Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Public Justice

Full company profile

uuid0022y4l

Namestring
Public Justice
Legal namestring
Public Justice, P.C. and Public Justice Foundation
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
1982
Descriptiontext

Public Justice is a U.S.-based nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1982, operating from national headquarters in Washington, D.C. (1620 L Street NW, Suite 630) and a West Coast office in Oakland, California (475 14th Street, Suite 610). The firm employs strategic impact litigation as its primary methodology across four stated issue areas: Defending Access to Justice, Advancing Students' Civil Rights, Protecting the Environment, and Ending the Criminalization of Poverty. Its work is organized into distinct projects including the Students' Civil Rights Project (Title IX litigation), the Debtors' Prison Project (cash bail and fines/fees), the Environmental Enforcement Project (Clean Water Act citizen suits and climate cases), and the Access to Justice Project (forced arbitration, court secrecy). Public Justice does not develop technology products; its "platform" is a roster of specialized attorneys (Alexandra Brodsky, Adele Kimmel, Brian Hardingham) supported by a curated coalition network of elite cooperating law firms (Munger, Tolles & Olson; Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel; Sanford Heisler Sharp) and peer nonprofits (Civil Rights Corps, ACLU, Our Children's Trust, Public Citizen, National Fair Housing Alliance, Democracy Forward). Notably successful matters include the Ninth Circuit en banc Brown v. State of Arizona Title IX ruling, the Sixth Circuit's Snyder-Hill v. Ohio State University reversal permitting Strauss survivor claims to proceed, an LA County preliminary injunction blocking wealth-based pretrial detention (Urquidi), and an Eighth Circuit reversal in the Black Hawk County jail fees class action.

The organization's revenue model is donations and membership contributions from individuals, foundations, and supporters, with cases delivered on a pro bono basis; no fees are charged to clients, and the website explicitly states "Public Justice is not your lawyer," emphasizing it does not provide individualized legal advice. Customer acquisition is community-led: prospective cases arrive via an online submission portal, referrals from civil rights groups and legal nonprofits, and partner coalitions, with intake filtered through alignment with the four issue areas and potential for systemic precedent. Beneficiary populations include student survivors of sexual harassment (e.g., Mackenzie Brown, Jane Doe, Snyder-Hill plaintiffs), individuals subjected to wealth-based pretrial detention (e.g., Phillip Urquidi), workers facing disparate-impact discrimination (e.g., Leah Cross), and youth plaintiffs in climate litigation (18 young Americans vs. EPA). Distribution of legal services occurs through direct attorney-client relationships and co-counsel litigation, with cases often pursued as class actions designed to produce structural rather than purely individual remedies. Public marketing and donor mobilization channels include the website, an email newsletter, active accounts on Facebook, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, and Medium, plus earned media and an annual gala.

Short descriptiontext

Public Justice is a U.S. nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1982 that pursues strategic impact litigation in access to justice, students' civil rights, environmental protection, and the criminalization of poverty, serving individuals and class members through pro bono representation and coalition co-counsel relationships.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSeattle, United States
HQ citystring
Seattle
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices2 records

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
impact litigation, public interest law, legal advocacy services, nonprofit legal services, civil rights litigation
Industry4 codes
1Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAAPrimaryYes
2Consumer Rights & Public Interest Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAKPrimaryNo
3Public Defense & Legal Aid Services
CodeBPAIAFACPrimaryNo
4Legal Literacy & Public Legal Education (Know Your Rights)
CodeEDAAAFAIPrimaryNo
NAICS code1 code
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Public Interest Legal Advocacy
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model2 records
1Donations and Charitable Contributions
TypeOthers
Description

Public Justice operates as a nonprofit organization that relies primarily on donations from individuals, foundations, and supporters. The website includes a 'Donate Today' call-to-action and membership program.

publicjustice.net
2Pro Bono Legal Representation
TypeOthers
Description

The organization provides free legal representation to clients, with cases often pursued as class actions or impact litigation on behalf of individuals and groups who cannot afford legal counsel.

