Internet Security (CIS), it provides operational threat intelligence to election officials in partnership with EAC. Direct peer in the election-cybersecurity sub-segment where EAC's preparedness resources are distributed.
  • Federal Election Commission (FEC): Independent federal agency that administers and enforces campaign finance law. It is the closest sister agency to the EAC in mission scope (federal elections) and structure (independent bipartisan commission), making it the most direct institutional peer.
  • Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): Federal agency co-developing election security resources and toolkits with EAC (e.g., Election Security Risk Profile Tool, Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative). Its election security subsector work makes it a co-functioning federal peer rather than a competitor.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Co-develops the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) with EAC and supports UOCAVA pilots. NIST's standards co-development role places it in a directly comparable technical-standards capacity to EAC's core product.
  • Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP): Department of Defense program responsible for absentee voting for Uniformed and Overseas Citizens. EAC and FVAP have a direct operational partnership on UOCAVA resources, making FVAP a tightly scoped peer in voter services for a specific population.

Regional players

  • International IDEA: Intergovernmental organization supporting democratic elections and providing comparative data on election administration worldwide. Comparable to EAC's clearinghouse/methodology role but operating globally rather than U.S.-only.

Broad incumbents

  • International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES): Nonprofit that provides technical assistance on election administration globally. Comparable to EAC in professionalizing election administration and producing practitioner-facing guidance, though focused on non-U.S. contexts.
  • National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS): Nonpartisan professional association of state secretaries of state, many of whom are chief state election officials. Comparable as a national convener of the election official community and co-developer (with EAC and NCSL) of election administration guides.
  • National Association of State Election Directors (NASED): Membership organization of state-level election directors that works closely with EAC on testing/certification and election administration best practices. Comparable to EAC in serving election officials but organized as a member-driven association rather than a federal agency.

Others

  • Verified Voting: U.S. nonprofit advocating for verifiably secure election technology. Operates in an adjacent advocacy and standards-monitoring niche to EAC's certification and VVSG work, but does not deliver federal programs.

Market position

Strengths4 records

Weaknesses4 records

Competitive moat6 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

U.S. Election Assistance Commission social profiles

Digital presence

U.S. Election Assistance Commission financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

U.S. Election Assistance Commission leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

U.S. Election Assistance Commission funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

U.S. Election Assistance Commission M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about U.S. Election Assistance Commission

What does U.S. Election Assistance Commission do?

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan federal commission that serves as the national clearinghouse for election administration under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002. It develops Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), operates testing and certification programs for voting systems, distributes HAVA grants to states, and provides professional training, toolkits, and accessibility resources to state and local election officials and voters.

Is U.S. Election Assistance Commission a public or private company?

U.S. Election Assistance Commission is a public company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was U.S. Election Assistance Commission founded?

U.S. Election Assistance Commission was founded in 2002. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is U.S. Election Assistance Commission based?

U.S. Election Assistance Commission is headquartered in Silver Spring, United States, in the North America region.

How does U.S. Election Assistance Commission make money?

One revenue line is on record: federal Appropriations and HAVA Grants.

Who are U.S. Election Assistance Commission's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC), Federal Election Commission (FEC), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP). International IDEA is listed as a regional player. Broad incumbents are International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and National Association of State Election Directors (NASED). Verified Voting is listed as an others.

Does U.S. Election Assistance Commission have an API?

No public API is recorded for U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

What industry is U.S. Election Assistance Commission in?

