Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Democracy Defenders Fund

Full company profile

uuid006hjb6

Namestring
Democracy Defenders Fund
Legal namestring
Democracy Defenders Fund
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearstring
-
Descriptiontext

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan nonprofit legal advocacy organization headquartered at 600 Pennsylvania Ave. SE #15180 in Washington, D.C. Its stated mission is to defend American democratic institutions against executive overreach, corruption, and election subversion. The organization structures its work around three programmatic pillars — Defending the Rule of Law, Fighting Corruption, and Protecting Elections — delivered through direct litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, coalition campaigns, and public education. There is no discrete paying customer; beneficiaries are broadly defined as the American public and democratic institutions.

DDF's substantive output is a portfolio of litigation matters and a content library rather than a software product. Notable case work includes a successful Supreme Court challenge in Trump v. Barbara striking down a birthright citizenship executive order (with ACLU, Legal Defense Fund, and Asian Law Caucus as co-plaintiffs), a Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Cook preserving Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's protections, an order compelling Elon Musk to testify in a USAID dismantlement case, and lead-counsel role in AFGE v. Trump challenging federal agency reorganization. Published research includes the 'Autocracy vs. Democracy in America: A First Year Report,' issue briefs on Trump-era crypto conflicts of interest, a birthright citizenship timeline, and a Polymarket regulatory advocacy campaign. The Future of Democracy Prize, a national competition for Americans ages 18–30 with $1,000 honoraria and anthology publication, broadens the platform beyond litigation.

DDF funds operations through voluntary charitable donations processed by ActBlue Charities, Inc., with publicly listed giving tiers of $25, $100, $250, $1,000, and custom amounts; no products or services are sold. Revenue mechanics are entirely donation-based, with no disclosed budget, donor count, or financial filings. An affiliated entity, Democracy Defenders Action, operates as the organization's advocacy arm from the same Washington address under a separate domain. Leadership comprises Executive Chair and co-founder Norm Eisen (a retired ambassador and former White House Special Counsel), Executive Director Susan Corke, Chief Counsel and Director for Ethics and Anticorruption Virginia Canter, Senior Policy Counsel Jonathan Barry-Blocker, Senior Ethics Counsel Chris Swartz, and board member Rahna Epting.

Short descriptiontext

Democracy Defenders Fund is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that conducts legal advocacy, litigation, policy research, and coalition campaigns to defend American democratic institutions against executive overreach, corruption, and election threats.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersWashington, United States
HQ citystring
Washington
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
legal advocacy services, constitutional litigation, anticorruption policy, election protection, democratic governance
Industry1 code
1Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy
CodeBPAGAFAAPrimaryYes
NAICS code1 code
  • Human Rights Organizations813311
Product category
Public Interest Legal Advocacy
Social media profiles1 record
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Charitable Donations
TypeGrants Donations
Description

The organization raises funds through charitable donations processed by ActBlue Charities, Inc., a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Donations are received and processed through ActBlue's platform and subsequently passed to Democracy Defenders Fund.

democracydefendersfund.org
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components4 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others
Pricing details1 tier
1Charitable donation tiers for supporters
ModelOtherBilling cadencePay-as-you-go
Notes

Donation tiers: $25, $100, $250, $1,000, and custom amounts. All donations are voluntary charitable contributions processed through ActBlue Charities.

democracydefendersfund.org
GTM typeB2B
B2B
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal advocacy organization that conducts litigation, files amicus briefs, submits policy advocacy, issues FOIA requests, and publishes research reports to defend the rule of law, fight corruption, and protect free and fair elections in the United States. The organization is funded by charitable donations processed through the ActBlue platform and operates a coalition-based advocacy model with allied legal groups, labor unions, and civil society organizations.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 4 values shown
  • Successfully challenged Trump's birthright citizenship executive order through Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara
+3 more records
Product overview1 text field

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that does not offer a traditional software product. Its 'products' are programmatic offerings centered on defending democracy through: (1) The Future of Democracy Prize, a national competition for young Americans with $1,000 honorariums and anthology publication; (2) Research Reports and Issue Briefs covering constitutional rights, election protection, corruption, and government accountability; (3) The Autocracy vs. Democracy Report analyzing the Trump administration's impact on democratic institutions; and (4) Core Democracy Defense Programs addressing rule of law, corruption, and election protection through litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, and coalition work. The organization operates as a mission-driven nonprofit rather than a technology product company.

Product and service3 records
1Democracy Defense Programs
CategoryLegal Advocacy Programs
Description

Programs focused on Defending Rule of Law, Fighting Corruption, and Protecting Elections through litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, and coalition-building with civil society organizations. Provided as the organization's core service offering to protect American democratic institutions.

2Research Reports and Issue Briefs
CategoryResearch Publications
Description

Comprehensive reports and analyses on threats to democracy including the 'Autocracy vs. Democracy in America: A First Year Report,' Trump Crypto Tracker, birthright citizenship timeline, and Epstein Files tracking. Published for public education and to support advocacy and litigation efforts.

3Autocracy vs. Democracy Report
Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership16 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-07-02
Description

Lead co-counsel in AFGE v. Trump case challenging unlawful government reorganization. Represents plaintiffs in coalition fighting Trump-Vance administration efforts to restructure federal agencies.

Strategic tierCoreTypeImplementation/ SI/ Consulting PartnerAnnounced on2026-07-02
Description

Co-counsel representing labor unions, nonprofits, cities, and counties in legal challenge to USDA reorganization and unlawful government restructuring.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-07-02
Description

Co-counsel in coalition fighting unlawful government reorganization, representing various plaintiffs in legal challenges against the Trump administration.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-07-02
Description

Partner organization in coalition representing local governments challenging unlawful government reorganization.

5Washington Litigation Group
Strategic tierCoreTypeImplementation/ SI/ Consulting PartnerAnnounced on2026-07-02
Description

Legal counsel representing Olympian Davey Hearn in DOJ indictment case. Nonpartisan team of attorneys dedicated to defending individuals unlawfully targeted.

democracydefendersfund.org
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-06-30
Description

Co-plaintiff in Trump v. Barbara Supreme Court case successfully challenging birthright citizenship executive order. Coalition included ACLU of NH, ME, MA, Legal Defense Fund, and Asian Law Caucus.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-06-30
Description

Co-plaintiff in successful Supreme Court challenge to birthright citizenship executive order in Trump v. Barbara case.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development PartnerAnnounced on2026-06-30
Description

Co-plaintiff in successful Supreme Court birthright citizenship case representing Asian American communities with historical ties to birthright citizenship fights.

Strategic tierMinorTypeImplementation/ SI/ Consulting Partner
Description

Designated agent for DMCA and copyright complaints. Contact: Emma Olson Sharkey at 250 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 400, Washington, DC 20001.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

DDF submitted amicus brief in Watson v. RNC on behalf of LULAC, arguing states, not federal government, set election law.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Labor union partner in coalition challenging unlawful government reorganization affecting workers.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Environmental nonprofit partner in coalition challenging USDA and government reorganization.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Lead plaintiff union in AFGE v. Trump case challenging unlawful government reorganization and workforce reductions.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Plaintiff union in coalition challenging USDA reorganization and government workforce reduction.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Public health organization partner in coalition challenging government reorganization affecting health programs.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Advocacy arm of the organization with separate website (democracydefendersaction.org). Related but distinct entity focused on advocacy activities.

Recent move7 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonpartisan legal advocacy organization that files litigation against executive overreach and election subversion. Listed as co-counsel with DDF on AFGE v. Trump government reorganization litigation, with overlapping mission, target defendants, and coalition model.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonpartisan organization supporting state-level election officials and defending against election subversion. Overlaps with DDF's election-protection and rule-of-law mandate through litigation and public education.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit legal group that pursues affirmative litigation to defend democratic institutions. Named as a strategic core partner of DDF in joint legal challenges and represents plaintiffs in the same coalition matters.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Established civil rights legal organization that pursues nonpartisan election protection and voting rights litigation through coalition lawyering. Operates with a comparable coalition-and-litigation model focused on democratic institutions.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Nonpartisan legal coalition of former DOJ and government attorneys filing ethics complaints and litigation. Joined DDF on the ethics complaint against Acting AG Todd Blanche, indicating collaboration on shared targets.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonpartisan law and policy institute at NYU focusing on democracy, voting rights, and rule of law. Comparable mission scope (election protection, anti-corruption, judicial independence) and produces research briefs and pursues advocacy in overlapping issue areas.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

Established civil rights legal organization pursuing racial justice and constitutional rights litigation through impact lawsuits. Comparable in mission, litigation strategy, and donor-supported funding model to DDF.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Government ethics and anti-corruption watchdog that files ethics complaints and litigation against federal officials. Comparable focus on executive-branch corruption and ethics enforcement, overlapping DDF's ethics and anticorruption docket.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Nonprofit that supports state and local government lawyers in affirmative civil rights and democracy litigation. Listed as a coalition partner of DDF in challenges to unlawful government reorganization.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

The largest U.S. civil liberties legal organization, with broad portfolio of constitutional rights litigation. Listed as a core co-plaintiff alongside DDF in the Trump v. Barbara birthright citizenship Supreme Court case and in coalition matters.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Segment1 record

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles6 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Democracy Defenders Fund

Public Interest Legal Advocacydemocracydefendersfund.org

Democracy Defenders Fund is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that conducts legal advocacy, litigation, policy research, and coalition campaigns to defend American democratic institutions against executive overreach, corruption, and election threats.

What Democracy Defenders Fund does

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan nonprofit legal advocacy organization headquartered at 600 Pennsylvania Ave. SE #15180 in Washington, D.C. Its stated mission is to defend American democratic institutions against executive overreach, corruption, and election subversion. The organization structures its work around three programmatic pillars — Defending the Rule of Law, Fighting Corruption, and Protecting Elections — delivered through direct litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, coalition campaigns, and public education. There is no discrete paying customer; beneficiaries are broadly defined as the American public and democratic institutions.

DDF's substantive output is a portfolio of litigation matters and a content library rather than a software product. Notable case work includes a successful Supreme Court challenge in Trump v. Barbara striking down a birthright citizenship executive order (with ACLU, Legal Defense Fund, and Asian Law Caucus as co-plaintiffs), a Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Cook preserving Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's protections, an order compelling Elon Musk to testify in a USAID dismantlement case, and lead-counsel role in AFGE v. Trump challenging federal agency reorganization. Published research includes the 'Autocracy vs. Democracy in America: A First Year Report,' issue briefs on Trump-era crypto conflicts of interest, a birthright citizenship timeline, and a Polymarket regulatory advocacy campaign. The Future of Democracy Prize, a national competition for Americans ages 18–30 with $1,000 honoraria and anthology publication, broadens the platform beyond litigation.

DDF funds operations through voluntary charitable donations processed by ActBlue Charities, Inc., with publicly listed giving tiers of $25, $100, $250, $1,000, and custom amounts; no products or services are sold. Revenue mechanics are entirely donation-based, with no disclosed budget, donor count, or financial filings. An affiliated entity, Democracy Defenders Action, operates as the organization's advocacy arm from the same Washington address under a separate domain. Leadership comprises Executive Chair and co-founder Norm Eisen (a retired ambassador and former White House Special Counsel), Executive Director Susan Corke, Chief Counsel and Director for Ethics and Anticorruption Virginia Canter, Senior Policy Counsel Jonathan Barry-Blocker, Senior Ethics Counsel Chris Swartz, and board member Rahna Epting.

Democracy Defenders Fund firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Democracy Defenders Fund
Legal name
Democracy Defenders Fund
Website
https://democracydefendersfund.org
Company type
Private
Operating status
Operating
Short description
Democracy Defenders Fund is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit that conducts legal advocacy, litigation, policy research, and coalition campaigns to defend American democratic institutions against executive overreach, corruption, and election threats.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Democracy Defenders Fund industry classification

Industry
Product category
Public Interest Legal Advocacy
NAICS
Human Rights Organizations (813311)
akta.pro primary industry
Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy (BPAGAFAA)

Keywords

  • Legal advocacy services
  • Constitutional litigation
  • Anticorruption policy
  • Election protection
  • Democratic governance

Where Democracy Defenders Fund is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Washington
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Democracy Defenders Fund business model

Business model
GTM type
B2B
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Others

Revenue model

  1. Charitable Donations: The organization raises funds through charitable donations processed by ActBlue Charities, Inc., a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Donations are received and processed through ActBlue's platform and subsequently passed to Democracy Defenders Fund.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherPay-as-you-goCharitable donation tiers for supporters

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Democracy Defenders Fund product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal advocacy organization that conducts litigation, files amicus briefs, submits policy advocacy, issues FOIA requests, and publishes research reports to defend the rule of law, fight corruption, and protect free and fair elections in the United States. The organization is funded by charitable donations processed through the ActBlue platform and operates a coalition-based advocacy model with allied legal groups, labor unions, and civil society organizations.

Product overview

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization that does not offer a traditional software product. Its 'products' are programmatic offerings centered on defending democracy through: (1) The Future of Democracy Prize, a national competition for young Americans with $1,000 honorariums and anthology publication; (2) Research Reports and Issue Briefs covering constitutional rights, election protection, corruption, and government accountability; (3) The Autocracy vs. Democracy Report analyzing the Trump administration's impact on democratic institutions; and (4) Core Democracy Defense Programs addressing rule of law, corruption, and election protection through litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, and coalition work. The organization operates as a mission-driven nonprofit rather than a technology product company.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Democracy Defense Programs Programs focused on Defending Rule of Law, Fighting Corruption, and Protecting Elections through litigation, policy advocacy, FOIA requests, and coalition-building with civil society organizations. Provided as the organization's core service offering to protect American democratic institutions.
  • Research Reports and Issue Briefs Comprehensive reports and analyses on threats to democracy including the 'Autocracy vs. Democracy in America: A First Year Report,' Trump Crypto Tracker, birthright citizenship timeline, and Epstein Files tracking. Published for public education and to support advocacy and litigation efforts.
  • Autocracy vs. Democracy Report

Quantifiable outcome

  • Successfully challenged Trump's birthright citizenship executive order through Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara
  • +3 more outcomes

Companies that use Democracy Defenders Fund

Customer profile

Segments1 record

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Democracy Defenders Fund technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Democracy Defenders Fund partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

16 partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Democracy ForwardcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 2 July 2026Lead co-counsel in AFGE v. Trump case challenging unlawful government reorganization. Represents plaintiffs in coalition fighting Trump-Vance administration efforts to restructure federal agencies.
  • Altshuler Berzon LLPcoreImplementation/ SI/ Consulting Partner · 2 July 2026Co-counsel representing labor unions, nonprofits, cities, and counties in legal challenge to USDA reorganization and unlawful government restructuring.
  • Protect DemocracycoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 2 July 2026Co-counsel in coalition fighting unlawful government reorganization, representing various plaintiffs in legal challenges against the Trump administration.
  • Public Rights ProjectminorStrategic or Co-development Partner · 2 July 2026Partner organization in coalition representing local governments challenging unlawful government reorganization.
  • Washington Litigation GroupcoreImplementation/ SI/ Consulting Partner · 2 July 2026Legal counsel representing Olympian Davey Hearn in DOJ indictment case. Nonpartisan team of attorneys dedicated to defending individuals unlawfully targeted.
  • ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)coreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 30 June 2026Co-plaintiff in Trump v. Barbara Supreme Court case successfully challenging birthright citizenship executive order. Coalition included ACLU of NH, ME, MA, Legal Defense Fund, and Asian Law Caucus.
  • Legal Defense FundcoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 30 June 2026Co-plaintiff in successful Supreme Court challenge to birthright citizenship executive order in Trump v. Barbara case.
  • Asian Law CaucuscoreStrategic or Co-development Partner · 30 June 2026Co-plaintiff in successful Supreme Court birthright citizenship case representing Asian American communities with historical ties to birthright citizenship fights.
  • Elias Law Group LLPminorImplementation/ SI/ Consulting PartnerDesignated agent for DMCA and copyright complaints. Contact: Emma Olson Sharkey at 250 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 400, Washington, DC 20001.
  • League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerDDF submitted amicus brief in Watson v. RNC on behalf of LULAC, arguing states, not federal government, set election law.
  • Service Employees International Union (SEIU)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerLabor union partner in coalition challenging unlawful government reorganization affecting workers.
  • Natural Resources Defense CouncilminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerEnvironmental nonprofit partner in coalition challenging USDA and government reorganization.
  • American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerLead plaintiff union in AFGE v. Trump case challenging unlawful government reorganization and workforce reductions.
  • American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerPlaintiff union in coalition challenging USDA reorganization and government workforce reduction.
  • American Public Health AssociationminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerPublic health organization partner in coalition challenging government reorganization affecting health programs.
  • Democracy Defenders ActioncoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerAdvocacy arm of the organization with separate website (democracydefendersaction.org). Related but distinct entity focused on advocacy activities.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves7 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Democracy Defenders Fund competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Protect Democracy: Nonpartisan legal advocacy organization that files litigation against executive overreach and election subversion. Listed as co-counsel with DDF on AFGE v. Trump government reorganization litigation, with overlapping mission, target defendants, and coalition model.
  • States United Democracy Center: Nonpartisan organization supporting state-level election officials and defending against election subversion. Overlaps with DDF's election-protection and rule-of-law mandate through litigation and public education.
  • Democracy Forward: Nonprofit legal group that pursues affirmative litigation to defend democratic institutions. Named as a strategic core partner of DDF in joint legal challenges and represents plaintiffs in the same coalition matters.
  • Brennan Center for Justice: Nonpartisan law and policy institute at NYU focusing on democracy, voting rights, and rule of law. Comparable mission scope (election protection, anti-corruption, judicial independence) and produces research briefs and pursues advocacy in overlapping issue areas.
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW): Government ethics and anti-corruption watchdog that files ethics complaints and litigation against federal officials. Comparable focus on executive-branch corruption and ethics enforcement, overlapping DDF's ethics and anticorruption docket.
  • Public Rights Project: Nonprofit that supports state and local government lawyers in affirmative civil rights and democracy litigation. Listed as a coalition partner of DDF in challenges to unlawful government reorganization.

Broad incumbents

  • Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: Established civil rights legal organization that pursues nonpartisan election protection and voting rights litigation through coalition lawyering. Operates with a comparable coalition-and-litigation model focused on democratic institutions.
  • NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund: Established civil rights legal organization pursuing racial justice and constitutional rights litigation through impact lawsuits. Comparable in mission, litigation strategy, and donor-supported funding model to DDF.
  • ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union): The largest U.S. civil liberties legal organization, with broad portfolio of constitutional rights litigation. Listed as a core co-plaintiff alongside DDF in the Trump v. Barbara birthright citizenship Supreme Court case and in coalition matters.