publicjustice.net
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Brand1 of 2 records shown
1Debtors' Prison Project
Description

A project within Public Justice that uses strategic litigation to combat the criminalization of poverty, fight the imposition of abusive fines and fees, and compel governments to stop conditioning freedom on ability to pay.

publicjustice.net
+1 more record
Core offering1 text field

Public Justice is a national nonprofit public interest law firm that pursues high-impact, precedent-setting litigation to advance consumers' and citizens' rights, protect the environment, and hold powerful interests accountable. The organization provides free legal representation through strategic lawsuits, coalition-based advocacy, and targeted projects focused on students' civil rights, debtors' prisons, environmental enforcement, and access to justice.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 3 values shown
  • Historic preliminary injunction blocking LA County's cash bail schedule
+2 more records
Product overview1 text field

Public Justice is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that operates as a single unified service offering—strategic impact litigation—rather than a technology product platform. The organization comprises distinct legal projects including the Students' Civil Rights Project (Title IX litigation), Debtors' Prison Project (cash bail reform), Environmental Enforcement Project (Clean Water Act), Access to Justice Project (forced arbitration/court secrecy), and a publicly accessible Case Database documenting their litigation work. These are advocacy service programs, not technology products or software platforms.

Product and service5 records
1Students' Civil Rights Project
CategoryCivil Rights Legal Services
Description

Legal representation and impact litigation project defending the constitutional and civil rights of students, including Title IX matters, due process in school discipline, and student-to-student harassment. Aimed at K-12 and college students whose rights have been violated.

2Debtors' Prison Project
3Environmental Enforcement Project
4Access to Justice Project
5Case Database
Scale indicator6 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership20 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2022-11-14
Description

Co-counsel in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles class action challenging unconstitutional cash bail. Partnered with Public Justice to argue preliminary injunction motion. Civil Rights Corps is a nonprofit dedicated to challenging systemic injustice in the American legal system.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating law firm providing pro bono co-counsel representation in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles. Munger Tolles & Olson Chair Brad Brian argued the preliminary injunction motion alongside Civil Rights Corps and Public Justice.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating civil rights law firm representing plaintiffs in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles class action lawsuit against LA County and City bail policies.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating law firm representing plaintiffs in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles case challenging wealth-based pretrial detention.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Coalition of grassroots organizations, advocates, and directly impacted communities working to reduce incarceration footprint. Coalition coordinator Ambrose Brooks S. provided statement supporting preliminary injunction victory.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Legal nonprofit partnering with Public Justice to file constitutional climate lawsuit against EPA on behalf of 18 young Americans challenging reversal of greenhouse gas endangerment finding.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating counsel in Czerwienski v. President and Fellows of Harvard College representing graduate students in Title IX lawsuit against Harvard for failure to protect students from sexual harassment.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating counsel in Brown v. State of Arizona representing Mackenzie Brown in Title IX case that resulted in landmark en banc Ninth Circuit ruling on off-campus harassment liability.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating counsel in Brown v. State of Arizona representing plaintiff Mackenzie Brown in Title IX lawsuit against University of Arizona.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Cooperating counsel representing survivors of Dr. Richard Strauss's sexual abuse in Snyder-Hill and Moxley v. Ohio State University lawsuits.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel in Cross v. EEOC challenging EEOC memorandum that abdicated statutory duty to investigate disparate impact discrimination charges under Title VII and ADEA.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel in Cross v. EEOC lawsuit challenging EEOC's closure of disparate impact discrimination charges.

