Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Judicial Appointments Commission

Full company profile

uuid02lv4ph

Namestring
Judicial Appointments Commission
Legal namestring
Judicial Appointments Commission
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2005
Descriptiontext

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an independent statutory public body of the UK Government, established under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and headquartered at 12th Floor, 102 Petty France, London. Its sole function is to select and recommend candidates for judicial office in England and Wales, including legal roles (judges, recorders, tribunal members) and non-legal tribunal positions, as well as some UK-wide tribunals. The organisation runs a rolling programme of selection exercises, working in coordination with HMCTS (forecasting vacancies), the Ministry of Justice (governance and prioritisation), and the Judicial Office (senior appointments and post-selection deployment).

JAC operates a Digital Recruitment Platform (apply.judicialappointments.digital) that manages the full selection lifecycle — application submission, online qualifying tests, name-blind shortlisting, competency-based selection days (conducted remotely via Microsoft Teams for fee-paid roles or in-person in London for salaried roles), and a candidate interview recording system retained for 12 months for audit. Supporting services include the Vacancies Portal, the Judging Your Future newsletter, case studies, a Welsh language scheme, and self-assessment survey tools (Eligibility, Good Character, Suitability). Character verification integrates with HMRC, SRA, BSB, CILEx, ACRO, and JCIO. The Targeted Outreach Programme and Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE) widen the pipeline from under-represented groups.

JAC is funded entirely through UK Government appropriations via the Ministry of Justice; it charges no fees to candidates. It has no commercial revenue model, no parent company, no subsidiaries, and no equity funding. Governance is provided by a Chair (Lynne Berry CBE from September 2026), a Vice Chair (Lord Justice Dove), and approximately 15 commissioners spanning judicial, professional (barrister/solicitor), non-legally qualified, and lay categories. Strategic oversight of diversity is exercised through the Judicial and Legal Diversity Board, co-chaired by the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice.

Short descriptiontext

The Judicial Appointments Commission is an independent UK Government statutory body that selects and recommends candidates for judicial office in England and Wales and some UK-wide tribunals, funded via the Ministry of Justice with no fees charged to candidates.

Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom
HQ citystring
London
HQ countrystring
United Kingdom
HQ regionstring
Europe
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
judicial appointments, merit-based selection, judicial recruitment, candidate assessment, public body services
Industry2 codes
1State/Provincial Courts & Judicial Administration
CodeBPAIABAEPrimaryYes
2Judicial Courts & Court Administration
CodeBPAIAFAAPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Courts92211
  • Courts922110
Product category
Judicial Selection Services
GTM motion2 records

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Government Funding
TypeManaged Services
Description

As an independent public body, the JAC is funded by the UK Government through the Ministry of Justice. It does not charge candidates for applications or services.

judicialappointments.gov.uk
Marketing channels6 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels3 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an independent UK public body that recommends individuals for judicial office in England and Wales, covering both legal and non-legal judicial roles. It delivers a three-stage selection process — application, name-blind shortlisting (with online qualifying tests), and selection day — operated through its proprietary JAC Digital Recruitment Platform, with all services provided free of charge to candidates.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Product overview1 text field

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) operates a digital recruitment platform and ecosystem of online services for selecting and recommending candidates for judicial office in England and Wales. The core offering consists of the Digital Recruitment Platform (apply.judicialappointments.digital) for managing applications and assessments, integrated with the public Vacancies Portal for browsing and applying to roles. Supporting services include the Targeted Outreach Programme and Judicial Guide Scheme for candidate support, multiple self-assessment survey tools (Eligibility Survey, Good Character Survey, Suitability Survey) to help candidates prepare, the Judging Your Future newsletter for communications, and Selection Day Preparation Resources including guidance documents and example exercises. The selection process follows a three-stage methodology: application (self-assessment or eligibility statement), shortlisting (name-blind sift or online tests), and selection day (competency interview and role play or situational questions). All services are delivered through the judicialappointments.gov.uk domain.

