Courtcall
- Company typePrivate
- Founded1996
- HeadquartersLos Angeles, United States
- Headcount11–50
- GTM typeB2B
- OfferingSoftware
Courtcall firmographics
Firmographics- Name
- Courtcall
- Legal name
- CourtCall, LLC
- Website
- https://courtcall.com
- Company type
- Private
- Founded year
- 1996
- Operating status
- Operating
- Headcount range
- 11–50 employees
- Ownership category
- akta.pro rank
Courtcall industry classification
Industry- Product category
- Legal Technology / Court Appearance Software
- NAICS
- Courts (922110), Courts (92211), Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities (922), Legal Services (5411)
- SIC
- Services-Legal Services (8111)
- akta.pro primary industry
- Judicial Courts & Court Administration (BPAIAFAA)
- akta.pro secondary industries
- State/Provincial Courts & Judicial Administration (BPAIABAE), Specialty & Problem-Solving Courts (Drug, Mental Health, Veterans, Family) (BPAIAFAG), Court Services & Operations (Clerks, Records, Jury, Interpreters) (BPAIAFAH), Litigation Support & Expert Witness Services (BPAHALAG), Dispute Resolution, Appeals & Tax Tribunals (BPAIADAK)
Keywords
Where Courtcall is headquartered
LocationHeadquarters
- HQ city
- Los Angeles
- HQ country
- United States
- HQ region
- North America
Offices1 record
Markets served
Courtcall business model
Business model- GTM type
- B2B
- Offering type
- Software
- Cost components
- Personnel, Technology or R&D, Operations, Marketing or Sales
Revenue model
- Court/Government Subscriptions: No cost to the Court - CourtCall handles the scheduling, coordination and operation of remote appearances at no charge to courts. Courts benefit from increased access to justice and improved judicial economy without financial risk.
- Attorney/User Fees: Attorneys pay fees for remote appearance scheduling services. Separate pricing for Single Attorney registration (immediate scheduling), Bulk Attorney registration, and various user types including self-represented clients and non-attorney participants.
- Court Technology Services: Multi-year agreements with court systems for delivery of remote collaboration platform technology and services, as exemplified by the Tyler Technologies agreement
Pricing tiers
| Model | Billing | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Other | Other | Court Services |
| Subscription | Other | Single Attorney Registration |
| Subscription | Other | Bulk Attorney Registration |
| Subscription | Other | Self-Represented / Clients |
Go-to-market motion2 records
Distribution channels3 records
Marketing channels4 records
Courtcall product offering
Product offeringCore offering
CourtCall operates a secure, browser-based video appearance platform that lets attorneys, self-represented parties, and in-custody defendants attend court hearings remotely without downloading software or special equipment. The company also provides the CourtCall Scheduler, a dedicated scheduling system, and a suite of specialized court-appearance services spanning arraignments, traffic court, mental health/drug courts, workers' compensation hearings, online dispute resolution, remote depositions, and remote interpretation.
Product overview
CourtCall offers a unified Remote Appearance Platform providing secure video, audio, and telephonic collaboration for court proceedings. The core platform includes specialized modules for Remote Video Arraignment/Bond Hearings, Traffic Court Appearances, Mental Health/Drug/Collaborative Justice Courts, Remote Interpretation, and Workers' Compensation proceedings. The platform features browser-based video with embedded DocuSign for document signing. All these products operate within the same secure infrastructure and scheduling system, with versions deployed at various participating courts including California county superior courts.
Differentiator
Problem solved
Functional benefit
Brands
- Court Conference: A division of CourtCall
Products and services
- Remote Appearance Platform Browser-based, secure video/audio conferencing platform that lets attorneys and self-represented parties attend scheduled court hearings remotely without downloading software or special equipment. Built for courts, attorneys, and self-represented litigants.
- CourtCall Scheduler Online scheduling system that lets attorneys and self-represented parties register an account, schedule remote court appearances, and receive confirmations via email and SMS.
- Remote Video Arraignment and Bond Hearings Remote video service that connects in-custody defendants to arraignment and bond hearings without transporting them to the courthouse. Designed for sheriffs, correctional facilities, and court judicial departments.
- Traffic Court Appearances by Video Remote video appearance service tailored for traffic court proceedings, including contested hearings and trials, reducing in-person appearances for defendants and attorneys.
- Mental Health, Drug and Collaborative Justice Courts Customized remote-appearance solution designed specifically for the procedural needs of mental health, drug, and collaborative justice courts, supporting treatment-team participation and remote check-ins.
- Workers' Compensation Remote Appearance Remote video appearance service built for workers' compensation hearings, allowing attorneys and injured workers to appear before Workers' Compensation Appeals Boards without travel.
- Remote Interpretation On-demand remote interpretation service that integrates into CourtCall remote appearances, providing language access for limited-English-proficiency participants and accessibility for deaf/hard-of-hearing users.
- Remote Depositions Browser-based remote deposition service that allows attorneys, witnesses, and court reporters to conduct depositions by video without specialized equipment.
- Online Dispute Resolution End-to-end online dispute resolution service enabling parties, attorneys, and mediators to conduct small claims and civil case resolution sessions via CourtCall's video and collaboration platform.
Quantifiable outcome
- Reduces in-custody transportation costs for brief arraignments via video links between courtrooms, jails and secure correctional facilities
- +3 more outcomes
Companies that use Courtcall
Customer profileNamed customers12 records
Segments7 records
Ideal customer profiles2 records
Courtcall technology and API
TechnologyTechnology focussed Yes
API detail
- Has API
- No
- API docs
- API detail
Core technology
AI maturity
App detail
Integration1 record
Feature7 records
Courtcall partnerships and signals
Strategic signalPartnerships
Twelve partnerships are on record, tiered core and minor.
- Tyler TechnologiescoreCourtCall announced a multi-year agreement with Tyler Technologies to expand delivery of their remote collaboration platform, increasing access to justice. Tyler Technologies is a major court technology provider, and this partnership allows CourtCall to leverage Tyler's distribution channels to reach more courts.
- Colorado Judicial DepartmentcoreCourtCall was the successful bidder of the Colorado Judicial Department's solicitation, RFP #25005, and has entered into an agreement with the Department to provide remote court appearance services statewide in Colorado.
- California Department of Workers Compensation (DWC)coreCourtCall serves the California Department of Workers Compensation with their remote appearance platform, enabling attorneys, hearing representatives, insurance representatives, lien claimants, medical experts, and injured workers to appear remotely.
- Butte County Superior CourtminorButte County Superior Court operates a version of CourtCall's technology for remote appearances.
- Kern County Superior CourtminorKern County Superior Court operates a version of CourtCall's technology for remote hearings.
- Los Angeles Superior Court / LACourtConnectminorLos Angeles Superior Court operates LACourtConnect, a version of CourtCall's technology for remote appearances.
- Nevada County Superior CourtminorNevada County Superior Court operates a version of CourtCall's technology for remote hearings.
- Orange County Superior CourtminorOrange County Superior Court operates remote appearance information services using CourtCall's technology.
- Placer County Superior CourtminorPlacer County Superior Court operates a version of CourtCall's technology for remote appearances.
- Riverside County Superior CourtminorRiverside County Superior Court operates remote appearance services using CourtCall's technology.
- Sacramento County Superior CourtminorSacramento County Superior Court uses CourtCall's technology for civil motions hearings and general remote appearances.
- San Diego County Superior CourtminorSan Diego County Superior Court operates virtual hearings using CourtCall's technology.
Scale indicators2 records
Recent moves5 records
Expansion highlights5 records
Courtcall competitors and assessment
Company assessmentBroad incumbents
- Tyler Technologies: Dominant U.S. provider of court case-management and judicial software (Odyssey, Ovation) and CourtCall's announced multi-year channel partner. Tyler overlaps in serving the same court buyers with adjacent products and competes for the same judicial technology budget.
- Zoom Video Communications: General-purpose video conferencing platform widely used by courts for remote proceedings, including specialized government/justice offerings. Competes with CourtCall as a 'good enough' alternative on the core video appearance use case.
- Microsoft (Teams for Government): Microsoft Teams is a default collaboration platform in many state and local government environments and is increasingly used for court hearings. Represents a broad, well-funded alternative for courts standardizing on the Microsoft 365 government stack.
- Cisco Webex: Established enterprise video and collaboration suite with government-sector deployment. Competes for the same court remote-appearance use case with deeper integration into existing government IT environments.
- Thomson Reuters: Major legal information and technology provider serving courts, law firms, and government legal departments. Comparable as a broad incumbent selling into the judicial ecosystem with overlapping buyer personas.
- Granicus: Government technology provider offering communications, meeting, and civic engagement software for state and local government, including solutions used by courts and judicial agencies. Comparable broad government SaaS competitor.
Emerging players
- Pexip: Provider of secure, self-hosted video interoperability for regulated industries including government and justice. Comparable to CourtCall in serving security-conscious public-sector clients that cannot rely on consumer-grade video tools.
Direct peers
- Modria (Tyler Technologies): Online Dispute Resolution platform acquired by Tyler Technologies. Direct overlap with CourtCall's ODR product line and operates within the same judicial channel ecosystem CourtCall is targeting.
- Court Innovations: Provides online dispute resolution, e-filing, and remote hearing tools specifically designed for courts and government agencies. Direct competitor to CourtCall's remote-appearance and ODR products with similar vertical specialization.
- For The Record (FTR): Provider of court recording, transcription, and digital audio management for courts worldwide. Adjacent but comparable in serving judicial technology buyers with mission-critical courtroom infrastructure.
Market position
Strengths5 records
Weaknesses5 records
Competitive moat5 records
Key risks6 records
Key highlights7 records
Customer concentration
Courtcall social profiles
Digital presenceCourtcall financial estimates
Financial estimateRevenue estimate
Valuation estimate
Courtcall leadership team
Management profileNumber of profiles
Profiles1 record
Courtcall funding detail
Funding detailFunding overview
Funding rounds
Investors
Funding detail is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Courtcall M&A and investment
M&A and investmentM&A
Investments
M&A and investment is available on the Subscription and Enterprise plan.Contact sales →
Frequently asked questions about Courtcall
What does Courtcall do?
CourtCall operates a secure, browser-based video appearance platform that lets attorneys, self-represented parties, and in-custody defendants attend court hearings remotely without downloading software or special equipment. The company also provides the CourtCall Scheduler, a dedicated scheduling system, and a suite of specialized court-appearance services spanning arraignments, traffic court, mental health/drug courts, workers' compensation hearings, online dispute resolution, remote depositions, and remote interpretation.
Is Courtcall a public or private company?
Courtcall is a private company. It is classified as founder individual operated bootstrapped and is currently operating.
When was Courtcall founded?
Courtcall was founded in 1996. It employs 11 to 50 people.
Where is Courtcall based?
Courtcall is headquartered in Los Angeles, United States, in the North America region.
How does Courtcall make money?
Three revenue lines are on record. Court/Government Subscriptions are the primary driver. The others are attorney/User Fees and court Technology Services.
Who are Courtcall's main competitors?
Broad incumbents on record are Tyler Technologies, Zoom Video Communications, Microsoft (Teams for Government), Cisco Webex, Thomson Reuters and Granicus. Pexip is listed as an emerging player. Direct peers are Modria (Tyler Technologies), Court Innovations and For The Record (FTR).
Does Courtcall have an API?
No public API is recorded for Courtcall.
What industry is Courtcall in?
Courtcall's product category is Legal Technology / Court Appearance Software. Its primary akta.pro industry code is BPAIAFAA, Judicial Courts & Court Administration, with a secondary code of BPAIABAE, State/Provincial Courts & Judicial Administration. Its NAICS code is 922110 and its SIC code is 8111.