13FarmSTAND
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-counsel in Cross v. EEOC lawsuit challenging EEOC memorandum on disparate impact discrimination.

publicjustice.net
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Lead organization in coalition challenging CFPB v. Colony Ridge settlement, with Public Justice participating in fair housing and civil rights coalition.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Partner organization in Chemours Clean Water Act citizen suit settlement, with Public Justice staff involved in environmental enforcement efforts.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Interfaith coalition of clergy plaintiffs challenging unconstitutional use of tax dollars to fund unlawful detention of individuals unable to pay bail in Urquidi case.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

American Civil Liberties Union partnered with Public Justice on multiple cases including Black Hawk County Jail Fee lawsuit and Rutherford v. Luna regarding LA jail conditions.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Partner organization in Oregon v. Trump case, with Public Justice filing motion to intervene to protect public's right of access to records.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Independent news publication represented by Public Justice in seeking to lift access restriction on electronic docket for U.H.A. v. Bondi civil lawsuit.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Partner in coalition letter opposing OPM's proposal to institute nondisclosure agreements for federal workers, with 61 additional organizations joining.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

National nonprofit legal organization using impact litigation to advance LGBTQ+ civil rights — directly comparable nonprofit impact-litigation model even though targeted at a different protected class.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit public-interest environmental law organization that uses impact litigation to enforce environmental statutes — directly comparable to Public Justice's Environmental Enforcement Project, especially on Clean Water Act citizen suits.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit consumer and worker rights advocacy organization that litigates and advocates on access-to-courts and regulatory issues — direct peer to Public Justice's Access to Justice Project and a co-counsel on Cross v. EEOC.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit legal and policy organization pursuing gender justice through litigation and advocacy — comparable impact-litigation model with overlap on Title IX and civil rights cases.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit civil rights organization that combines impact litigation, education, and advocacy to pursue systemic justice reform — directly comparable legal-advocacy model and issue overlap.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Premier civil rights impact litigation organization pursuing precedent-setting cases on racial justice, education, and criminal justice — directly comparable in mission, methodology (impact litigation), and donor-funded nonprofit structure.

TypeDirect peer
Description

National nonprofit legal advocacy organization that pursues impact litigation across civil rights, criminal justice, and First Amendment issues — directly overlapping Public Justice's case portfolio, and an explicit coalition partner of Public Justice on multiple cases.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit legal advocacy group using impact litigation to advance constitutional and international human rights — directly comparable model and frequently overlapping civil liberties docket.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit impact-litigation organization focused on workers' rights and economic justice — directly comparable to Public Justice's worker-side impact cases and an active co-counsel partner (Cross v. EEOC).

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit organization dedicated to systemic justice reform through impact litigation — direct peer to Public Justice's Debtors' Prison Project, and a co-counsel partner on Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat5 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers6 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles1 record

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Public Justice

Public Interest Legal Advocacypublicjustice.net

Public Justice is a U.S. nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1982 that pursues strategic impact litigation in access to justice, students' civil rights, environmental protection, and the criminalization of poverty, serving individuals and class members through pro bono representation and coalition co-counsel relationships.

What Public Justice does

Public Justice is a U.S.-based nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1982, operating from national headquarters in Washington, D.C. (1620 L Street NW, Suite 630) and a West Coast office in Oakland, California (475 14th Street, Suite 610). The firm employs strategic impact litigation as its primary methodology across four stated issue areas: Defending Access to Justice, Advancing Students' Civil Rights, Protecting the Environment, and Ending the Criminalization of Poverty. Its work is organized into distinct projects including the Students' Civil Rights Project (Title IX litigation), the Debtors' Prison Project (cash bail and fines/fees), the Environmental Enforcement Project (Clean Water Act citizen suits and climate cases), and the Access to Justice Project (forced arbitration, court secrecy). Public Justice does not develop technology products; its "platform" is a roster of specialized attorneys (Alexandra Brodsky, Adele Kimmel, Brian Hardingham) supported by a curated coalition network of elite cooperating law firms (Munger, Tolles & Olson; Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel; Sanford Heisler Sharp) and peer nonprofits (Civil Rights Corps, ACLU, Our Children's Trust, Public Citizen, National Fair Housing Alliance, Democracy Forward). Notably successful matters include the Ninth Circuit en banc Brown v. State of Arizona Title IX ruling, the Sixth Circuit's Snyder-Hill v. Ohio State University reversal permitting Strauss survivor claims to proceed, an LA County preliminary injunction blocking wealth-based pretrial detention (Urquidi), and an Eighth Circuit reversal in the Black Hawk County jail fees class action.