Product and service1 record
1JAC Digital Recruitment Platform
Scale indicator3 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership14 partners
1His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

HMCTS is responsible for forecasting judicial requirements across courts and tribunals, providing supply and demand data and determining the number and location of vacancies. They submit Vacancy Requests to the JAC and establish delivery teams for exercises.

judicialappointments.gov.uk
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

The MoJ considers and prioritizes HMCTS requirements, which are signed off by the Lord Chancellor. They establish delivery teams for exercises and provide overall governance oversight of the judicial appointments system.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

The JO identifies requirements for leadership and senior appointments and provides job descriptions for selection exercises. They manage job offers, deployment, training through the Judicial College, and Royal Warrants after JAC recommendations are accepted.

Strategic tierCoreTypeOthers
Description

Conducts character checks on candidates including tax affairs verification as part of the good character assessment process. HMRC risk assessment looks back over the last five years.

Strategic tierCoreTypeOthers
Description

Conducts professional conduct checks on solicitor candidates as part of character verification process.

Strategic tierCoreTypeOthers
Description

Conducts professional conduct checks on barrister candidates as part of character verification process.

Strategic tierCoreTypeOthers
Description

Conducts criminal record checks on candidates as part of the good character assessment process.

Strategic tierCoreTypeOthers
Description

Conducts professional conduct checks on Chartered Institute of Legal Executives members as part of character verification.

9Judicial and Legal Diversity Board (JLDB)
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Co-chaired by Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice, bringing together JAC, judiciary, MoJ and legal professions (Law Society, CILEx, Bar Council, Legal Services Board) to provide strategic direction on judicial diversity.

judicialappointments.gov.uk
Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Part of JLDB, works with JAC on developing the judicial pipeline and supporting solicitor candidates.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Part of JLDB, collaborates on diversity initiatives and barrister outreach.

Strategic tierMinorTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

Part of JLDB, contributes to judicial diversity strategy and legal executive candidate support.

13Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE) Programme
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

JAC supports this programme designed to give direct insight into skills involved in becoming a judge, developed by the Judicial Diversity Forum to support lawyers from under-represented groups.

judicialappointments.gov.uk
Strategic tierMinorTypeOthers
Description

Consulted when candidates are existing judicial office holders to check for complaints or pending investigations.

Recent move6 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight5 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
1Law Society of England and Wales
TypeOthers
Description

The representative body for solicitors in England and Wales and a member of the JAC's Judicial and Legal Diversity Board. Comparable as a member-side stakeholder that supplies the JAC's candidate pipeline and helps shape judicial diversity strategy.

2General Council of the Bar (Bar Council)
TypeOthers
Description

The professional body for barristers and a JLDB member that collaborates with the JAC on barrister outreach and diversity initiatives. It is an ecosystem peer that influences and feeds the JAC's applicant pool.

TypeOthers
Description

The independent regulator overseeing legal services regulators in England and Wales and a JLDB member. Comparable to the JAC as a statutory oversight body in the legal-justice ecosystem, operating under parallel independence principles.

TypeRegional player
Description

Australian state-level body covering judicial appointments, conduct, and education in NSW. Internationally comparable to the JAC as a sub-national judicial-selection and accountability body with similar professional-conduct and merit-selection functions.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The statutory body responsible for recommending judicial appointments to Scottish courts. It is the most direct functional peer to the JAC, performing the same merit-based selection role in a different UK jurisdiction, with similar statutory underpinning and selection methodology.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

An independent body overseeing recruitment to the UK civil service under prerogative powers. It is comparable to the JAC as a similarly structured UK public recruitment body with statutory independence and merit-based selection, but operates in a different (civil-service) domain.

7Judicial Appointments Commission (Australia - Federal)
TypeRegional player
Description

Australia is currently establishing a federal Judicial Appointments Commission following a 2023 inquiry. While not yet operational at scale, it represents the closest future international counterpart to the JAC's model and a useful jurisdictional peer for structural comparison.