U.S. Election Assistance Commission's product category is Federal Election Administration. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPADAGAA, Electoral Support & Election Observation. Its NAICS code is 92.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
The Times of IndiaHow to update your voter record after a move or name change before the US midterm elections 2026 so you don't hit a snag at the polls, step by stepVoters preparing for the 2026 US midterm elections are advised to check and update their registration details if they have moved, changed their name, or haven't voted recently. The US Election Assistance Commission recommends updating registration after a move or name change, and states set their own deadlines and mail ballot rules.The Times of IndiaUS midterm elections 2026: How to find your correct polling place - early voting rules may differ and vote centers can change where you voteVoters for the 2026 midterms should check their state or local election office to find their polling place, as rules vary by jurisdiction. Early voting availability, hours, and vote-center systems differ, so verification is necessary. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission advises checking official sources for accurate information.The Victoria AdvocateVictoria County elections administrator earns federal certificationVictoria County Elections Administrator Karen Cline earned the U.S. Election Assistance Commission's Certificate of Federal Professional Training. The certification requires 30 training credits covering election law, accessibility, and voting systems. Cline said it will help her office operate at the highest standard for safe, secure, and fair elections.Bipartisan Policy CenterEvaluating Federal Grant Programs to Improve Voting AccessibilityA U.S. Election Assistance Commission report evaluates HAVA's Section 261 and Section 291 accessibility grants, which provided $103.8 million to state election offices (2003-2011) and $138.5 million to protection and advocacy organizations (ongoing). The report documents activities such as site surveys, accessible voting systems, poll worker training, and voter outreach, noting the disability turnout gap narrowed from 14-21 percentage points to 4.6-11.3 points between 2012-2022.PBS.orgMonitoring the Midterms: Are midterms safe from cybersecurity threats?CISA held a conference call with state election officials to discuss cybersecurity preparations for the upcoming midterm elections. This outreach occurred three months before the vote, despite earlier claims by President Trump regarding hacker risks. The article also references broader concerns about workforce reductions at CISA and the role of the Election Assistance Commission.MarketScreenerTrump team scrutinized election agency over 2020 vote before firing its leadersPresident Trump's administration spent over a year scrutinizing the Election Assistance Commission, questioning its handling of the 2020 presidential election before firing its two Democratic commissioners and accepting the resignation of its Republican members, leaving the four-member panel vacant. Documents reviewed by Reuters show administration officials pressed the agency over its assertion that the 2020 election was secure and vetted potential nominees including allies who worked to overturn Trump's 2020 loss. Trump has vowed to work with states to address alleged vulnerabilities in voting systems ahead of November's midterm elections, though the White House has not specified what role the commission would play.DevdiscourseTrump's Moves to Transform the Election Assistance CommissionThe Trump administration dismissed the Election Assistance Commission's Democratic commissioners after spending over a year scrutinizing the agency's handling of the 2020 election, seeking to increase influence over federal elections. The EAC, a bipartisan body that certifies voting systems, faces an uncertain future as the administration contends its changes enhance security while Democrats argue they restrict access. Potential nominees for the vacancies included Trump allies such as Patrice Johnson and Kurt Olsen.PBS.orgOusted Election Assistance Commission chair on Trump's effort to control votingThe article discusses the Election Assistance Commission's inability to function effectively during the current election year due to leadership issues. It features an interview with former EAC member Thomas Hicks regarding these operational challenges and federal support for state-level election preparations.CyberScoopStates are building their own election defense networks as federal support evaporatesThe Trump administration fired Election Assistance Commission commissioners and the DOJ sent letters threatening states with criminal prosecution for election officials, prompting secretaries of state to build independent election defense networks. States including Oregon and Arizona are now coordinating directly with local law enforcement and other states to fill security gaps left by the withdrawal of federal support, with officials expressing deep distrust of CISA. A federal judge upheld West Virginia's refusal to hand over voter data to the DOJ, while Oregon officials are advising county clerks on handling federal subpoenas.ReutersTrump officials sought ways to sidestep election agency before firings, sources sayThe White House spent months exploring ways to bypass the Election Assistance Commission, including considering declaring a national emergency to create a federal task force on voting systems, before President Trump ousted the agency's commissioners on Thursday. The firings left the bipartisan federal agency without a quorum, preventing it from taking up any new business such as implementing changes to voting procedures or the national mail voter registration form. Democrats accused the administration of attempting to increase control over U.S. elections ahead of November's midterm elections when control of Congress will be at stake.