The organization's revenue model is donations and membership contributions from individuals, foundations, and supporters, with cases delivered on a pro bono basis; no fees are charged to clients, and the website explicitly states "Public Justice is not your lawyer," emphasizing it does not provide individualized legal advice. Customer acquisition is community-led: prospective cases arrive via an online submission portal, referrals from civil rights groups and legal nonprofits, and partner coalitions, with intake filtered through alignment with the four issue areas and potential for systemic precedent. Beneficiary populations include student survivors of sexual harassment (e.g., Mackenzie Brown, Jane Doe, Snyder-Hill plaintiffs), individuals subjected to wealth-based pretrial detention (e.g., Phillip Urquidi), workers facing disparate-impact discrimination (e.g., Leah Cross), and youth plaintiffs in climate litigation (18 young Americans vs. EPA). Distribution of legal services occurs through direct attorney-client relationships and co-counsel litigation, with cases often pursued as class actions designed to produce structural rather than purely individual remedies. Public marketing and donor mobilization channels include the website, an email newsletter, active accounts on Facebook, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, and Medium, plus earned media and an annual gala.

Public Justice firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Public Justice
Legal name
Public Justice, P.C. and Public Justice Foundation
Website
https://publicjustice.net
Company type
Private
Founded year
1982
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Short description
Public Justice is a U.S. nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1982 that pursues strategic impact litigation in access to justice, students' civil rights, environmental protection, and the criminalization of poverty, serving individuals and class members through pro bono representation and coalition co-counsel relationships.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Public Justice industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Interest Legal Advocacy
NAICS
Human Rights Organizations (813311)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy (BPAGAFAA)
akta.pro secondary industries
Consumer Rights & Public Interest Advocacy (BPAGAFAK), Public Defense & Legal Aid Services (BPAIAFAC), Legal Literacy & Public Legal Education (Know Your Rights) (EDAAAFAI)

Keywords

  • Impact litigation
  • Public interest law
  • Legal advocacy services
  • Nonprofit legal services
  • Civil rights litigation

Where Public Justice is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Seattle
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices2 records

Markets served

Public Justice business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Donations and Charitable Contributions: Public Justice operates as a nonprofit organization that relies primarily on donations from individuals, foundations, and supporters. The website includes a 'Donate Today' call-to-action and membership program.
  2. Pro Bono Legal Representation: The organization provides free legal representation to clients, with cases often pursued as class actions or impact litigation on behalf of individuals and groups who cannot afford legal counsel.

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Public Justice product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Public Justice is a national nonprofit public interest law firm that pursues high-impact, precedent-setting litigation to advance consumers' and citizens' rights, protect the environment, and hold powerful interests accountable. The organization provides free legal representation through strategic lawsuits, coalition-based advocacy, and targeted projects focused on students' civil rights, debtors' prisons, environmental enforcement, and access to justice.

Product overview

Public Justice is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that operates as a single unified service offering—strategic impact litigation—rather than a technology product platform. The organization comprises distinct legal projects including the Students' Civil Rights Project (Title IX litigation), Debtors' Prison Project (cash bail reform), Environmental Enforcement Project (Clean Water Act), Access to Justice Project (forced arbitration/court secrecy), and a publicly accessible Case Database documenting their litigation work. These are advocacy service programs, not technology products or software platforms.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Brands

  • Debtors' Prison Project: A project within Public Justice that uses strategic litigation to combat the criminalization of poverty, fight the imposition of abusive fines and fees, and compel governments to stop conditioning freedom on ability to pay.
  • Students' Civil Rights Project