TypeDirect peer
Description

The independent statutory commission that selects judicial office holders in Northern Ireland under the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. It is a directly comparable body to the JAC with overlapping governance, statutory independence, and selection process design.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

An executive agency of the Ministry of Justice responsible for operating courts and tribunals. It is the JAC's primary partner, submitting Vacancy Requests that drive the JAC's selection workload, making it the closest 'broad incumbent' counterpart in the England & Wales justice system.

10Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (Canada)
TypeRegional player
Description

Canadian federal body that supports federal judicial appointments and administers related programs. It is a like-for-like international comparable to the JAC in mandate (federal judicial selection logistics), although appointees are politically nominated in Canada—useful as an international structural peer.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers6 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile3 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
Yes
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

Integration2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Description, Source

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Feature3 records

Each record includes

Title, Differentiator, Description, Source

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles15 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
Compliance2 records

Each record includes

Name, Class, Description

Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Judicial Appointments Commission

Judicial Selection Servicesjudicialappointments.gov.uk

The Judicial Appointments Commission is an independent UK Government statutory body that selects and recommends candidates for judicial office in England and Wales and some UK-wide tribunals, funded via the Ministry of Justice with no fees charged to candidates.

What Judicial Appointments Commission does

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an independent statutory public body of the UK Government, established under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and headquartered at 12th Floor, 102 Petty France, London. Its sole function is to select and recommend candidates for judicial office in England and Wales, including legal roles (judges, recorders, tribunal members) and non-legal tribunal positions, as well as some UK-wide tribunals. The organisation runs a rolling programme of selection exercises, working in coordination with HMCTS (forecasting vacancies), the Ministry of Justice (governance and prioritisation), and the Judicial Office (senior appointments and post-selection deployment).

JAC operates a Digital Recruitment Platform (apply.judicialappointments.digital) that manages the full selection lifecycle — application submission, online qualifying tests, name-blind shortlisting, competency-based selection days (conducted remotely via Microsoft Teams for fee-paid roles or in-person in London for salaried roles), and a candidate interview recording system retained for 12 months for audit. Supporting services include the Vacancies Portal, the Judging Your Future newsletter, case studies, a Welsh language scheme, and self-assessment survey tools (Eligibility, Good Character, Suitability). Character verification integrates with HMRC, SRA, BSB, CILEx, ACRO, and JCIO. The Targeted Outreach Programme and Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE) widen the pipeline from under-represented groups.

JAC is funded entirely through UK Government appropriations via the Ministry of Justice; it charges no fees to candidates. It has no commercial revenue model, no parent company, no subsidiaries, and no equity funding. Governance is provided by a Chair (Lynne Berry CBE from September 2026), a Vice Chair (Lord Justice Dove), and approximately 15 commissioners spanning judicial, professional (barrister/solicitor), non-legally qualified, and lay categories. Strategic oversight of diversity is exercised through the Judicial and Legal Diversity Board, co-chaired by the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice.

Judicial Appointments Commission firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Judicial Appointments Commission
Legal name
Judicial Appointments Commission
Website
https://judicialappointments.gov.uk
Company type
Private
Founded year
2005
Operating status
Operating
Short description
The Judicial Appointments Commission is an independent UK Government statutory body that selects and recommends candidates for judicial office in England and Wales and some UK-wide tribunals, funded via the Ministry of Justice with no fees charged to candidates.
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Judicial Appointments Commission industry classification

Industry
Product category
Judicial Selection Services
NAICS
Courts (92211), Courts (922110)
akta.pro primary industry
State/Provincial Courts & Judicial Administration (BPAIABAE)
akta.pro secondary industry
Judicial Courts & Court Administration (BPAIAFAA)

Keywords

  • Judicial appointments
  • Merit-based selection
  • Judicial recruitment
  • Candidate assessment
  • Public body services

Where Judicial Appointments Commission is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
London
HQ country
United Kingdom
HQ region
Europe

Offices1 record

Markets served

Judicial Appointments Commission business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Technology or R&D, Marketing or Sales, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Government Funding: As an independent public body, the JAC is funded by the UK Government through the Ministry of Justice. It does not charge candidates for applications or services.

