akta.pro is the best Exa alternative for teams building AI agents that need company data and company news as structured fields. Exa is a neural web search engine that finds the pages mentioning a company, ranked by meaning, and it does that job well. But an agent still has to read those pages and extract the facts. akta.pro returns the company itself as structured data, plus classified news.
What is akta.pro? akta.pro is an agent-native company intelligence and news signals data layer, built for the agentic era. AI agents, and the people who connect them, call it directly through an API, MCP, CLI and webhooks. Each of 20M+ entity-resolved companies carries 74 data points, and every news article arrives linked to the right company, summarized, scored for sentiment and tagged with one of 77 event types. AI builders, vibe coders and developer teams use it to spin up their own research agents, screeners, monitors and apps in hours.
Where akta.pro pulls ahead
The company, not pages about it
One call returns a resolved company record with 74 data points across 15 categories, the same fields for every company.
vs Exa: company pages to read; structured fields only through your own output schema or Websets, which bills separately
News linked to the right company
“Airtable” means Airtable the company, including its subsidiaries and aliases, with every article tied to its company ID.
vs Exa: the company name goes in the query text, and the agent works out which company each result is about
77 event types across 11 categories
Ask for funding rounds, acquisitions, product launches, leadership changes or workforce reductions directly.
vs Exa: no event classification on news results
News signals benchmarked: top-tier accuracy
92.2% precision and 72.7% recall on company news retrieval. See the benchmark.
vs Exa: no accuracy benchmark published for company news
Enrichment included, not metered
AI summary, sentiment, company mentions and named entities come with every article at no extra charge.
vs Exa: AI summaries, page contents and results above 10 are each billed as separate add-ons
Company, news and signals on one key
Headcount, web traffic, job posts, employee reviews, product reviews and social posts join the same company ID (Subscription or Enterprise).
vs Exa: no company signal datasets
What Exa is built for
Exa is a search engine designed for AI, and it serves open-web retrieval well.
- Semantic search across the open web. Queries match pages by meaning rather than keywords, which suits questions no fixed dataset anticipates.
- Documentation and research papers. Agents that answer technical questions or review literature can pull the most relevant pages and their text.
- Finding similar pages. Starting from a page or idea, Exa surfaces related content across the web.
- Content no dataset covers. Niche blogs, forums and long-tail sites that sit outside any curated company or news product.
If your agent’s job is to find and read pages, these features fit well. Once your agent needs company fields and classified news it can act on, akta.pro is the better choice.
akta.pro vs Exa at a glance
| akta.pro | Exa | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | ✅ Agents that act on company data and news | ✅ Agents that retrieve web pages to read |
| What comes back | ✅ A resolved company record and classified articles | ⚠️ Web pages with text, highlights and optional summaries |
| Company data | ✅ 20M+ companies, 74 data points across 15 categories | ⚠️ Company category returns pages; fields via your schema or Websets |
| Schema | ✅ Same fields for every company and every article | ⚠️ Varies with the pages found and the schema requested |
| Entity resolution | ✅ Names, domains, subsidiaries and aliases resolve to one ID; resolve tools free | ❌ No persistent company ID published |
| Company news | ✅ Every article linked to resolved company IDs | ⚠️ News category; company named in query text |
| Event classification | ✅ 77 event types across 11 categories | ❌ Not provided |
| News signal enrichment | ✅ AI summary, sentiment, company mentions, named entities, included | ⚠️ AI summaries billed as an add-on; no sentiment |
| News signals benchmarked | ✅ 92.2% precision, 72.7% recall, top tier (benchmark) | Not published for company news |
| Industry filter | ✅ 30K+ sub-sectors with industry codes | ⚠️ Industry terms in the query text |
| Company signals | ✅ Headcount, web traffic, job posts, employee and product reviews, social posts (Subscription or Enterprise) | ⚠️ Not native; third-party signal datasets may be integrated and billed separately |
| Funding and M&A | ✅ Structured sections (Enterprise) | ⚠️ Found in pages returned by search |
| MCP | ✅ Native MCP server for company data, news signals and alternative signals | ✅ Hosted MCP server for search |
| Pricing | ✅ Pay-as-you-go, subscriptions, enterprise plans for bulk; enrichment included | ⚠️ Per request, with results, contents and summaries metered separately |
akta.pro is the better fit when an agent needs fields to act on. Exa is the better fit when an agent needs pages to read.