Products and services

  • Students' Civil Rights Project Legal representation and impact litigation project defending the constitutional and civil rights of students, including Title IX matters, due process in school discipline, and student-to-student harassment. Aimed at K-12 and college students whose rights have been violated.
  • Debtors' Prison Project
  • Environmental Enforcement Project
  • Access to Justice Project
  • Case Database

Quantifiable outcome

  • Historic preliminary injunction blocking LA County's cash bail schedule
  • +2 more outcomes

Companies that use Public Justice

Customer profile

Named customers6 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Public Justice technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Public Justice partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

20 partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Civil Rights CorpscoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 14 November 2022Co-counsel in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles class action challenging unconstitutional cash bail. Partnered with Public Justice to argue preliminary injunction motion. Civil Rights Corps is a nonprofit dedicated to challenging systemic injustice in the American legal system.
  • Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating law firm providing pro bono co-counsel representation in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles. Munger Tolles & Olson Chair Brad Brian argued the preliminary injunction motion alongside Civil Rights Corps and Public Justice.
  • Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating civil rights law firm representing plaintiffs in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles class action lawsuit against LA County and City bail policies.
  • Schonbrun Seplow Harris Hoffman & Zeldes, LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating law firm representing plaintiffs in Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles case challenging wealth-based pretrial detention.
  • JusticeLA CoalitioncoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCoalition of grassroots organizations, advocates, and directly impacted communities working to reduce incarceration footprint. Coalition coordinator Ambrose Brooks S. provided statement supporting preliminary injunction victory.
  • Our Children's TrustcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerLegal nonprofit partnering with Public Justice to file constitutional climate lawsuit against EPA on behalf of 18 young Americans challenging reversal of greenhouse gas endangerment finding.
  • Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating counsel in Czerwienski v. President and Fellows of Harvard College representing graduate students in Title IX lawsuit against Harvard for failure to protect students from sexual harassment.
  • All Rise Trial & AppellatecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating counsel in Brown v. State of Arizona representing Mackenzie Brown in Title IX case that resulted in landmark en banc Ninth Circuit ruling on off-campus harassment liability.
  • Hunter, Humphrey & YavitzcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating counsel in Brown v. State of Arizona representing plaintiff Mackenzie Brown in Title IX lawsuit against University of Arizona.
  • Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLPcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCooperating counsel representing survivors of Dr. Richard Strauss's sexual abuse in Snyder-Hill and Moxley v. Ohio State University lawsuits.
  • Public CitizencoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel in Cross v. EEOC challenging EEOC memorandum that abdicated statutory duty to investigate disparate impact discrimination charges under Title VII and ADEA.
  • Towards JusticecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel in Cross v. EEOC lawsuit challenging EEOC's closure of disparate impact discrimination charges.
  • FarmSTANDcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-counsel in Cross v. EEOC lawsuit challenging EEOC memorandum on disparate impact discrimination.
  • National Fair Housing AlliancecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerLead organization in coalition challenging CFPB v. Colony Ridge settlement, with Public Justice participating in fair housing and civil rights coalition.
  • Appalachian Mountain AdvocatescoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPartner organization in Chemours Clean Water Act citizen suit settlement, with Public Justice staff involved in environmental enforcement efforts.
  • CLUE (Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerInterfaith coalition of clergy plaintiffs challenging unconstitutional use of tax dollars to fund unlawful detention of individuals unable to pay bail in Urquidi case.
  • ACLUcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerAmerican Civil Liberties Union partnered with Public Justice on multiple cases including Black Hawk County Jail Fee lawsuit and Rutherford v. Luna regarding LA jail conditions.
  • Public AccountabilitycoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPartner organization in Oregon v. Trump case, with Public Justice filing motion to intervene to protect public's right of access to records.
  • Law DorkminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerIndependent news publication represented by Public Justice in seeking to lift access restriction on electronic docket for U.H.A. v. Bondi civil lawsuit.
  • Democracy ForwardcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPartner in coalition letter opposing OPM's proposal to institute nondisclosure agreements for federal workers, with 61 additional organizations joining.

