Developer docs
API playgroundTry for free, no card

Search company profiles

Social Media Victims Law Center

Full company profile

uuid003d58t

Namestring
Social Media Victims Law Center
Legal namestring
Social Media Victims Law Center
Company typeenum
Private
Founded yearint
2021
Operating statusenum
Operating
Ownership categoryenum
Headcount rangeband
11–50
akta.pro rankint
HeadquartersSeattle, United States
HQ citystring
Seattle
HQ countrystring
United States
HQ regionstring
North America
Markets served

Serves global market

Offices1 record

Each record includes

City, Country, Type, Description, Source

Keyword5 values
product liability litigation, social media lawsuits, mass tort litigation, wrongful death lawsuits, contingency fee legal services
Industry3 codes
1Personal Injury & Insurance Defense
CodeBPAHAAAMPrimaryYes
2Product Liability
CodeFSAJADACPrimaryNo
3Media Liability (Digital Content & IP)
CodeFSAJAOADPrimaryNo
NAICS code2 codes
  • Offices of Lawyers541110
  • Legal Services5411
SIC code1 code
  • Services-Legal Services8111
Product category
Mass Tort and Product Liability Legal Services
GTM motion1 record

Each record includes

Type, Description, Source

Revenue model1 record
1Legal Services — Contingency Fee Representation
TypeTransaction Fee
Description

The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning it is paid a portion of any recovery obtained in a case and clients do not owe attorneys' fees if the lawsuit does not result in a recovery. This is the sole revenue model for the firm.

socialmediavictims.org
Marketing channels4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Stage, Description, Source

Distribution channels2 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Scope, Target buyer, Description, Source

Cost components5 values
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure
Pricing details1 tier
1Contingency fee representation — no upfront costs
ModelOtherBilling cadenceMulti-year contract
Notes

The firm is paid a portion of any recovery obtained in the case. If the lawsuit does not result in a recovery, clients owe no attorneys' fees.

socialmediavictims.org
GTM typeB2C
B2C
Offering typeServices
Services
Core offering1 text field

Social Media Victims Law Center is a law firm that provides legal representation exclusively to families and institutions whose children have suffered harm from social media and AI platforms. The firm uses a product liability legal strategy to sue companies such as Meta, Snap, TikTok, Discord, and OpenAI for harms including suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, sextortion, and fentanyl-related deaths. All cases are handled on a contingency fee basis with no upfront client costs.

Differentiator
Functional benefit
Problem solved
Quantifiable outcome1 of 6 values shown
  • $6 million jury verdict against Meta and YouTube secured in March 2026
+5 more records
Product overview1 text field

The Social Media Victims Law Center is a law firm that operates as a single-service legal practice offering specialized litigation services exclusively for families whose children have been harmed by social media and AI platforms. The firm's portfolio consists of multiple practice areas targeting specific platforms: Meta/Facebook & Instagram litigation, Snapchat litigation, TikTok litigation, Discord litigation, ChatGPT/AI litigation, Snapchat fentanyl lawsuits, and subway surfing challenge lawsuits. These services are unified by a product liability approach applied to hold technology companies accountable for defective platform designs that harm minors. The firm operates on a contingency fee basis with free case evaluations.

Product and service9 records
1Social Media Addiction Legal Services
CategoryProduct liability litigation — social media
Description

Legal representation for families whose children have suffered harm from social media platform addiction, including mental health issues, suicide, self-harm, and eating disorders.

2Meta/Facebook & Instagram Litigation
CategoryProduct liability litigation — Meta platforms
Description

Legal representation against Meta Platforms for harms caused by Facebook and Instagram, including addiction, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and suicide among minors.

3Snapchat Litigation
CategoryProduct liability litigation — Snap Inc.
Description

Legal representation against Snap Inc. for platform harms including mental health injuries, sexual abuse, sextortion, suicide, and fentanyl-related deaths connected to Snapchat.