Go-to-market motion2 records

Distribution channels3 records

Marketing channels6 records

Judicial Appointments Commission product offering

Product offering

Core offering

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an independent UK public body that recommends individuals for judicial office in England and Wales, covering both legal and non-legal judicial roles. It delivers a three-stage selection process — application, name-blind shortlisting (with online qualifying tests), and selection day — operated through its proprietary JAC Digital Recruitment Platform, with all services provided free of charge to candidates.

Product overview

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) operates a digital recruitment platform and ecosystem of online services for selecting and recommending candidates for judicial office in England and Wales. The core offering consists of the Digital Recruitment Platform (apply.judicialappointments.digital) for managing applications and assessments, integrated with the public Vacancies Portal for browsing and applying to roles. Supporting services include the Targeted Outreach Programme and Judicial Guide Scheme for candidate support, multiple self-assessment survey tools (Eligibility Survey, Good Character Survey, Suitability Survey) to help candidates prepare, the Judging Your Future newsletter for communications, and Selection Day Preparation Resources including guidance documents and example exercises. The selection process follows a three-stage methodology: application (self-assessment or eligibility statement), shortlisting (name-blind sift or online tests), and selection day (competency interview and role play or situational questions). All services are delivered through the judicialappointments.gov.uk domain.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • JAC Digital Recruitment Platform

Companies that use Judicial Appointments Commission

Customer profile

Named customers6 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles3 records

Judicial Appointments Commission technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed Yes

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Integration2 records

Feature3 records

Judicial Appointments Commission partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

14 partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerHMCTS is responsible for forecasting judicial requirements across courts and tribunals, providing supply and demand data and determining the number and location of vacancies. They submit Vacancy Requests to the JAC and establish delivery teams for exercises.
  • Ministry of Justice (MoJ)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerThe MoJ considers and prioritizes HMCTS requirements, which are signed off by the Lord Chancellor. They establish delivery teams for exercises and provide overall governance oversight of the judicial appointments system.
  • Judicial Office (JO)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerThe JO identifies requirements for leadership and senior appointments and provides job descriptions for selection exercises. They manage job offers, deployment, training through the Judicial College, and Royal Warrants after JAC recommendations are accepted.
  • HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)coreOthersConducts character checks on candidates including tax affairs verification as part of the good character assessment process. HMRC risk assessment looks back over the last five years.
  • Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)coreOthersConducts professional conduct checks on solicitor candidates as part of character verification process.
  • Bar Standards Board (BSB)coreOthersConducts professional conduct checks on barrister candidates as part of character verification process.
  • ACRO Criminal Records OfficecoreOthersConducts criminal record checks on candidates as part of the good character assessment process.
  • CILEx RegulationcoreOthersConducts professional conduct checks on Chartered Institute of Legal Executives members as part of character verification.
  • Judicial and Legal Diversity Board (JLDB)coreStrategic or Co-development PartnerCo-chaired by Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice, bringing together JAC, judiciary, MoJ and legal professions (Law Society, CILEx, Bar Council, Legal Services Board) to provide strategic direction on judicial diversity.
  • Law SocietyminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerPart of JLDB, works with JAC on developing the judicial pipeline and supporting solicitor candidates.
  • Bar CouncilminorStrategic or Co-development PartnerPart of JLDB, collaborates on diversity initiatives and barrister outreach.
  • Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx)minorStrategic or Co-development PartnerPart of JLDB, contributes to judicial diversity strategy and legal executive candidate support.
  • Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE) ProgrammecoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerJAC supports this programme designed to give direct insight into skills involved in becoming a judge, developed by the Judicial Diversity Forum to support lawyers from under-represented groups.
  • Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)minorOthersConsulted when candidates are existing judicial office holders to check for complaints or pending investigations.