Scale indicators6 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Public Justice competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Lambda Legal: National nonprofit legal organization using impact litigation to advance LGBTQ+ civil rights — directly comparable nonprofit impact-litigation model even though targeted at a different protected class.
  • Earthjustice: Nonprofit public-interest environmental law organization that uses impact litigation to enforce environmental statutes — directly comparable to Public Justice's Environmental Enforcement Project, especially on Clean Water Act citizen suits.
  • Public Citizen: Nonprofit consumer and worker rights advocacy organization that litigates and advocates on access-to-courts and regulatory issues — direct peer to Public Justice's Access to Justice Project and a co-counsel on Cross v. EEOC.
  • National Women's Law Center: Nonprofit legal and policy organization pursuing gender justice through litigation and advocacy — comparable impact-litigation model with overlap on Title IX and civil rights cases.
  • Southern Poverty Law Center: Nonprofit civil rights organization that combines impact litigation, education, and advocacy to pursue systemic justice reform — directly comparable legal-advocacy model and issue overlap.
  • NAACP Legal Defense Fund: Premier civil rights impact litigation organization pursuing precedent-setting cases on racial justice, education, and criminal justice — directly comparable in mission, methodology (impact litigation), and donor-funded nonprofit structure.
  • ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union): National nonprofit legal advocacy organization that pursues impact litigation across civil rights, criminal justice, and First Amendment issues — directly overlapping Public Justice's case portfolio, and an explicit coalition partner of Public Justice on multiple cases.
  • Center for Constitutional Rights: Nonprofit legal advocacy group using impact litigation to advance constitutional and international human rights — directly comparable model and frequently overlapping civil liberties docket.
  • Towards Justice: Nonprofit impact-litigation organization focused on workers' rights and economic justice — directly comparable to Public Justice's worker-side impact cases and an active co-counsel partner (Cross v. EEOC).
  • Civil Rights Corps: Nonprofit organization dedicated to systemic justice reform through impact litigation — direct peer to Public Justice's Debtors' Prison Project, and a co-counsel partner on Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat5 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights6 records

Customer concentration

Public Justice social profiles

Digital presence

Public Justice financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Public Justice leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles1 record

Public Justice funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Public Justice M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Public Justice

What does Public Justice do?

Public Justice is a national nonprofit public interest law firm that pursues high-impact, precedent-setting litigation to advance consumers' and citizens' rights, protect the environment, and hold powerful interests accountable. The organization provides free legal representation through strategic lawsuits, coalition-based advocacy, and targeted projects focused on students' civil rights, debtors' prisons, environmental enforcement, and access to justice.

Is Public Justice a public or private company?

Public Justice is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Public Justice founded?

Public Justice was founded in 1982. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Public Justice based?

Public Justice is headquartered in Seattle, United States, in the North America region.

How does Public Justice make money?

Two revenue lines are on record. Donations and Charitable Contributions are the primary driver. The others are pro Bono Legal Representation.

Who are Public Justice's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Lambda Legal, Earthjustice, Public Citizen, National Women's Law Center, Southern Poverty Law Center, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), Center for Constitutional Rights, Towards Justice and Civil Rights Corps.

Does Public Justice have an API?

No public API is recorded for Public Justice.

What industry is Public Justice in?

Public Justice's product category is Public Interest Legal Advocacy. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAA, Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy, with a secondary code of BPAGAFAK, Consumer Rights & Public Interest Advocacy. Its NAICS code is 813311 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
EIN PresswireHecht Partners Honored as Part of Public Justice's 2026 Trial Lawyer of the Year Award-Winning TeamHecht Partners attorneys were honored as part of Public Justice's 2026 Trial Lawyer of the Year team for work in a Sudanese refugee case. The jury awarded $20.75 million to bellwether plaintiffs, the first civil liability against a major international bank for genocide support. The verdict prompted a BNP Paribas stock decline over ten percent.WikipediaCivil Rights Corps: Difference between revisionsCivil Rights Corps (CRC) has litigated the "Right 2 Hug Project," challenging jail policies that replace in-person family visits with paid phone and video calls. In March 2024, CRC, Public Justice, and the law firm Pitt McGehee filed lawsuits in Genesee County and St. Clair County, Michigan, alleging violations of the right to associate under the Michigan Constitution, and in January 2025 filed a similar suit against Adams County, Colorado, arguing children have a constitutional right to hug incarcerated parents. Law enforcement officials have countered that virtual-only visits are an efficient use of resources and reduce security risks associated with bringing outsiders into jails.Inside Climate NewsHealthcare Professionals, Scientists and Children Sue the EPA for Backtracking on Greenhouse Gas RegulationTwo lawsuits were filed Wednesday in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals against the Environmental Protection Agency following its reversal of a 2009 endangerment finding that underpinned federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from sectors such as motor vehicles and power plants. One suit was brought by a coalition of 17 health and environmental groups including the Sierra Club, American Lung Association, and American Public Health Association, while a second suit was filed by legal nonprofits Our Children’s Trust and Public Justice on behalf of 18 young Americans who argue the repeal violates their constitutional rights. President Trump called the reversal “the single largest deregulatory action in American history,” while plaintiffs and health experts described the EPA’s action as “climate denialism.”Law360Judiciary Panel Gets Earful On Legal Financing, SubpoenasThe Advisory Committee on Civil Rules held a virtual hearing Tuesday to debate proposed revisions to federal court rules covering recusal disclosures, third-party litigation funding transparency, subpoena service methods, and remote testimony protocols. Defense-oriented firms like Horvitz & Levy and Lawyers for Civil Justice pressed for broader third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements, while plaintiff firms including Hagens Berman argued against expanding remote testimony access and questioned criticism of proposed service-of-process changes. The proposed amendments to Rule 45 regarding subpoena delivery methods and Rule 7.1 on recusal disclosures have generated intense feedback, with the public comment period set to end February 16.PR NewswireGlenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes and Public Justice Secure a Preliminary Injunction in High-Profile Pro Bono Case Protecting Student Civil RightsGlenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes obtained a preliminary injunction in the District of Massachusetts blocking the Department of Education's mass termination of the Office of Civil Rights, which had cut roughly half of OCR's staff and closed half its offices. The court ruled the plaintiffs demonstrated a clear likelihood of success, finding the cuts would prevent timely resolution of student discrimination complaints and leave affected students without vital support. The injunction means OCR must continue investigating complaints of discrimination and enforcing federal civil rights laws in schools.PR NewswireFarrin Attorneys Become Patron Members of Public Justice FoundationSix litigation attorneys from the Law Offices of James Scott Farrin were recently admitted as patron-level members of The Public Justice Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that advocates for individual rights. As patron members, the firm will provide regular financial support to fund initiatives covering access to justice, civil rights, consumer rights, environmental causes, and worker's rights in the United States. The Public Justice Foundation works to hold corrupt companies, discriminating organizations, and irresponsible polluters accountable on behalf of negatively affected individuals.PR NewswireSanford Heisler And Public Justice Win Key Decision In California Supreme CourtThe California Supreme Court ruled in Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. that employers cannot use arbitration agreements to prevent employees from pursuing class action disputes together, sending a clear message that workers do not waive their right to fight injustice collectively through carefully worded fine print clauses. Sanford Heisler LLP and Public Justice obtained this favorable ruling for plaintiff Timothy Sandquist, an African American former sales manager at John Elway's Manhattan Beach Toyota who filed racial discrimination claims after being passed over for promotions and subjected to harassment based on race. The decision reinstates Sandquist's original employment discrimination claims after years of litigation focused on the arbitration agreement's enforceability.