4TikTok / ByteDance Litigation
CategoryProduct liability litigation — TikTok
Description

Legal representation against TikTok and ByteDance for harms linked to the platform's addictive design and algorithm, including deaths from dangerous challenges and eating disorders.

5Discord Litigation
CategoryProduct liability litigation — Discord
Description

Legal representation against Discord for failing to protect minors from predators, sexual exploitation, and unsafe platform design that enabled child harm.

6ChatGPT / AI Litigation
CategoryProduct liability litigation — AI / OpenAI
Description

Legal representation against OpenAI for ChatGPT-related harms including suicide, psychological manipulation, and emotional dependency claims involving the AI chatbot.

7Snapchat Fentanyl Lawsuits
CategoryProduct liability litigation — Snapchat (fentanyl)
Description

Specialized legal representation for families of victims who died from fentanyl poisoning after purchasing drugs through Snapchat's platform.

8Subway Surfing Challenge Lawsuits
CategoryProduct liability litigation — social media (dangerous challenges)
Description

Legal representation for families whose children died or were injured participating in subway surfing trends promoted through social media platforms.

9Free Social Media Addiction Case Evaluation
CategoryLegal intake and case evaluation
Description

Free confidential case evaluation service to assess potential lawsuits for children and families harmed by social media addiction.

Scale indicator9 records

Each record includes

Type, Value, Description, Source

Partnership5 partners
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

The Social Media Victims Law Center works alongside the Archewell Foundation, which shares a common mission of protecting children and holding social media companies accountable. The partnership supports accountability, education, and prevention efforts.

Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

SMVLC collaborates with Mothers Against Media Addiction to amplify the voices of families affected by social media harm while raising awareness about the risks these platforms pose to children.

3Tech Justice Law Project
Strategic tierCoreTypeStrategic or Co-development Partner
Description

SMVLC and Tech Justice Law Project filed seven lawsuits against OpenAI over ChatGPT 'suicide coach' behavior in November 2025. Tech Justice Law has been involved in nearly half of chatbot-related lawsuits.

socialmediavictims.org
Strategic tierMinorTypeImplementation/ SI/ Consulting Partner
Description

SMVLC and C.A. Goldberg PLLC jointly filed claims in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of plaintiff parents in the Snapchat fentanyl lawsuits, alleging the app's design features facilitated illegal drug sales to minors.

Strategic tierMinorTypeImplementation/ SI/ Consulting Partner
Description

SMVLC and Holland Law Firm jointly filed a federal lawsuit against Snap, Inc. on behalf of a Missouri family whose 12-year-old daughter was groomed and sexually assaulted by a predator through Snapchat.

Recent move7 records

Each record includes

Date, Type, Title, Description, Source

Expansion highlight6 records

Each record includes

Type, Description

Peers10 records
TypeDirect peer
Description

National mass-tort plaintiff firm with a strong product-liability and public-nuisance practice, including work against social media platforms. Closely comparable to SMVLC in applying industry-changing tort theories (asbestos, opioids, opioids-like litigation) against well-resourced corporate defendants.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Mass-tort firm that has filed major social media harm claims on behalf of UK and European families against Meta, TikTok, Snap, and YouTube. Comparable in pursuing cross-border social media addiction cases against the same Big Tech defendants, with an emerging, niche focus.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Plaintiff mass-tort firm active in social media, opioid, and public-nuisance litigation. Comparable as a contingency-fee mass-tort competitor with overlapping defendant sets, though with a much broader practice area footprint.

TypeBroad incumbent
Description

One of the largest plaintiff-side personal injury and mass tort firms in the U.S., with a broad social media and Big Tech practice. Comparable in plaintiff mass-tort execution capability, though it serves a much wider range of practice areas beyond social media and AI harm.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with a long track record in product liability, consumer protection, and tech-related cases. Highly comparable to SMVLC in applying product-liability and consumer-fraud theories against large technology and platform defendants.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Plaintiff-side firm that has jointly filed Snapchat fentanyl and child sexual exploitation claims with SMVLC in Los Angeles Superior Court. Operates in the same social media child-harm plaintiff niche with overlapping case theory.

TypeEmerging player
Description

Plaintiff firm historically focused on asbestos and product-liability mass torts that has expanded into social media and AI harm cases. Comparable in applying a product-liability playbook to emerging defendant categories and complex toxic-exposure-style litigation.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Complex litigation and class action firm with a long history in tech-related consumer protection and product liability cases, including social media harm matters. Comparable in applying consumer-protection and product-defect theories to technology platforms.

TypeDirect peer
Description

Large mass-tort plaintiff firm that has been active in social media addiction litigation against Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Google. Directly comparable as a deep-pocketed, multi-state mass tort firm pursuing the same product-liability theory against Big Tech defendants.

10Tech Justice Law Project
TypeDirect peer
Description

Direct co-litigation partner in AI chatbot and social media harm cases. Tech Justice Law has been involved in nearly half of chatbot-related lawsuits and has jointly filed seven OpenAI/ChatGPT cases with SMVLC, operating in the same narrow niche of plaintiff-side AI and platform liability.

Market position
Strengths5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Weaknesses5 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Competitive moat4 records

Each record includes

Type, Details

Key risks6 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Key highlights7 records

Each record includes

Headline, Details, Source

Customer concentration

Classification, Details

Named customers10 records

Each record includes

Name, Industry, Type, Use case, Source, UUID

Segment4 records

Each record includes

Title, Type, Primary, Description, Pain point addressed, Use case, Source

Ideal customer profile4 records

Each record includes

Profile, Firmographic size, Sales motion, Sales cycle length, Buying structure, Purchase trigger, Buyer persona, Geography, Industry vertical, Primary use case, Description, Pain points, Evidence proof points, Target buyer

Technology focused
No
API detail
Has APIbool
No

Docs URL, Description

AI maturity
App detail

Has app

Core technology
Revenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Number of profiles
Profiles9 records

Each record includes

Name, Designation, Designation category, Overview, Profile commentary, Source

No data
No data
Funding overview

Funding stage, Last funding date, Total funding USD

Funding rounds

Each record includes

Round, Amount USD, Date, Pre money valuation, Total investors, Investors, News

Investors

Each record includes

Name, Type, Date of entry, Rounds participated, Website

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

M&A

Each record includes

Name, Acquisition type, Announced date, Completed date, Status, Website, News

Investment

Each record includes

Name, Round, Announced date, Lead investor, Website, News

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Social Media Victims Law Center

Mass Tort and Product Liability Legal Servicessocialmediavictims.org

Social Media Victims Law Center firmographics

Firmographics
Name
Social Media Victims Law Center
Legal name
Social Media Victims Law Center
Website
https://socialmediavictims.org
Company type
Private
Founded year
2021
Operating status
Operating
Headcount range
11–50 employees
Ownership category
akta.pro rank

Social Media Victims Law Center industry classification

Industry
Product category
Mass Tort and Product Liability Legal Services
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers (541110), Legal Services (5411)
SIC
Services-Legal Services (8111)
akta.pro primary industry
Personal Injury & Insurance Defense (BPAHAAAM)
akta.pro secondary industries
Product Liability (FSAJADAC), Media Liability (Digital Content & IP) (FSAJAOAD)

Keywords

  • Product liability litigation
  • Social media lawsuits
  • Mass tort litigation
  • Wrongful death lawsuits
  • Contingency fee legal services

Where Social Media Victims Law Center is headquartered

Location

Headquarters

HQ city
Seattle
HQ country
United States
HQ region
North America

Offices1 record

Markets served

Social Media Victims Law Center business model

Business model
GTM type
B2C
Offering type
Services
Cost components
Personnel, Operations, Marketing or Sales, Technology or R&D, Infrastructure

Revenue model

  1. Legal Services — Contingency Fee Representation: The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning it is paid a portion of any recovery obtained in a case and clients do not owe attorneys' fees if the lawsuit does not result in a recovery. This is the sole revenue model for the firm.

Pricing tiers

ModelBillingPrice
OtherMulti-year contractContingency fee representation — no upfront costs

Go-to-market motion1 record

Distribution channels2 records

Marketing channels4 records

Social Media Victims Law Center product offering

Product offering

Core offering

Social Media Victims Law Center is a law firm that provides legal representation exclusively to families and institutions whose children have suffered harm from social media and AI platforms. The firm uses a product liability legal strategy to sue companies such as Meta, Snap, TikTok, Discord, and OpenAI for harms including suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, sextortion, and fentanyl-related deaths. All cases are handled on a contingency fee basis with no upfront client costs.

Product overview

The Social Media Victims Law Center is a law firm that operates as a single-service legal practice offering specialized litigation services exclusively for families whose children have been harmed by social media and AI platforms. The firm's portfolio consists of multiple practice areas targeting specific platforms: Meta/Facebook & Instagram litigation, Snapchat litigation, TikTok litigation, Discord litigation, ChatGPT/AI litigation, Snapchat fentanyl lawsuits, and subway surfing challenge lawsuits. These services are unified by a product liability approach applied to hold technology companies accountable for defective platform designs that harm minors. The firm operates on a contingency fee basis with free case evaluations.

Differentiator

Problem solved

Functional benefit

Products and services

  • Social Media Addiction Legal Services Legal representation for families whose children have suffered harm from social media platform addiction, including mental health issues, suicide, self-harm, and eating disorders.
  • Meta/Facebook & Instagram Litigation Legal representation against Meta Platforms for harms caused by Facebook and Instagram, including addiction, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and suicide among minors.
  • Snapchat Litigation Legal representation against Snap Inc. for platform harms including mental health injuries, sexual abuse, sextortion, suicide, and fentanyl-related deaths connected to Snapchat.
  • TikTok / ByteDance Litigation Legal representation against TikTok and ByteDance for harms linked to the platform's addictive design and algorithm, including deaths from dangerous challenges and eating disorders.
  • Discord Litigation Legal representation against Discord for failing to protect minors from predators, sexual exploitation, and unsafe platform design that enabled child harm.
  • ChatGPT / AI Litigation Legal representation against OpenAI for ChatGPT-related harms including suicide, psychological manipulation, and emotional dependency claims involving the AI chatbot.
  • Snapchat Fentanyl Lawsuits Specialized legal representation for families of victims who died from fentanyl poisoning after purchasing drugs through Snapchat's platform.
  • Subway Surfing Challenge Lawsuits Legal representation for families whose children died or were injured participating in subway surfing trends promoted through social media platforms.
  • Free Social Media Addiction Case Evaluation Free confidential case evaluation service to assess potential lawsuits for children and families harmed by social media addiction.

Quantifiable outcome

  • $6 million jury verdict against Meta and YouTube secured in March 2026
  • +5 more outcomes

Companies that use Social Media Victims Law Center

Customer profile

Named customers10 records

Segments4 records

Ideal customer profiles4 records

Social Media Victims Law Center technology and API

Technology

Technology focussed No

API detail

Has API
No
API docs
API detail

Core technology

AI maturity

App detail

Social Media Victims Law Center partnerships and signals

Strategic signal

Partnerships

Five partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.

  • Archewell FoundationcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerThe Social Media Victims Law Center works alongside the Archewell Foundation, which shares a common mission of protecting children and holding social media companies accountable. The partnership supports accountability, education, and prevention efforts.
  • Mothers Against Media AddictioncoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerSMVLC collaborates with Mothers Against Media Addiction to amplify the voices of families affected by social media harm while raising awareness about the risks these platforms pose to children.
  • Tech Justice Law ProjectcoreStrategic or Co-development PartnerSMVLC and Tech Justice Law Project filed seven lawsuits against OpenAI over ChatGPT 'suicide coach' behavior in November 2025. Tech Justice Law has been involved in nearly half of chatbot-related lawsuits.
  • C.A. Goldberg PLLCminorImplementation/ SI/ Consulting PartnerSMVLC and C.A. Goldberg PLLC jointly filed claims in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of plaintiff parents in the Snapchat fentanyl lawsuits, alleging the app's design features facilitated illegal drug sales to minors.
  • Holland Law FirmminorImplementation/ SI/ Consulting PartnerSMVLC and Holland Law Firm jointly filed a federal lawsuit against Snap, Inc. on behalf of a Missouri family whose 12-year-old daughter was groomed and sexually assaulted by a predator through Snapchat.

Scale indicators9 records

Recent moves7 records

Expansion highlights6 records

Social Media Victims Law Center competitors and assessment

Company assessment

Direct peers

  • Motley Rice: National mass-tort plaintiff firm with a strong product-liability and public-nuisance practice, including work against social media platforms. Closely comparable to SMVLC in applying industry-changing tort theories (asbestos, opioids, opioids-like litigation) against well-resourced corporate defendants.
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein: Plaintiff-side class action and mass-tort firm with a long track record in product liability, consumer protection, and tech-related cases. Highly comparable to SMVLC in applying product-liability and consumer-fraud theories against large technology and platform defendants.
  • C.A. Goldberg PLLC: Plaintiff-side firm that has jointly filed Snapchat fentanyl and child sexual exploitation claims with SMVLC in Los Angeles Superior Court. Operates in the same social media child-harm plaintiff niche with overlapping case theory.
  • Keller Rohrback L.L.P. Complex litigation and class action firm with a long history in tech-related consumer protection and product liability cases, including social media harm matters. Comparable in applying consumer-protection and product-defect theories to technology platforms.
  • Beasley Allen Law Firm: Large mass-tort plaintiff firm that has been active in social media addiction litigation against Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Google. Directly comparable as a deep-pocketed, multi-state mass tort firm pursuing the same product-liability theory against Big Tech defendants.
  • Tech Justice Law Project: Direct co-litigation partner in AI chatbot and social media harm cases. Tech Justice Law has been involved in nearly half of chatbot-related lawsuits and has jointly filed seven OpenAI/ChatGPT cases with SMVLC, operating in the same narrow niche of plaintiff-side AI and platform liability.

Emerging players

  • Pogust Goodhead: Mass-tort firm that has filed major social media harm claims on behalf of UK and European families against Meta, TikTok, Snap, and YouTube. Comparable in pursuing cross-border social media addiction cases against the same Big Tech defendants, with an emerging, niche focus.
  • Napoli Shkolnik: Plaintiff mass-tort firm active in social media, opioid, and public-nuisance litigation. Comparable as a contingency-fee mass-tort competitor with overlapping defendant sets, though with a much broader practice area footprint.
  • Levy Konigsberg LLP: Plaintiff firm historically focused on asbestos and product-liability mass torts that has expanded into social media and AI harm cases. Comparable in applying a product-liability playbook to emerging defendant categories and complex toxic-exposure-style litigation.

Broad incumbents

  • Morgan & Morgan: One of the largest plaintiff-side personal injury and mass tort firms in the U.S., with a broad social media and Big Tech practice. Comparable in plaintiff mass-tort execution capability, though it serves a much wider range of practice areas beyond social media and AI harm.

Market position

Strengths5 records

Weaknesses5 records

Competitive moat4 records

Key risks6 records

Key highlights7 records

Customer concentration

Social Media Victims Law Center social profiles

Digital presence

Social Media Victims Law Center financial estimates

Financial estimate

Revenue estimate

Valuation estimate

Social Media Victims Law Center leadership team

Management profile

Number of profiles

Profiles9 records

Social Media Victims Law Center funding detail

Funding detail

Funding overview

Funding rounds

Investors

Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Social Media Victims Law Center M&A and investment

M&A and investment

M&A

Investments

M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →

Frequently asked questions about Social Media Victims Law Center

What does Social Media Victims Law Center do?

Social Media Victims Law Center is a law firm that provides legal representation exclusively to families and institutions whose children have suffered harm from social media and AI platforms. The firm uses a product liability legal strategy to sue companies such as Meta, Snap, TikTok, Discord, and OpenAI for harms including suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, sextortion, and fentanyl-related deaths. All cases are handled on a contingency fee basis with no upfront client costs.

Is Social Media Victims Law Center a public or private company?

Social Media Victims Law Center is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.

When was Social Media Victims Law Center founded?

Social Media Victims Law Center was founded in 2021. It employs 11 to 50 people.

Where is Social Media Victims Law Center based?

Social Media Victims Law Center is headquartered in Seattle, United States, in the North America region.

How does Social Media Victims Law Center make money?

One revenue line is on record: legal Services — Contingency Fee Representation.

Who are Social Media Victims Law Center's main competitors?

Direct peers on record are Motley Rice, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, C.A. Goldberg PLLC, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Beasley Allen Law Firm and Tech Justice Law Project. Emerging players are Pogust Goodhead, Napoli Shkolnik and Levy Konigsberg LLP. Morgan & Morgan is listed as a broad incumbent.

Does Social Media Victims Law Center have an API?

No public API is recorded for Social Media Victims Law Center.

What industry is Social Media Victims Law Center in?

Social Media Victims Law Center's product category is Mass Tort and Product Liability Legal Services. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAHAAAM, Personal Injury & Insurance Defense, with a secondary code of FSAJADAC, Product Liability. Its NAICS code is 541110 and its SIC code is 8111.

Unlock the full company data

50 free credits on sign-up, no credit card required.

Contact sales
Live signals
SocialmediavictimsChatGPT Suicide LawyersThe Social Media Victims Law Center and the State of Florida have filed lawsuits against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging that ChatGPT's GPT-4o model contributed to multiple suicides by providing dangerous advice and failing to implement adequate safety safeguards. The litigation accuses the company of knowingly releasing a psychologically manipulative product without proper testing, with specific cases involving users who received instructions on suicide methods or were discouraged from seeking medical help.FinancialContent Business PageSocial Media Victims Law Center Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Alleging Tech Giants Targeted Minors and Hid Evidence as Child Deaths MountedThe Social Media Victims Law Center filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Delaware Superior Court against Meta Platforms Inc., TikTok LLC, ByteDance Inc., Snap Inc., and YouTube LLC (Google), alleging these companies ignored warnings from their own researchers, concealed evidence of harm, and targeted minors with addictive features linked to four children's deaths between July 2024 and September 2025. The lawsuit draws on newly unsealed internal documents showing the companies built systems that profiled minors during psychological vulnerability and pushed algorithmic content known to worsen anxiety, depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. The families from Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota, and Tennessee are seeking accountability for what the filing attorney described as a decade of misconduct that has created a national youth mental health crisis.PressdemocratSocial media companies sued over deaths of four teens as pressure, lawsuits over child safety mountThe families of four teenagers who died by suicide are suing Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube over allegations that these social media platforms caused addictive and dangerous harms to young users, with the lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court on behalf of families from Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota and Tennessee. The complaint alleges the companies knew they were causing harm to minors, with the deaths occurring over a 14-month period from July 2024 through September 2025, and the plaintiffs are represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center. This lawsuit is part of a broader wave of litigation against social media companies, with Meta currently facing multiple state and federal trials and reporting $2.4 billion in legal expenses in the second quarter.San Diego Union-TribuneSocial media companies sued over deaths of four teens as pressure, lawsuits over child safety mountThe families of four teenagers who died by suicide are suing Meta, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube in Delaware Superior Court, alleging the social media platforms caused years of escalating harms including addiction, sleep deprivation, depression, and anxiety that contributed to their deaths over a 14-month period from July 2024 through September 2025. The lawsuit, brought by the Social Media Victims Law Center, claims the companies knew they were causing harm to young users yet continued their practices. The mounting legal pressure has financial consequences, with Meta reporting $2.4 billion in legal expenses and a 14% profit decline in Q2, as multiple state and federal lawsuits over harms to minors proceed.MorningstarSocial Media Victims Law Center Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Alleging Tech Giants Targeted Minors and Hid Evidence as Child Deaths MountedThe Social Media Victims Law Center filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Meta, TikTok, Snap, and Google, alleging they targeted minors and hid evidence. The suit covers four children who died by asphyxiation or gunshot wound between July 2024 and September 2025. It claims the platforms ignored warnings and used addictive design to worsen mental health.Business Wire BlogSocial Media Victims Law Center Lawsuit Claims Snap’s Design Enabled Predator to Find, Groom, and Sexually Assault 12‑Year‑Old Missouri GirlThe Social Media Victims Law Center and Holland Law Firm sued Snap, Inc. on behalf of a 12-year-old Missouri girl, alleging Snapchat's design and recommendation systems enabled a 25-year-old predator to groom and sexually assault her. The complaint cites Quick Add, Bitmoji, and location-sharing as key features that facilitated the assault, which occurred in September 2021.EIN Presswire'They Knew and Did Nothing':Bad Mom Podcast & Atty. Matthew Bergman Expose Big Tech’s Role in Youth Mental Health CrisisThe Bad Mom Podcast featured attorney Matthew Bergman discussing his legal strategy to hold tech companies accountable for youth mental health issues. He argues platforms are designed to be addictive and that lawsuits should target product design, not content, citing internal evidence of prioritizing engagement over well-being.American Enterprise InstituteSuicides, Settlements, and Unresolved Chatbot Issues: A Long Litigation Road Lies AheadSettlements may soon arrive in lawsuits against Character Technologies and its co-founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, as well as Google and Alphabet, for allegedly causing minors to commit suicide through Character.AI chatbots. Separately, the Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project filed seven lawsuits against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman in California in November, including Raine v. OpenAI brought by parents of a 16-year-old who allegedly killed himself after ChatGPT became his closest confidant. An FTC inquiry launched in September 2024 investigating chatbot safety for children is adding regulatory pressure, while law firms are increasingly establishing practice areas for AI suicide litigation, signaling that more cases are likely to come.Barron'sSnapchat Settles To Avoid Social Media Addiction TrialSnap Inc. confirmed on Wednesday that it reached a settlement to avoid an imminent civil trial in Los Angeles that accused it, along with Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, of designing addictive social media platforms harmful to young users. The trial was designated as a "bellwether" proceeding, meaning its outcome could set precedent for hundreds of similar coordinated lawsuits across the United States. Snap and the Social Media Victims Law Center jointly announced the resolution without disclosing settlement details, while the broader litigation against the other social media companies proceeds.Business Wire BlogSocial Media Victims Law Center Lawsuit Alleges Meta Prioritized Engagement Over Child Safety in Instagram Sextortion DeathsThe Social Media Victims Law Center filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Meta Platforms and Instagram in Delaware Superior Court, alleging the company knew since 2019 that Instagram was exposing children to predators but chose to prioritize engagement and profit over safety, citing unsealed internal documents from California litigation. The lawsuit involves two minors—16-year-old M.D. from Scotland and 13-year-old L.M. from Pennsylvania—who died by suicide after being targeted in sextortion schemes through Instagram, with the filing revealing that Meta rejected simple safety measures like defaulting teen accounts to private or blocking adult DMs from strangers. Internal documents show that Meta's own researchers warned leadership about the platform connecting adult strangers to children, and evidence reveals that in 2022 alone, Instagram recommended 1.4 million teens to potential predators in a single day.