Emerging players

  • Lawyers Defending American Democracy: Nonpartisan legal coalition of former DOJ and government attorneys filing ethics complaints and litigation. Joined DDF on the ethics complaint against Acting AG Todd Blanche, indicating collaboration on shared targets.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Democracy Defenders Fund social profiles

Digital presence

Democracy Defenders Fund financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Democracy Defenders Fund leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles6 records

Democracy Defenders Fund funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Democracy Defenders Fund M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Democracy Defenders Fund

What does Democracy Defenders Fund do?

Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal advocacy organization that conducts litigation, files amicus briefs, submits policy advocacy, issues FOIA requests, and publishes research reports to defend the rule of law, fight corruption, and protect free and fair elections in the United States. The organization is funded by charitable donations processed through the ActBlue platform and operates a coalition-based advocacy model with allied legal groups, labor unions, and civil society organizations.

Is Democracy Defenders Fund a public or private company?

Democracy Defenders Fund is a private company. It is classified as nonprofit foundation owned and is currently operating.

When was Democracy Defenders Fund founded?

Democracy Defenders Fund was founded in -1.

Where is Democracy Defenders Fund based?

Democracy Defenders Fund is headquartered in Washington, United States, in the North America region.

How does Democracy Defenders Fund make money?

One revenue line is on record: charitable Donations.

Who are Democracy Defenders Fund's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Protect Democracy, States United Democracy Center, Democracy Forward, Brennan Center for Justice, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and Public Rights Project. Broad incumbents are Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). Lawyers Defending American Democracy is listed as an emerging player.

Does Democracy Defenders Fund have an API?

No public API is recorded for Democracy Defenders Fund.

What industry is Democracy Defenders Fund in?

Democracy Defenders Fund's product category is Public Interest Legal Advocacy. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAGAFAA, Civil Liberties & Constitutional Rights Advocacy. Its NAICS code is 813311.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
YahooGroup sues after approved housing money not allowed for useA federal lawsuit filed September 29, 2026, challenges the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's cancellation of approximately $56 million in congressionally appropriated housing funding. The suit, brought by Democracy Defenders Fund and Jacobson Lawyers Group on behalf of 10 nonprofit organizations, includes the Fair Housing Resource Center, which provides housing counseling in Ohio counties.The GuardianLegal veterans lead fightback against Trump’s ‘full-out assault on democracy’Legal groups including the Democracy Defenders Fund and Campaign Legal Center have expanded challenges to Trump's voting executive orders, including a lawsuit against the USPS mail-voting rules. A federal judge in Massachusetts made a 14-day injunction permanent, blocking the rules, while the DoJ appealed to the Supreme Court. The groups say the administration's moves threaten mail voting for about 50 million Americans.CampaignlegalSecond Unlawful Anti-Voter Executive Order Challenged by Voting Rights CoalitionCampaign Legal Center and Democracy Defenders Fund sued the executive office and federal agencies on behalf of LULAC, Secure Families Initiative, and Arizona Students' Association over an executive order limiting mail-in voting. The complaint asserts the order violates separation of powers and exceeds presidential authority, as only states and Congress regulate elections and mail.Maryland MattersAgency shutdown messaging draws Hatch Act, Antideficiency Act challengesPublic Citizen filed nine complaints with the Office of Special Counsel over federal agencies posting partisan shutdown messages, alleging Hatch Act violations. The Democracy Defenders Fund urged GAO to investigate potential Antideficiency Act breaches. HUD and other agencies have posted messages blaming Democrats for the shutdown.CampaignlegalEthics Watchdogs Demand Investigations into Treasury Secretary Bessent’s Potential Conflicts of Interest and Ethics ViolationsThe Campaign Legal Center and Democracy Defenders Fund have formally requested investigations by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics and the Treasury Department’s Office of Inspector General into Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for failing to divest from financial holdings as required by his confirmation agreement. The complaint highlights that the 90-day divestiture deadline passed in April without documentation of compliance, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest regarding assets such as private equity funds and cryptocurrency products. These watchdog groups argue that Bessent's continued ownership of these assets while participating in government activities creates a risk of corruption and violates public trust.