What one search returns vs one company record
The split shows up in a single response. An Exa search returns a list of pages. An akta.pro call returns the answer those pages would have to be mined for.
| Field | akta.pro | Exa |
|---|---|---|
| URL, title, publish date | ✅ On every article | ✅ On every result |
| Text | ✅ AI summary on every article, included | ⚠️ Text or highlights, each content type billed separately |
| Summary | ✅ Included | ⚠️ Optional, billed as an add-on |
| Company | ✅ Resolved company ID, plus 74-field profile on request | ❌ Inferred by the agent from the text |
| Event type | ✅ One of 77 | ❌ |
| Sentiment | ✅ Scored | ❌ |
| Business model, products, customers | ✅ Structured sections | ❌ Written somewhere in the pages |
| Strategic signals, financial estimates | ✅ Structured sections | ❌ |
The same data is available as a tool call through the akta.pro MCP server at https://mcp.akta.pro/mcp, so Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, VS Code or a custom agent can use it without extra code.
Exa’s response is a strong starting point for reading. To act on it, an agent still has to pay for contents or summaries, decide which company each page is about, classify the event, score the sentiment and map everything to a schema. Every one of those steps costs model tokens or another metered add-on. akta.pro ships those steps as the product.
Pricing
akta.pro prices the finished output: a company section or a classified article, with enrichment included. Exa prices the raw search and meters each add-on separately.
| akta.pro | Exa | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Pay-as-you-go credits, subscriptions, enterprise plans for bulk | Pay-as-you-go per request |
| Free access | Free to start, usable in production | Monthly free credits |
| News | 0.1 credits per call + 0.01 credits per article, enrichment included | Metered per search request; each result still needs reading and classifying |
| Add-ons | None: summary, sentiment, event type and company links included | Extra results, AI summaries and page contents each metered separately |
| Company data | From 0.5 credits per section; resolve tools free | Deep Search runs with your own schema, or Websets on separate credits |
| News-retrieval latency (benchmark p50–p90) | 3.1–11.7 seconds; company-linked, enriched news signals | 4.4–9.9 seconds in the same company-news benchmark; search modes and workflows vary |
Exa’s per-request pricing suits open-web retrieval, where the pages are the output. For company data and news, the finished record is the output, and akta.pro includes the enrichment that an Exa pipeline would otherwise pay for step by step.
Why teams choose akta.pro over Exa
Research agents that need facts, not links
An account-research or due-diligence agent pulls business model, customers, management and strategic signals as fields, instead of searching, reading and extracting for every company.
Portfolio and competitor monitoring
Filter news by company and event type, such as funding or product launches, and get alerts already summarized and scored. The company links and event classification are included. Exa also offers Websets monitoring and webhooks; akta.pro’s advantage is a ready company-linked signal feed.
CRM enrichment with a fixed schema
Write the same 74 fields into every account record, with company signals like headcount and hiring joined on the same ID.
Your own company intelligence app, built in hours
Use akta.pro’s list generation feature to get a filtered list of companies based on your query. Selectively enrich hundreds of matching companies using their company IDs and a defined response schema. Budget by company volume and requested sections, with news signals billed by calls and returned articles. Platform builders can deliver account context without asking their users to wait for a fresh multi-step web-research job.
Which should you choose?
Choose akta.pro if your agent or product needs to know what a company is and what just happened to it, as fields it can filter, score and act on: account research, deal screening, portfolio and competitor monitoring, CRM enrichment or “why now” signals.
Choose Exa if your agent needs to find and read pages across the open web by meaning, such as documentation, research papers, similar pages or long-tail content no dataset covers.
Use akta.pro with Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, or an Exa-based agent: akta.pro supplies the structured company and news-signal context, while the agent handles reasoning, live web processing, scraping and open-ended research. The latency row reports successful news-retrieval responses from akta.pro’s July 2026 benchmark, not a production SLA or company-enrichment measurement.
Frequently asked questions
What is Exa best for?
Semantic retrieval across the open web: documentation, research papers, similar pages and content no curated dataset covers. For company data and company news an agent can act on, akta.pro is the better choice.
How much does Exa cost?
Exa is pay-as-you-go and meters each part separately: search requests, results beyond the first 10, AI summaries, page contents, Deep Search and Monitors. Current rates are on Exa’s pricing page. With akta.pro, summaries, sentiment, event types and company links come with every article at one per-article rate.
What is the best Exa alternative for company and news data?
akta.pro: 20M+ entity-resolved companies with 74 data points each, and news linked to the right company, summarized, scored for sentiment and tagged with one of 77 event types, on pay-as-you-go pricing.
Does Exa have a news API?
Exa offers a news category within its Search API, filtered by published date and domain. Results arrive as pages with text or highlights, not as company-linked articles with event types and sentiment. akta.pro’s News API returns those fields on every article.
Does Exa have company data?
Exa’s company category returns company pages, and structured fields come from Deep Search output schemas or Websets, which bills on separate credits. akta.pro serves entity-resolved company records with the same 74 data points for every company.
How is akta.pro priced?
Pay-as-you-go credits, subscriptions and enterprise plans for bulk. News signals cost 0.1 credits per call plus 0.01 credits per article, and company-profile sections start at 0.5 credits each; resolve tools are free. Alternative-signal data requires a Subscription or Enterprise plan; funding and M&A sections require Enterprise.