Scale indicators3 records

Recent moves6 records

Expansion highlights5 records

Judicial Appointments Commission competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Others

  • Law Society of England and Wales: The representative body for solicitors in England and Wales and a member of the JAC's Judicial and Legal Diversity Board. Comparable as a member-side stakeholder that supplies the JAC's candidate pipeline and helps shape judicial diversity strategy.
  • General Council of the Bar (Bar Council): The professional body for barristers and a JLDB member that collaborates with the JAC on barrister outreach and diversity initiatives. It is an ecosystem peer that influences and feeds the JAC's applicant pool.
  • Legal Services Board: The independent regulator overseeing legal services regulators in England and Wales and a JLDB member. Comparable to the JAC as a statutory oversight body in the legal-justice ecosystem, operating under parallel independence principles.

Regional players

  • Judicial Commission of New South Wales: Australian state-level body covering judicial appointments, conduct, and education in NSW. Internationally comparable to the JAC as a sub-national judicial-selection and accountability body with similar professional-conduct and merit-selection functions.
  • Judicial Appointments Commission (Australia - Federal): Australia is currently establishing a federal Judicial Appointments Commission following a 2023 inquiry. While not yet operational at scale, it represents the closest future international counterpart to the JAC's model and a useful jurisdictional peer for structural comparison.
  • Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (Canada): Canadian federal body that supports federal judicial appointments and administers related programs. It is a like-for-like international comparable to the JAC in mandate (federal judicial selection logistics), although appointees are politically nominated in Canada—useful as an international structural peer.

Direct peers

  • Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland: The statutory body responsible for recommending judicial appointments to Scottish courts. It is the most direct functional peer to the JAC, performing the same merit-based selection role in a different UK jurisdiction, with similar statutory underpinning and selection methodology.
  • Northern Ireland Judicial Appointments Commission: The independent statutory commission that selects judicial office holders in Northern Ireland under the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. It is a directly comparable body to the JAC with overlapping governance, statutory independence, and selection process design.

Broad incumbents

  • Civil Service Commission: An independent body overseeing recruitment to the UK civil service under prerogative powers. It is comparable to the JAC as a similarly structured UK public recruitment body with statutory independence and merit-based selection, but operates in a different (civil-service) domain.
  • HM Courts and Tribunals Service: An executive agency of the Ministry of Justice responsible for operating courts and tribunals. It is the JAC's primary partner, submitting Vacancy Requests that drive the JAC's selection workload, making it the closest 'broad incumbent' counterpart in the England & Wales justice system.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks5 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Judicial Appointments Commission social profiles

Digital presence

Judicial Appointments Commission compliance and trust

Trust signal

Compliance2 records

Judicial Appointments Commission financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Judicial Appointments Commission leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles15 records

Judicial Appointments Commission funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Judicial Appointments Commission M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Judicial Appointments Commission

What does Judicial Appointments Commission do?

The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is an independent UK public body that recommends individuals for judicial office in England and Wales, covering both legal and non-legal judicial roles. It delivers a three-stage selection process — application, name-blind shortlisting (with online qualifying tests), and selection day — operated through its proprietary JAC Digital Recruitment Platform, with all services provided free of charge to candidates.

Is Judicial Appointments Commission a public or private company?

Judicial Appointments Commission is a private company. It is classified as state government owned and is currently operating.

When was Judicial Appointments Commission founded?

Judicial Appointments Commission was founded in 2005.

Where is Judicial Appointments Commission based?

Judicial Appointments Commission is headquartered in London, United Kingdom, in the Europe region.

How does Judicial Appointments Commission make money?

One revenue line is on record: government Funding.

Who are Judicial Appointments Commission's main competitors?

Others on record are Law Society of England and Wales, General Council of the Bar (Bar Council) and Legal Services Board. Regional players are Judicial Commission of New South Wales, Judicial Appointments Commission (Australia - Federal) and Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (Canada). Direct peers are Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland and Northern Ireland Judicial Appointments Commission. Broad incumbents are Civil Service Commission and HM Courts and Tribunals Service.

Does Judicial Appointments Commission have an API?

No public API is recorded for Judicial Appointments Commission.

What industry is Judicial Appointments Commission in?

Judicial Appointments Commission's product category is Judicial Selection Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIABAE, State/Provincial Courts & Judicial Administration, with a secondary code of BPAIAFAA, Judicial Courts & Court Administration. Its NAICS code is 92211.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales